bzdisk broken in 2.4.5?

2001-05-28 Thread D. Stimits
floppy (I did try an entire box of different floppies) on 2.4.5+? Especially, can anyone verify this for SMP and/or purely scsi machines? If scsi, do you use aic7xxx? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

2.4.5 Oops at boot

2001-05-30 Thread D. Stimits
for the failed kernel, which is requested in the boot message at one point, so I have to do this through the RH stock 2.4.2 SMP kernel of RH 7.1. Kernel config for this is attached. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bootup: ... ... ... Redundant entry in serial pci_table. Please send the output of lspci -vv

Re: 2.4.5 Oops at boot

2001-05-30 Thread D. Stimits
Chris Mason wrote: On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 03:03:32 PM -0600 D. Stimits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ snip ] RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 Freeing initrd memory: 249k freed VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem). Red Hat nash version 3.0.10 starting VFS: Mounted root

missing sysrq

2001-05-31 Thread D. Stimits
, and wondering if this could be something that used to be supported but no longer is. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: missing sysrq

2001-05-31 Thread D. Stimits
use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual compile. Maybe it is just a quirk/oddball. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] vm.freepages = 383 766 1149 tat feature is removed in recent VM Systems. Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-01 Thread D. Stimits
Dieter Nützel wrote: D. Stimits wrote: Bernd Eckenfels wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. It is a compile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel left it out. I compiled

2.4.6 pre1 and 2.4.5 CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS missing?

2001-06-07 Thread D. Stimits
, with no luck. Can anyone tell me if ipchains compatibility has been removed from current config options? If not, how it can be selected, or if it is broken? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 2.4.6 pre1 and 2.4.5 CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS missing?

2001-06-07 Thread D. Stimits
D. Stimits wrote: I know somewhere there is a menuconfig item corresponding to CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS, and that selecting various other iptables options can make this item disappear and no longer be selectable. But I have fished all over, have set config to give devel and incomplete

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-07 Thread D. Stimits
is definitely in the config. No doubt at all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual compile. Maybe it is just a quirk/oddball. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Have you tried echo 1 /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq? You need both, compiled in and activation. Since

bzDisk compression Q; boot debug Q

2001-06-13 Thread D. Stimits
bzip2 compression for any initial ramdisk, versus gzip compression? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read

Re: obsolete code must die

2001-06-13 Thread D. Stimits
mice? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a.out Who needs it anymore. I love ELF. I really think doing a clean up is worthwhile. Maybe while looking for stuff to clean up we'll even be able to better comment the existing code. Any other features people would like to get rid of? Any comments

Re: initial ramdisk failure

2001-06-14 Thread D. Stimits
To punish myself for this silly problem, I'll be giving Bill Gates a compliment, and pulling my toe nails out with pliers. Everything was set up right, but the one thing I always config, initial ramdisk, was not set. Sorry. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] D. Stimits wrote: I have been trying

Re: bzDisk compression Q; boot debug Q

2001-06-14 Thread D. Stimits
system would be beneficial as kernels get larger? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http

Re: bzDisk compression Q; boot debug Q

2001-06-14 Thread D. Stimits
Holger Lubitz wrote: D. Stimits proclaimed: down to 1.44 MB. But then it would also have to be self-extracting, which complicates it, so I'm wondering how effective this current compression is, and if a more bzip2-like system would be beneficial as kernels get larger? bzip2 has

Re: ipchains

2001-06-18 Thread D. Stimits
-n). D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)

2001-06-20 Thread D. Stimits
Rob Landley wrote: ...snip... The patches-linus-actuall-applies mailing list idea is based on how Linus says he works: he appends patches he likes to a file and then calls patch -p1 thatfile after a mail reading session. It wouldn't be too much work for somebody to write a toy he could use

Re: Threads FAQ entry incomplete

2001-06-20 Thread D. Stimits
J.D. Bakker wrote: At 13:42 -0600 20-06-2001, Charles Cazabon wrote: Rodrigo Ventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, I have a question: Can the availability of dual-CPU boards for intel and amd processors, rather then tri- or quadra-CPU boards, be explained with the fact that the

Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-21 Thread D. Stimits
that is currently being confused by this distinction; there is a need to find a proper means to detect libc and linker information) D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

Re: Controversy over dynamic linking -- how to end the panic

2001-06-21 Thread D. Stimits
Jonathan Lundell wrote: At 8:06 PM +0100 2001-06-21, Alan Cox wrote: the stdio.h, I'd tell him to go screw himself. What is the difference between including kernel header file and including GPLed header file? There are real differences between programs and interface definitions.

Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address - 2.4.5

2001-06-21 Thread D. Stimits
, which I don't think is part of ac or regular kernels. I use kgcc to compile all, and am running dual pIII (I run without APIC because of the defective i840 chipset). All of this is using the stock aic7xxx module or compiled in directly. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Chris Leger

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
Luigi Genoni wrote: I do not know if this is a new filesystem hierarchy, it should not be, at less untill lsb finishes all discussion (anyway it is similar to lsb standard). Your mail is a little confusing for me. Let's see if i can clarify my ideas. On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
Keith Owens wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:39:45 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The existing build process for aic7xxx on Linux has several problems. * Users have to manually select rebuild firmware. Relying on users to perform any action other than make *config is

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
, I don't know what it modifies relative to aic7xxx. But so far all of my recent test kernels will fail to complete boot correctly if rebuild firmware is not used. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
will have to find some non-trivial workaround. It sounds like the /lib/i686/ path was hardcoded in the linker when it was compiled, which means there are no simple config file checks. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] this is the interesting section of the output. This way you can check for an hack

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
of error messages) D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Missing firmware rebuild is fatal for my system, SMP x86 with integrated 7892. Messages and config menu information is inadequate, it requires a bit of pounding the head on the wall to figure it out. It is hard to make the kernel driver give

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-23 Thread D. Stimits
Luigi Genoni wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote: Luigi Genoni wrote: Again i am confused. /usr/bin/ld is linker at compilation time, at it works how i told in second part of my mail, (just try to compile it, it comes with binutils, ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-23 Thread D. Stimits
/libc.so.6 is used in place of /lib/libc.so.6 (which could be deleted and RH 7.1 wouldn't care...very strange). D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http

Re: For comment: draft BIOS use document for the kernel

2001-06-23 Thread D. Stimits
the differences when booting from an ATAPI cdrom (or the fact that there is no difference). Or for SCSI cdrom if relevant or useful to the purposes of the paper. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED

page reserved twice

2001-07-03 Thread D. Stimits
with RH's 2.4.2 kernel, BX chipset, and IO-APIC enabled. The machine this is from has had this message on earlier kernels as well, none of which had XFS patches. What is the significance (or consequence) of pages reserved twice? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: 128 MB RAM stability problems (again)

2001-07-04 Thread D. Stimits
, and make sure the ram matches; even if your memory is good, it might not be good in your circumstances. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've been running Mandrake 7.2 on another machine for some time - no problem, until. I added another 64 MB RAM and tried to install redhat (25 times

Re: 128 MB RAM stability problems (again)

2001-07-05 Thread D. Stimits
Ronald Bultje wrote: On 04 Jul 2001 17:29:12 -0400, Chris Siebenmann wrote: You write: | I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in | my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me | that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a

bzImage, root device Q

2001-07-20 Thread D. Stimits
,iso9660 or vmlinuz root=/dev/scd0,xfs)? Or is this limited in some way, requiring mount on one or a few known filesystem types (linux native subset comes to mind), followed by a chroot or pivot_root style command (which in turn means no direct root mount of some filesystem types)? D. Stimits

bzdisk broken in 2.4.5?

2001-05-28 Thread D. Stimits
re verify that "make bzdisk" will create a bootable floppy (I did try an entire box of different floppies) on 2.4.5+? Especially, can anyone verify this for SMP and/or purely scsi machines? If scsi, do you use aic7xxx? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: se

2.4.5 Oops at boot

2001-05-30 Thread D. Stimits
lspci -vv for the failed kernel, which is requested in the boot message at one point, so I have to do this through the RH stock 2.4.2 SMP kernel of RH 7.1. Kernel config for this is attached. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bootup: ... ... ... Redundant entry in serial pci_table. Please send the output of

Re: 2.4.5 Oops at boot

2001-05-30 Thread D. Stimits
Chris Mason wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 30, 2001 03:03:32 PM -0600 "D. Stimits" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [ snip ] > > > RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0 > > Freeing initrd memory: 249k freed > > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 f

missing sysrq

2001-05-31 Thread D. Stimits
the kernel, and wondering if this could be something that used to be supported but no longer is. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.

Re: missing sysrq

2001-05-31 Thread D. Stimits
the config. No doubt at all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual compile. Maybe it is just a quirk/oddball. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > vm.freepages = 383 766 1149 > > tat feature is removed in recent VM Systems. > > Greetings > Bernd

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-01 Thread D. Stimits
Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > D. Stimits wrote: > > > > > Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > > > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > However, if I go to /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq does not exist. > > > > > &g

2.4.6 pre1 and 2.4.5 CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS missing?

2001-06-07 Thread D. Stimits
, with no luck. Can anyone tell me if ipchains compatibility has been removed from current config options? If not, how it can be selected, or if it is broken? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: 2.4.6 pre1 and 2.4.5 CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS missing?

2001-06-07 Thread D. Stimits
"D. Stimits" wrote: > > I know somewhere there is a menuconfig item corresponding to > CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS, and that selecting various other iptables > options can make this item disappear and no longer be selectable. But I > have fished all over, have

Re: missing sysrq

2001-06-07 Thread D. Stimits
mpile time option, so the person who compiled your kernel > >> > left it out. > >> > >> I compiled it, and the sysrq is definitely in the config. No doubt at > >> all. I also use make mrproper and config again before dep and actual > >> compile. Maybe it is j

bzDisk compression Q; boot debug Q

2001-06-13 Thread D. Stimits
ing bzip2 compression for any initial ramdisk, versus gzip compression? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htm

Re: obsolete code must die

2001-06-13 Thread D. Stimits
ports that are useful now. USB is an evolving and often broken standard. Your idea of obsolete is not completely wrong, but it is far too wrong to go about it this way. And printers or serial mice? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > a.out > Who needs it anymore. I love ELF. > >

initial ramdisk failure

2001-06-13 Thread D. Stimits
.o | |-- pagebuf.o | |-- scsi_mod.o | |-- sd_mod.o | |-- xfs.o | `-- xfs_support.o |-- linuxrc |-- loopfs `-- sbin |-- bin -> bin `-- modprobe -> /bin/nash Something is wrong, it lacks scsi support if I make scsi a module, it lacks XFS support if I make that a module

Re: initial ramdisk failure

2001-06-14 Thread D. Stimits
To punish myself for this silly problem, I'll be giving Bill Gates a compliment, and pulling my toe nails out with pliers. Everything was set up right, but the one thing I always config, "initial ramdisk", was not set. Sorry. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "D. Stimits" wro

Re: bzDisk compression Q; boot debug Q

2001-06-14 Thread D. Stimits
, so I'm wondering how effective this current compression is, and if a more bzip2-like system would be beneficial as kernels get larger? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majord

Re: bzDisk compression Q; boot debug Q

2001-06-14 Thread D. Stimits
Holger Lubitz wrote: > > "D. Stimits" proclaimed: > > down to 1.44 MB. But then it would also have to be self-extracting, > > which complicates it, so I'm wondering how effective this current > > compression is, and if a more bzip2-like system would be be

Re: ipchains

2001-06-18 Thread D. Stimits
lies and does not tell you when ipchains startup fails (as root manually do something like ipchains -L -n). D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)

2001-06-20 Thread D. Stimits
Rob Landley wrote: ...snip... > The patches-linus-actuall-applies mailing list idea is based on how Linus > says he works: he appends patches he likes to a file and then calls patch -p1 > < thatfile after a mail reading session. It wouldn't be too much work for > somebody to write a toy he could

Re: Threads FAQ entry incomplete

2001-06-20 Thread D. Stimits
"J.D. Bakker" wrote: > > At 13:42 -0600 20-06-2001, Charles Cazabon wrote: > >Rodrigo Ventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > BTW, I have a question: Can the availability of dual-CPU boards for intel > >> and amd processors, rather then tri- or quadra-CPU boards, be explained with > >> the

Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-21 Thread D. Stimits
mized boot software that is currently being confused by this distinction; there is a need to find a proper means to detect libc and linker information) D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Controversy over dynamic linking -- how to end the panic

2001-06-21 Thread D. Stimits
Jonathan Lundell wrote: > > At 8:06 PM +0100 2001-06-21, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > the stdio.h, I'd tell him to go screw himself. > >> What is the difference between including kernel header file and > >> including GPLed header file? > > > >There are real differences between programs and

Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address - 2.4.5

2001-06-21 Thread D. Stimits
lesystem patch, I also have to use their "rebuild firmware" option, which I don't think is part of ac or regular kernels. I use kgcc to compile all, and am running dual pIII (I run without APIC because of the defective i840 chipset). All of this is using the stock aic7xxx module or compil

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
> > syntax is like: > SEARCH_DIR(/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/lib); SEARCH_DIR(/usr/local/lib); \ > SEARCH_DIR(/usr/i386-slackware-linux/lib); > > (that is why you need to pass -L/usr/X11R6/lib to link X11 apps > at runtime) anyway to load shared libraries is managed by > /lib/ld-2.XXX

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
Keith Owens wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:39:45 -0600, > "Justin T. Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The existing build process for aic7xxx on Linux has several problems. > >> > >>* Users have to manually select "rebuild firmware". Relying on users > >> to perform any action other

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
oes. > > This is easier, doesn't it ? It would cause problems for me. Perhaps it is an issue of XFS filesystem patches, rather than the regular kernel, I don't know what it modifies relative to aic7xxx. But so far all of my recent test kernels will fail to complete boot correctly if rebuild fir

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
g chosen without it being specified anywhere else. I think this will end up just being one of those mysteries, and the boot software coder will have to find some non-trivial workaround. It sounds like the /lib/i686/ path was hardcoded in the linker when it was compiled, which means there are no

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
starts normally, then hangs in what seems like a controller or filesystem failure of a scsi drive, try to enable the option. (this would give some hint about debugging an aic7xxx failure, regardless of error messages) D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Missing firmware rebuild is fatal fo

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-23 Thread D. Stimits
Luigi Genoni wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, D. Stimits wrote: > > > Luigi Genoni wrote: > > > > > > Again i am confused. > > > > > > /usr/bin/ld is linker at compilation time, at it works how i told in > > > second part >

Re: Is this part of newer filesystem hierarchy?

2001-06-23 Thread D. Stimits
es of a highly customized linux install. It still remains to be seen how it is that /lib/i686/libc.so.6 is used in place of /lib/libc.so.6 (which could be deleted and RH 7.1 wouldn't care...very strange). D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: For comment: draft BIOS use document for the kernel

2001-06-23 Thread D. Stimits
> loader or other services > If it is within the realm of the paper, I'd like to know the differences when booting from an ATAPI cdrom (or the fact that there is no difference). Or for SCSI cdrom if relevant or useful to the purposes of the paper. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

page reserved twice

2001-07-03 Thread D. Stimits
with RH's 2.4.2 kernel, BX chipset, and IO-APIC enabled. The machine this is from has had this message on earlier kernels as well, none of which had XFS patches. What is the significance (or consequence) of pages reserved twice? D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)

2001-07-04 Thread D. Stimits
or exact requirements, and make sure the ram matches; even if your memory is good, it might not be good in your circumstances. D. Stimits, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've been running Mandrake 7.2 on another machine for some time - no > problem, until. I added another 64 MB RAM and tried

Re: >128 MB RAM stability problems (again)

2001-07-05 Thread D. Stimits
Ronald Bultje wrote: > > On 04 Jul 2001 17:29:12 -0400, Chris Siebenmann wrote: > > You write: > > | I'm kind of astounded now, WHY can't linux-2.4.x run on ANY machine in > > | my house with more than 128 MB RAM?!? Can someone please point out to me > > | that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x

bzImage, root device Q

2001-07-20 Thread D. Stimits
=/dev/scd0,iso9660" or "vmlinuz root=/dev/scd0,xfs")? Or is this limited in some way, requiring mount on one or a few known filesystem types ("linux native" subset comes to mind), followed by a chroot or pivot_root style command (which in turn means no direct root mount of some