here verify
that "make bzdisk" will create a bootable floppy (I did try an entire
box of different floppies) on 2.4.5+? Especially, can anyone verify this
for SMP and/or purely scsi machines? If scsi, do you use aic7xxx?
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: se
st lspci -vv for
the failed kernel, which is requested in the boot message at one point,
so I have to do this through the RH stock 2.4.2 SMP kernel of RH 7.1.
Kernel config for this is attached.
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bootup:
...
...
...
Redundant entry in serial pci_table. Please send the
Chris Mason wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 03:03:32 PM -0600 "D. Stimits"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ snip ]
>
> > RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
> > Freeing initrd memory: 249k freed
> > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 f
re going on in the kernel, and wondering if this could be something
that used to be supported but no longer is.
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info a
the config. No doubt at
all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual
compile. Maybe it is just a quirk/oddball.
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > vm.freepages = 383 766 1149
>
> tat feature is removed in recent VM Systems.
>
> Greetings
> Bernd
Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
> > D. Stimits wrote:
> >
> > > Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > > >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist.
> > >
> > >
with no luck. Can anyone tell me if
ipchains compatibility has been removed from current config options? If
not, how it can be selected, or if it is broken?
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [
"D. Stimits" wrote:
>
> I know somewhere there is a menuconfig item corresponding to
> CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS, and that selecting various other iptables
> options can make this item disappear and no longer be selectable. But I
> have fished all over, have set
mpile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel
> >> > left it out.
> >>
> >> I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at
> >> all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual
> >> compile. Maybe it is j
running bzip2
compression for any initial ramdisk, versus gzip compression?
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-inf
there...modern...have game ports that are useful
now. USB is an evolving and often broken standard. Your idea of obsolete
is not completely wrong, but it is far too wrong to go about it this
way. And printers or serial mice?
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> a.out
> Who needs it a
y
| |-- tty1
| |-- tty2
| |-- tty3
| `-- tty4
|-- etc
|-- lib
| |-- aic7xxx.o
| |-- pagebuf.o
| |-- scsi_mod.o
| |-- sd_mod.o
| |-- xfs.o
| `-- xfs_support.o
|-- linuxrc
|-- loopfs
`-- sbin
|-- bin -> bin
`-- modprobe -> /bin/nash
Something is wrong, it lac
To punish myself for this silly problem, I'll be giving Bill Gates a
compliment, and pulling my toe nails out with pliers. Everything was set
up right, but the one thing I always config, "initial ramdisk", was not
set. Sorry.
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"D. Stimits"
o I'm wondering how effective this current
compression is, and if a more bzip2-like system would be beneficial as
kernels get larger?
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holger Lubitz wrote:
>
> "D. Stimits" proclaimed:
> > down to 1.44 MB. But then it would also have to be self-extracting,
> > which complicates it, so I'm wondering how effective this current
> > compression is, and if a more bzip2-like system would
, and lies and does not tell you when ipchains
startup fails (as root manually do something like ipchains -L -n).
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Rob Landley wrote:
...snip...
> The patches-linus-actuall-applies mailing list idea is based on how Linus
> says he works: he appends patches he likes to a file and then calls patch -p1
> < thatfile after a mail reading session. It wouldn't be too much work for
> somebody to write a toy he could
"J.D. Bakker" wrote:
>
> At 13:42 -0600 20-06-2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> >Rodrigo Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BTW, I have a question: Can the availability of dual-CPU boards for intel
> >> and amd processors, rather then tri- or quadra-CPU boards, be explained with
> >> the fa
Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 20 June 2001 20:42, D. Stimits wrote:
> > Rob Landley wrote:
> > ...snip...
> >
> > > The patches-linus-actuall-applies mailing list idea is based on how Linus
> > > says he works: he appends patches he likes to a file
g on
customized boot software that is currently being confused by this
distinction; there is a need to find a proper means to detect libc and
linker information)
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [E
Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
> At 8:06 PM +0100 2001-06-21, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > the stdio.h, I'd tell him to go screw himself.
> >> What is the difference between including kernel header file and
> >> including GPLed header file?
> >
> >There are real differences between programs and interfac
an XFS filesystem patch, I also
have to use their "rebuild firmware" option, which I don't think is part
of ac or regular kernels. I use kgcc to compile all, and am running dual
pIII (I run without APIC because of the defective i840 chipset). All of
this is using the stock aic7xxx m
or at less it should.
>
> syntax is like:
> SEARCH_DIR(/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/local/lib); \
> SEARCH_DIR(/usr/i386-slackware-linux/lib);
>
> (that is why you need to pass -L/usr/X11R6/lib to link X11 apps
> at runtime) anyway to load shared libraries is mana
Keith Owens wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:39:45 -0600,
> "Justin T. Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>The existing build process for aic7xxx on Linux has several problems.
> >>
> >>* Users have to manually select "rebuild firmware". Relying on users
> >> to perform any action other than
oes.
>
> This is easier, doesn't it ?
It would cause problems for me. Perhaps it is an issue of XFS filesystem
patches, rather than the regular kernel, I don't know what it modifies
relative to aic7xxx. But so far all of my recent test kernels will fail
to complete boot correctly if r
being chosen without it being specified anywhere else. I
think this will end up just being one of those mysteries, and the boot
software coder will have to find some non-trivial workaround. It sounds
like the /lib/i686/ path was hardcoded in the linker when it was
compiled, which means there are no s
ut it at first, but if bootup starts
normally, then hangs in what seems like a controller or filesystem
failure of a scsi drive, try to enable the option.
(this would give some hint about debugging an aic7xxx failure,
regardless of error messages)
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >Missin
Luigi Genoni wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote:
>
> > Luigi Genoni wrote:
> > >
> > > Again i am confused.
> > >
> > > /usr/bin/ld is linker at compilation time, at it works how i told in
> > > second part
>
dependencies of a highly customized
linux install.
It still remains to be seen how it is that /lib/i686/libc.so.6 is used
in place of /lib/libc.so.6 (which could be deleted and RH 7.1 wouldn't
care...very strange).
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this
loppy boot
> loader or other services
>
If it is within the realm of the paper, I'd like to know the differences
when booting from an ATAPI cdrom (or the fact that there is no
difference). Or for SCSI cdrom if relevant or useful to the purposes of
the paper.
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTE
nt machine with RH's
2.4.2 kernel, BX chipset, and IO-APIC enabled. The machine this is from
has had this message on earlier kernels as well, none of which had XFS
patches. What is the significance (or consequence) of pages reserved
twice?
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
web site for exact requirements, and make sure the ram matches;
even if your memory is good, it might not be good in your circumstances.
D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've been running Mandrake 7.2 on another machine for some time - no
> problem, until. I added another 64 M
Ronald Bultje wrote:
>
> On 04 Jul 2001 17:29:12 -0400, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> > You write:
> > | I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in
> > | my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me
> > | that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x
root=/dev/scd0,iso9660"
or "vmlinuz root=/dev/scd0,xfs")? Or is this limited in some way,
requiring mount on one or a few known filesystem types ("linux native"
subset comes to mind), followed by a chroot or pivot_root style command
(which in turn means no direct root mount of
34 matches
Mail list logo