On 3/17/24 6:59 PM, Ubisectech Sirius wrote:
> Hello.
> We are Ubisectech Sirius Team, the vulnerability lab of China ValiantSec.
> Recently, our team has discovered a issue in Linux kernel
> 6.8.0-ge5e038b7ae9d. Attached to the email were a POC file of the issue.
>
> Stack dump:
>
>
Hello.
We are Ubisectech Sirius Team, the vulnerability lab of China ValiantSec.
Recently, our team has discovered a issue in Linux kernel 6.8.0-ge5e038b7ae9d.
Attached to the email were a POC file of the issue.
Stack dump:
==
On 3/18/24 02:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:24:36PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 3/15/24 21:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:45:10PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
Yes, I guess smp_wmb() ('dmb') is buggy on NVidia's grace-hopper platform. I
tried
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 08:31:44 -0700 SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Honggyu,
>
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:36:29 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi SeongJae,
> >
> > Thanks for the confirmation. I have a few comments on young filter so
> > please read the inline comments again.
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Mar
On 15/03/2024 22:15, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> AMD-Xilinx Versal and Versal-NET are successor of ZynqMP platform. ZynqMP
> remoteproc driver is mostly compatible with new platforms except few
> platform specific differences.
>
> Versal has same IP of cortex-R5 cores hence maintained compatible string
On 15/03/2024 22:15, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> AMD-Xilinx Versal-NET platform is successor of Versal platform. It
> contains multiple clusters of cortex-R52 real-time processing units.
> Each cluster contains two cores of cortex-R52 processors. Each cluster
> can be configured in lockstep mode or split
On 15/03/2024 22:15, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> AMD-Xilinx Versal platform is successor of ZynqMP platform. Real-time
> Processor Unit R5 cluster IP on Versal is same as of ZynqMP Platform.
> Only difference is power-domains ID needed by power management firmware.
> Hence, keeping the compatible
On 3/16/24 08:46, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 18:56:35 -0500
> Jinghao Jia wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/24 10:17, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
>>> From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
>>>
>>> Read from an unsafe address with copy_from_kernel_nofault() in
>>>
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:24:36PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>
> On 3/15/24 21:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:45:10PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > > > > Yes, I guess smp_wmb() ('dmb') is buggy on NVidia's grace-hopper
> > > > > platform. I tried
> > > to reproduce it
Hi Honggyu,
On Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:36:29 +0900 Honggyu Kim wrote:
> Hi SeongJae,
>
> Thanks for the confirmation. I have a few comments on young filter so
> please read the inline comments again.
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2024 08:53:00 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
> > Hi Honggyu,
> >
> > > >
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 02:50:27PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:15:31PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> > AMD-Xilinx Versal platform is successor of ZynqMP platform. Real-time
> > Processor Unit R5 cluster IP on Versal is same as of ZynqMP Platform.
>
> > Only difference is
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:15:31PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> AMD-Xilinx Versal platform is successor of ZynqMP platform. Real-time
> Processor Unit R5 cluster IP on Versal is same as of ZynqMP Platform.
> Only difference is power-domains ID needed by power management firmware.
> Hence, keeping
Hi SeongJae,
Thanks for the confirmation. I have a few comments on young filter so
please read the inline comments again.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2024 08:53:00 -0800 SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Honggyu,
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: SeongJae Park
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2024
13 matches
Mail list logo
