Dear All,
I am new to this group. I was asked to write a device driver for a
new pci card. My doubt is, Kernel will detect a new pci card which is
attached to the system? Or how we can make the kernel to detect the new
card which is newly attached? I am using kernel 2.6.11.12. Please
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Vasily Averin a e'crit :
>> When the number of conntracks is reached nf_conntrack_max limit,
>> early_drop() is
>> called and tries to free one of already used conntracks in one of the
>> hash
>> buckets. If it does not find any conntracks that may be freed, it
>> leads to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Lennart. Tell me again that these results from
>
> http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm and
> http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm
>
> are not of interest to you. I still don't understand why you have your
> head in the sand.
Teddy,
It is a pity you don't address the full set of results, when you make
your snide comments.
Now since you have them,... why don't you make reasoned comment about
them.
You can read more here:
http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm and
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:42:00 -0400 (EDT) John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Removes the entire check_part array and uses the presence of new stub
> functions in header files in fs/partitions to call them directly in a list
> and let the compiler
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:40:50 -0400 (EDT) John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Functions of the form adfspart_check_FOO and foo_partition defined in
> fs/partitions/*.h are helper functions called in a deliberate order by
> check_partition in
From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Removes the entire check_part array and uses the presence of new stub
functions in header files in fs/partitions to call them directly in a list
and let the compiler optimize away any that aren't compiled in. Also fixes
a bug where " unable to
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:21:01 -0500 Larry Finger wrote:
With the following line in /etc/modprobe.conf.local:
options bcm43xx fwpostfix = ".fw3" locale=8
the kernel oops below is generated. I realize that the line should have no whitespace around the
"=", but I do not feel
From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Adds a dependency to ACORN_PARTITION_RISCIX in fs/partitions/Kconfig to
prevent compilation of the function riscix_partition which is used only
within ACORN_PARTITION_CUMANA and ACORN_PARTITION_ADFS sections, thereby
preventing an
From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Adds conditional-compilation directives to fs/partitions/acorn.c to
prevent compilation of the functions adfs_partition and linux_partition
which are used only within ACORN_PARTITION_CUMANA and ACORN_PARTITION_ADFS
sections, thereby preventing
From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Functions of the form adfspart_check_FOO and foo_partition defined in
fs/partitions/*.h are helper functions called in a deliberate order by
check_partition in check.c. Add conditional-compilation directives and
static inline no-op functions to
From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Adds top-of-file identifying comments to check.h and ibm.h in
fs/partitions similar to the other files in the directory. Removes an
obsolescent comment from check.h leftover from devfs.
Signed-off-by: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In addition to the Kconfig help text patch I submitted earlier, this is a
set of patches to touch up the partition handling files and also to change
the "array of function pointers" algorithm of the main checking function
to "list of calls to possible stub functions" to better fit in with the
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:44:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To get a feel for the performance increases that can be achieved by
> using compression, we look at the total time (in seconds) to run the
> test:
You mean the performance increases of writing a file which is mostly
all zero's?
Hello,
Alan Stern wrote:
>> The problem here is that kobjec_get() in sysfs_schedule_callback()
>> doesn't grab the module backing the kobject it's grabbing. By the
>> time (ss->func)(ss->kobj) runs, scsi_mod is already gone.
>
> As the author of this routine, I wish you had included my
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:21:01 -0500 Larry Finger wrote:
> With the following line in /etc/modprobe.conf.local:
>
> options bcm43xx fwpostfix = ".fw3" locale=8
>
> the kernel oops below is generated. I realize that the line should have no
> whitespace around the
> "=", but I do not feel that an
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Now that sysfs_dirent can be disconnected from kobject on deletion,
> there is no need to orphan each attribute files. All [bin_]attribute
> nodes are automatically orphaned when the parent node is deleted.
> Kill attribute file orphaning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Al,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 02:32:34PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
... for some usages (temporary space),
light compression can increase speed. For instance, when processing logs,
I get better speed by compressing intermediate
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > I just tried the approach that we discussed earlier and it was not
> > > nice either.
> >
> > We've discussed at least three approaches, so we don't know to
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 06:02:37PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thats interesting, I didn't know that.
>
> Do you know if deb-pkg and rpm-pkg take care of creating the initrd
> automatically.
>
> I seriously doubt they do.
>
> Actually, I guess I only need to compile another kernel to
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:47:20 -0400 (EDT) John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
> (Linux v2.6.20.6.)
>
> The function md_autodetect_dev is defined in drivers/md/md.c. Its
> declaration is on line 1443, outside of conditionals. However, both its
> use on line 1455 and its definition on line 5600 are
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I just tried the approach that we discussed earlier and it was not
> > nice either.
>
> We've discussed at least three approaches, so we don't know to what you refer.
Thats the approach of checking two flags at the same time. In that case
the
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 05:44:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lennart. Tell me again that these results from
>
> http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm and
> http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm
Hmm, copying kernel sources around. Not that
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Which is all a ton of fun, but this subversion of the architecture's
> > freedom to use volatile, memory barriers etc is a worry. We do the same in
> >
> It is *highly* recommended that you change the kernel identifier at
> least slightly, so that you can install '2.6.20-1.local' without
> overlaying
> the vendor-supplied 2.6.20-1 kernel. Among other things, this lets you
> boot back to the equivalent code level in the vendor kernel,
> so you
> It is quite possible to build a kernel that has all the drivers built-in,
> but still require an initrd file. For instance, if you have a recent
> RedHat or Fedora system, '/' may very well be on an LVM partition, which
> means you need an initrd to do a 'lvm varyonvg' before mounting your
Lennart. Tell me again that these results from
http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm and
http://m.domaindlx.com/LinuxHelp/resources/fs-benchmarks.htm
are not of interest to you. I still don't understand why you have your
head in the sand.
.-.
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am quite sure that the kernel RPM file is *already* compressed, at least
> somewhat.
Sure - that's the point - it's better to have the tool compress
data when it makes sense.
OTOH I think Reiser4 fs is not about transparent compression, it's
rather about the
Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps,
>>
>> --- t/kernel/exit.c~ 2007-04-06 23:31:31.0 +0400
>> +++ t/kernel/exit.c 2007-04-06 23:31:57.0 +0400
>> @@ -275,10 +275,7 @@ static void reparent_to_init(void)
>>
Hi
Trying to mount filesystem image, mounted over block2mtd to USB Flash (usb-
storage), got OOPS/BUG. Reproduced on latest kernel, 2.6.21-rc6.
Do you need complete JFFS2 image?
Please CC me in reply, cause i am not subscribed to list.
oops text:
[ 41.355000] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Which is all a ton of fun, but this subversion of the architecture's
> freedom to use volatile, memory barriers etc is a worry. We do the same in
> page_alloc.c, of course...
I just tried the approach that we discussed earlier and it was not
nice
With the following line in /etc/modprobe.conf.local:
options bcm43xx fwpostfix = ".fw3" locale=8
the kernel oops below is generated. I realize that the line should have no whitespace around the
"=", but I do not feel that an oops is the best way to report the syntax error. Could there be a
On Apr 7 2007 16:36, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
>So how do we solve this problem? I can think of two solutions:
>
>1) Deprecate telldir/seekdir() altogether. Relatively few progams use
>this functionality, and it is highly questionable how useful it is,
>anyway. If you use telldir/seekdir and keep
Hi.
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 April 2007 00:31, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 15:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:20:39 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
>
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 04:36:33PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> this functionality, and it is highly questionable how useful it is,
> anyway. If you use telldir/seekdir and keep the cookie for a long
> time, even the POSIX-provided guarantees about files that are created
> and deleted between the
(Please CC me on emails, I'm not on LKML).
Somewhere between 2.6.19 and 2.6.20, unloading of the netconsole module
got broken. It's still broken as of 2.6.21-rc6.
If you try to unload the module, the rmmod/modprobe-r just sits there
forever. I can reproduce it on tg3, forcedeth and e1000
On Sunday, 8 April 2007 00:31, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 15:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:20:39 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > This should allow us to reduce the memory usage, practically always, and
>
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Did you investigate
> >
> > static inline int page_tail(struct page *page)
> > {
> > return ((page->flags & (PG_compound|PG_tail)) ==
(Linux v2.6.20.6.)
The function md_autodetect_dev is defined in drivers/md/md.c. Its
declaration is on line 1443, outside of conditionals. However, both its
use on line 1455 and its definition on line 5600 are inside "#ifndef
MODULE" conditionals. So it seems obvious that the declaration
"Andika Triwidada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[cc linux-acpi]
> Question: is that normal? I thought power consumption will be
> automatically reduced if one core offlined.
The current cpu offline essentially just runs a special idle loop.
The standard idle loop is even a bit more aggressive
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 15:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:20:39 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > This should allow us to reduce the memory usage, practically always, and
> > improve performance.
>
> And does it?
It will. I've been using
On Sunday 08 April 2007 00:06:13 Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Results:
>
> x86_64 boot with virtual memmap
>
> Format: #events totaltime (min/avg/max)
>
> kfree_virt_to_page 598430 5.6ms(3ns/9ns/322ns)
>
> x86_64 boot regular sparsemem
>
> kfree_virt_to_page 596360
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Did you investigate
>
> static inline int page_tail(struct page *page)
> {
> return ((page->flags & (PG_compound|PG_tail)) == (PG_compound|PG_tail));
> }
The usual test_bit that we are using there uses a volatile reference
so these wont be
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 10:43:39 +0200 Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Updates on this take4 :
>
> - All remarks from Nick were addressed I hope
>
> - Current mm code have a problem with 64bit futexes, as spoted by Nick :
>
> get_futex_key() does a check against sizeof(u32)
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Christoph if you could let us know which benchmarks you are seeing gains
> > with that would be a help.
>
> You saw the numbers that Ken got with the pipe test right?
>
> Then there are some minor
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:20:39 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should allow us to reduce the memory usage, practically always, and
> improve performance.
And does it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 22:50 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > Looks like this path ,
> >
> > arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c: time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takes xtime_lock
> > mark_tsc_unstable();
> >
Hi.
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 18:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Make handle_initrd() call try_to_freeze() in a suitable place instead of
> setting
> PF_NOFREEZE for the current task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Hi again.
By the way, I'm stopping using [EMAIL PROTECTED]; could you
please change your address book to nigel at nigel dot suspend2 dot net?
Thanks!
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On 07/04/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 07/04/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:48:43 +0200 "Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > On 07/04/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:09:43 +0200
Hi,
Some time ago we discussed the possibility of simplifying the swsusp's approach
towards tracking the swap pages allocated by it for saving the image (so that
they can be freed if there's an error).
I think we can get back to it now, as it is a nice optimization that should
allow us to use
On Thursday 05 April 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>Ok,
> I don't think there really is anything very interesting here, but we're
>hopefully whittling down the list of regressions, and fixing various
>random other small issues while at it.
>
>Some smallish MIPS updates, networking (and network
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:43 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Looks like this path ,
>
> arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c: time_cpufreq_notifier(); <-- takes xtime_lock
>mark_tsc_unstable();
> clocksource_change_rating(_tsc, 0);
>
Remove conditionals and code related to checking for a pre-2.2
kernel.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
i'm fairly certain there's no value in checking for pre-2.2 kernels
anymore. (not compile tested as i have no such system.)
diff --git
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:57:32AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> In their closed chambers (well, workshops,
> http://lwn.net/Articles/226351/), the filesystem developers complain
> about readdir. I fully appreciate the difficulties. But what I fail
> to see so far is any proposal for an
On Saturday 07 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 20:08 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > (who the hell runs a 'make -j 200' or 50 while(1)'s in the real
>> > world?
>>
>> not many - and i dont think Mike tested any of these - Mike
On 04/06, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Perhaps,
>
> --- t/kernel/exit.c~ 2007-04-06 23:31:31.0 +0400
> +++ t/kernel/exit.c 2007-04-06 23:31:57.0 +0400
> @@ -275,10 +275,7 @@ static void reparent_to_init(void)
> remove_parent(current);
> current->parent =
On Saturday 07 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes it would be Ingo, but so far, none of the recent -rt patches has
>> booted on this machine, the last one I tried a few days ago failing to
>> find /dev/root, whatever the heck that is.
>
>did you have a
CC [M] net/iucv/iucv.o
net/iucv/iucv.c: In function 'iucv_init':
net/iucv/iucv.c:1556: error: 'iucv_cpu_notifier' undeclared (first use in this
function)
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/iucv/iucv.c |2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/iucv/iucv.c
On 07/04/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:48:43 +0200 "Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/04/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:09:43 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > > BTW. I
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:48:43 +0200 "Michal Piotrowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/04/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:09:43 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > BTW. I guess that this need a similar fix.
> > >
> > > kernel
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:43:17 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
> > The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz has been uploaded to
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz
> >
On Friday 06 April 2007 10:01 pm, Greg KH wrote:
> Are you _sure_ you have a 1-to-1 relationship here? No multiple devices
> pointing to the same acpi node? Or the other way around? If so, you
> are going to have to change the name to be something more unique.
I've wondered that too. The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
> The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz has been uploaded to
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz
>
> It contains the following patches against 2.6.21-rc6:
suspend-to-disk doesn't work when
Laurent Riffard wrote:
Le 06.04.2007 00:42, Ignatich a écrit :
While trying to find the cause of problems with reiser4 in recent
kernels I came across this.
Incomplete write handling seem to be missing from
reiser4_write_extent() thanks to reiser4-temp-fix.patch. Strangely,
there is a
Hello! Could I talk to you for a second?
I am a submissive SlaveGirl, and am looking for master/mistress. I
would like to submit to master/mistress' wildest desire.
You are welcome to visit my blog: http://blog.25u.com
/Kitty
My Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:32:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don't you agree, that "If they are accurate, THEN they are obviously
> very relevant."
Nope, if they are accurate and they have something to do with your
particular usage and applications, then they are relevant. But it
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 20:08 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (who the hell runs a 'make -j 200' or 50 while(1)'s in the real world?
>
> not many - and i dont think Mike tested any of these - Mike tested
> pretty low make -j values (Mike, can you
Andrew Morton found a section mismatch warning in x86_64 triggered
by a wrongly placed __initdata marker.
git grep "struct __initdata" revealed that board-sam9260.c
had the same problem.
This patch fixes this by placing the __initdata marker correct.
It was checked with objdump that the variable
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 20:39:16 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:59:47AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:20:17 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I don't have a x86-64 compile environment on
> > >
* Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> Committer: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CommitDate: Sat Apr 7 10:18:33 2007 -0700
>
> sched.c: Remove unused variable 'relative'
>
> Getting rid of the p->children printout in show_task() left behind an
> unused variable.
grumble.
On 4/7/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And my "patch" is made obsolete :P
Jan Engelhard from the netfilter list made patch set within the
patch-o-matic tree.
Cheers Jan :D
Patrick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > Is it too late to get a v2.6.21-rc6 tag ?
>
> It's definitely there, I can see it in gitweb..
>
> Do you have some really ancient git that didn't fetch the tags
> automatically?
Oh, my bad.
* Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes it would be Ingo, but so far, none of the recent -rt patches has
> booted on this machine, the last one I tried a few days ago failing to
> find /dev/root, whatever the heck that is.
did you have a chance to try the yum kernel by any chance? The
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 11:46:13 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > Is it too late to get a v2.6.21-rc6 tag ?
>
> It's definitely there, I can see it in gitweb..
>
> Do you have some really ancient git that didn't fetch the tags
>
On 07/04/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:09:43 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW. I guess that this need a similar fix.
>
> kernel BUG at kernel/ptrace.c:494!
> invalid opcode: [#2]
> PREEMPT SMP
> last sysfs file:
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> Is it too late to get a v2.6.21-rc6 tag ?
It's definitely there, I can see it in gitweb..
Do you have some really ancient git that didn't fetch the tags
automatically?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Apr 7 2007 16:57, JanuGerman wrote:
>
>Thanks Jan for the response.
>
>>struct dentry *fbar = lookup_one_len("/foo/bar", current->fs->root);
>
>But that gives me a dentry, where as file object is still not reachable.
So use filp_open.
>Question: I am currently using a function called
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 10:59:47AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:20:17 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't have a x86-64 compile environment on
> > hand, so the 64 bits are completely untested
>
>
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:09:43 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW. I guess that this need a similar fix.
>
> kernel BUG at kernel/ptrace.c:494!
> invalid opcode: [#2]
> PREEMPT SMP
> last sysfs file: devices/platform/w83627hf.656/temp2_input
> Modules linked in:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ok,
> I don't think there really is anything very interesting here, but we're
> hopefully whittling down the list of regressions, and fixing various
> random other small issues while at it.
>
> Some smallish MIPS updates,
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 17:04:44 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> In a different approach here's a patch that handles the special case of
> composite arithmetic expressions in array size initializers. With it,
> prior to pushing the split strings on the @first_arg array, I split the
> keywords before
From: Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In a different approach here's a patch that handles the special case of
composite arithmetic expressions in array size initializers. With it,
prior to pushing the split strings on the @first_arg array, I split the
keywords before the array name as before
On Saturday 07 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>* Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To be expected, there are after all, only so many cpu cycles to go
>> around. Here I sit, running 2.6.21-rc6 ATM, and since there is not an
>> SD patch that applies cleanly to rc6, I am back to typing half
Here's what I try to do. I want to monitor from a Linux Gentoo
machine with inotify enabled on a directory for new files hosted by a
windows share(Windows server, not Samba).
Samba now uses inotify if available on the server side to support the
Directory Change Notification requested by
Hallo
I have problem with a Linux kernel oops. It mostly appears when I
download files using bittorrent or other large file. I have a phone
modem based Internet access using Home Internet Solution
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_internet_Solution). I use Debian
testing, Linux vanilla version:
Andrew Morton napisał(a):
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:30:04 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
>>> The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz has been uploaded to
>>>
>>>
>>>
* Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To be expected, there are after all, only so many cpu cycles to go
> around. Here I sit, running 2.6.21-rc6 ATM, and since there is not an
> SD patch that applies cleanly to rc6, I am back to typing half or more
> of a sentence blind while I answer
Egmont Koblinger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 01:00:48PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Hi,
Please, no dot, and no inverse color.
Imagine someone had the following bitmap for :
No dot, I'm already convinced. To clarify the inverse thingy:
This is what the current kernel does:
1) tries to
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:20:17 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't have a x86-64 compile environment on
> hand, so the 64 bits are completely untested
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On 4/7/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi lads,
Oh! And! I don't want to take credit for things I didn't write, which
is this exactly.
I merely got the ip_tables.h header from 2.6.20 and filtered out what
I needed to get things work.
So, the actual credit for the code in the patch
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:30:04 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
> > The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz has been uploaded to
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz
> >
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:19:30AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:24:06 -0600
> Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:16:48PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Use ethtool -S to if there are any pause frames, etc. See if frames are
> >
On Saturday 07 April 2007 19:44, Larry Finger wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 15:51 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> >> On Saturday 07 April 2007 02:01, Larry Finger wrote:
> >>> The current mb and wireless-dev git trees both get a kernel NULL pointer
> >>> in
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 03:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:03:16 -0700 Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Before this change the timekeeping code would poll the clocksource
> > list every interrupt. This changes that so the clocksource list is
> > only checked
Hi lads,
I had some problems compiling the external netfilter modules due to
missing definitions.
I googled a lot, saw a lot of people having the same problems but no
real answer to how to fix it.
So.. I made a little patch which make things work for me, at least.
Modules that work after
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 19:47:36 PDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 11:21:19 -0400, "Jan Harkes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > With compression there is a pretty high probability that one corrupted
> > byte or disk block will result in loss of a considerably larger amount
> > of data.
>
>
On 4/6/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:32:24PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +static int attach_task(struct container *cont, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
[snip]
> + task_lock(tsk);
You need to check here if task state is PF_EXITING and
From: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Adds help text for ACORN_PARTITION_EESOX and improves help text for
MSDOS_PARTITION in fs/partitions/Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: John Anthony Kazos Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Applied against Linux v2.6.20.6.
---
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 01:00:48PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Hi,
> Please, no dot, and no inverse color.
> Imagine someone had the following bitmap for :
No dot, I'm already convinced. To clarify the inverse thingy:
This is what the current kernel does:
1) tries to display the desired
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
