Andre Hedrick writes:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> > However, flaming about it isn't the right answer either. Nor are snide
> > comments. The point can be raised politely (i.e. "I have difficulty
> > parsing your messages because of your writing style/grammar/spelling").
>
> Hi
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:40:36AM +1200, Simon Garner wrote:
> From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > I've seen the exact same behavior with my CUV4X-D (2x1GHz) under
> > > 2.4.2 (debian woody). In addition, the kernel would sometimes hang
> > > around NMI watchdog enable. At least, I th
From: "Allen Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Patience is likely to be effective. The chipset isn't exactly rare
> being on SMP boards from Gigabyte, MSI, Tyan and Asus, and likely
> others. I'm betting it will be fixed soon enough. UP and 2.2.x
> kernels worked fine here if you're really despe
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> It looks more like that Acer misimplemented PCI_IRQPIN register - if it
> is legacy IDE interface using ports 1F0-1F7/170-177, with IRQs 14 & 15,
> it should report zero as IRQ pin. What 'lspci -vx -s 0:f.0' says?
> Last four bytes it prints should re
Hello Stephen,
I've just switched from 2.2.18 to 2.4.3 (on a Dell Inpiron 8000, r128 M4
adapter) and I am experimenting some problems with Xfree 4.02 (debian woody)
and (probably) APM. When I resume after a suspend, the X server
hangs. Connecting through ethernet, using strace -p `pid-of-Xfree`
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Yes this is problem. See my response to Paul about this. The only reason
> > I'm using MMX for the vesa framebuffer because it has no acceleration. MMX
> > gives a big boost for genuine intel chips. Other types of MMX are fast but
> > they don't seemed to be
On Tuesday April 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Neil,
>
> I think I've found bug in nfsd. Here's patch for fixing.
> I'd like to explain what's problem and what's changed, after patch.
snip
>
> Because
>
> L710: err = file.f_op->write(&file, buf, cnt, &file.f_pos);
>
> does not store di
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:39:19PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
>
> if the distro/sysadmin _always_ installs the kernel the 'right way' then
> the difference isn't nessasarily that large, but if you want reliability
> on any system it may be worth loosing a page or so of memory (hasn't
> someone said
I'm having some bttv problems in 2.4.3 (2.4.2 works fine). When my xawtv
window (or my fbtv resolution) gets to a certain point (like 768x576, which
is what I want, 640x480 is still fine) the right part of the tv window is
left black. I'm back to using 2.4.2 again, but I could produce a screenshot
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Eric Gillespie wrote:
> >
> >...
> > VESA fb mode 1280x1024x16, clock lost 1m 35s in time
> > ...
> > Same command, normal (non-fb mode) lost no time off clock.
>
> Is due to the 2.4.3 console drivers. They block interrupts during
> console output. There's a fix in 2.4.2-
Please send reports directly to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I hope to figure out a news reader and have it parse real problems, but
for now I am dropping off lkml for sometime as I am tired.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux
> > >If I use X on an accelerated, normal Matrox screen, my monitor complains
> > >on exit:
> > >
> > >fH 49.4 KHz, fV 39.8 Hz
> > >
> > >(and it doesn't sync at 40 Hz vertical refresh :-( ).
> > >
> > >This is _half_ of the normal 80 Hz. Using fbset -a "1600x1200-80"
> > >before X, of after X, d
Hello,
Three times since I upgraded to 2.4.3 and at least once in the 2.4.3-pre
series, my machine would completely lock hard. I've got KDB running on
a serial console (as I've been seeing lots of crashes, usually in the
scsi_eh_0 process) and even this fails to pick up anything wrong. It's
jus
> One more property, that i'd like to have should be request key to force
> the most basic text mode (say 80x25) on the console, when eg. X freezes
> and i kill its session, then last gfx mode resides on the screen and
> see no way to restore back the text mode - /usr/bin/reset or something
> ali
>Is it possible that "jump scroll" would provide more performance benefit
>than an accelerated driver anyway?
I wouldn't rule it out. If someone wants to wipe up some code I would have
no problem testing it to see if it is worth it.
>Seeing as you bring up this topic of writing a 9525 driver.
Don Dugger wrote:
>
> The error message idicates that the MPS table doesn't provide interrupt
> routing information for that PCI slot. I ran into the same problem
> on my K6 machine. I was able to fix it in the BIOS. In the BIOS setup
> go to the `Advaned' page. Look under `Installed O/S'. I
Quim K Holland wrote:
>
> > "BS" == BERECZ Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BS> ... a setiathome running at nice level 19, and a bladeenc at
> BS> nice level 0. setiathome uses 14 percent, and bladeenc uses
> BS> 84 percent of the processor. I think, setiathome should use
> BS> max 2
>"Justin T. Gibbs" wrote:
>> It is bogus that this stuff depends on link order to function
>> correctly.
>
>No, it is simply one more rule, and one that is not immediately
>obvious. Take heart though. Like Rolaids, 2.5's updated makefile
>system will bring relief...
Its not something the build
Apparently "Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I want to login to my MIPS box through serial port.
> I execute 'make menuconfig' and select the 'serial console'.
> But I can't see the login prompt in my window(I use netterm).
> May I ask how serial console work?
> Or I forget som
a module for 2.4.3 will work for any 2.4.3 kernel that supports modules
at all (except for the SMP vs UP issue) so it's not the same thing as
trying to figure out which if the 2.4.3 kernels matches what you are
running.
David Lang
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001
I have tried out the latest NVidia driver set, and they do work fine
for me with plain vanilla 2.4.3 on my Athlon with GCC 2.95.3. I would
blame your compiler, it's dated July 2000, that's an old CVS version
AFAIK.
- Aric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Eric Gillespie wrote:
>
>...
> VESA fb mode 1280x1024x16, clock lost 1m 35s in time
> ...
> Same command, normal (non-fb mode) lost no time off clock.
Is due to the 2.4.3 console drivers. They block interrupts during
console output. There's a fix in 2.4.2-ac.
There's also a patch against 2.4.
Kernel gurus,
Since the boot process on some SMP machines can be rather verbose, it seems
that the ring buffer for printk()s wraps before it can be snarfed by
klogd/syslogd after boot.
This makes it difficult to troubleshoot messages printed early in the boot
process (like BIOS RAM maps).
The de
The error message idicates that the MPS table doesn't provide interrupt
routing information for that PCI slot. I ran into the same problem
on my K6 machine. I was able to fix it in the BIOS. In the BIOS setup
go to the `Advaned' page. Look under `Installed O/S'. It probably
says something sil
Hello,
I sent a message a few days ago about some limitations I found in the
linux scheduler.
In servers like Apache where a large (> 1000) number of processes can be
running at the same time and where many of them are runnable at the same
time, the default Linux scheduler just starts trashing a
First off, CC: back to me, as my machine can't handle an estimated 200
messages a day for me to sign up to the list 8-( - Anyway..
I updated my kernel to 2.4.3 when the patch was released. As I said earlier, I
noticed my timer losing a few seconds over the space of a couple of
hours. Well, I ha
Thanks a lot.
A fool question: since IDE controller is a PCI device, and the PCI is 32bit/33MHz -
132MB/s or so. How does two ATA-100 device work, it will use 2 x 100MB/s bandwidth.
I know most IDE controller is in the Sound Bridge, but I can buy an IDE expand card,
which support ATA-100 too.
That is what I said. I am using vmalloc only. But the call to
vmalloc is hanging.
-hiren
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: vmalloc on 2.4.x on ia64
>
>
> kmalloc() has
Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> If you have a lot of kernels around, which Config-2.4.3 applies to kernel 2.4.3
> given 5 to choose from...the idea (same for System.map) is that it being in the
> same
> file they can't be confused. Kinda like forks under Mac (but let's not go there
> now)
The same appli
yes it's unreclaimable memory and that's why we want to minimize how much
is used.
on the other hand there is a factor of reliability in the kernel knowing
what options were used to compile it that you just cannot match with a
seperate file, or even with it a part of the on-disk image that is thr
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> > Yes, I like this. I do this manually, it allows reproducability, and
> > incremental
> > modifications, tracing how that kernel on that problem system was made...
> >
> > I think the ultimate would be to put all of .config (gzipped?) in a new ELF
>
Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> Hello Andrejs!!
> > /usr/src/linux-2.4.3/include/asm/pgalloc.h:334: conflicting types for
> > `pte_alloc'
> This is happening on ia64 as well. The interface seems to have changed
> but some architectures were forgotten.
The interface changed and other architectures have
Jeremy Jackson wrote:
> Yes, I like this. I do this manually, it allows reproducability, and
> incremental
> modifications, tracing how that kernel on that problem system was made...
>
> I think the ultimate would be to put all of .config (gzipped?) in a new ELF
> section without the Loadable at
Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001, Jeff Golds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let me show what I got with the 2.4.2 kernel with USB support enabled.
> >
> > Mar 19 14:10:00 Eng99 kernel: uhci: host controller halted. very bad
> > Mar 19 14:10:31 Eng99 last message repeated 108 times
PLease Cc: all responses to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hiya,
since I'm not on the list, and my experience with and knowledge of kernel
internals are negligable, please keep in mind to Carbon copy all forcoming
relevant conversation to me. Thank you.
Ok, I bought a Nikon Coolpix 990, aand to download t
Greetings.
Is vmalloc() interface broken on any of 2.4.x kernel on ia64 ?
I am trying to call vmalloc from the driver to allocate
about 130kb of memory and it hangs the system.
I am running 2.4.1 kernel with ia64 patch (I can find out the
exact patch if needed) on LION. Let me know if more inform
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Boris Pisarcik wrote:
> on say tty2. The processes get created pretty fast. After a short while
> I supposed a single solution to this to kill all session by alt+sysrq+k,
> but nothing happened. Under normal averagely loaded situation, this will
> imidiately kill all processes
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 07:50:04PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > "J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This is one other try to make kernel sources gcc-3.0 friendly. This cleans
> > > some muti-line asm strings in checksum.h and floppy.h (this were the only
> > >
"Justin T. Gibbs" wrote:
> It is bogus that this stuff depends on link order to function
> correctly.
No, it is simply one more rule, and one that is not immediately
obvious. Take heart though. Like Rolaids, 2.5's updated makefile
system will bring relief...
Make sure to add a comment, when yo
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001, Jeff Golds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let me show what I got with the 2.4.2 kernel with USB support enabled.
>
> Mar 19 14:10:00 Eng99 kernel: uhci: host controller halted. very bad
> Mar 19 14:10:31 Eng99 last message repeated 108 times
> Mar 19 14:11:37 Eng99 last messag
Andi Kleen wrote:
> "J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is one other try to make kernel sources gcc-3.0 friendly. This cleans
> > some muti-line asm strings in checksum.h and floppy.h (this were the only
> > ones reported in my kernel build, perhaps there are more in drivers I
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Tom Leete wrote:
> > > How about /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/.config ? It's already there.
>
> > It'd be great if we got away from the config being hidden too.
>
> When exporting it outside the kernel tree,
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 03:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Ketil Froyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > While running kernel 2.4.2-ac28, I switched on spinlock debugging and
> > verbose BUG() reporting (I always use sysrq). Anyway, while running
> > buz.c: In function `v4l_fbuffer_alloc':
> > buz.c:188: `KMALLOC_MAXSIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > buz.c:188: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > buz.c:188: for each function it appears in.)
>
> Easy solution -- just delete the entire test
>
> if (si
> The sad part is that there has been a fix for this "problem", supplied
> by the author of the driver, for well over a month that everyone seems
> to ignore.
I've not had a patch from the author to apply so I've not applied anything.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
> kernels. As I want to run Linux-2.4.x, I can't find a kernel supporting
> the PERC, and this annoys me... Does anyone know when this will be
> merged into the main source tree?
When someone writes a driver that is less disgusting than the current one
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Tom Leete wrote:
> > How about /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/.config ? It's already there.
> It'd be great if we got away from the config being hidden too.
When exporting it outside the kernel tree, the '.' prefix should
definitely be stripped... My
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Tom Leete wrote:
> Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Lang wrote:
> > > > if we want to get the .config as part of the report then we need to make
> > > > it part of the kernel in some standard way (the old
> > I got the following while rm -rf'ing my mozilla cvs checkout. Deadly or not
>deadly?
>
> Highly deadly.
>
> Your disk is dropping bits, or, more likely, your RAM. This is very,
> very bad.
if it was 2.2 I'd believe it. 2.4 is still showing these kind of problems in
software on many VIA c
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> Sure - very simple. If the execute bit is set on a file, don't allow
> ANY write to the file. This does modify the permission bits slightly
> but I don't think it is an unreasonable thing to have.
Oh, honestly! Think about what you are saying here:
Wha
Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Lang wrote:
> > > if we want to get the .config as part of the report then we need to make
> > > it part of the kernel in some standard way (the old /proc/config flamewar)
> > > it's difficult enough
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001, Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 03:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: Ketil Froyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > While running kernel 2.4.2-ac28, I switched on spinlock debugging and
> > verbose BUG() reporting (I alwa
> "BS" == BERECZ Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BS> ... a setiathome running at nice level 19, and a bladeenc at
BS> nice level 0. setiathome uses 14 percent, and bladeenc uses
BS> 84 percent of the processor. I think, setiathome should use
BS> max 2-3 percent. the 14 percent is way to
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 03:35:03 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Ketil Froyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> While running kernel 2.4.2-ac28, I switched on spinlock debugging and
> verbose BUG() reporting (I always use sysrq). Anyway, while running this I
> got an oops after about 2
> I've found a (to me) unexplicable system behaviour when the number of
> Apache forked instances goes somewhere beyond 1050, the machine
> suddently slows down almost top a halt and becomes totally unresponsive,
> until I stop the test (SpecWeb).
Im suprised it gets that far
> Moreover the max
> Yes this is problem. See my response to Paul about this. The only reason
> I'm using MMX for the vesa framebuffer because it has no acceleration. MMX
> gives a big boost for genuine intel chips. Other types of MMX are fast but
> they don't seemed to be optimized for memory transfers like MMX on
the reason for suggesting /proc is that this data needs to be available in
a standard place, putting it in the kernel image (compressed is fine,
bitmap is fine) eliminates the problems of trying to dictate where in the
filesystem the distros need to put things.
putting it in /proc _somewhere_ (/
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I've seen the exact same behavior with my CUV4X-D (2x1GHz) under
> > 2.4.2 (debian woody). In addition, the kernel would sometimes hang
> > around NMI watchdog enable. At least, I think it's trying to
>
> Known problem. Thats one reason why -ac trees had
On 04.03 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> "J . A . Magallon" wrote:
> > Could make part of the kernel scripts, or in one other
> > standard software package, like modutils, so its versions are controlled
>
> There is value in putting it into the Linux kernel source tree, in
> linux/scripts dir. But most v
> /lib/modules/2.4.3/video/NVDriver: unresolved symbol _mmx_memcpy
>
> however if i rebuild my kernel using an "i686" architecture this problem
> no longer comes up.
>
> It is quite possible that this is NVidia's problem, however it seemed
> reasonable that the "athlon" architecture should suppo
> I've seen the exact same behavior with my CUV4X-D (2x1GHz) under
> 2.4.2 (debian woody). In addition, the kernel would sometimes hang
> around NMI watchdog enable. At least, I think it's trying to
Known problem. Thats one reason why -ac trees had nmi watchdog turned off.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:43:42, Petr Vandrovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>
> > I get this as well on my G200. From observation it appears that the
> > refresh rate is being doubled when you exit X and that's why the
> > console appears blank. On my system I normally use
>
> I noticed that 2.4.3 contains some fixs for shared memory -
> So the final question IS :
>
> Is oracle 8.1.5 + Kernel 2.4.3 a sane combination ?
Probably not yet but getting closer.
> In general is oracle + Kernel 2.4 working ?
Ditto.
The shm and rawio fixes are very recent
-
To unsubscri
Hi!
I just noticed, that a process with nice level 19, gets some processor
time, even if there is another process, which would use all of the
processor time.
for example, there is a setiathome running at nice level 19, and a
bladeenc at nice level 0. setiathome uses 14 percent, and bladeenc uses
> Mount NFS device areas with NFSv2. Thats the standard workaround
Oh, sure. We survived with 16 bits and we'll survive with 32.
Nevertheless it is a bad sign that you have to start talking
about workarounds even before the new system has been implemented.
(And NFSv2 has its quirks as well.
Sola
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
> Could make part of the kernel scripts, or in one other
> standard software package, like modutils, so its versions are controlled
There is value in putting it into the Linux kernel source tree, in
linux/scripts dir. But most vendors can and should take this script as
"J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is one other try to make kernel sources gcc-3.0 friendly. This cleans
> some muti-line asm strings in checksum.h and floppy.h (this were the only
> ones reported in my kernel build, perhaps there are more in drivers I do
> not use).
I surely
Richard A. Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:50:59 +0100, Adrian Cox wrote:
>> If only. In my limited experience SanDisk cards have been the most
>> tolerant. I suspect that Sandisk actually implement the full range of
>> timings documented in the spec, and nobody else bothers.
[...]
> We
I like specially this:
http://www.passport.com/Consumer/TermsOfUse.asp
..
Microsoft reserves the right to review materials posted to a Communication
Service and to remove any materials in its sole discretion. Microsoft reserves
..
Well, this just says they will read all your e-mail and kick you
> Not using 64 also gives interesting small problems with Solaris or
> FreeBSD NFS mounts. One uses 14+18, the other 8+24, so with 12+20
> we cannot handle Solaris' majors and we cannot handle FreeBSD's minors.
Mount NFS device areas with NFSv2. Thats the standard workaround for the
fact the NFSv
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 06:26:45AM +0100, Richard Russon wrote:
> On 01 Apr 2001 18:21:29 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Let's hope it's not a flamewar, but here goes :)
> >
> > We -need- .config, but /proc/config seems like pure bloat.
>
> Don't ask me for sample code, but...
>
> The init code
The latest drop of JFS was made available today.
The file system has fixes included. Also, the utilities have
been cleaned up to use standard types.
In the file system the following problems have been fixed.
- Fix for assert(iagp->wmap[extno] & mask); (line #2875) in jfs_imap
while running db
On 04.02 Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> As a former proponent of /proc/config (I wrote one of the much-debated
> patches), I tend to agree. Debian's make-kpkg does the right thing, namely
> treating .config the same way it treats System-map, putting it in the
> package and eventually installing it in
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:50:59 +0100, Adrian Cox wrote:
>> IIRC SanDisk was the original people to come out with IDE CFA and everyone
>> else just copied them. I have the SanDisk datasheets that I can send you
>> if you need them to verify stuff. I believe that if you verify it with
>> the SanDi
I built and installed 2.2.19 on my SparcStation 4 last night, and have
been testing it by recompiling gcc 2.95.2 over and over. Just noticed now
that it doesn't seem to swap at all, despite the fact that the swap
partition exists and is active.
Here's the output from procinfo (snipped for brevity
>The intent is that all built in HBA drivers are
>initialized _before_ the built in upper level
>drivers (e.g. sd). To get the effect you describe
>the driver init order seems to have been:
> register ncr53c8xxx
> register sd
> register aic7xxx # too late ...
It is bogus that this stuff
Richard A. Smith wrote:
> IIRC SanDisk was the original people to come out with IDE CFA and everyone else just
>copied
> them. I have the SanDisk datasheets that I can send you if you need them to verify
>stuff. I
> believe that if you verify it with the SanDisk then all the other MFG's sh
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:57:12 -0700 (PDT), Andre Hedrick wrote:
>> OK can we just have a technical discussion?
>Please, lets do, I am tired of the battles
Me three... I am much better at tech than flames although I seemed to have missed all
the
flambe.
BTW... why is this thread called Road Ru
Dear freinds:
I have following questions about memory maps. I appreciate any
suggestion.
Q. (1)When a process is running, how can I get the range of data, stack,
and code segments, say the stack segment is from address 0x. to
0x. so do data segments and code segments?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Ford) wrote on 01.04.01 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why not have the /proc/config option but instead of being plain text,
> make it binary with a userspace app that can interpret it?
>
> It could have a signature as to kernel version + patches and the rest
> would be just bi
OK - everybody back from San Jose - pity I couldnt come -
and it is no longer April 1st, so we can continue quarreling
a little.
Interesting that where I had divided stuff in the trivial part,
the interesting part and the lot-of-work part we already start
fighting on the trivial part. Maybe it is
monstr will debug this and elena will enter it into our buglist file.
Hans
Rasmus Bøg Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I am getting musch the same types of corruption. I am on a K6-2 with a
> 30Gb IBM HD and 256Mb RAM running vanilla 2.4.3 with iptables and squid
> caching proxy. The problems arise
> So change them as well for a new distribution. What's there problem.
> There isn't anything out there you can't do by hand.
> Fortunately so!
So users cannot go back and forward between new and old kernels. Very good.
Try explaining that to serious production -users- of a system and see how
it
Nigel Gamble wrote:
>
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, george anzinger wrote:
> > I think this should be:
> > if (p->has_cpu || p->state & TASK_PREEMPTED)) {
> > to catch tasks that were preempted with other states.
>
> But the other states are all part of the state change that happens at
- Forwarded message from Bryan-TheBS-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Copyright/Licensing] "Dual-copyright/licensing" of your IP
withOUT your permission
Date: 2001 April 02
[Copyright/Licensing] "Dual-copyright/licensing"
According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Salzenberg) wrote:
>>Why not have a kernel thread and use standard RPC techniques like
>>sockets? Then you'd not have to invent anything unimportant like
>>Yet Another IPC Technique.
>
>kerneld (kmod's late unlamented predecessor) used to u
> This is consistent throughout all 2.4.x at least. From your comment I've
> learnt SuS v2 requires -ENODEV for the len=0 case. While this would
it needs -ENODEV for all cases where you mmap a file which does not support
mmap operations. A 0 length mmap could return the address, EINVAL and maybe
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Lang wrote:
> > if we want to get the .config as part of the report then we need to make
> > it part of the kernel in some standard way (the old /proc/config flamewar)
> > it's difficult enough sometimes for the sysadmin of a box
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First of all, you as the HDLC subsystem maintainer have a lot more
> control over what goes into include/linux/hdlc.h than
> include/linux/sockios.h. New SIOC ioctls should not be added on a
> whim, but after examination of the issues involved.
Righ
>
>I'm using 2.4.3 vanilla with aic7xxx (aic7880 onboard)
>I set the max # of TCQ commands per device setting to 50..what's a really
>good setting for this, just the default of 253?
Depends on the device. The aic7xxx driver will determine the
maximum number of tags that a particular device can h
Hi all.
Ok, maybe this isn't the right list for this question. In 2.2.x the
parport_probe module extracted the ieee1284 device id correctly and added to the
proc fs. However this doesn't seem to work for me in 2.4.x
I only have one device to test it on and since I know there have been some
diffic
I'm using 2.4.3 vanilla with aic7xxx (aic7880 onboard)
I set the max # of TCQ commands per device setting to 50..what's a really
good setting for this, just the default of 253?
In /proc/scsi/aic7xxx/0 i see for my drives these numbers:
Commands Queued 14
Commands Active 0
Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Padraig Brady wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I have. They seem to following the latest spec I
>> downloaded from www.compactflash.org
>
> I am not paying $2500-$5000 annual for membership sorry.
> It is bad enough that I burn $800 for T13 plus about $1000 p
SYMPA -- Systeme de Multi-Postage Automatique
(Automatic Mailing System)
User's Guide
SYMPA is an electronic mailing-list manager that automates list management
functions such as subscriptions, moderation, and archive managem
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 07:40:36AM -0700, James Simmons wrote:
>
> >If I use X on an accelerated, normal Matrox screen, my monitor complains
> >on exit:
> >
> >fH 49.4 KHz, fV 39.8 Hz
> >
> >(and it doesn't sync at 40 Hz vertical refresh :-( ).
> >
> >This is _half_ of the normal 80 Hz. Using fbs
Robert,
That output below is part of the results from
reiserfsck /dev/hde5
(obviously /dev/hde5 is the partition that I checked). I'm
using reiserfsprogs version 3.x.0i. You can run reiserfsck
without any arguments and it can't do any harm to your
partition - it's read-only.
I tried "rei
Hi all,
great to hear, that the fix solves the problem. Is there any information
about, whether and when the fix will migrate into the isdn4l source pool?
Roland
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAI
You could try the ALSA driver if you're certain it is not a hw problem.It
works better here than the one in the kernel.
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Has anybody an idea how to get rid of the annoying clicks of the
> VIA 82C686 audio codec? Using xmms (just as an ex
mythos wrote:
>
> I solved the problem with dualhead!!!
> Second head from 2.4.3 is /dev/fb2 rather than /dev/fb1.
> Just had to look to the messages.
And who is /dev/fb1? You must change your configuration...
> P.S. Petr on the second head if I put mouse in the right-corner at the
> bottom of
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Padraig Brady wrote:
> I'm not sure I have. They seem to following the latest spec I
> downloaded from www.compactflash.org
I am not paying $2500-$5000 annual for membership sorry.
It is bad enough that I burn $800 for T13 plus about $1000 per meeting.
$7000 is my personal fi
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
