/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165590
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.13/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c~ 2005-09-09 19:24:25.0
-0400
+++ linux-2.6.13/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c 2005-09-09 19:33:18.0
-0400
@@ -94,22 +94,27 @@ static int set_max_cstate(struct
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 06:43:32PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.18.3 release.
There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
us know.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 06:43:37PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After the inode slimming patch that unionised i_pipe/i_bdev/i_cdev, it's
no longer enough to
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 11:24:08AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
The cs5530A will be able to go into active idle (PWRSVE) so its PCI class
revision should be accurately stored.
Already queued in cpufreq.git for .20
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:28:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:03:45 -0800
Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2.6.18-rc7 and later during LTP:
http://test.kernel.org/abat/48393/debug/console.log
The traces are a bit confusing, but I don't actually
Sometimes the soft watchdog fires after we're done oopsing.
See http://projects.info-pull.com/mokb/MOKB-25-11-2006.html for an example.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.18.noarch/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c~ 2006-11-26
01:40:58.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.18.noarch
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 11:11:53PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:00:45 -0500
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:28:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 13:03:45 -0800
Martin J. Bligh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Sometimes the soft watchdog fires after we're done oopsing.
See http://projects.info-pull.com/mokb/MOKB-25-11-2006.html for an example.
The NMI watchdog could also fire, so tickle both watchdogs.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c~ 2006-11-26 01:44
audit_log_start and abort early. (oddly, it looks like every other
function called there checks for !ab.)
Maybe additional code should be added here to printk the audit message
to dmesg so that we don't lose it entirely, but for now, minimal fix.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
diff --git
to check it.
Later we could remove all those same checks from audit_log_format
and friends. For now, this just prevents similar bugs being introduced
as the one in my previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
index 36abf2a
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:46:28AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Hit this in overnight fuzz testing..
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0020
IP: [81103365] audit_log_d_path+0x35/0xf0
PGD 12fded067 PUD 142c06067 PMD 0
Oops: [#1] SMP
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:36:06AM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
Following on from the previous patch that fixed an oops, these
are all the other similar code patterns in the tree with the same
checks added. I never saw
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 11:47:49AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Not certain because I haven't looked at what happens with the error
code, but I think this might not be right. auditd can be explictly
told not to audit certain events, in which case it is normal and
expected that ab would
...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index bd92431..4ada3be 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ int mpol_to_str(char *buffer, int maxlen, struct
mempolicy *pol, int no_context)
break
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:32:49AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
I just realised, the funny thing about this is that the machine running
that test
had selinux/audit disabled. And yet here we are, screwing around with
audit buffers.
The intent was to have this message show up in dmesg
I was chasing a networking bug, and had trinity reduced to just making read
setsockopt calls,
and let that run overnight. I woke up to 800mb of traces from a different bug..
The traces look mostly like this..
=
BUG
It doesn't seem worth adding a new taint flag for this, so just re-use
the one from 'bad page'
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 2fdd96f..0c5009d 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -568,6 +568,8 @@ static void slab_bug(struct kmem_cache *s
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:38:44AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Quoting the entire email, since I added Greg to the list of people (as
the documented maintainer of debugfs) along with what I think are the
guilty parties.
Dave, is trinity perhaps doing read calls on the same file in
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:27:58PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Dave Jones wrote:
It doesn't seem worth adding a new taint flag for this, so just re-use
the one from 'bad page'
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:27:37PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Create a 350 processes reading
/sys/kernel/debug/kvm/spinlocks/histo_blocked
file simultaneously in while loop for more than 3 hours on my box.
You need to open the
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Al? Please look into this. I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but
lockdep complains about this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:43:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Supervisor Mode Access Prevention (SMAP) is a new security feature
disclosed by Intel in revision 014 of the Intel® Architecture
Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Linus tree as of 5fecc9d8f59e765c2a48379dd7c6f5cf88c7d75a
Dave
==
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe - HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
3.5.0+ #122 Not tainted
PWM Support (PWM) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?
CONFIG_PWM:
This enables PWM support through the generic PWM framework.
Well that's.. enlightening. I'm picking on PWM here, but this isn't an
isolated case. Every merge window we see a slew of new options with useless
help texts. They may as well be
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:10:48AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org wrote:
This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
almost always enabled by default. Remove it and adjust various config
logic and
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 03:10:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The kernel summit is over, and most people have either returned or are
returning from San Diego.
Still seeing this, that I started seeing just before leaving for San Diego..
Dave
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 08:54:31PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Linus tree as of 5fecc9d8f59e765c2a48379dd7c6f5cf88c7d75a
Dave
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
include/linux/buffer_head.h:333
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 9894, name: fstest
3 locks held by fstest/9894:
#0: (type-i_mutex_dir_key#4/1){+.+.+.}, at: [811d5dae]
kern_path_create+0x7e/0x140
#1:
This started showing up after todays pull.
==
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe - HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
3.6.0-rc3+ #35 Not tainted
--
trinity-main/5043 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 03:58:56PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
BTW, it turns out I was wrong about Linux being used on Mars.
Apparently Linux was used on the Mars Global Surveyor, as well as the
Sprit and Opportunity rovers
citation? My recollection was that they were running VxWorks.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 07:07:41PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:16:00AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
PWM Support (PWM) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?
CONFIG_PWM:
This enables PWM support through the generic PWM framework.
Well that's.. enlightening
Since 3.5, I've started noticing weird things happening with signal delivery.
Things I've seen so far..
- long running tasks SIGINT, even though I wasn't even anywhere near the
keyboard.
- processes running inside screen/tmux disappearing (and taking the whole
session with them).
And now,
00 00
00 00 00 85 c9 0f 84 08 01 00 00 48 8b 8a
RIP [811a3b16] mpol_to_str+0x156/0x360
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index bd92431..4ada3be 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2562,7 +2562,7 @@ int mpol_to_str
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 05:11:34PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 07/31, Dave Jones wrote:
Since 3.5, I've started noticing weird things happening with signal
delivery.
Things I've seen so far..
- long running tasks SIGINT, even though I wasn't even anywhere near
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:50:46PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
ping?
I'm still seeing this on linux-next.
Likewise, except I'm seeing it in Linus' tree since shortly after this merge
window
began. (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/24/443).
I've spent all of this last week doing multiple
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:12:39AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
I reported this a year ago (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/20/308).
It's still a problem apparently ...
And another two months pass in silence.
This is happening to other people too.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846037
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 02:34:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 17 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc8/2.6.24-rc8-mm1/
- selinux is busted on one of my two selinux-enabled test machines.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks. But, i think we should rather do the following: if X86_PAT
is eanbled then /proc/mtrr should be read-only. There's no problem
_looking_ at MTRR contents, as long as we do
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:47:05AM -0800, Venki Pallipadi wrote:
This exclusion is going to be a real pain in the ass for
distro kernels.
It's impossible for example to build a kernel that will now support
the MTRR-alike registers on the AMD K6/early Cyrix etc and also
support PAT.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you mean modifies MTRRs? Which code is that? (besides the
/proc/mtrr userspace API)
This exclusion is going to be a real pain in the ass for distro
kernels. It's
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 02:34:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 17 of January 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc8/2.6.24-rc8-mm1/
- selinux is busted on one of my two selinux-enabled test machines.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 05:50:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Personally, I keep a copy of Arjan's restrict devmem patch from Fedora
around, so I guess that says which camp I belong in, and the fact it's a
Fedora
patch and not mainstream says something too...)
The way that patch
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:21:03PM +0100, Petr Titěra wrote:
Hello,
is there some reason for printing current voltage and multiplier of
processor after each change? This change was added by commit 553ae38c.
If this required for some reason can be this output changed to use
all the way.
Signed-off-by: Balaji Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Yi Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 04:27:33AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
Gabriel C wrote:
Dave Airlie wrote:
Hi,
When building agp* modular ( CONFIG_AGP=y/m and CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=m )
intel-agp does nothing on my box
( Dell Precision WorkStation 530 MT ) chipset is not being detected.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:00:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
Subject: kbuild: allow -fstack-protector to take effect
to the 2.6.24-stable tree. Its filename is
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:18:08PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:06:04PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:00:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch
titled
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:42:16PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
I thought that thread was for the much larger patches, not just this
Makefile change.
At the least we'll likely want to also pick up the other stack protector
fixes
that went into .25rc if we turn it on in
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 12:03:55AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
You are right without EDAC built , agp modular does work fine. I'm on
2.6.25-rc2-00477-g1a4c6be right now.
So it is an EDAC bug ?
No, it's a failing of the pci driver model. It currently doesn't
allow more
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 08:30:31PM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
What does happen if one builds both into the kernel ? ( eg: all the *_AGP* Y
, and all the *_EDAC* y )
Guessing no one of them will work ?
First one to init wins.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To
The boot_delay switch seems to be behaving strangely in the
current -git. Setting it to =10 makes the output 'bursty'
it becomes slow for some printk's whilst others scroll by
at regular speed.
Setting it any higher than that seems to make it pause for
a really long time before it outputs any
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:31:31PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:25:14 +0100,
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
lspci -vvv:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 02)
Is this a regression, i.e. did you get similar
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:11:17AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Andrew is trying to get s2ram to work on Fedora:
Please try s2ram, there's good chance it will just work.
configure: error: Required libx86 was not found
apt-get install libx86-dev?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
toward at the power management summit several years ago
(hal/pm-utils) then, yes.
I must have been on different summit... I believe it is bad to tie
s2ram to
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:16:11PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2008-02-26 13:10:01, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:54PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
if by 'custom' you mean the solution everyone agreed to work
toward at the power management summit several
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:08:28PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:59:13 -0800 Chris Wright wrote:
* Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Responses should be made by Mon Feb 3 02:30 UTC 2007
Yes, that's Mon Feb 5 (thanks to those on their toes ;-)
And
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
Hello,
I've got a regression in 2.6.20-rc7 (-rc6 was fine) due to commit
4b95320fc4d21b0ff2f8604305dd6c851aff6096 ([AGPGART] intel_agp: restore
graphics device's pci space early in resume).
I think the key to this failure is
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 01:08:46PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:00:16 +0100 Eric Piel wrote:
04.02.2007 18:18, Dave Jones wrote/a écrit:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:51:38PM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
Hello,
I've got a regression in 2.6.20-rc7 (-rc6
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 02:26:59PM -0500, Eric Buddington wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:00:05AM +0100, Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
Eric,
Sorry for the breakage. Can you try the attached patch and see if it
fixes the problem.
/Thomas
Thomas,
Thanks! That seems to fix
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 01:56:22PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 02:26:59PM -0500, Eric Buddington wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:00:05AM +0100, Thomas Hellstr?m wrote:
Eric,
Sorry for the breakage. Can you try the attached patch
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:10:58PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Two things:
a. Can you try a recent/current kernel to see if this happens?
b. The Tainted: GF means that a module was forcibly loaded.
What module was this? and is it compatible with a 2.6.16.38 kernel?
Can you
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:07:50PM +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote:
On 2/5/07, Stefan Seyfried [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:14:31AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 05:24:28PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Wrong. I abandoned all floppy drives some years ago.
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:51:11AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
@@ -26,7 +29,7 @@ config X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
config ELAN_CPUFREQ
tristate AMD Elan SC400 and SC410
select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
-depends on X86_ELAN
+depends on X86_32 X86_ELAN
---help---
This adds
I noticed that the format of the oom-killer output seems to have changed, and
now it spews stuff like..
[49461.758070] lowmem_reserve[]:
[49461.758071] 0
[49461.758071] 2643
[49461.758071] 3878
[49461.758072] 3878
[49461.758072]
[49461.758072] Node 0
[49461.758075] DMA32 free:50432kB
=
BUG kmalloc-32 (Not tainted): Invalid object pointer 0x8801054f6600
-
INFO: Slab 0xea0004153d00 objects=45 used=37
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 01:56:31PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
That single patch doesn't apply cleanly to Linus'
8c84bf4166a4698296342841a549bbee03860ac0
What else is necessary?
Your tree seems to have a collection of random patches.
It might be
[34323.844970] [ cut here ]
[34323.84] kernel BUG at kernel/timer.c:711!
[34323.846110] invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[34323.846657] CPU 6
[34323.846670] Modules linked in:
[34323.853968] ebtables
[34323.866941] xt_cpu
[34323.890355] msdos
[34323.920927]
I just triggered this using my fuzzing tool. To give it some more interesting
things
to chew on, I had first loaded every module I had built. This is why the P and
C flags
are tainted (patch sent to netdev for the 'P' in nci.ko).
(The W flag was a warning from networking about an MAX_ORDER
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:10:12PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
What's puzzling me though is how we got from do_dentry_open to
try_module_get ?
It's the
f-f_op = fops_get(inode-i_fop);
that does
kernel BUG at fs/configfs/dir.c:59!
invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU 4
Modules linked in:
ebtable_nat
nf_tproxy_core
hfsplus
ppp_synctty
async_tx
raid6_pq raid10 shpchp fakephp aer_inject ptp pps_core target_core_file
target_core_iblock target_core_pscsi tcm_loop target_core_mod
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:48:51PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:27 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
I noticed that the format of the oom-killer output seems to have
changed, and
now it spews stuff
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:52:17PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:48:51PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
It looks fine here with the above mentioned patch:
Now that that patch is in Linus tree
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:47:57PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
Also, I have no idea how the hell the 'Modules linked in:' line (9th
line) ended up being printed /after/ the
module listing began (2nd line).
They do not belong together. The second line is just another call to
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:56:06AM +0200, nicolas prochazka wrote:
[ 2384.900061] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
0001002f
That '1' looks like a random bit flip. Try running memtest86.
[ 2384.910010] Pid: 23838, comm: queue.sh Tainted: G D W
This wasn't the
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:53:45PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
I'll add a fix to that WARN_ON in my futex-fixes branch along with the
fix for the bug Dan found.
I think I have root cause. futex_wait_requeue_pi() doesn't like having
uaddr == uaddr2. The handle_early_wakeup()
Linus tree as of 5fecc9d8f59e765c2a48379dd7c6f5cf88c7d75a
Dave
==
[ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe - HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ]
3.5.0+ #122 Not tainted
--
trinity-child2/5327
WARN shouldn't be used as a means of communicating failure to a userspace
programmer.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index ed7b5d1..a745317 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -4136,13 +4136,11
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 08:15:16AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 05:57:29PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
More syscall fuzzing fallout..
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
IP: [812cf3f6] selinux_inode_setxattr+0x196/0x200
PGD
[ 66.104790] WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs600.c:571
rs600_irq_set+0x1e2/0x200()
[ 66.105748] Hardware name: GA-MA78GM-S2H
[ 66.106220] Can't enable IRQ/MSI because no handler is installed
[ 66.106935] Modules linked in:
[ 66.107329] Pid: 43, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 09:55:15AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
We had a user report the soft lockup detector kicked after 22
seconds of no progress, with this trace..
Where is the original report? The reporter may help provide
(Taint comes from previous r600 bug reported here
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/8/131)
[35662.070628] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
(null)
[35662.071719] IP: [814761e5] r100_debugfs_cp_ring_info+0x115/0x140
[35662.072652] PGD b4c17067 PUD b69d1067
This says rc8+, but it's just missing the Makefile change, so it's still there
in 3.7
Curious that firefox was the process mentioned here, as ~/.mozilla isn't on xfs.
My only xfs partition is /data holding a kernel source tree .ccache
Dave
[30557.769727]
When we see reports like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883576
it might be useful to know what modules had been loaded, so they can be compared
with similar reports to see if there is a common suspect.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones da...@redhat.com
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
Looks like we're doing a double-init on a timer.
I had been experimenting with powertop, so that may have triggered something
maybe suspend/resume related ?
(says -rc8, but it's only missing the Makefile change)
[14844.560489] WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:261 debug_print_object+0x8c/0xb0()
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:44:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
I've been able to trigger this for the last week or so.
Unclear whether this is a new bug, or my fuzzer got smarter, but I see the
pi-futex code hasn't changed since the last time it found something..
BUG: unable to
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:37:40AM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
I've sent a patch to address this. It has now been running trinity -c
futex for about 12 hours. I haven't seen any more futex failures
Looks good here too.
but I
have seen a few OOMs. Is that expected from trinity?
Yeah, seems
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:10:41PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
Linus, maybe you missed this. What is the reason telling people
CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should be Y if we actually do otherwise?
commit 281dc5c5ec0fb299514567cbc358562649c1af95
Author: Linus Torvalds
Hugh,
We had a user report hitting the BUG_ON at the end of shmem_evict_inode.
I see in 3.7 you changed this to a WARN instead.
Does the trace below match the one you described chasing in commit
0f3c42f522dc1ad7e27affc0a4aa8c790bce0a66 ?
Full report at
We had a user report the soft lockup detector kicked after 22
seconds of no progress, with this trace..
:BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [flush-8:16:3137]
:Pid: 3137, comm: flush-8:16 Not tainted 3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64 #1
:RIP: 0010:[812eeb8c] [812eeb8c]
(At least I think that's where 'cpu_list_show' comes from...
those preprocessor tricks confuse ctags)
Just started seeing this today..
(fwiw, cpu is a Phenom(tm) 9750)
Dave
WARNING: at kernel/mutex.c:198 mutex_lock_nested+0x39c/0x3b0()
Hardware name: GA-MA78GM-S2H
Modules linked in:
From Linus' tree as of a half hour ago.
echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
[ 67.675171] ==
[ 67.676121] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 67.677084] 3.7.0+ #34 Not tainted
[ 67.677641]
Did a mount from a client (also running Linus current), and the
server spat this out..
[ 6936.306135] [ cut here ]
[ 6936.306154] WARNING: at net/sunrpc/clnt.c:617
rpc_shutdown_client+0x12a/0x1b0 [sunrpc]()
[ 6936.306156] Hardware name:
[ 6936.306157] Modules
This happened to a box I left running fuzz tests over the holidays.
schedule_timeout: wrong timeout value fff0
Pid: 6606, comm: trinity-child1 Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1+ #43
Call Trace:
[81698415] schedule_timeout+0x305/0x340
[8169ae82] ? preempt_schedule+0x42/0x60
This happened a few times to my test boxes I left running over the holidays..
[ 8419.797533] [ cut here ]
[ 8419.798341] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476
flush_to_ldisc+0x1de/0x1f0()
[ 8419.800313] Hardware name: GA-MA78GM-S2H
[ 8419.800887] tty is NULL
[
We've had a increased number of reports in the last six months or so
from Fedora users getting corrupted page tables.
At first I wrote it off to bad hardware, but they started happening frequently
enough that I began to wonder if it was a real problem.
The only common thing I could think of was
Along the same lines as 779302e67835fe9a6b74327e54969ba59cb3478a, xattrs
can cause big allocations, which are likely to fail under memory pressure..
[20539.081122] trinity-child3: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x1040d0
[20539.090405] Pid: 27617, comm: trinity-child3 Not tainted
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 11:01:15AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
[52460.280346] BUG: Bad page map in process panel-6-systray
pte:8800b665a0e8 pmd:b6659067
[52460.280848] addr:0038bf3fd000 vm_flags:0070 anon_vma:
(null) mapping:88011052fd98 index:1fd
I have no idea what happened here, but this is the first time I've seen this
one.
This was running a tree pulled yesterday afternoon.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 880100201000
IP: [81333235] copy_page_rep+0x5/0x10
PGD 1c0c063 PUD cfbff067 PMD cfc01067 PTE
Fuzz-testing fallout from post 3.7 tree as of commit
414a6750e59b0b687034764c464e9ddecac0f7a6
[ 2181.230579] [ cut here ]
[ 2181.231277] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476
flush_to_ldisc+0x1de/0x1f0()
[ 2181.232358] Hardware name: GA-MA78GM-S2H
[ 2181.232925] tty
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 06:05:47PM +, Linux Kernel wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/linus/;a=commit;h=1cc807a234cb988d69ba18f6a3a1c68d71e54bed
Commit: 1cc807a234cb988d69ba18f6a3a1c68d71e54bed
Parent: e151a202a084f9f4310d1aa4398325c56ca95fda
Author: Durgadoss R
801 - 900 of 4526 matches
Mail list logo