. Works great for me, under both 2.2 and 2.4. (I don't
have any SMP systems, FWIW.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
the least...
(I meant to report this during 2.4test, but I'm only getting a chance
now.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
the
machine too much... I have no idea if that helps, but I thought I'd go
ahead and throw in my two cents, just in case it does.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please re
e, the slowdown was clearly visible - the disk light was at full
brightness under 2.2.16, but not 2.4.0testwhatever.
I wanted to try again without any APM stuff in the kernel (or at least,
not APM CPU idling) before reporting it, but I never got a chance to do
that.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECT
for
reproducing the problem, but since I'm writing an email to the list, here
it is...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
one speaker) under both Linux 2.2 and
Win2K. If it was just Linux, I'd assume it was a driver problem, but the
fact that I'm getting very similar misbehavior from both Linux and Win2K
(I don't have Win98 or ME on the machine, so I can't test that) makes me
really wonder...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL
now.
In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux
2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of
testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
"Barry K. Nathan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux
2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of
testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next...
That so? Must get Linus an Alpha or SPARC
on that...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-2+ name.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
patch and see if it makes the sound play properly or if it breaks things
and makes sound play too fast. (For the sake of completeness, the sound
files that I tested with were 44100Hz.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- drivers/sound/maestro-old.c Tue Aug 22 12:24:08 2000
+++ drivers/sound
After looking at the various other patches that people posted, I've come
up with this revised version of my original...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ruN linux-2.4.0test10pre5/Documentation/Changes
linux-2.4.0test10pre5-bkn/Documentation/Changes
--- linux-2.4.0test10pre5
:58 [loop2]
2816 pts/4S 0:00 fgrep loop
Since I have 3 image files mounted, that means my Inspiron 5000e has a load
of 3 when it's idle... ;)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
glitches, and I *really* would
not recommend it -- also, I forget how I hacked it into working on an
older machine; I *think* the hacking procedure involved using an OS 9 CD
at some point in the process.]
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
don't know when the
error was first introduced...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(Linus Torvalds added to the cc list because there's now a patch to fix
the problem.)
Alan Cox wrote:
pm.o should be listed as a symbol exporting object in kernel/Makefile
Ok, here's a patch that does this. Tested for both the in-kernel and
module cases.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
http://www.via.com.tw/news/98mvp3nr.htm
http://www.via.com.tw/products/prodmvp3.htm
http://www.via.com.tw/support/faq.htm#ide
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
that
stops any attempts to compile it with 2.7.2.3.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ther stuff instead of implementing this, but I haven't
decided for sure yet.) In any case, I think the solution would be
completely orthogonal to devfs...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
it. (Perhaps I've overlooked a detail or
oversimplified something, in which case I'd appreciate being corrected.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the F
I got the same error with the ipchains-compatible netfilter compiled as
modules. Compiling into the kernel instead, I also get an error. I've
included the error and my .config below.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ld -m elf_i386 -r -o netfilter.o ipchains.o ip_nf_compat.o
ip_nf_compat.o
Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got the same error with the ipchains-compatible netfilter compiled as
modules. Compiling into the kernel instead, I also get an error. I've
included the error and my .config below.
Try removing
] Error 1
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
had overall.)
Anyway, those are my experiences and recommendations. YMMV. :)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
it is, I'll soon post a patch
for Documentation/Changes...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.
Perhaps that accounts for the missing version dependencies...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
The following patch:
(a) Adds a URL for the egcs 1.1.2 source code. This change is both
low-risk and important IMO.
(b) Fixes two sloppy underlines.
Please apply.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.4.0/Documentation/Changes Mon Jan 1 10:00:04 2001
+++ linux-2.4.0bkn1
is against test10pre7 but applies cleanly to test10 final as
well.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ruN linux-2.4.0test10pre7/Documentation/Configure.help
linux-2.4.0test10pre7-bkn/Documentation/Configure.help
--- linux-2.4.0test10pre7/Documentation/Configure.help Mon Oct 30 21:36:42 2000
.2.)
Is this a real bug or just a documentation bug?
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ix and IBM made 5x86's as well - are those more like fast 486's
or slow Pentiums? I don't remember. If they're like Pentiums, perhaps
"486/AMD 5x86" and "586/non-AMD 5x86/6x86/6x86MX"...?)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hedrick has said in the past that a marginal PSU or
motherboard can also cause CRC errors.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
, probably around 400K total,
if anyone wants me to do that.)
This patch is a merge of a bug fix from 2.2.10-ac11. This fix was merged
into 2.2.11pre2, but it doesn't seem to have been merged into 2.3 or 2.4
at all...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ruN linux-2.4.2-pre4/init/main.c linux-2.4.2
, and it did not
have this problem.
In my case, it's usually mozilla (I'm seeing this with the daily
snapshots, but not with mozilla-0.8.1, at least not yet), but at least
once I saw it with freeamp (2.1rc5) too.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 07:14:45AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
2.6.11-bk9 works (actually it takes under 2 seconds, not 5-10).
2.6.11-bk10 has the weird slowdown.
I'll see if I can isolate it any further.
2.6.11-mm2 works, but 2.6.11-mm3 has the ridiculously slow resumes.
Later today I'll
, it should be much smaller.
I'm planning to go as far as I can before going to bed tonight.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
, this computer happens to hit the bug where
all the printk timestamps are 000.000 (don't take the # of
digits too literally). Probably unrelated, but I may as well mention it.
(System is an Athlon XP 2200+ with SiS chipset. I can't remember which
model of SiS chipset.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 02:27:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I've narrowed the problem down to one patch. In 2.6.11-mm3, the
problem goes away if I remove this patch:
swsusp-enable-resume-from-initrd.patch
That really helps, thanks
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 08:06:14PM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
BTW, there's another strange thing that's introduced by 2.6.11-rc2-mm1:
With that kernel, suspend is also ridiculously slow (speed is comparable
to the slow resume with the aforementioned patch). 2.6.11-rc2 does not
have
(Sorry I took so long to respond. I was busy with tons of stuff
offline...)
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:33:27PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Do you have XFS compiled in, by chance?
Yes.
You are not actually resuming from initrd, right?
That is correct.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED
, but it's possible that I won't be able to get to
it until next Friday or Saturday.
I do not why it interferes, but I've seen that before on suse
kernels...
Have you seen it without the resume-from-initrd patch too, or only with
that patch?
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe
that, I'll try a camcorder or digital camera and
transcribe from that.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
/reiser4 tails. (At least, I *think*
reiser4 has tails. I know reiserfs 3.x does.)
BTW, I happen to agree completely with Linus on this issue, but I still
figured I'd mention this for the sake of completeness.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
root forgets to do the checkin.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org
to me.
I didn't understand it either, at first, but then I read this:
http://www.usenix.org/events/hotos03/tech/full_papers/henson/henson_html/node9.html
Whether this is serious enough to actually worry about is another
question...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list
] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
This patch fixes the compile error. I don't have this hardware so I
don't think I can actually run this code, however.
Signed-off-by: Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.12-rc2-9d469ee9f21c680c41dbffe5b0f36ab5010ca8b1/drivers/usb/image/microtek.c
I can execute this code.
Signed-off-by: Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.12-rc2-9d469ee9f21c680c41dbffe5b0f36ab5010ca8b1-bkn1/drivers/scsi/ultrastor.c
2005-04-19 00:46:13.689904927 -0700
+++
linux-2.6.12-rc2-9d469ee9f21c680c41dbffe5b0f36ab5010ca8b1-bkn2/drivers/scsi
. I've compile-tested this but I
haven't actually run it.
Signed-off-by: Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
linux-2.6.12-rc2-9d469ee9f21c680c41dbffe5b0f36ab5010ca8b1-bkn2/drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.c
2005-04-19 00:46:11.666064007 -0700
+++
linux-2.6.12-rc2
know, rpm itself could be one of these!)
I hope this helps...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
it's more of a proof-of-concept, just to see if
Eric's on the right track...
This is the motivation behind the patch:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=110665405402747w=2
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
, please?
I forgot to mention, this patch is known to break Alt-SysRq-O on at
least some systems. See here:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0501.3/0869.html
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] fix microtek.c compile failure
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-develm=111391865311903w=2
Another LKML poster (who I added to CC on this message) already hit the
aic7xxx compile failure with 2.6.12-rc3...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 10:08:27PM -0400, Pete Clements wrote:
FYI:
[snip]
In case anyone hits this problem but misses my post to the main Re:
Linux 2.6.12-rc3 thread, the fix is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsim=111391769011616w=2
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED
that previously didn't work. Now it
works.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
supported.
http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/features/
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
in (as opposed to being a module).
And if you do the above, make sure to have lots of paper handy. Also,
this trick probably won't work with all printers, but it stands a good
chance of working.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
as well.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
it would need to do,
say, 2.6.12-rc2-pre1 instead of 2.6.12-rc1-bk1, and while that seems
natural to me, I don't know how the rest of the planet's human population
would react...
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is missing in that case.
I have tested this patch against oldconfig and menuconfig on 2.6.11-bk2.
Signed-off-by: Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.11-bk2/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug2004-12-24 13:34:45.0
-0800
+++ linux-2.6.11-bk2-bkn2/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug
altogether at boot in that case, if
that's not unreasonably hard to implement.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
the existing code, and it could be a long while until I have a
boot-time message patch that is both functional and clean enough to be
incorporated into mainline.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
haven't been reading LKML
closely enough to say that with 100% certainty, however.)
Summary: kernel-2.6.9-1.724_FC3 breaks APM suspend on Thinkpad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=144415
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:21:54AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
More fixlets derived from the Coverity tool (does this thing have a name?)
AFAICT the name of the tool is Coverity Prevent. (But I'm not
absolutely 100% sure.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list
; this time I think it happened when the fixes
from 2.6.11.6 were merged into Linus's BK tree.
You can still get to the snapshots using this URL, but as I said, the
scripts are confused right now:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED
it supports LBA48.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
problems.
[snip]
I was having the same problem on a system of mine too, but it went away
after I disabled CONFIG_DEVFS_FS. You didn't include enough of your
.config for me to be able to tell if that is at all relevant in your
case however.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
, and under 2.6.12-rc1-mm4, ieee1394/sbp2 can at
least stay up indefinitely as long as I don't suspend -- that's a
tremendous improvement over 2.6.11.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 06:44:08AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
swsusp: reading slkf;jalksfsadflkjas;dlfasdfkl (12345 pages): 34%
[sorry, I just got up so my short-term memory isn't working that well
yet]
takes 10-30 minutes (depending on whether it's closer to 11000 pages or
2) rather
PCI cards) and see if that makes
any difference. (I remember reading something about OHCI being more
efficient than UHCI in some cases, although I don't remember the details
now.)
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
is less than the # of CPU's. I imagine someone has thought about
this in the past and answered the question one way or another, but I
don't happen to know the answer.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
figuring out when the problem started and when it was fixed, but I
just wanted to mention that in fact there are problems in earlier
2.6.11-rc releases that seem to be fixed later on.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
distinction is overengineering, it's easily removed
(see the beginning of this paragraph).
Whether with alpha/beta or just plain pre, this seems more robust to me
than the other suggestions so far.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
really the same concept.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
are also magical, insofar as they get treated differently
(e.g. RHEL kernels always get backports whereas Fedora ones often get
updated altogether). If the bits weren't magical then I think people
would simply run Fedora Core instead of creating RHEL rebuild projects.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED
| S
...
e.g. if odd/even causes too many long releases or other problems like
that, then something like the middle column (every Nth release is
extra-stable, for N = 3) could be tried.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
be a foolish question, but, are there possibly any code paths
in the *BIOS* that could care?
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 03:14:06AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:35:00AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
So I will ask again, as I did when Andrew first pointed this in my
direction. What code path in the kernel
patches.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
in the call chain instead of use a proper
hook. But I can't quickly find an existing hook in the proper
location.
I had to fix a couple of typos (apci and offf) to get it to compile.
Once I did that, the patch made shutdown work again.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 07:12:55PM +, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
This acpi_power_off issue ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/11/88 ) still
happens.
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
Look at that bug report (especially toward the bottom) for the latest
information.
-Barry K
just a guess.
-Barry K. Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:06:10PM +, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
This isn't new to 2.6.11-rc1-mm1, but it has the infamous (to Fedora
users) ACPI shutdown bug -- poweroff hangs instead
Am79C971. Works great for me, under both 2.2 and 2.4. (I don't
have any SMP systems, FWIW.)
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
l, to
say the least...
(I meant to report this during 2.4test, but I'm only getting a chance
now.)
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
ing the
machine too much... I have no idea if that helps, but I thought I'd go
ahead and throw in my two cents, just in case it does.
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PRO
or piping cat into nc).
In my case, the slowdown was clearly visible - the disk light was at full
brightness under 2.2.16, but not 2.4.0testwhatever.
I wanted to try again without any APM stuff in the kernel (or at least,
not APM CPU idling) before reporting it, but I never got a chance to do
tha
s until I
got a chance to put together a self-contained package & instructions for
reproducing the problem, but since I'm writing an email to the list, here
it is...
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
ugh one speaker) under both Linux 2.2 and
Win2K. If it was just Linux, I'd assume it was a driver problem, but the
fact that I'm getting very similar misbehavior from both Linux and Win2K
(I don't have Win98 or ME on the machine, so I can't test that) makes me
really wonder...
-Barry K. Nathan <
DW<0:57 [loop0]
116 ?DW<0:58 [loop2]
2816 pts/4S 0:00 fgrep loop
Since I have 3 image files mounted, that means my Inspiron 5000e has a load
of 3 when it's idle... ;)
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
having now.
In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux
2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of
testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next...
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "Barry K. Nathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux
> > 2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of
> > testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next.
weird glitches, and I *really* would
not recommend it -- also, I forget how I hacked it into working on an
older machine; I *think* the hacking procedure involved using an OS 9 CD
at some point in the process.]
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
ted to build on that...
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
arrive at the K6-2+ name.
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
patch and see if it makes the sound play properly or if it breaks things
and makes sound play too fast. (For the sake of completeness, the sound
files that I tested with were 44100Hz.)
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- drivers/sound/maestro-old.c Tue Aug 22 12:24:08 2000
+++ drivers
/32" should
be "IA-32") and clarifies that the Documentation/Changes comments about gcc
versions apply mainly to x86.
If I made any mistakes, please correct me...
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.4.0test10pre5/Documentation/Changes Mon Oct 23 20:20:31 20
don't know when the
error was first introduced...
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
(Linus Torvalds added to the cc list because there's now a patch to fix
the problem.)
Alan Cox wrote:
> pm.o should be listed as a symbol exporting object in kernel/Makefile
Ok, here's a patch that does this. Tested for both the in-kernel and
module cases.
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PRO
mp; 686A
do, others don't.
http://www.via.com.tw/news/98mvp3nr.htm
http://www.via.com.tw/products/prodmvp3.htm
http://www.via.com.tw/support/faq.htm#ide
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
preprocessor check that
stops any attempts to compile it with 2.7.2.3.
-Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
