David Ford wrote:
>
> Mhm. Is it worth the effort to make a dependancy on the CPU type for SMP?
>
>
>
> -d
>
> Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > * David Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > A person just brought up a problem in #kernelnewbies, building an SMP
> > > kernel doesn't work very well,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> Would it be enough to port the acpi_wake function to 2.4? If so, I can do
> that myself. In fact, I think I'll try that right away. Who needs
> breakfast anyway? :-)
Ok, I tried it, and it works. I can now start my computer using WOL
packets
Joe deBlaquiere wrote:
~snip~
> The locical answer is run with HZ=1 so you get 100us intervals,
> right ;o).
Lets not assume we need the overhead of HZ=1 to get 100us
alarm/timer resolution. How about a timer that ticks when we need the
next tick...
On systems with multiple
On Wednesday, 31 January 2001, at 08:36:42 (+0100),
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 1) You don't seem to have any drives on the VIA controller. If this is
> true, I don't think this can be a VIA IDE driver problem.
>
Hi, Are you referring to Mark or me?
I have drives on my VIA (only..) IDE
Hi,
When compiling either 2.4.1 or 2.4.0 without SMP support on a Compaq
Armada E500
running RH 7.0 (yes I do use kgcc) I get the following error:
ld -m elf_i386 -T /root/linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext arch/i386/kernel/head.
o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \
Hi!
1) You don't seem to have any drives on the VIA controller. If this is
true, I don't think this can be a VIA IDE driver problem.
2) In your original message you suggest bs=1024M, which isn't a very
good idea, even on a 768 MB system. Here with bs=1024k it seems to run
fine.
3) You sent
> http://opensource.corel.com/cprof.html
>
> I haven't used it yet, myself.
>
I have. cprof is no good - extremely slow and generates a 100MB trace
even with a simple hello world program.
- Mohit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> The code was broken, so I disabled it.
Because of the loss of state bug with Cyclone, and the "missing" acpi_wake
workaround, right?
> I "fixed" WOL in the 2.2.19-pre candidate driver. It's
> at
[David Ford]
> Mhm. Is it worth the effort to make a dependancy on the CPU type for
> SMP?
Yes. 'make config' should not allow unsupported configurations, at
least where convenient.
So - are any of the other chip types also incompatible with SMP support
(the Winchips, maybe)?
Peter
---
Thanks Keith,
I don't get any errors if I add these lines to my .config
file:
CONFIG_SOUND_OSS=m
CONFIG_SOUND_ACI_MIXER=m
Ruurd, are you maintaining this driver?
If not, is anyone else willing to hack the config scripts
to enforce this dependency? This is not my area of
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Excuse me for the lack of patch in this mail,...
> In 2.4.x, linux/fs/inode.c has a hash() function with a small
> slip-up. The inode hash-value is initialized with "unsigned
> long tmp = i_ino | ((unsigned long) sb / L1_CACHE_BYTES);".
> ...
[Miles Lane]
> I think the problem may be due to usermode tools not handling the new
> "mount multiple devices to a single mount point" feature, but I'm not
> sure.
Yes, quite possibly. Rumor has it that util-linux has recently
acquired some wisdom in this area. (I can't confirm or deny.)
[Bernd Eckenfels]
> May even decrease the kernel for systems < 4 busses.
Be careful, though. Users may set this thinking "I have a generic
system with only one PCI bus" without realizing that AGP, cardbus and
some motherboard devices are all counted. Pad the CONFIG option by
about 4 busses
You system did something funny or the new VIA code did it.
But because you observed this pattern the new feature that on Linux has
kicked in and hopefull recovered the system for you.
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, [iso-8859-1] Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
> Me too. But I couldn't get UDMA 66 after
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote:
>
> Woohoo! Just found out that ATA66 on the VIA aint too great.
>
> I set the kernel boot options idebus=66 ide0=ata66 enabling ATA66
Sorry but you are not right in this world ...
Where in you manual does is "QUOTE" you can drive the ATA/IDE
[Richard B. Johnson]
> Then, simply:
> cp /boot/boot.0800 /dev/whatever
Ah, but that reverts the partition table, which may have been changed
since first installing lilo. To avoid this, just type 'lilo -U', which
does much the same thing but without touching the partition table.
Peter
-
Hello, I just switched to 2.4.1 from 2.2.18 and have the kernel set up
in generally the same manner in terms of functionality. I've found that
VFAT access is incredibly slow in directories with a large number of
files. I have a single directory with approximately 1500 items, all
3-5MB apiece,
[Richard B. Johnson]
> Bob Tracy found the problem: the second ':' really needs to be
> escaped even though newer versions of make allow what was written.
> -$(MODINCL)/%.ver: CFLAGS := -I./include $(CFLAGS)
> +$(MODINCL)/%.ver: CFLAGS \:= -I./include $(CFLAGS)
No, that's a workaround in that
See
http://opensource.corel.com/cprof.html
I haven't used it yet, myself.
- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi,
I'm using Linux-2.2 and discovered a problem with the profiling of
a multi-threaded program (uses Linux pthreads). Basically, upon compiling
the program with '-pg' option, running it and invoking gprof on the
gmon.out file only shows the profile information corresponding to the
[Michael B. Trausch]
> > I've noticed that with some audio devices, I have a Bass and Treble
> > setting that I can play with (and usually do, becuase it makes
> > things sound MUCH better). Why don't I have that in some devices,
> > and is there a way (through the kernel, or through a
Rusty Russell writes:
> Oops. Thanks to Anton for testing and touching up this patch.
>
> The 2.0/2.2 setsockopt code used to do the copy_from_user for you...
I've applied this to my tree, thanks a lot.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Byron Stanoszek wrote:
> (unless you're overclocking). Setting it to 66 will cause the VIA driver to
> believe your PCI bus is running at 66MHz and will program the IDE controller to
> run at half the speed to maintain 33MHz. In reality, your controller now runs
> at 16.
I
Hi,
The current swapin readahead code reads a number of pages (1 >>
page_cluster) which are physically contiguous on disk with reference to
the page which needs to be faulted in.
However, the pages which are contiguous on swap are not necessarily
contiguous in the virtual memory area where
Mhm. Is it worth the effort to make a dependancy on the CPU type for SMP?
-d
Stephen Frost wrote:
> * David Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > A person just brought up a problem in #kernelnewbies, building an SMP
> > kernel doesn't work very well, current is undefined. I don't have more
>
2.4.1 detects 64 MB, but 2.4.0 detects 192 (Maybe 191, not sure).
dmesg attached.
Linux version 2.4.1 (root@tabriel) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux
(egcs-1.1.2 release)) #9 Tue Jan 30 15:35:21 EST 2001
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-88: 0009f000 @
Hello,
if I run mkreiserfs on a 32megablocks /dev/loop0 it will lock up while
generating the journaling information. Sometimes at 20% sometimes at 60%.
Since mkreiserfs is not using the kernel module i guess this is a loop
device problem in 2.4.1 kernels.
There is no dmesg message at the
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> the patch below contains 3 small changes to mm/filemap.c:
>
> 1. replace the aging in __find_page_nolock() with setting
>PageReferenced(), otherwise a large number of small
>reads from (or writes to) a page can drive up the page
In message <01013014063301.15042@Petete> you write:
> I use kernel 2.4.0 + ipchains compatibilty. I use ipchains 1.3.9
>
> This code:
>
> ipchains -A input -p tcp --dport 80 -s 192.168.0.35 -j REDIRECT 81
Oops. Thanks to Anton for testing and touching up this patch.
The 2.0/2.2
Hi,
Compiled 2.4.1 with the same options as 2.4.0, it hangs right after
"Freed kernel memory: 228k".
If needed:
Kernel config avaible
@ http://nriaz.resnet.rutgers.edu/~bleh/kernel-config-2.4.1.gz
Computer config @ http://nut.dhs.org/mycomputer.php3
Thanks in advance.
-- Nadeem
-
To
Hi. It worked without any problems with 2.4.0. Now with 2.4.1 I
don't get anymore the usual messages in /var/log/messages (like
pppd start and local and remote IP). The only change was the
addition of devfs, but I don't think it's causing this problem.
Any hints? I didn't change anything on my
The user-mode port of 2.4.1 is available.
I added support for attaching file descriptors and pts devices to UML serial
lines and consoles, plus specifying input and output channels separately.
'no-xterm' can now be duplicated with 'con0=fd:0,fd:1 con=pty'.
There is now page dirty and access
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 06:58:22PM -, mirabilos wrote:
> I accept donations in IDE and SCSI, as well as parport devices.
I have a parport device (one of the few things left from my XT).
I can send it to you if you pay shipping.
--
John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune:
Saints
Me too. But I couldn't get UDMA 66 after changing my BIOS
settings and booting. With 33 it's very stable (what I used
with 2.4.0). A diff:
-hda: 30015216 sectors (15368 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=1868/255/63, UDMA(33)
+hda: 30015216 sectors (15368 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=1868/255/63, UDMA(66)
...
This is fixed in the -ac series against 2.4.0, from I think -ac2.
I don't think the fix made the mainstream kernel yet.
--
/* Bill Crawford, Unix Systems Developer, ebOne, formerly GTS Netcom */
#include "stddiscl.h"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David D.W. Downey wrote:
>
> Woohoo! Just found out that ATA66 on the VIA aint too great.
>
> I set the kernel boot options idebus=66 ide0=ata66 enabling ATA66
> according to dmesg. The HDD is a WDC UDMA100 30.5GB drive. I retried the
The 'idebus=xx' parameter doesn't
* David Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> A person just brought up a problem in #kernelnewbies, building an SMP
> kernel doesn't work very well, current is undefined. I don't have more
> time to debug it but I'll strip the config and put it up at
> http://stuph.org/smp-config
They're
Hello,
I have a customer who's getting tons of these msgs in his LOGs:
kernel: protocol 0008 is buggy, dev hdlc0
kernel: protocol 0608 is buggy, dev hdlc0
The msg comes from net/core/dev.c, and this device is using the Cisco HDLC
protocol in drivers/net/hdlc.c . However, AFAIK, 0008 and 0608
Woohoo! Just found out that ATA66 on the VIA aint too great.
I set the kernel boot options idebus=66 ide0=ata66 enabling ATA66
according to dmesg. The HDD is a WDC UDMA100 30.5GB drive. I retried the
dd if=/dev/hda7 of=/tmp/testing2.img bs=1024k count=2000
on one VT, ran renice -20 on the dd
A person just brought up a problem in #kernelnewbies, building an SMP
kernel doesn't work very well, current is undefined. I don't have more
time to debug it but I'll strip the config and put it up at
http://stuph.org/smp-config
-d
--
There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:27:40 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:15:20 -0600 (CST),
>> Jason Michaelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Greetings. I've just procured myself a copy of 2.4.1, and tried to build
>> >it. At the tail
Michael Pacey writes:
> But it looks like I can change the order in driver/scsi/hosts.c, though
> this is not an elegant solution :(
You can compile the "primary (rootfs)" adapter into the kernel, and load
the second adapter as a module. This is supposed to work.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas
> > How does ZC/SG change the nature of the packets presented to the NIC?
>
> what do you mean? I am _sure_ you know how SG/ZC work. So i am suspecting
> more than socratic view on life here. Could be influence from Aristotle;->
Well, I don't know the specifics of Linux, but I gather from what
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:05:51 Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> If you are using ext2 filesystems, you don't care which is which, because
> you can mount by filesystem UUID or LABEL, so just ignore the device
> names.
> The same is true with LVM.
Well, I tried changing the order of driver loading in
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, adrian wrote:
>I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results:
> 2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The
> card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the card initialized and the
> kernel continued to boot.
OK, just completed the upgrade to 2.4.1-pre12 + via82c.diff.
SYSTEM SPECS CHANGES
===
Shut off ACPI
Shut off 2nd IDE controller in BIOS
Shut off APM
Disabled UDMA support in BIOS
Removed 256MB RAM (768M total RAM) *
Everything is running stabler now. Here's what I've got
Excuse me for the lack of patch in this mail, but I'm currently
suffering some connection-troubles... Please Cc replies to me.
In 2.4.x, linux/fs/inode.c has a hash() function with a small slip-up.
The inode hash-value is initialized with "unsigned long tmp = i_ino |
((unsigned long) sb /
Hmmm,
I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results:
2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The
card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the card initialized and the
kernel continued to boot. Interesting.
Regards,
Adrian
On Tue, 30
Miguel Rodriguez Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I have a Matrox G200 card installed on an Ali motherboard.
> Sometimes when I use any opengl program my box crashes. It is more
> likely that it will crash if I have used the xvideo extension or the
> matroxfb, but this is not a must, it
On Thursday January 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > This looks better and it makes FreeBSD able to ls the directory, and on
> > touch /mnt/try, I get EROFS on the client, so this is okay; however, the
> > access reply does not include EXECUTE
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Rick Jones wrote:
> > ** I reported that there was also an oddity in throughput values,
> > unfortunately since no one (other than me) seems to have access
> > to a gige cards in the ZC list, nobody can confirm or disprove
> > what i posted. Here again as a reminder:
> >
>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 02:17:57PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> 8.5MB/sec sounds like half-duplex 100baseT.
> No; I'm 100% its FD; HD gives 40k/sec TCP because of collisions and
> such like.
> Positive you are running at full duplex all
He's probably sending it to the list the same reason why most in tech
circles do.
To cut down on the amount of work required. Personally I would love to have
all my custom changes put into a 'standard' distribution that way I wouldn't
need
to keep as many custom notes for x,y,z platforms or
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > > - is this UDP or TCP based? (UDP i guess)
> > >
> > TCP
>
> well then i'd suggest to do:
>
> echo 10 10 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
>
> does this make any difference?
According to my
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I guess the cleanest solution would be to allow variable setting of the
> maximum number of PCI busses in the config file, similar to the
> CONFIG_UNIX98_PTY_COUNT setting, so that "exotic" users with 32+ PCI
> busses can boost the standard value
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> 256, in later 2.4.* kernel releases? That would allow this customer to
> work with an unpatched kernel, at the cost of an additional 3.5 kB of
> variables in the kernel.
Don't think this is fairly common. So especially since I consider that kind of
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:05:51 Andreas Dilger wrote:
> If you are using ext2 filesystems, you don't care which is which, because
> you can mount by filesystem UUID or LABEL, so just ignore the device
> names.
> The same is true with LVM.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
Well, I do care... This machine is
OK, here is the output of lspci -v on the SMP box I'm having trouble with
as requested...
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C691 [Apollo PRO] (rev c4)
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
Memory at d000 (32-bit, prefetchable)
Capabilities: [a0]
I am having trouble removing the usbide module
which enables me to access my USB external
hard drive. I think the problem may be due
to usermode tools not handling the new "mount
multiple devices to a single mount point" feature,
but I'm not sure.
Here was my mount configuration for /dev/pda
I have experienced similar issues with 2.4.0 and its test. I have a bttv848 chipset.
I even tried compiling in kdb as a part of the kernel to see if it oopses, but no luck.
I will try trying 0.7.47 today.
this works on 2.2.16, last time i tried.
--
Prasanna Subash --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
> > - is this UDP or TCP based? (UDP i guess)
> >
> TCP
well then i'd suggest to do:
echo 10 10 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem
does this make any difference?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> ** I reported that there was also an oddity in throughput values,
> unfortunately since no one (other than me) seems to have access
> to a gige cards in the ZC list, nobody can confirm or disprove
> what i posted. Here again as a reminder:
>
> Kernel | tput | sender-CPU | receiver-CPU |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Jasen wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote:
>
> > These errors all occur in the same way (as near as I can tell) in
> > kernels 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, using bttv drivers 0.7.50 (incl. w/ kernel),
> > 0.7.53, and 0.7.55.
> >
> > I am currently using
Michael Pacey writes:
> Given two host adapters each with 1 disk of ID 0, how do I tell Linux which
> is sda and which sdb?
You can't - you need to make sure either the cards are different and check
the SCSI host probe order, or the detection order in the PCI bus. You
should only need to do
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > Kernel | tput | sender-CPU | receiver-CPU |
> > -
> > 2.4.0-pre3 | 99MB/s | 87% | 23% |
> > NSF|||
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
> Kernel | tput | sender-CPU | receiver-CPU |
> -
> 2.4.0-pre3 | 99MB/s | 87% | 23% |
> NSF||| |
> -
>
Congratulations to all involved in fixing the subject problem. With
the 2.4.1 kernel, I can now actually use agpgart with my GeForce2 MX
on a Tyan S1590S motherboard. Just thought someone might appreciate
another data point, because prior to 2.4.1 I had to leave out agpgart
support :-(.
--Bob
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > > 11.5kBps, quite consistently.
> >
> > This gige card is really sick. Are you sure? Please double check.
>
> Umm.. the starfire chipset is 100Mbit only. So 11.5MBps (sorry, that was a
> typo, it's mega not
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote:
> These errors all occur in the same way (as near as I can tell) in
> kernels 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, using bttv drivers 0.7.50 (incl. w/ kernel),
> 0.7.53, and 0.7.55.
>
> I am currently using 2.4.0-test10 with bttv 0.7.47, which works fine.
>
> I have
Chris Wedgwood writes:
> There are ... ... 3 switches between four switches in
> between, mostly linked via GE. I'm not sure if latency might be an
> issue here, is it was critical I can imagine 10 km of glass might be
> a problem but it's not _that_ far...
Other than this, I don't know
Christopher Neufeld wrote:
> The only patch
> which has to be applied to make Linux run stably on these systems is to
> increase that limit. Would it be possible to bump it up to 128, or even
> 256, in later 2.4.* kernel releases? That would allow this customer to
> work with an unpatched
** Reply to message from Christopher Neufeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 30
Jan 2001 16:08:32 -0800
> Would it be possible to bump it up to 128, or even
> 256, in later 2.4.* kernel releases? That would allow this customer to
> work with an unpatched kernel, at the cost of an additional 3.5 kB
Hi,
> Given two host adapters each with 1 disk of ID 0, how do I tell Linux which
> is sda and which sdb?
[...]
which leads me to the question:
Is there any reason for the (IMHO stupid) "dynamic" naming of
SCSI devices (in contrast to e.g. IDE devices or the "physical"
device naming used in
On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 03:42:36 PM -0800 "Brett G. Person"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Worked fine here but i am getting segfaults on my Reiser filesystems.
> I've been distracted by a project over the last few days. Is what I'm
> seeing a symptom of the fs corruption people were
On 31 Jan 01 at 0:36, Andreas Ackermann (Acki) wrote:
> Jan 29 08:17:39 ane kernel: CPU:0
> Jan 29 08:17:39 ane kernel: EIP:0010:[prune_dcache+24/328]
> Jan 29 08:17:39 ane kernel: EFLAGS: 00010216
> Jan 29 08:17:39 ane kernel: Call Trace: [shrink_dcache_memory+33/48]
>
** Reply to message from Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 31
Jan 2001 01:06:08 +0100
> > What is wrong with sleep_on()?
>
> If you have a task that looks like:
>
> loop:
>
> sleep_on(q)
>
> And you do wakeup(q) hoping to get something important done, then if
Timur Tabi wrote:
>
> ** Reply to message from David Woodhouse
>
> > Note that this is _precisely_ the reason I'm advocating the removal of
> > sleep_on(). When I was young and stupid (ok, "younger and stupider") I used
> > sleep_on() in my code. I pondered briefly the fact that I really
Hello,
I'm working at a customer site with custom hardware. The 2.4.0 series
kernel almost works out of the box, but the machine has 52 PCI busses.
Plans are to produce a 4-way box which would have over 80 PCI busses. The
file include/asm-i386/mpspec.h allocates space for 32 busses in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> Hi again Rusty
God I'm an idiot. I swear I've fixed this before. <>. Yep,
I did. And before that, the same bug in the conntrack code.
This fixed the `core nat compiled in, rest as modules' case, of
course, by actually exporting the symbols.
In 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, when I try to load the bttv driver, one of two
things happens: the system hangs (even alt-sysrq doesn't work!), or the
system powers off by itself (ATX mobo). Instant power-off usually
happens after a soft reboot (init 6), while it usually hangs up after a
hard reboot (power
Worked fine here but i am getting segfaults on my Reiser filesystems.
I've been distracted by a project over the last few days. Is what I'm
seeing a symptom of the fs corruption people were talking about last week?
Brett G. Person
415-358-2656
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Penguin Computing - The World's
I assume I'm not the first one to notice, but the RAID-cleanups that made it
into 2.4.1-pre12 (and thus also the final) resulted in "unresolved symbols"
when compiling the RAID-stuff as modules (worked fine in 2.4.1-pre11).
Any patches/fixes anyone?
Ole André
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi folks,
using the new Kernel it now occured for the 4th time that I get an Oops
some minutes after bootup, with X-Windows running. However, if I get
past this 'criticak period' the system seems to run ok (it never crashed
a second time although running all day), even when heavily loaded
On 31 Jan 01 at 0:06, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
> > > Installed a Matrox G450 on my linux system. Now it has problems
> > > booting. The kernel is compiled with framebuffer support so is supposed
> > > to boot up with the Linux logo. Unfortunately the systems hangs when
> > > the kernel switches
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:09:48 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>> You mean that nobody reads Documentation/Changes any more?
>
>Seldom, only once or twice a day. Guess that's not often enough
>to keep up on the new tool
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:15:20 -0600 (CST),
> Jason Michaelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Greetings. I've just procured myself a copy of 2.4.1, and tried to build
> >it. At the tail end of a make modules_install, the following error occurs:
> >
>
Kenneth Yeung wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Can anyone tell me where I can find infomation on digiboard support in
> linux specifically the PC/X model?
>
> THanks
> -Ken
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Is there a way to get threaded applications to dump core properly on
2.4.0? There is a patch floating around for 2.2.x, but the patch is not
applicable to the 2.4. code.
Any help is appreciated
af
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:57:44 -0500 (EST),
> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> >> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >The
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> > "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> > >make[4]: Entering directory
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:53:45PM -0500, tc lewis wrote:
>
> try the latest driver that matrox provides. i had to do this with just a
> stock redhat 7.0 system. i don't think the standard kernel distributions
> redhat packages use a driver that knows about the 450 yet.
>
>
Of course I should have said this is linux kernel 2.2.17, an IBM PS/2 9585,
in-built 'IBM MCA' SCSI adapter and an AHA-1640 MCA card.
I now realise that in 2.4 I can use scsihosts=ibmmca:aha1542, but have no
info for 2.2.17.
Sorry for the lack of info previously :)
Thanks again.
On Tue, 30
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:57:44 -0500 (EST),
"Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
>> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
>>
Hi !
I had a similar problem also for the 2.4.0-test10 kernel ... if I switch
from the standard settings in the .config file and change only the
processor type to Athlon/K7 compilation fails and I waited for a
newer kernel ...
I'm using a RedHat 7.0 distribution (with all available updates
"Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> > "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> > >make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:45:16 -0500 (EST),
> "Richard B. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The subject says it all. `make dep` is now broken.
> >make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.1/drivers/acpi'
> >Makefile:29: *** target pattern
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:08:12 -0800,
Miles Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
>/lib/modules/2.4.1/kernel/drivers/media/radio/radio-miropcm20.o
>depmod:aci_write_cmd
>depmod:aci_indexed_cmd
>depmod:aci_write_cmd_d
Those symbols are defined
Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
>
> When shutting down my computer with Linux, I cannot wake it up using
> wake-on-LAN, which I can do if I shut it down from WinME or the LILO
> prompt using the power button.
>
> I see some "interesting" code in 3c59x.c and acpi_set_WOL, and there is
> the following
Sorry for posting this here, I'm sure you're all busy with 2.4.1 and 2.2.18
but I'm read the SCSI HOWTO and asked on #LinPeople to no avail:
Given two host adapters each with 1 disk of ID 0, how do I tell Linux which
is sda and which sdb?
After this I'll be filling the 2nd SCSI chain
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:15:20 -0600 (CST),
Jason Michaelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Greetings. I've just procured myself a copy of 2.4.1, and tried to build
>it. At the tail end of a make modules_install, the following error occurs:
>
>depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
