sunrpc ODEBUG assertion.

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Jones
restarted my nfs server, and mounted it from a Mac, and got this.. [47433.585266] WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb0() [47433.585269] Hardware name: [47433.585273] ODEBUG: assert_init not available (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint:

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode != parent-d_inode);

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:16:09PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Goodie. Your bug reports gave me heartburn. But it sounds like we have an angle on all of the ones you've seen now? Or have I forgotten about some case? To be honest I've lost track of the whole collection. Let me repull

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode != parent-d_inode);

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:36:34PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Note that my tree does not have the pipe changes. Um still not sure about the cause, see the patch with a warn-on-once in it. I don't like just adding the NULL pointer checks willy nilly without understanding why they made...

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode != parent-d_inode);

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:38:33PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com writes: On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:16:09PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Goodie. Your bug reports gave me heartburn. But it sounds like we have an angle on all of the ones you've

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode != parent-d_inode);

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:31:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: I have a feeling there were some sysfs ones that may still be unfixed. I was right.. [ 425.836722] general protection fault: [#1

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode != parent-d_inode);

2013-03-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 12:13:16AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: On 03/08/2013 11:39 PM, Dave Jones wrote: On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:31:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: I have a feeling there were some

Re: ipc/testmsg GPF.

2013-03-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:27:01PM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote: On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 16:38 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: Dave, I thought I copied you on the 'ipc MSG_COPY fixes' patchset that fixes this. Or is this gp fault happening with that patchset? Linus, The fixes should

Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1

2013-03-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: On 2013.03.11 at 18:18 +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: I get hash failures on completed torrents since 3.9.0-rc1 (Linux 3.8 seems to be fine). What happens is that the torrents apparently complete successfully. After

Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1

2013-03-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:13:34PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: Worked fine for me on two separate machines. Could it be a network problem perhaps ? If something is mangling the packet before it hits the disk, that would explain it. What NIC do you use ? I normally use ATL1E,

Re: torrent hash failures since 3.9.0-rc1

2013-03-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:12:27AM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: I've started a full bisection from v3.8 to todays git tree. It will take ~13 steps. However it's already late here in Germany. I will continue the bisection tomorrow and report back. The issue started with:

Re: pipe_release oops.

2013-03-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:30:01AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: Yeah, that does the trick. I changed your other diff a little to use a goto, which reduces a level of indentation.. Hmm. So I've been trying

Re: pipe_release oops.

2013-03-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:43:53PM +, Al Viro wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:31:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: Probably not missing anything subtle. I think all of this code is very old, and related to previous /proc/pid/fd/n escapades. And the semantics for those files

Re: ipc/testmsg GPF.

2013-03-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 03:02:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:03:22 -0400 Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote: On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: { I just hit this again on rc2 which looks like it has the fixes

lockdep trace from kill_fasync (tty) vs account (random)

2013-03-05 Thread Dave Jones
Came home to this on my box that I left fuzz-testing. [56194.899379] == [56194.899529] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [56194.899679] 3.9.0-rc1+ #67 Not tainted [56194.899769]

lockdep trace from prepare_bprm_creds

2013-03-06 Thread Dave Jones
Looks like this happens when my fuzzer tries to look up garbage in /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/ trinity -c execve -V /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/ will reproduce it very quickly. This isn't a new trace. I've seen it in the past from iknowthis also. Dave [ 943.971541]

BUG_ON(nd-inode != parent-d_inode);

2013-03-06 Thread Dave Jones
Fuzz tester just hit this. Dave [11235.974332] [ cut here ] [11235.975039] kernel BUG at fs/namei.c:1441! [11235.975661] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP [11235.976433] Modules linked in: bnep vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vmw_vmci vsock fuse l2tp_ppp l2tp_core

use after free in sysfs_find_dirent

2013-03-06 Thread Dave Jones
general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vmw_vmci vsock bnep fuse rfcomm hidp l2tp_ppp l2tp_core 8021q garp mrp dlci pppoe pppox ppp_generic slhc scsi_transport_iscsi rose caif_socket caif can_raw bridge af_key can_bcm llc2 stp can netrom

sysfs_dir_cache slab corruption

2013-03-06 Thread Dave Jones
And even more sysfs fallout (From a clean boot).. = BUG sysfs_dir_cache (Not tainted): Poison overwritten - Disabling lock debugging due to

Re: use after free in sysfs_find_dirent

2013-03-06 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:02:30PM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:28:54AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vmw_vmci vsock bnep fuse rfcomm hidp l2tp_ppp l2tp_core 8021q

BUG_ON(nd-inode-i_op-follow_link);

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:16:45PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: kernel BUG at fs/namei.c:1441! invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: bnep vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vmw_vmci vsock fuse l2tp_ppp l2tp_core hidp 8021q garp mrp llc2 netrom phonet bridge dlci stp

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode-i_op-follow_link);

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:30:56AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:16:45PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: kernel BUG at fs/namei.c:1441! Ok, that's a seriously bad error case. although I still

ipc/testmsg GPF.

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
Trying to reproduce that nd_jump_link trace, but I keep hitting other bugs instead. It's like whackamole. Except these are even more annoying than moles. general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: rose ax25 phonet lockd sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6

Re: ipc/testmsg GPF.

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Adding Davem to the list, since this looks like networking. That said, I'm also starting to wonder if you're just triggering odd bugs because of some use-after-free corruption of random kernel data structures? Plausible.

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode-i_op-follow_link);

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:33:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: If this is fairly repeatable, I really think it would be interesting to see the names involved. Especially for sysfs, there are a *lot* of random files that have odd semantics, and it depends on the file. Same is (to a

pipe_release oops.

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 05:03:33PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: I seem to have a dim memory of you usually doing your trinity runs with more debugging options, but based on just the oops message you don't have DEBUG_PAGEALLOC enabled, for example. Maybe that and SLUB debugging might

Re: BUG_ON(nd-inode-i_op-follow_link);

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:50:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Yes, I can reproduce this, and I know what's going on. I don't have a patch, though, and I think it's in Al's court on what we should do. Al? Anyway, so the old=fd thing implies that it's one of the symlinks in

fasync_remove_entry oops

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
And.. More fun with pipes. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0080 IP: [811c3c10] fasync_remove_entry+0x30/0xd0 PGD 1225c5067 PUD 11a133067 PMD 0 Oops: [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: rfcomm bnep nfnetlink can_bcm l2tp_ppp

Re: fasync_remove_entry oops

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: And.. More fun with pipes. for (fp = fapp; (fa = *fp) != NULL; fp = fa-fa_next) { 1650: 49 8b 06mov(%r14),%rax

Re: fasync_remove_entry oops

2013-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:54:09PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: And.. More fun with pipes. for (fp = fapp; (fa = *fp) != NULL; fp = fa-fa_next

Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-12 Thread Dave Jones
My Thinkpad T430s suspend/resumes fine most of the time. But every so often (like one in ten times or so), as soon as I suspend, I get a black screen, and a blinking power button. (Note: Not the capslock lights like when we panic, this laptop 'conveniently doesn't have those. This is the light

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add P state driver for Intel Core Processors

2013-02-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 09:02:07AM -0800, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: From: Dirk Brandewie dirk.brande...@gmail.com This driver implements a scaling driver with an internal governor for Intel Core processors. The driver follows the same model as the Transmeta scaling driver

Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:26:22PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: On Tue, 12 Feb 2013, Dave Jones wrote: My Thinkpad T430s suspend/resumes fine most of the time. But every so often (like one in ten times or so), as soon as I suspend, I get a black screen, and a blinking power button

Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:26:22PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: Me too on T420s, except that is blessed with a blinking CapsLk. It's so erratic (though I think I see more failures than you do: I'd say a quick resume never fails, but an overnight resume fails half the time): I'm afraid I

Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:56:55PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: so I can hit this pretty quickly with this.. while [ 1 ]; do rtcwake -s 5 -m no ; pm-suspend done Which should make it bisectable at least.. Thanks, I'll give that a try this evening. So uh, put a

Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:37:27PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: I think for the moment I'm going to hope that under the surface our problems are related, and when your bisection points a finger, look around to see if it suggests anything for my case. Lazy, but... I have the worst luck with

btrfs crash when low on memory.

2013-02-26 Thread Dave Jones
Something I've yet to repeat managed to leak a whole bunch of memory while I was travelling, and locked up my workstation. When I got home, this was the last thing printed out before it locked up (it did make it into the logs thankfully) after a bunch of instances of the oom-killers handywork.

EXT4 corruption on Linus latest tree.

2013-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
Built from a pull around midnight EST last night. (Don't have the git hash, as the source is on the disk that is now inaccessable..) EXT4-fs error (device sdb1): htree_dirblock_to_tree:919: inode #172235804: block 152052301: comm ls: bad entry in directory: rec_len is smaller than minimal -

Re: EXT4 corruption on Linus latest tree.

2013-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 04:55:39PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:43:11AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: Built from a pull around midnight EST last night. (Don't have the git hash, as the source is on the disk that is now inaccessable..) EXT4-fs error (device

Re: EXT4 corruption on Linus latest tree.

2013-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:44:17AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:04:46AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: EXT4-fs error (device sdb1): htree_dirblock_to_tree:919: inode #172235804: block 152052301: comm ls: bad entry in directory: rec_len is smaller than minimal

Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 updates for 3.9

2013-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:49:12PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: Markus, Dave, can you confirm that this fixes your problem? Thanks!! (Sigh, this is a real brown paper bug; I'm embarassed I missed this in my code review.) Building now. Can you confirm that nothing on-disk should be

Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 updates for 3.9

2013-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 02:04:19PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:57:55PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: Building now. Can you confirm that nothing on-disk should be awry ? Or will I need a new fsck to detect what happened ? Well, it's possible that a read from

Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 updates for 3.9

2013-02-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 07:56:25PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: On 2013.02.27 at 13:49 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: Markus, Dave, can you confirm that this fixes your problem? Yes, it fixes the issue. Looks like it's fixed here too. How did this make it through -next without

commit_creds oops

2013-02-28 Thread Dave Jones
Just hit this on Linus' current tree. [ 89.621770] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00c8 [ 89.623111] IP: [810784b0] commit_creds+0x250/0x2f0 [ 89.624062] PGD 122bfd067 PUD 122bfe067 PMD 0 [ 89.624901] Oops: [#1] PREEMPT SMP [

lockdep trace from nfsd

2013-02-28 Thread Dave Jones
[ 39.878535] = [ 39.879670] [ BUG: rpc.nfsd/666 still has locks held! ] [ 39.880871] 3.8.0+ #3 Not tainted [ 39.881858] - [ 39.882850] 2 locks on stack by rpc.nfsd/666: [ 39.883868] #0: held:

Re: [GIT PULL URGENT] ext4 regression fix for 3.9

2013-02-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 03:12:17PM -0500, Linus Torvalds wrote: The following changes since commit 304e220f0879198b1f5309ad6f0be862b4009491: ext4: fix free clusters calculation in bigalloc filesystem (2013-02-22 15:27:52 -0500) are available in the git repository at:

Re: commit_creds oops

2013-02-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:25:40PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote: [ 89.639850] RIP: 0010:[810784b0] [810784b0] commit_creds+0x250/0x2f0 [ 89.658399] Call Trace: [ 89.658822] [812c7d9b] key_change_session_keyring+0xfb/0x140 [ 89.659845]

Re: PROBLEM: __list_del_entry in lib/list_debug.c does not delete the node if the list is corrupted

2013-01-17 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 03:53:11PM +0530, Shankar Brahadeeswaran wrote: Hi, The following is the Bug Report on list_debug.c implementation. [1.] The __list_del_entry implemented in lib/list_debug.c does not delete the node if the list is corrupted [2.] Full description of the

Re: [PATCH] MODSIGN: Add TAINT_NOKEY_MODULE

2013-01-17 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:27:27AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: taint: add explicit flag to show whether lock dep is still OK. Fix up all callers as they were before, with make one change: an unsigned module taints the kernel, but doesn't turn off lockdep. Signed-off-by: Rusty

Remove noisy warning from default_send_IPI_mask_logical

2013-01-18 Thread Dave Jones
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894865 Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c index cce91bf..7434d85 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ void

kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:125!

2013-01-18 Thread Dave Jones
Since 3.7, we've started seeing reports of this BUG_ON in kernel/smpboot.c being hit.. 121 if (kthread_should_park()) { 122 __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); 123 preempt_enable(); 124 if (ht-park td-status

Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 (tty is NULL)

2013-01-18 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:37:44AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: This happened a few times to my test boxes I left running over the holidays.. [ 8419.797533] [ cut here ] [ 8419.798341] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc+0x1de/0x1f0

Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Note that there is only ever one bad commit - since all the commits you test while bisecting are by definition reachable from the previous bad one and both contain the bug, picking a bad commit makes all other previous bad

Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-14 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:56:25AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: My test was a loop of 100 suspend/resume cycles before calling something 'good'. The 'bad' cases all failed within 10 cycles (usually 2-3

Re: Debugging Thinkpad T430s occasional suspend failure.

2013-02-15 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 04:50:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: Dave, one thing that might be worth trying is to disable CONFIG_BUG and see whether the system manages to limp through to get console output? Didn't make any difference. Black screen, blinky power light. Dave -- To

general protection fault in do_msgrcv [3.8]

2013-02-19 Thread Dave Jones
general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Modules linked in: can af_rxrpc binfmt_misc scsi_transport_iscsi ax25 ipt_ULOG decnet nfc appletalk x25 rds ipx p8023 psnap p8022 llc irda crc_ccitt atm lockd sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_conntrack

Re: slab: odd BUG on kzalloc

2013-02-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 01:18:25PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: [ 169.930103] ---[ end trace 4d135f3def21b4bd ]--- The code translates to the following in fs/pipe.c:alloc_pipe_info : pipe = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pipe_inode_info), GFP_KERNEL); if (pipe) {

Re: WARNING: at drivers/ata/libata-core.c:5049 ata_qc_issue+0x1c7/0x3a0()

2013-02-19 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:04:33PM -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote: On 13-02-19 01:37 PM, Tommi Rantala wrote: Hello, Hit this WARNING once while fuzzing the kernel with trinity in a qemu virtual machine as the root user. Does this make any sense? I have occasionally seen some ATA

Re: [GIT PULL] x86/platform changes for v3.9

2013-02-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:15:31AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: My main desktop just had a reboot failure - it just got stuck at the end, not powering down, and not rebooting like it should have.

Re: general protection fault in do_msgrcv [3.8]

2013-02-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23:22PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: Pid: 887, comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #57 Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA78GM-S2H/GA-MA78GM-S2H RIP: 0010:[812aebba] [812aebba] do_msgrcv+0x22a/0x670 ... Looks like Stanislav

odd GPF bug on resume from hibernate.

2013-02-20 Thread Dave Jones
We had two users report hitting a bug that looks like this.. general protection fault: 8800 [#1] SMP PM: Restoring platform NVS memory Modules linked in: fuse ipt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netbios_ns nf_conntrack_broadcast ip6table_mangle ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 iptable_nat

Re: odd GPF bug on resume from hibernate.

2013-02-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 08:42:46PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 02:28:26 PM Dave Jones wrote: We had two users report hitting a bug that looks like this.. general protection fault: 8800 [#1] SMP 0: ca 00 55lret

Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:40:10AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: USB patches for 3.9-rc1 Here's the big USB merge for 3.9-rc1 Nothing major, lots of gadget fixes, and of course, xhci stuff. I get no USB devices recognised when I insert them any more, which I think is pretty major. I suspect

Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:51:10PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: Nothing major, lots of gadget fixes, and of course, xhci stuff. I get no USB devices recognised when I insert them any more, which I think is pretty major. I suspect it has something to do with this ? Lan Tianyu

lockdep trace from sockstat_seq_show

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
Just hit this on Linus' current tree. [ 1789.629729] = [ 1789.629731] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1789.629736] 3.8.0+ #76 Not tainted [ 1789.629738] - [

Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 01:02:11AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: What can I do to debug this ? Can you attach the output of dmesg with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG? http://paste.fedoraproject.org/3620 How aboutsudo lsusb -s 1:1 -v or 2:1? (12:13:51:davej@t430s:~)$ sudo lsusb -s 1:1

Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 01:17:42AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: On 2013/2/23 1:14, Dave Jones wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 01:02:11AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote: What can I do to debug this ? Can you attach the output of dmesg with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG? http

Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:51:58PM +0100, Fabio Baltieri wrote: On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:59:54AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:40:10AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: It looks like every port on my laptop is powered down, as I can't even charge devices with it. I

Re: [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix

2005-08-24 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 09:01:52PM -0700, Linux Kernel wrote: tree c81c261274011d301dfbcfd1a3e13480b93c167e parent ae75784bc576a1af70509c2f3ba2b70bb65a0c58 author Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:04:27 -0700 committer Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 24 Aug 2005

Re: [PATCH] cpu_exclusive sched domains on partial nodes temp fix

2005-08-24 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:13:40PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: I'm still a couple of hours from actually verifying that ppc64 builds with this - due to unrelated confusions on my end. Perhaps you or Mackerras will report in first, to verify if this patch works as advertised. It does build,

Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.

2005-08-26 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 02:03:50PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 20:01 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: Not that we've been able to tell. It is a legacy platform device. So, unfortunately, no probe() routine. dmi surely Patches accepted. A little

Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.

2005-08-26 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:29:15PM -0400, Robert Love wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 20:55 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: I think that should be fixed before its merged. Let me be clear, it has an init routine that effectively probes for the device. It just lacks a simple quick

Re: Incorrect CPU Frequency in /proc/cpuinfo

2005-08-27 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 09:31:48PM -0500, Patrick wrote: There is a problem with the display of CPU Frequency in /proc/cpuinfo. It displays the CPU Frequency correctly... until you change the speed manually with the kernel's frequency scaling. Before I do this, my frequency displayed in

Re: [PATCH] i386, x86_64 Initial PAT implementation

2005-08-30 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: On Llu, 2005-08-29 at 18:20 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: ways. Currently this code only allows for an additional flavor of uncached access to physical memory addresses which should be hard to abuse, and should raise no

Re: agp_backend_initialize() failed on ServerWorks CNB20LE

2005-09-02 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:21:39PM +0200, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: Hello, On a server with ServerWorks CNB20LE and CONFIG_AGP_SWORKS enabled I get these upon bootup: Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones agpgart: unable to determine aperture size. agpgart

Re: x86-cache-pollution-aware-__copy_from_user_ll.patch added to -mm tree

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n) { BUG_ON((long) n 0); Ehh? It's unsigned. This will never be true. +unsigned long +__copy_from_user_ll_nocache(void *to, const

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:13:10PM +0200, Bas Westerbaan wrote: Though 4K stacks are used a lot, they probably aren't used on all configurations yet. Other situations may arise where 8K stacks may be preferred. It is too early to kill 8K stacks imho. Please name situations where

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:41:58PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote: It will never be 'appropriate' if the system doesn't somehow work on Joe's hardware. We currently have something that works. works. As someone who gets to read a lot of bug reports from end-users, this thing is far from perfect

Re: [linux-pm] Re: PowerOP 2/3: Intel Centrino support

2005-08-10 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:58:48PM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote: Minimal PowerOP support for Intel Enhanced Speedstep Centrino notebooks. These systems run at an operating point comprised of a cpu frequency and a core voltage. The voltage could be set from the values recommended in

Re: suspect code in drivers/char/agp/generic.c

2005-08-11 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:06:55PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: I was just looking at agp_copy_info(), which contains this code: 318 if (bridge-mode AGPSTAT_MODE_3_0) 319 info-mode = bridge-mode ~AGP3_RESERVED_MASK; 320 else 321

Re: [PATCH] kernel spams syslog every 10 sec with w1 debug

2005-08-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:38:37PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: Olaf Hering [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bug 104020 - kernel spams syslog every 10 sec with: w1_driver w1_bus_master1: No devices present on the wire. After installing 10.0 B1, I found this in my syslog: Aug 10

Re: [PATCH] Fix mmap_kmem (was: [question] What's the difference between /dev/kmem and /dev/mem)

2005-08-12 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:35:03AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: Found the problem. It is a bug with mmap_kmem. The order of checks is wrong, so here's the patch. Attached is a little program that reads the System map looking for the

Re: obsolete modparam change busted.

2005-08-13 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:01:16PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 14:49 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: However this change was broken, and if the modprobe.conf has trailing whitespace, modules fail to load with the following helpful message.. Hi Dave

IDE CD problems in 2.6.13rc6

2005-08-13 Thread Dave Jones
I've noticed this week whilst trying to encode a bunch of audio CDs to oggs that my boxes running the latest kernels are having serious issues, whereas 2.6.12 seems to cope just fine. The symptoms vary. On some of my machines just inserting an audio CD makes the box instantly lock up. If I boot

Re: obsolete modparam change busted.

2005-08-15 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 02:39:10PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:27 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: We're now munching the end of the boot command line it seems. Wow, if we had testcases in the kernel source, I would not have to keep rewriting them (badly) every time I

Fix up befs compile.

2005-08-20 Thread Dave Jones
-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.12/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c~2005-08-20 15:46:30.0 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.12/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c 2005-08-20 15:47:25.0 -0400 @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ befs_destroy_inodecache(void) * The data stream become link name. Unless

Re: Fix up befs compile.

2005-08-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 08:58:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 03:48:40PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: fs/befs/linuxvfs.c:466: error: conflicting types for 'befs_follow_link' fs/befs/linuxvfs.c:44: error: previous declaration of 'befs_follow_link' was here fs/befs

s390 build fix.

2005-08-20 Thread Dave Jones
{standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:397: Error: symbol `.Litfits' is already defined {standard input}:585: Error: symbol `.Litfits' is already defined Newer gcc's inline this it seems, which blows up. --- linux-2.6.12/arch/s390/kernel/cpcmd.c~ 2005-08-18

Re: s390 build fix.

2005-08-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 06:11:31AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:38:39AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:397: Error: symbol `.Litfits' is already defined {standard input}:585: Error: symbol `.Litfits' is already defined

suspicious behaviour in pcwd driver.

2005-08-22 Thread Dave Jones
it. Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.12/arch/ppc64/kernel/setup.c~ 2005-08-09 17:37:36.0 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.12/arch/ppc64/kernel/setup.c 2005-08-09 17:37:53.0 -0400 @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ void machine_power_off(void) local_irq_disable

Re: skge missing ifdefs.

2005-08-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:38:18PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:34:42PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: with CONFIG_PM undefined, the build breaks due to undefined symbols. akpm already sent a fix to Linus. This is still broken afaics in todays -git

Re: suspicious behaviour in pcwd driver.

2005-08-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:30:06PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: drivers/char/watchdog/pcwd.c does this if it detects a temperature out of range.. if (temp_panic) { printk (KERN_INFO PFX Temperature overheat trip!\n); machine_power_off

Re: skge missing ifdefs.

2005-08-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:23:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:38:18PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 04:34:42PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: with CONFIG_PM undefined, the build breaks due

Re: New maintainer needed for the Linux smb filesystem

2005-08-22 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:46:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since Urban Widmark was not active for some time, and I didn't have any success trying to reach him, it seems we need a new maintainer for the smb filesystem in the Linux kernel.

Re: [patch] suspend: update warnings

2005-08-23 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 06:53:49AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: - CPU Freq (improving too) It might be good to mention these areas too. Well, right; but those 'only' cause system to crash during suspend. I was talking about really dangerous stuff. Both usb and

Re: [patch] raw: don't allow the creation of a raw device with minor number 0

2007-01-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 05:58:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: == Regarding Re: [patch] raw: don't allow the creation of a raw device with minor number 0; Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds: jengelh On Jan 12 2007 11:32, Jeff Moyer wrote: Minor number 0 (under the raw major)

Re: gpu sharing layer for kernel

2007-01-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 02:06:31PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:39:47AM +1100, Dave Airlie wrote: Why do we want this? Currently the kernel cannot provide both the fb and drm drivers with access to the device model and this means the drm cannot get

Re: Support for i386 PATs

2007-01-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:20:18AM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote: Hi! Does anybody have a strong opinion against adding support for i386 Page Attribute Tables? It pops up about once a year, everyone agrees it'd be a good idea, and then nothing happens. Last year, I started picking over

Re: The mbox format archives of linux-kernel are gone.

2007-01-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 12:59:27AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: On Sunday 28 January 2007 8:52 pm, Oleg Verych wrote: On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:17:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:46:32 + Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If somebody will get lkml

Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known regressions with patches

2007-01-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:45:48AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: ACPI: fix cpufreq regression References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/120 Submitter : Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caused-By : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: i965 testers wanted (Re: intel-agp PM experiences)

2007-01-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:21:31PM +0100, Frédéric Riss wrote: Le lundi 29 janvier 2007 à 23:10 +0100, Pavel Machek a écrit : Ok, I guess we'd like some testing here... so that in can be fixed in mainline... I can confirm that this patch is needed for my Intel Mac Mini to

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >