On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:43:30PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-08-29 11:16:28, Christopher Arges wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2016-08-26 13:50:27, Chris J Arges wrote:
> > > > It can be useful to e
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:43:30PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-08-29 11:16:28, Christopher Arges wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2016-08-26 13:50:27, Chris J Arges wrote:
> > > > It can be useful to e
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Christopher Arges wrote:
>
> > Another example is CVE-2016-2117. Here we need to unset NETIF_F_SG on a
> > particular device. If the device is already loaded we need a way to
> > fixup h
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Christopher Arges wrote:
>
> > Another example is CVE-2016-2117. Here we need to unset NETIF_F_SG on a
> > particular device. If the device is already loaded we need a way to
> > fixup h
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2016-08-26 13:50:27, Chris J Arges wrote:
> > It can be useful to execute hook functions whenever a livepatch is applied
> > or unapplied to a particular object. Currently this is possible by writing
> > logic in the __init
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:23:30PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Fri 2016-08-26 13:50:27, Chris J Arges wrote:
> > It can be useful to execute hook functions whenever a livepatch is applied
> > or unapplied to a particular object. Currently this is possible by writing
> > logic in the __init
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:34:58PM -0400, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few months ago, Chris Arges reported a bug involving alternatives/paravirt
> patching that was discussed here [1] and here [2]. To briefly summarize the
> bug, patch modules that contained .altinstructions or
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:34:58PM -0400, Jessica Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few months ago, Chris Arges reported a bug involving alternatives/paravirt
> patching that was discussed here [1] and here [2]. To briefly summarize the
> bug, patch modules that contained .altinstructions or
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:31:59AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Currently we do not allow patch module to unload since there is no
> method to determine if a task is still running in the patched code.
>
> The consistency model gives us the way because when the unpatching
> finishes we know that
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:31:59AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Currently we do not allow patch module to unload since there is no
> method to determine if a task is still running in the patched code.
>
> The consistency model gives us the way because when the unpatching
> finishes we know that
10 matches
Mail list logo
