On 2024/3/8 10:23, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 10:18:18 +0800
Kassey Li wrote:
The trace event "workqueue_activate_work" only print work struct.
However, function is the region of interest in a full sequence of work.
Current workqueue_activate_work trace event output:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 6:50 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:58:14 -0800
> Song Liu wrote:
>
> > Hi Calvin,
> >
> > It is great to hear from you! :)
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:23 PM Calvin Owens wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 03/06 at 13:34 -0800, Luis Chamberlain
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:58:14 -0800
Song Liu wrote:
> Hi Calvin,
>
> It is great to hear from you! :)
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 3:23 PM Calvin Owens wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday 03/06 at 13:34 -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:05:07PM -0800, Calvin Owens wrote:
> >
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:22:07 +0200
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:05:10PM -0800, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > If something like this is merged down the road, it can go in at leisure
> > once the module_alloc change is in: it's a one-way dependency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Calvin
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:05:10 -0800
Calvin Owens wrote:
> If something like this is merged down the road, it can go in at leisure
> once the module_alloc change is in: it's a one-way dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens
> ---
> arch/Kconfig| 2 +-
> kernel/kprobes.c
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:34:40 -0800
Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:05:07PM -0800, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > This patchset makes it possible to use bpftrace with kprobes on kernels
> > built without loadable module support.
>
> This is a step in the
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 10:18:18 +0800
Kassey Li wrote:
> The trace event "workqueue_activate_work" only print work struct.
> However, function is the region of interest in a full sequence of work.
> Current workqueue_activate_work trace event output:
>
> workqueue_activate_work: work struct
On 2024/3/8 9:50, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:09:29 +0800
Kassey Li wrote:
The trace event "workqueue_activate_work" only print work struct.
However, function is the region of interest in a full sequence of work.
Current workqueue_activate_work trace event output:
The trace event "workqueue_activate_work" only print work struct.
However, function is the region of interest in a full sequence of work.
Current workqueue_activate_work trace event output:
workqueue_activate_work: work struct ff88b4a0f450
With this change, workqueue_activate_work will
Hi Calvin,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 12:05:08 -0800
Calvin Owens wrote:
> Both BPF_JIT and KPROBES depend on CONFIG_MODULES, but only require
> module_alloc() itself, which can be easily separated into a standalone
> allocator for executable kernel memory.
Thanks for your work!
As Luis pointed, it
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:09:29 +0800
Kassey Li wrote:
> The trace event "workqueue_activate_work" only print work struct.
> However, function is the region of interest in a full sequence of work.
> Current workqueue_activate_work trace event output:
>
> workqueue_activate_work: work struct
The trace event "workqueue_activate_work" only print work struct.
However, function is the region of interest in a full sequence of work.
Current workqueue_activate_work trace event output:
workqueue_activate_work: work struct ff88b4a0f450
With this change, workqueue_activate_work will
Le 06/03/2024 à 21:05, Calvin Owens a écrit :
> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de jcalvinow...@gmail.com.
> Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à
> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> If something like this is merged down the road, it can go in at leisure
> once
Le 06/03/2024 à 21:05, Calvin Owens a écrit :
> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de jcalvinow...@gmail.com.
> Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à
> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> No BPF code has to change, except in struct_ops (for module refs).
>
> This
Configuring ipvs in a non-initial user namespace using the genl
netlink interface, e.g., by 'ipvsadm' is currently resulting in an
'-EPERM'. This is due to the use of GENL_ADMIN_PERM flag in
'ip_vs_ctl.c'.
Similarly to other genl interfaces, we switch to the use of
GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM flag which
Hi Björn,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 8:27 PM Björn Töpel wrote:
>
> Puranjay!
>
> Puranjay Mohan writes:
>
> > This patch enables support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS on RISC-V.
> > This allows each ftrace callsite to provide an ftrace_ops to the common
> > ftrace trampoline, allowing each
Hi Mathieu,
> > + do {
> > + state_reg = readl(priv->reset_cfg.state_reg);
> > + *rst_ack = EXTSYS_RST_ST_RST_ACK(state_reg);
> > +
> > + if (*rst_ack == EXTSYS_RST_ACK_RESERVED) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "unexpected RST_ACK value: 0x%x\n",
> > +
Puranjay!
Puranjay Mohan writes:
> This patch enables support for DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS on RISC-V.
> This allows each ftrace callsite to provide an ftrace_ops to the common
> ftrace trampoline, allowing each callsite to invoke distinct tracer
> functions without the need to fall back to
Hi Calvin,
Le 06/03/2024 à 21:05, Calvin Owens a écrit :
> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de jcalvinow...@gmail.com.
> Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à
> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> Both BPF_JIT and KPROBES depend on CONFIG_MODULES, but only require
>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni :
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 17:29:32 +0800 you wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar things
> also happen in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They
>
On Mon, 2023-12-18 at 08:38 +0100, Peter Hilber wrote:
> RFC v3 updates
> --
>
> This series implements a driver for a virtio-rtc device conforming to spec
> RFC v3 [1]. It now includes an RTC class driver with alarm, in addition to
> the PTP clock driver already present before.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:29 AM Jason Xing wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing
>
> Use the existing parameter and print the address of skbaddr
> as other trace functions do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:29 AM Jason Xing wrote:
>
> From: Jason Xing
>
> Printing the addresses can help us identify the exact skb/sk
> for those system in which it's not that easy to run BPF program.
> As we can see, it already fetches those, then use it directly
> and it will print like
On Thu 07-03-24 15:40:29, Bixuan Cui wrote:
[...]
> Currently, with the help of kernel trace events or tools like Perfetto, we
> can only see that kswapd is competing for CPU and the frequency of memory
> reclamation triggers, but we do not have detailed information or metrics
> about memory
> > > +static int pm886_initialize_subregmaps(struct pm886_chip *chip)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = >client->dev;
> > > + struct i2c_client *page;
> > > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > > + int err;
> > > +
> > > + /* regulators page */
> > > + page = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(dev,
On 06/03/2024 15:40, Duje Mihanović wrote:
> IST3032C (and possibly some other models) has touch keys. Document this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Duje Mihanović
> ---
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Best regards,
Krzysztof
26 matches
Mail list logo
