[PATCH 2.6.13 2/4] Cleanup - remove unnecessary handle_IRQ_event() prototype (ppc)

2005-09-07 Thread Kenji Kaneshige
The function prototype for handle_IRQ_event() in include/asm-ppc/irq.h seems no longer needed because ppc uses GENERIC_HARDIRQ. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-ppc/irq.h |4 1 files changed, 4 deletions(-) Index:

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 08 September 2005 07:10, Parag Warudkar wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works. > > 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may > be i386 or arch-independent changes?) > It seems it has got something to do

[PATCH 2.6.13 4/4] Cleanup - remove unnecessary handle_IRQ_event() prototype (x86_64)

2005-09-07 Thread Kenji Kaneshige
The function prototype for handle_IRQ_event() in include/asm-x86_64/irq.h seems no longer needed because x86_64 uses GENERIC_HARDIRQ. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-x86_64/irq.h |4 1 files changed, 4 deletions(-) Index:

[PATCH 2.6.13 3/4] Cleanup - remove unnecessary handle_IRQ_event() prototype (sh)

2005-09-07 Thread Kenji Kaneshige
The function prototype for handle_IRQ_event() in include/asm-sh/irq.h seems no longer needed because sh uses GENERIC_HARDIRQ. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-sh/irq.h |4 1 files changed, 4 deletions(-) Index:

[PATCH 2/5] SUBCPUSETS: add subcpusets framework to the CPUSETS

2005-09-07 Thread KUROSAWA Takahiro
This patch adds subcpusets framework code to the CPUSETS. Subcpusets are meant for subdividing cpuset resources. A few files are added in order to control the guarantee and the limit of the resource amount to the cpuset filesystem. Also, interfaces for the specific resource controller like CPU

[PATCH 3/5] SUBCPUSETS: subcpusets document

2005-09-07 Thread KUROSAWA Takahiro
This patch adds a document of the SUBCPUSETS. Signed-off-by: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- /dev/null +++ to-work/Documentation/subcpuset.txt 2005-09-08 11:44:47.994331730 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ +Addition to the cpuset filesystem: "subcpuset" + + "subcpuset" directories are

[PATCH 4/5] SUBCPUSETS: CPU resource controller

2005-09-07 Thread KUROSAWA Takahiro
This patch adds CPU resource controller. It enables us to control CPU time percentage of tasks grouped by the cpu_rc structure. It controls time_slice of tasks based on the feedback of difference between the target value and the current usage in order to control the percentage of the CPU usage

[PATCH 5/5] SUBCPUSETS: connect the CPU resource controller to subcpusets

2005-09-07 Thread KUROSAWA Takahiro
This patch puts the CPU resource controller into SUBCPUSETS framework. With this patch, we can control the CPU resource from the cpuset filesystem. Signed-off-by: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- from-0005/init/Kconfig +++ to-work/init/Kconfig2005-09-07 20:49:02.766634348 +0900

[PATCH 2.6.13 1/4] Cleanup - remove unnecessary handle_IRQ_event() prototype (mips)

2005-09-07 Thread Kenji Kaneshige
The function prototype for handle_IRQ_event() in include/asm-mips/irq.h seems no longer needed because mips uses GENERIC_HARDIRQ. This patch removes it. Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> include/asm-mips/irq.h |3 --- 1 files changed, 3 deletions(-) Index:

[PATCH 1/5][BUG] SUBCPUSETS: fix for cpusets minor problem

2005-09-07 Thread KUROSAWA Takahiro
This patch fixes minor problem that the CPUSETS have when files in the cpuset filesystem are read after lseek()-ed beyond the EOF. Signed-off-by: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- from-0001/kernel/cpuset.c +++ to-work/kernel/cpuset.c 2005-09-05 20:26:18.075772762 +0900 @@ -984,6

[PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS

2005-09-07 Thread KUROSAWA Takahiro
The following patchset adds resource control functionality to the CPUSETS code by subdividing a cpuset into smaller pieces (SUBCPUSETS). It is made up from two parts, one for the resource control framework and another for the specific resource controller. Resource controllers can be added by

[PATCH 2.6.13 0/4] Cleanup - remove unnecessary handle_IRQ_event() prototype

2005-09-07 Thread Kenji Kaneshige
Hi, I think the function prototypes for handle_IRQ_event() in include/asm-{mips,ppc,sh,x86_64}/irq.h are no longer needed because these architectures are using GENERIC_HARDIRQ. This series of patches removes those unnecessary handle_IRQ_event() prototypes. NOTE: Since I don't have these

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-07 Thread David Teigland
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > +static inline void glock_put(struct gfs2_glock *gl) > +{ > + if (atomic_read(>gl_count) == 1) > + gfs2_glock_schedule_for_reclaim(gl); > + gfs2_assert(gl->gl_sbd, atomic_read(>gl_count) > 0,); > +

Re: [PATCH] Wistron laptop button driver

2005-09-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +static void call_bios(struct regs *regs) > +{ > +unsigned long flags; > + > +preempt_disable(); > +local_irq_save(flags); > +asm volatile ("pushl %%ebp;" > + "movl %[data], %%ebp;" > + "call

Re: How to find out kernel stack over flow?

2005-09-07 Thread nazim khan
Thanks Michal for your response, I forgot to mention that I am using linux 2.4.26, and STACKOVERFLOW option is not available here. regards, Nazim --- Michal Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > nazim khan wrote: > > I suspect that one of my module that I am > inserting in > > the kernel may be

Re: Git broken for IPW2200

2005-09-07 Thread Alejandro Bonilla Beeche
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 22:18 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote: > > Wanna post a URL to your .config? Jeff, Sorry, I did not paste it in the ML because this has always worked for me, but hell, maybe I got something wrong! :| Attached... .Alejandro > Jeff

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Parag Warudkar
Andi Kleen wrote: Hmm - not many x86-64 patches in mm1. 2.6.13 definitely works. 2.6.13-git7 works. So something in -mm has gone bad (if not x86_64, may be i386 or arch-independent changes?) It seems it has got something to do with the sys_set_tid_address as evident from the strace output

Re: kernel status, "Elitegroup K7S5A"

2005-09-07 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:55:46 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re: Elitegroup K7S5A + usb_storage problem > [linux-usb-devel] Fw: Re: Elitegroup K7S5A + usb_storage problem This appears to be stuck. It has to have someone with a lot of patience to play with the device. Martin

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)

2005-09-07 Thread Grant Grundler
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:05:30PM -0500, Brian King wrote: > I reverted the patch to use a spinlock and added a comment. > How does this look? Fine with me. Ball is in akpm/Paul's court. grant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: 2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Andi Kleen
On Thursday 08 September 2005 05:54, Parag Warudkar wrote: > I am clueless as to what's going on but just raising a flag in case it > is a not yet known problem. > Thunderbird, 32bit Sun Java and Opera are the ones I tried. They all > work fine with the Fedora 2.6.12-x kernel but > consistently

2.6.13-mm1 X86_64: All 32bit programs segfault

2005-09-07 Thread Parag Warudkar
I am clueless as to what's going on but just raising a flag in case it is a not yet known problem. Thunderbird, 32bit Sun Java and Opera are the ones I tried. They all work fine with the Fedora 2.6.12-x kernel but consistently seg fault with 2.6.13-mm1. Parag Sample stack trace for

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)

2005-09-07 Thread Brian King
Grant Grundler wrote: On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:39:15AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: Grant Grundler writes: I would argue it more obvious. People looking at the code are immediately going to realize it was a deliberate choice to not use a spinlock. It achieves exactly the same effect as

Re: [patch 00/10] parport: ieee1284 fixes and cleanups

2005-09-07 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 06:50, Andrew Morton wrote: > Marko Kohtala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You just sent ten patches, all with the same name. This causes me grief > > > (See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt, section > > 2a). > > > > I used "quilt

MAP OF THE PHILIPPINES

2005-09-07 Thread emmanuelle maps
CUNANAN MAPHOUSE (CMH) #4930 A.S. Arnaiz Ave., Pio del Pilar, Makati City Tel. 888-0199 TeleFax. 888-0199 Cel. 0916-2560182 0920-4725175 OFFER TO SELL SPECIAL MAPS GLAD TIDINGS! It is with special gladness to invite your early investments in handmade, hand-colored and updated Cunanan

Re: 2.6.13 (was 2.6.11.11) and rsync oops (SATA or NFS related?)

2005-09-07 Thread Aric Cyr
Kalin KOZHUHAROV thinrope.net> writes: > ata1: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 > ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/100 > scsi1 : sata_sil >Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD360GD-00FL Rev: 21.0 >Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 >Vendor: ATA Model:

Re: [PATCH 1/2] (repost) New System call, unshare (fwd)

2005-09-07 Thread Janak Desai
Thanks Chris and Nick for your feedback. I am investigating the issues that you raised. Hopefully I will address them by COB tomorrow. -Janak Chris Wright wrote: * Janak Desai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: diff -Naurp linux-2.6.13-mm1/kernel/fork.c

Re: swsusp

2005-09-07 Thread Bernard Blackham
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:33:57AM -0400, rob wrote: > Is there some way to change the sowftware suspend2 scripts to work with the > unpatched kernel software suspend Yes. Just comment out everything in the suspend2 section, and enable "UseSysfsPowerState disk". It really should get a less ugly

Re: Git broken for IPW2200

2005-09-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote: Hi, Where does one report this? I was building Linus Git tree as per I updated it at 09/07/2005 7:00PM PDT and got this while compiling. Where do I report this? Debian unstable updated at same time. it looks like ipw2200 is thinking that ieee80211 is

Re: [SCSI] qla1280: endianess annotations

2005-09-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c b/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c --- a/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ qla1280_return_status(struct response * int host_status = DID_ERROR; uint16_t comp_status =

Re: A couple of OOM killer races

2005-09-07 Thread Coywolf Qi Hunt
On 9/2/05, Richard Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > It appears there is no protection in badness() (called by > out_of_memory() for each process) when it reads p->mm->total_vm. Another > processor (or a kernel preemption) could presumably run do_exit and then > exit_mm, freeing the

Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix

2005-09-07 Thread Magnus Damm
On 9/8/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > --On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:27:54 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:22 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > >> CONFIG_NUMA

Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix

2005-09-07 Thread Magnus Damm
On 9/8/05, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:22 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > CONFIG_NUMA was meant to (and did at one point) support both NUMA and flat > > machines. This is essential in order for the distros to support it - same > > will go for sparsemem. > >

Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: read current link status from phy

2005-09-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: tree 1771b690cdee80312ace3fe046e29e965a0b30eb parent c8d127418d78aaeeb1a417ef7453dc09c9118146 author Tommy S. Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 05:17:28 -0700 committer Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 08 Sep 2005 06:57:30 -0700 [PATCH]

Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix

2005-09-07 Thread Magnus Damm
On 9/8/05, Martin J. Bligh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:28:36 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 12:56 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > >> This patch for 2.6.13-git5 fixes single node sparsemem support. In the case > >>

Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix

2005-09-07 Thread Magnus Damm
On 9/8/05, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 12:56 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > > This patch for 2.6.13-git5 fixes single node sparsemem support. In the case > > when multiple nodes are used, setup_memory() in arch/i386/mm/discontig.c > > calls > > get_memcfg_numa()

Git broken for IPW2200

2005-09-07 Thread Alejandro Bonilla Beeche
Hi, Where does one report this? I was building Linus Git tree as per I updated it at 09/07/2005 7:00PM PDT and got this while compiling. Where do I report this? Debian unstable updated at same time. it looks like ipw2200 is thinking that ieee80211 is not compiled in, but I did select

Re: [PATCH 1/2] (repost) New System call, unshare (fwd)

2005-09-07 Thread Nick Piggin
Janak Desai wrote: - tsk->min_flt = tsk->maj_flt = 0; - tsk->nvcsw = tsk->nivcsw = 0; + /* +* If the process memory is being duplicated as part of the +* unshare system call, we are working with the current process +* and not a newly allocated task

[PATCH 8/9] [IPV4]: Reassembly trim not clearing CHECKSUM_HW

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- [IPV4]: Reassembly trim not clearing CHECKSUM_HW This was found by inspection while looking for checksum problems with the skge driver that sets CHECKSUM_HW. It did not fix the problem, but it looks like

[PATCH 6/9] [CRYPTO] Fix boundary check in standard multi-block cipher processors

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- [CRYPTO] Fix boundary check in standard multi-block cipher processors Fixes Bug 5194 (IPSec related Oops in 2.6.13). The boundary check in the standard multi-block cipher processors are broken when

[PATCH 4/9] [PATCH] x86: pci_assign_unassigned_resources() update

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- I had some time to think about PCI assign issues in 2.6.13-rc series. The major problem here is that we call pci_assign_unassigned_resources() way too early - at subsys_initcall level. Therefore we give

[PATCH 5/9] [NET]: 2.6.13 breaks libpcap (and tcpdump)

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- [NET]: 2.6.13 breaks libpcap (and tcpdump) Patrick McHardy says: Never mind, I got it, we never fall through to the second switch statement anymore. I think we could simply break when load_pointer

[PATCH 1/9] [PATCH] Kconfig: saa7134-dvb must select tda1004x

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- I wish I had seen this before 2.6.13 was released... I guess this only goes to show that there haven't been any testers using saa7134-hybrid dvb/v4l boards that depend on the tda1004x module, during the

[PATCH 3/9] [PATCH] Fix PCI ROM mapping

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- This fixes a problem with pci_map_rom() which doesn't properly update the ROM BAR value with the address thas allocated for it by the PCI code. This problem, among other, breaks boot on Mac laptops.

[PATCH 7/9] [RTC]: Use SA_SHIRQ in sparc specific code.

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- Based upon a report from Jason Wever. Signed-off-by: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/char/rtc.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2

[PATCH 9/9] [PATCH] 32bit sendmsg() flaw (CAN-2005-2490)

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- When we copy 32bit ->msg_control contents to kernel, we walk the same userland data twice without sanity checks on the second pass. Second version of this patch: the original broke with 64-bit arches

[PATCH 0/9] -stable review

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.13.1 release. There are 9 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants to add a

[PATCH 2/9] [PATCH] aacraid: 2.6.13 aacraid bad BUG_ON fix

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. -- This was noticed by Doug Bazamic and the fix found by Mark Salyzyn at Adaptec. There was an error in the BUG_ON() statement that validated the calculated fib size which can cause the driver to panic.

Re: Fund Management.

2005-09-07 Thread Patrick McFarland
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 08:34 pm, Mr. Liam Johnson wrote: > Dear Sir, > > Please accept my sincere apologies if my email does not meet > your business or personal ethics. Apology accepted. -- Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)

2005-09-07 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:39:15AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Grant Grundler writes: > > > I would argue it more obvious. People looking at the code > > are immediately going to realize it was a deliberate choice to > > not use a spinlock. > > It achieves exactly the same effect as

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1 of 4] Configfs is really sysfs

2005-09-07 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:54:45PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > Finally, assuming that the sysfs_dirent/configfs_dirent > arrangement is pretty fleshed out, I think that perhaps this backing > store could be joined. Again, no more magic could be added, and it > would have to handle the sysfs

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-07 Thread Giridhar Pemmasani
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 01:25:20 +0200, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Jan> Yes, I can provide some numbers around atheros devices (10-20% Jan> speed-up). And yes, I can explain why ndiswrapper suffers from Are you comparing atheros Windows driver with ndiswrapper or madwifi with

Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13

2005-09-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is > > known to not compile? James was assuming you'd merged the klist patch whcih I'd sent beforehand. > Btw, I see the

Re: [PATCH] ppc64: iSeries early printk breakage

2005-09-07 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 06:04:36 -0500 Milton Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anything actually break without this patch? Yes, an iSeries box will not boot. > My reading of unregister_console says we will acquire > the console semaphore, walk the list, fail to find the > console, relase

Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13

2005-09-07 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is > > known to not compile? > > Btw, I see the patch that is supposed to fix it, but I'm in no position to > know whether it's even acceptable to basically double

Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13

2005-09-07 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:41 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And also, this fails to compile due to the klist problem. > > Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is > known to not compile? > > Now I made the mistake of pushing the thing out before I realized that the

Re: [patch 1/1] ipw2100: remove by-hand function entry/exit debugging

2005-09-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
David S. Miller wrote: From: Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:39:08 +0200 Jeff Garzik wrote: I find them useful in my own drivers; they are definitely not pure noise. gcc -finstrument-functions I was going to mention this as well, and also the idea to enable

Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13

2005-09-07 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is > known to not compile? Btw, I see the patch that is supposed to fix it, but I'm in no position to know whether it's even acceptable to basically double the size of the

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-07 Thread Alex Davis
--- Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Davis wrote: > >>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers". > > > > ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care". > > > > > >>I don't want the pain of debugging crashes on the machines which run >

Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13

2005-09-07 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > You meant > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-for-linus-2.6.git > > I do believe, And also, this fails to compile due to the klist problem. Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is known to

Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13

2005-09-07 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:31 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > master.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/scm/jejb/scsi-for-linus-2.6.git > > No it isn't. > > You meant > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-for-linus-2.6.git > > I

Re: [patch] KGDB for Real-Time Preemption systems

2005-09-07 Thread George Anzinger
Serge Noiraud wrote: mercredi 17 Août 2005 02:53, George Anzinger wrote/a écrit : I have put a version of KGDB for x86 RT kernels here: http://source.mvista.com/~ganzinger/ The common_kgdb_cfi_ stuff creates debug records for entry.S and friends so that you can "bt" through them. Apply

Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI merge for 2.6.13

2005-09-07 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, James Bottomley wrote: > > master.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/scm/jejb/scsi-for-linus-2.6.git No it isn't. You meant master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-for-linus-2.6.git I do believe, Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: Some warnings and stuff GCC 4

2005-09-07 Thread Grant
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:55:18 +0200, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>drivers/media/video/zr36120.c: At top level: >>drivers/media/video/zr36120.c:1821: error: unknown field 'open' >>specified in initializer >>> Being discussed on the V4L list >> It seems that nobody are interested

Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix

2005-09-07 Thread Andrew Morton
"Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:27:54 -0700 Dave Hansen <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:22 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> CONFIG_NUMA was meant to (and did at one point) support both NUMA and flat > >>

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-07 Thread Jan Kiszka
2005/9/7, Giridhar Pemmasani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > > Ndiswrapper is already slower than native drivers are, also due to > > horribly implemented Windows drivers btw (the ndis model itself isn't > > that bad, though). > > Do you have any evidence to back your claims? What

Re: [PATCH][MM] cleanup rionet and use updated rio message interface

2005-09-07 Thread Matt Porter
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:44:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > This is the rionet cleanup patch previously posted in reply to Jeff's > > concerns with this driver. It depends on the rapidio messaging interface > > updates patch. > > Thanks. So

scsi error "sense key: No Sense" with usb flash drive

2005-09-07 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Hi, upon insertion of my new 2048 MB usb flash drive, the kernel (vanilla 2.6.13) spat out the following errors: usb 4-2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 7 scsi1 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices usb-storage: device found at 7 usb-storage: waiting for device to

Re: [RFC] broken installkernel.sh with CROSS_COMPILE

2005-09-07 Thread Dave Hansen
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:35 -0500, linas wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 01:39:13PM -0700, Dave Hansen was heard to remark: > > I noticed that my cross-compilation 'make install' broke with 2.6.13 (I > > don't use it horribly often). It's from this commit: > > > > Which added CROSS_COMPILE to

Re: [PATCH][MM] cleanup rionet and use updated rio message interface

2005-09-07 Thread Andrew Morton
Matt Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is the rionet cleanup patch previously posted in reply to Jeff's > concerns with this driver. It depends on the rapidio messaging interface > updates patch. Thanks. So are there any outstanding issues with the rapidio patches? - To unsubscribe

Re: [ham] Re: Gracefully killing kswapd, or any kernel thread

2005-09-07 Thread linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Kristis Makris wrote: >> To kill a kernel thread, you need to make __it__ call exit(). It must be > > There must be another way to do it. Perhaps one could have another > process effectively issue the contents of do_exit for the kswapd > task_struct ? > >> CODED to do that!

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pci: Block config access during BIST (resend)

2005-09-07 Thread Paul Mackerras
Grant Grundler writes: > I would argue it more obvious. People looking at the code > are immediately going to realize it was a deliberate choice to > not use a spinlock. It achieves exactly the same effect as spin_lock/spin_unlock, just more verbosely. :) > > and it precludes the sorts of

Re: [RFC] broken installkernel.sh with CROSS_COMPILE

2005-09-07 Thread linas
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 01:39:13PM -0700, Dave Hansen was heard to remark: > I noticed that my cross-compilation 'make install' broke with 2.6.13 (I > don't use it horribly often). It's from this commit: > > Which added CROSS_COMPILE to each arch's install.sh: > > if [ -x

Re: [ham] Re: Gracefully killing kswapd, or any kernel thread

2005-09-07 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Sep 7, 2005, at 17:07:12, Kristis Makris wrote: To kill a kernel thread, you need to make __it__ call exit(). It must be There must be another way to do it. Perhaps one could have another process effectively issue the contents of do_exit for the kswapd task_struct ? Umm, so then the

[PATCH] CHECKFLAGS on ppc64 got broken

2005-09-07 Thread viro
Now that asm-powerpc/* is using ifdefs on __powerpc64__ we need to add it to CHECKFLAGS on ppc64. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-simserial/arch/ppc64/Makefile RC13-git7-ppc64-sparse/arch/ppc64/Makefile --- RC13-git7-simserial/arch/ppc64/Makefile

[PATCH] bogus #if (ncr53c406)

2005-09-07 Thread viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-hamachi/drivers/scsi/NCR53c406a.c RC13-git7-ncr53c406/drivers/scsi/NCR53c406a.c --- RC13-git7-hamachi/drivers/scsi/NCR53c406a.c 2005-08-28 23:09:45.0 -0400 +++ RC13-git7-ncr53c406/drivers/scsi/NCR53c406a.c

[PATCH] bogus #if (smc91x.h)

2005-09-07 Thread viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-hisax/drivers/net/smc91x.h RC13-git7-smc-undef/drivers/net/smc91x.h --- RC13-git7-hisax/drivers/net/smc91x.h2005-08-28 23:09:44.0 -0400 +++ RC13-git7-smc-undef/drivers/net/smc91x.h2005-09-07

[PATCH] bogus #if (simserial)

2005-09-07 Thread viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-xfs/arch/ia64/hp/sim/simserial.c RC13-git7-simserial/arch/ia64/hp/sim/simserial.c --- RC13-git7-xfs/arch/ia64/hp/sim/simserial.c 2005-08-28 23:09:39.0 -0400 +++ RC13-git7-simserial/arch/ia64/hp/sim/simserial.c

[PATCH] bogus #if (arch/um/kernel/mem.c)

2005-09-07 Thread viro
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-ppc64-sparse/arch/um/kernel/mem.c RC13-git7-uml-mem/arch/um/kernel/mem.c --- RC13-git7-ppc64-sparse/arch/um/kernel/mem.c 2005-08-28 23:09:40.0 -0400 +++ RC13-git7-uml-mem/arch/um/kernel/mem.c 2005-09-07

[PATCH] -Wundef fixes (ncr5380)

2005-09-07 Thread viro
NDEBUG and NDEBUG_ABORT are almost always used as integers in NCR5380; added define to 0 if they are not defined, switched lone ifdef NDEBUG into if. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-smc-undef/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c RC13-git7-ncr5380/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.c ---

[PATCH] -Wundef fixes (hisax)

2005-09-07 Thread viro
CARD_... in hisax are all used with #if; CARD_FN_ENTERNOW_PCI lacks define to 0 if corresponding config option is not set. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-uml-mem/drivers/isdn/hisax/hisax.h RC13-git7-hisax/drivers/isdn/hisax/hisax.h ---

[PATCH] -Wundef fixes (hamachi)

2005-09-07 Thread viro
All uses of ADDRLEN are comparisons with 64 (it's an address width). added define to 32 (again, we only care about comparisons with 64) if not defined. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -urN RC13-git7-ncr5380/drivers/net/hamachi.c RC13-git7-hamachi/drivers/net/hamachi.c ---

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-07 Thread Giridhar Pemmasani
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Ndiswrapper is already slower than native drivers are, also due to > horribly implemented Windows drivers btw (the ndis model itself isn't > that bad, though). Do you have any evidence to back your claims? What tests did you do to say that ndiswrapper is slower than native

Re: [xfs-masters] warning: "__BIG_ENDIAN" is not defined

2005-09-07 Thread Nathan Scott
Hi Tony, On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > I see a lot (90) of warnings when building xfs on ia64. The Christoph has a patch pending (slightly different approach to yours) that should resolve this. cheers. -- Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [patch] KGDB for Real-Time Preemption systems

2005-09-07 Thread George Anzinger
Serge Noiraud wrote: mercredi 17 Août 2005 02:53, George Anzinger wrote/a écrit : I have put a version of KGDB for x86 RT kernels here: http://source.mvista.com/~ganzinger/ The common_kgdb_cfi_ stuff creates debug records for entry.S and friends so that you can "bt" through them. Apply

Re: [PATCH 1/2] (repost) New System call, unshare (fwd)

2005-09-07 Thread Chris Wright
* Janak Desai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > diff -Naurp linux-2.6.13-mm1/kernel/fork.c > linux-2.6.13-mm1+unshare-patch1/kernel/fork.c > --- linux-2.6.13-mm1/kernel/fork.c2005-09-07 13:25:01.0 + > +++ linux-2.6.13-mm1+unshare-patch1/kernel/fork.c 2005-09-07 >

Re: swsusp doesn't suspend devices

2005-09-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more > precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine. Yes, and that's okay. What happens to devices during swsusp? They seem to be resumed during system suspend? A: That's correct. We need to resume them if

Re: [ham] Re: Gracefully killing kswapd, or any kernel thread

2005-09-07 Thread Kristis Makris
> To kill a kernel thread, you need to make __it__ call exit(). It must be There must be another way to do it. Perhaps one could have another process effectively issue the contents of do_exit for the kswapd task_struct ? > CODED to do that! You can't do it externally although you can send I'm

Re: Some warnings and stuff GCC 4

2005-09-07 Thread Jiri Slaby
John Richard Moser napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I get lots of warnings building my kernel. I've attached my .config; I'm using a kernel I downloaded from kernel.org, unpatched. [snip] . . . one of the V4L drivers failed to build too, I turned it off.

[AIO] kiocb locking to serialise retry and cancel

2005-09-07 Thread Benjamin LaHaise
[AIO] kiocb locking to serialise retry and cancel Implement a per-kiocb lock to serialise retry operations and cancel. This is done using wait_on_bit_lock() on the KIF_LOCKED bit of kiocb->ki_flags. Also, make the cancellation path lock the kiocb and subsequently release all references to it if

[PATCH 1/2] change io_cancel return code for no cancel case

2005-09-07 Thread Benjamin LaHaise
From: Wendy Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Note that other than few exceptions, most of the current filesystem and/or drivers do not have aio cancel specifically defined (kiob->ki_cancel field is mostly NULL). However, sys_io_cancel system call universally sets return code to -EAGAIN. This gives

Re: swsusp doesn't suspend devices

2005-09-07 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 22:17, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > > > > >>It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more > >>precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the

Re: 8250_hp300: initialisation ordering bug

2005-09-07 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:17:49PM +0200, Kars de Jong wrote: > Yes, you are right. I am working on rewriting the driver a bit to use a > platform device for the APCI driver, I'll take your bug report into > account as well. Thanks. > On a related note: can I use the "serial8250" platform driver

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-07 Thread Jan Kiszka
2005/9/7, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wednesday 07 September 2005 15:52, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Ah, there's another issue: an interrupt can come in when esp is on the ndis > stack and above THREAD_SIZE, so do_IRQ will not find thread_info. Sorry, > this one is nasty. > Oh, you

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-07 Thread Jan Kiszka
2005/9/7, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Is there a technical reason ("hard to implement" is a practical reason) > > > why all stacks need to be the same size? > > > > Because of > > > > static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void) > > { > > struct thread_info

Re: swsusp doesn't suspend devices

2005-09-07 Thread Pierre Ossman
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >On Wednesday, 7 of September 2005 13:20, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > >>It would seem that swsusp doesn't properly suspend devices, or more >>precisely it wakes them up again before suspending the machine. >> >> > >Yes, it does. By design. > > > That seems

Re: 8250_hp300: initialisation ordering bug

2005-09-07 Thread Kars de Jong
On zo, 2005-09-04 at 11:19 +0100, Russell King wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that 8250_hp300 is buggy wrt the ordering of hardware > initialisation to the visibility of devices to user space. Namely, > 8250_hp300 does the following: > > ... > serial8250_register_port() makes the port visible

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-09-07 Thread Max Asbock
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:25, Russell King wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:12:54PM -0700, Max Asbock wrote: > > Here is a patch for the ibmasm driver. Let me know it I missed > > something. > > Thanks. Does it still need to include serial.h? > > Also, can I have a signed-off-by line as per

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-07 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Wednesday 07 September 2005 15:52, Daniel Phillips wrote: Ah, there's another issue: an interrupt can come in when esp is on the ndis stack and above THREAD_SIZE, so do_IRQ will not find thread_info. Sorry, this one is nasty. Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

battery status events (RE: Kernel 2.6.13 repeated ACPI events?)

2005-09-07 Thread Brown, Len
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan De Luyck >Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 9:17 AM >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.13 repeated ACPI events? > >I'm seeing repeated ACPI events too, but of the battery

Re: [RFC] SCSI target for IBM Power5 LPAR/SCST 0.9.3-pre1 published

2005-09-07 Thread Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Mike Christie wrote: Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: Sorry, I can see on stgt page only mail lists archive and not from start (from Aug 22). Mike, can I see stgt code and some design description, please? You can send it directly on my e-mail address, if necessary. goto the svn page for the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >