Re: Kernel utf-8 handling

2007-06-02 Thread DervishD
Hi Alexander :) * Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: I have a do-it-yourself Linux box, and I'm planning to move to UTF8 (currently I'm using es_ES locale, with latin1 encoding). One of my main concerns (apart from programs with little or no utf8 support, which I will

Re: Kernel utf-8 handling

2007-06-02 Thread DervishD
Hi Alexander :) * Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: The switch is possible. You could try the latest development LFS LiveCD (http://ums.usu.ru/~patrakov/test/lfslivecd-x86-6.3-pre2-r1897.iso) and see if it works for you (be sure to CC: me if you post any feedback). I was

Re: Kernel utf-8 handling

2007-06-02 Thread DervishD
Hi Ken :) * Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:20:58PM +0200, DervishD wrote: Will the console work as it works now if I can live with latin1 accented characters only? Is there any terminal emulator *for the console*, not for X, that handles utf8

Re: Kernel utf-8 handling

2007-06-02 Thread DervishD
Hi Jan :) * Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Jun 1 2007 16:20, DervishD wrote: This said, I know that the console will give me no problems regarding character representantion (heck, I'm pretty sure that I will be able to use even the same font I'm using right now

Re: Kernel utf-8 handling

2007-06-02 Thread DervishD
Hi H. Peter :) * H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Jan Engelhardt wrote: (1) I can do Compose~n just fine on vt (2) I can do ö just fine on vt too (3) And copy+paste them both using GPM too, again w/o probs Both of those are in the 0-255 range, though. I thought the issue

Re: Kernel utf-8 handling

2007-06-02 Thread DervishD
Hi Jan :) * Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Jun 2 2007 09:58, DervishD wrote: * H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Jan Engelhardt wrote: (1) I can do Compose~n just fine on vt (2) I can do ö just fine on vt too (3) And copy+paste them both using GPM too, again

Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Matthieu :) * Matthieu CASTET [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:43:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: OTOH, you also didn't supply a patch. If you do this, I'll be glad to consider it. If I can read it, that is. s|/bin/sh|/bin/bash is so hard to do ? Given that

Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Jan :) * Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Tue, 2007-06-26 12:16:39 +0200, DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that it happens too with ldd, it really *is* that hard. I don't know why still people think that /bin/sh is always /bin/bash. If they want/need bash

Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Arne :) * Arne Georg Gleditsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OTOH, you also didn't supply a patch. If you do this, I'll be glad to consider it. If I can read it, that is. I like bash as much as the next guy, but (to my surprise) /bin/sh on my

Re: NAK (bashizm in the /bin/sh script): [PATCH v3] doc/oops-tracing: add Code: decode info

2007-06-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Randy :) * Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:33:59 +0200 DervishD wrote: * Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Tue, 2007-06-26 12:16:39 +0200, DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Given that it happens too with ldd, it really *is* that hard

Re: Problems with fb console [was Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm2]

2007-06-27 Thread DervishD
Hi J.A. :) * J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: kernel /boot/vmlinuz video=vesafb:mtrr,ywrap vga=0x31A ro root=/dev/sdc1 (tried both with hex and decimal). Try vga=0x031A. I vaguely remember I had a similar problem and IIRC that's how I solved it. Anyway, you can always try

USB card reader and HAL

2007-06-28 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I have a new card reader (internal) but I've tested with my old one too: the same happens. I have a do-it-yourself linux box, self compiled kernel 2.6.19.5 (by now). When I insert a card in the reader, it is not detected, no udev event is generated and I have to do things

Re: USB card reader and HAL

2007-06-29 Thread DervishD
Hi Kay :) * Kay Sievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On 6/28/07, DervishD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I insert a card in the reader, it is not detected, no udev event is generated and I have to do things like hdparm -z /dev/sda to probe the card. Moreover, I have to do the same when

Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1

2007-07-04 Thread DervishD
Hi Karel :) * Karel Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: The package build system is now based on autotools. The build system supports separate CFLAGS and LDFLAGS for suid programs (SUID_CFLAGS, SUID_LDFLAGS). For more details see the README file If you want to have configurable

Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1

2007-07-05 Thread DervishD
Hi Bodo :) * Bodo Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Nix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4 Jul 2007, DervishD stated: Anyway, if you don't like mobs or you just don't want to try it, that's fine, but please don't use autotools, it doesn't make much sense for a linux only project, since

usb-storage nice value

2007-05-17 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I'm using kernel 2.6.19.5. I'm having problems when reading/writing to external USB harddisks: my *internal* harddisk stalls from time to time, so watching a movie while copying data is a PITA (well, if the movie is bad, the leaps help a bit...). I thought about

Re: usb-storage nice value

2007-05-17 Thread DervishD
Hi Alan :) * Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: My system is a bit modest: a 7 years old motheboard with VIA686B, a 1900+ Athlon XP, but with plenty of RAM (1280MB + 1GB swap). I know, if I want more hard disk performance I should buy a new box with SATA or whatever, but the fact

Re: usb-storage nice value

2007-05-18 Thread DervishD
Hi Stefan :) * Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: DervishD wrote: I'm having problems when reading/writing to external USB harddisks: my *internal* harddisk stalls from time to time, so watching a movie while copying data is a PITA (well, if the movie is bad, the leaps help

Re: usb-storage nice value

2007-05-18 Thread DervishD
Hi Jan :) * Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: Try ionice. I didn't know about it, probably I didn't install it the last time I built util-linux. Anyway, I've seen an ionice in Documentation/block/ioprio.txt (which, BTW, I missed when searching for information about my problem).

Re: usb-storage nice value

2007-05-18 Thread DervishD
Hi Heikki :) * Heikki Orsila [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:03:08PM +0200, DervishD wrote: I'm having problems when reading/writing to external USB harddisks: my *internal* harddisk stalls from time to time, so watching a movie while copying data

Re: usb-storage nice value

2007-05-18 Thread DervishD
Hi Jan :) * Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: On May 18 2007 10:21, DervishD wrote: Or try echo 10 /proc/sys/kernel/dirty_ratio Not in my proc :?? Perhaps /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio? Mine is 40, which I think is too high. Linus also thinks it is too high; I do

linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers

2005-03-30 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I'm going to build a new glibc for my system, and I've installed 'linux-libc-headers', but I've noticed that it provides headers for 'scsi/' subdir, and glibc *does that too*. Should I use the scsi headers from llh? Should I instead compiled my new glibc without that headers and

Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers

2005-03-30 Thread DervishD
Hi all and sorry for self-answering: * DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > 'linux-libc-headers', but I've noticed that it provides headers for > 'scsi/' subdir, and glibc *does that too*. Should I use the scsi > headers from llh? Should I instead compiled my ne

Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers

2005-03-30 Thread DervishD
Hi Mariusz :) * Mariusz Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On ?roda 30 marzec 2005 20:10, DervishD wrote: > > Yes, I know, this is in the llh FAQ, but the answer starts with > > 'Not too sure on this one', that's the reason I'm asking here... > Use whatever w

Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers

2005-03-31 Thread DervishD
Hi Mariusz :) * Mariusz Mazur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > I don't know which set of headers will work, and in fact I don't > > know if I must follow 'Linux From Scratch' advice and use raw kernel > > headers for building glibc and LLH headers for any other thing. I > > think I

Re: TFTP design and implimentation

2005-03-31 Thread DervishD
Hi Pavan :) * pavan kishore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > i'm doing project on TFTP n need the practical scenario > of implimentation.assist me in bringing out the best design. In the kernel? Why? There are a couple tftp implementations out there quite good. IIRC, H.Peter Anvin has one.

Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers

2005-03-31 Thread DervishD
Hi Jesper :) * Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > And I don't see any point in LFS suggesting using raw kernel > > > headers to compile glibc > > I don't know their reasons because I haven't read any rationale > > (if any exists at all). Anyway, I've used LLH (including the

Re: find: /usr/src/linux-2.4.30/include/asm: Too many levels of symbolic links

2005-04-07 Thread DervishD
Hi Martin :) * Martin MOKREJ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > again I've hit some wird problem doing "make dep" for 2.4 kernel: Not a kernel problem but a findutils problem. Fixed in 4.2.19, but 4.2.20 was released recently. Upgrade. Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux

Re: How to get the maximum output from dmesg command

2005-02-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Srinivas :) * Srinivas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > How to get maximum output from dmesg command? > I am unable to see all my debug messages after loading my driver. > I think there is a restriction in displaying the dmesg output. > I saw in printk.c file under source directory.

Re: How to get the maximum output from dmesg command

2005-02-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Rogério :) * Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Srinivas G. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I saw in printk.c file under source directory. There I found LOG_BUF_LEN > > is 16384. > Sorry if this is obvious, but have you considered using the -s option of > dmesg? Of course,

Re: hama card reader 19in1 question on USB (not workie)

2005-04-19 Thread DervishD
Hi Grzegorz :) * Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Apr 19 14:03:49 thinkpaddie kernel: Vendor: USB Read Model: CF Card > CF Rev: 1.8D > Apr 19 14:03:49 thinkpaddie kernel: Type: Direct-Access > ANSI SCSI revision: 00 [...] > But no SD card is

Re: halt: init exits/panic

2005-07-09 Thread DervishD
Hi Nico :) * Nico Schottelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > What's the 'correct behaviour' of an init system, if someone wants > to shutdown the system? What I do in my vcinit, the last steps I mean, is: reboot(RB_POWER_OFF); /* If halting*/ or reboot(RB_AUTOBOOT); /* If

Re: fdisk: What do plus signs after "Blocks" mean?

2005-07-12 Thread DervishD
Hi Konstantin :) * Konstantin Kudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Can anyone enlighten me what the pluses mean? It is commented in the README.fdisk file in util-linux distribution: the '+' flag means that the partition has an odd number of sectors. That means that you can waste a sector

Re: fdisk: What do plus signs after "Blocks" mean?

2005-07-13 Thread DervishD
Hi Horst :) * Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a good idea to have a copy of the partition table around, if > > it is not simple (the one you had is NOT simple). > Be careful. What you'll get out of

Re: fdisk: What do plus signs after "Blocks" mean?

2005-07-13 Thread DervishD
Hi Konstantin :) * Konstantin Kudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Actually, it seems like one can backup information on ALL partitions > by using the command "sfdisk -dx /dev/hdX". Supposedly, it reads not > only primary but also extended partitions. "sfdisk -x /dev/hdX" should > be then

Re: fdisk: What do plus signs after "Blocks" mean?

2005-07-14 Thread DervishD
Hi kernel. * kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > First 446 bytes are boot code and all > Next 64 bytes are for 4 partition records, 16 bytes each > Last 2 bytes are signature And that's right, but only for the MBR. If you set up an extended partition in the MBR, the partition table for

IProute2 questions

2005-03-07 Thread DervishD
Hi :)) I want to upgrade my iproute2 package, in my do-it-yourself linux box. I'm currently using iproute2-ss010824. I've gone to the distribution sites and I find a lot of iproute2 flavors... Namely: - 2.2.4 'ss' version - 2.4.7 'now-ss' version - 2.6.10 version -

2.4.29 'make dep' error

2005-03-14 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I don't know if I've had this error previously, I noticed it this morning when recompiling the kernel *I already use*. When doing 'make dep' I had this: make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/kernel' scripts/mkdep -- `find /usr/kernel/include/asm /usr/kernel/include/linux

USB API, ioctl's and libusb

2005-01-26 Thread DervishD
Hi everybody :) I've been solving a USB problem related to a digital photo camera, and I've noticed that 'libusb' uses a ioctl interface to the USB kernel system. In fact it implements 'usb_control_msg()' using ioctl's. On the other hand, the kernel itself (I'm talking about 2.4.29)

Re: USB API, ioctl's and libusb

2005-01-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Oliver :) * Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Am Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2005 13:20 schrieb DervishD: > >     My question is: which interface should be used by user space > > applications, or ioctl's? Is the ioctl interface > > deprecated in any way

Re: [Linux-usb-users] Re: USB API, ioctl's and libusb

2005-01-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Alan :) * Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > BTW, and judging from the program I've read, there are lots of > > operations that must be done using 'usb_control_msg', and libusb > > implements that function with exactly the same interface as the > > kernel. The only difference is

Re: USB API, ioctl's and libusb

2005-01-27 Thread DervishD
Hi Johannes :) * Johannes Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005, DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > You are supposed to use libusb. > > That's irrelevant, the progr

Re: USB API, ioctl's and libusb

2005-01-28 Thread DervishD
Hi Johannes :) * Johannes Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005, DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Didn't knew about that... Thanks a lot for the info!. Is there > > any documentation available for the ioctl USB interface to th

Re: My System doesn't use swap!

2005-02-01 Thread DervishD
Hi Bill :) * Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > >Swap is orders of magnitude slower than RAM. Why put things there if you > >still have RAM left? The kernel only puts things in swap when it has no > >more RAM _and_ has already deleted big chunks of its disk cache. > Unless he just

Re: Huge unreliability - does Linux have something to do with it?

2005-02-04 Thread DervishD
Hi Jerome :) * jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > [Sorry for the sensational title] It catched my attention ;))) > I halted the machine correctly yesterday night. I never dropped the > box in 3 years. Am I just being unlucky? Or could the fact that I am > using Linux on the

Voodoo 3 2000 framebuffer problem

2005-03-21 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) Linux Kernel 2.4.29, in a do-it-yourself linux box, equipped with an AGP Voodoo 3 2000 card, tdfx framebuffer support. I boot in vga mode 0x0f05, with parameter 'video=tdfx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and I get (correctly) 100x37 character grid. All of that is correct. What is not

Re: Voodoo 3 2000 framebuffer problem

2005-03-22 Thread DervishD
Hi David :) * David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Mar 22 at 08:51:16, DervishD wrote: > > Linux Kernel 2.4.29, in a do-it-yourself linux box, equipped with > > an AGP Voodoo 3 2000 card, tdfx framebuffer support. I boot in vga > > mode 0x0f05, with p

Re: Voodoo 3 2000 framebuffer problem

2005-03-22 Thread DervishD
Hi Bodo :) * Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > Linux Kernel 2.4.29, in a do-it-yourself linux box, equipped with > > an AGP Voodoo 3 2000 card, tdfx framebuffer support. I boot in vga > > mode 0x0f05, with parameter 'video=tdfx:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and I get > > (correctly) 100x37

Re: Problem with usb-storage and /dev/sd?

2005-08-10 Thread DervishD
Hi Tomasz :) * Tomasz Torcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:22:43PM +0200, DervishD wrote: > > The problem is that if I plug my USB memory, unplug it and plug > > my MP3 player, it gets /dev/sdb this time, not /dev/sda. The mess is > >

Re: Problem with usb-storage and /dev/sd?

2005-08-11 Thread DervishD
Hi Pete :) * Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:22:43 +0200, DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not using hotplug currently so... how can I make the USB > > subsystem to assign always the same /dev/sd? entry to my U

Re: Problem with usb-storage and /dev/sd?

2005-08-11 Thread DervishD
Hi Greg :) * Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:06:16AM +0200, DervishD wrote: > > * Tomasz Torcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > That's what udev is for. > > I know, but I use a 2.4.x kernel (which I didn't mention

Re: Problem with usb-storage and /dev/sd?

2005-08-12 Thread DervishD
Hi Pete :) * Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > Which label will a random USB stick have? > GUID, I presume. Ask Andries Brouwer, he hacked on that, IIRC. > Actually msdos has on-disk format for user-settable labels in > the way analoguous to tune2fs -L label. I just do not know if

Re: Problem with usb-storage and /dev/sd?

2005-08-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Pete :) * Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > A global unique ID won't work out to make all USB mass storage devices > > appear under a common mountpoint, especially if it is recreated while > > "formating" it. > That is correct, but not what Dervish wanted. He wanted to mount

Re: Problem with usb-storage and /dev/sd?

2005-08-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Willy :) * Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > That's not possible. sd_mod will assign different devices for > > different USB gadgets, and that's my problem in the first case!. If I > > plug my USB-whatever, it gets assigned /dev/sda1 (for the first > > partition, I mean).

Re: USB debouncing?

2005-07-20 Thread DervishD
Hi Pete :) * Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:24:25 +0200, DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a new MP3 player, and when I disconnect it from the USB > > port, my logs says: > > > > <30>

USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12

2005-09-01 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I don't know if this is a known issue, but usb-storage speed for 'Full speed' devices dropped from 2.6.11.12 (more than 800Kb/s) to 2.6.12 (less than 250Kb/s). The problem still exists in 2.6.13. The lack of speed seems to affect only the OHCI driver. My test was done over

Re: USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12

2005-09-01 Thread DervishD
Salut Brice :) * Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Le 01.09.2005 13:36, DervishD a écrit : > > The lack of speed seems to affect only the OHCI driver. My test > > was done over a PCI USB 2.0 card, ALi chipset, OHCI driver (well > > EHCI+OHCI) and using

[SOLVED] USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12

2005-09-01 Thread DervishD
Hi Brice, again :) * Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Are you mounting this storage with vfat and 'sync' option ? > IIRC, sync support for vfat was added around 2.6.12, making > write way slower since it's now really synchron. That seems to be the problem. Mounting without

Re: [SOLVED] USB Storage speed regression since 2.6.12

2005-09-01 Thread DervishD
Hi Mark :) * Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > >the new implementation seems to rewrite the fat on every single > >write (that's the reason of the slowdown, probably), and since I'm > >not sure about the quality of the flash memory present in the > >device, it is very probable that it

[KBUILD] I don't want initramfs in 2.6.19.1 but usr/ is still processed

2007-01-03 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I've noticed that, even if I say NO to initramfs (and even ramdisk support), the make process wants to GEN usr/initramfs_data.cpio.gz by running the scripts/gen_initramfs_list.sh script. Why is that script run no matter the initramfs support? Looks like it only depends on

Re: single bit errors on files stored on USB-HDDs via USB2/usb_storage

2006-12-07 Thread DervishD
Hi Matthias :) * Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > My averate file size is about 1GB with files from about 400MB to > 5000MB I estimate the average error-rate at about one damaged file in > about 10GB of data. > > I'm not sure and haven't checked if the files are wrongly

Re: single bit errors on files stored on USB-HDDs via USB2/usb_storage

2006-12-08 Thread DervishD
Hi Matthias :) * Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > * Matthias Schniedermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > >>Today i copied a few files back and checked them against the stored > >>MD5 sums and 5 files of 86 (each about 700 MB) had errors. So i > >>copied the 5

Re: [TESTED] tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-03-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) NEW INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROBLEM * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > > > With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is > > > > unusable. The

tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-02-26 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines, just like sync was lost. The display can be repaired by switching to

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-02-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot > > test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negati

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-02-26 Thread DervishD
Hi James :) * James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot > > test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative > > offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines, > > just

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-02-26 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > > Try fbset -a -vyres 600 first and let us know of the result. > > > > After doing this, I no longer can garble the display (before, just a &

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-02-28 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 21:32 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > Probably setting it back to 4096 will make the problem reappear. > > Right now I cannot test, but I'll make some experiments. > > Can yo

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-03-01 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen corruption. With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is unusable. The time to scroll 30 lines is about a minute or so (probably more, I just measured

udev rule makes the system hang: revisited

2007-03-01 Thread DervishD
Hi all :)) I'm CC'ing this message to LKML because I don't know if this is some weird (and known) interaction between modules. I'm using vanilla 2.6.19.5. I was having a problem using this rule: ACTION=="add", ENV{MODALIAS}=="?*", RUN+="/sbin/modprobe $env{MODALIAS}" and I

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-03-05 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen > > > corruption.

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-03-06 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > > > * An

Re: tdfx framebuffer garbles display in 2.6.19.5

2007-03-07 Thread DervishD
Hi Antonino :) * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote: > > > > If you want me to test other patches, just tell :) > > > > > > Can you change the mdelay to udelay and use higher/lower d

Re: introducing conditional submenus in the config process?

2007-02-10 Thread DervishD
Hi Robert :) * Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > i brought this up a while back but nothing was finalized -- is there > sufficient value in being able to select or deselect entire submenus > of features without having to descend into that submenu first? Not that my

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-13 Thread DervishD
Hi Kevin :) > >I was wondering: is there any reason not to use ext2 on an USB > >pendrive? Really my question is not only about USB pendrives, but any > >device whose storage is flash based. Let's assume that the device > >has a > >good quality flash memory with wear leveling and the

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-13 Thread DervishD
Hi Bernd :) * Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > All of the posts fail to address the question here: what is the > > correct file system, or does one exist yet, for wear leveling flash > > storage. JFFS2 and logfs are nice for MTD, but

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-13 Thread DervishD
* Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Monday 11 June 2007 19:42, DervishD wrote: > > I know about cheap pendrives that you cannot format even with FAT32, only > > with FAT16. > > I'm not sure if the price was the reason that they failed with differen

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-13 Thread DervishD
Hi Philipp :)) * Ph. Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > I was just wondering if, apart from the excessive wear, there were > > other reasons. One of the reasons I would like to use a good filesystem > > for a pendrive is to be able to store file metadata (UID, GID, mode, > > etc.)

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Jan :) * Jan Knutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Wednesday 13 June 2007 16:48, DervishD wrote: > > But anyway the memory should last long. Even cheap flash memories > > with poor wear leveling (if any at all) usually long last. Given > > that I won't be

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Jörn :) * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > So let us look at the problems and how they interact with filesystems. > > 1. Write overhead > > If a filesystem only writes a small amount of data, typically 512 or > 4096 bytes, smartmedia has to erase and write a full block. Most >

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Jörn :) * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Any method I can imagine to offer good wear leveling will result in > either a filesystem or at least a simplified one-file-system with the > only file being the "block device" exported outward. So naturally my > answer to the problem is

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-14 Thread DervishD
Hi Jörn :) * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Thu, 14 June 2007 19:19:53 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > > Cool, does it mean we have the first Linux filesystem supporting > > compression, which can be used on USB-sticks (I don't count old > > ext2+compression patches)? :) >

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-15 Thread DervishD
Hi Jörn :) * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Thu, 14 June 2007 22:17:14 +0200, DervishD wrote: > > * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > > 2. Wear leveling > > > > > > Wear leveling happens implicitly by picking a differ

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-15 Thread DervishD
Hi Jörn :) * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Thu, 14 June 2007 22:20:47 +0200, DervishD wrote: > > I'm with you in that. So stop emailing and go working on it XD > > :) No. Seriously. Go! XDD > > Now seriously, I will take a look

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-15 Thread DervishD
Hi Jörn :) * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Fri, 15 June 2007 00:46:46 +0200, DervishD wrote: > > When do you think it will be included mainstream? > > I am horrible at predictions, doubly so when concerning the future. > > Several people believ

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-18 Thread DervishD
Hi Jörn :) * Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Fri, 15 June 2007 18:22:53 +0200, DervishD wrote: > > A pity that my digital camera won't want to use LogFS :(( > > That's quite ok, actually. FAT is perfect for digital cameras. All the > unix file permi

Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-22 Thread DervishD
Hi Ogawa :) * OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > A mount option to force walking the FAT and getting the real > > info could be interesting. That way, it will be only done for > > certain devices (small disks,

Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-22 Thread DervishD
Hi Ogawa (and Andrew) :) * OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there some way in which we can work out what's happened and fix > > it up? > > It seems that the recent Windows changed specification, and it's > undocumented. Windows

Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-22 Thread DervishD
Hi Ogawa :) * OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The problem is that if a program writes a file onto the filesystem > > without using statfs first to check for free space, the free_clusters > > entry won't h

Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-22 Thread DervishD
Hi Bodo :) * Bodo Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > >>> So the last free sector count is also stored. When mounting this > >>> filesystem you don't need to walk through the whole FAT to

Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-23 Thread DervishD
Hi Ogawa :) * OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It would add the limitation to following simple usage, > >> > >># mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /mnt > >> # cp -a * /mnt > >

Re: "menu" versus "menuconfig" -- they're *both* a bad idea

2007-04-12 Thread DervishD
Hi Carlo :) * Carlo Florendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > (in short, if i, the builder, explicitly choose *not* to add a > >certain feature to my build, i think i have every right to expect that > >some other part of my configuration isn't quietly going to put

Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-19 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I have a portable device with a FAT32 formatted hard disk in it, and everytime I delete a file in the device *using the device itself to do it* the device increases its count of free space and if I plug the device in a Windows system, Windows agrees on the free space. Linux

Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-19 Thread DervishD
Hi Juergen :) * Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Thursday 19 April 2007 10:57, DervishD wrote: > > I have a portable device with a FAT32 formatted hard disk in it, and > > everytime I delete a file in the device *using the device itself to > > do i

Re: Wrong free clusters count on FAT32

2007-04-19 Thread DervishD
Hi Boaz :) * Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > Apart from not using the device itself to delete files (and probably > > not using Windows for that, either) and to run fsck.vfat now and > > then, is anything I can do to avoid this problem? > > > Not that I know how to fix it. But

radeonfb problem in 2.6.19.5

2007-06-10 Thread DervishD
Hi all :)) If I enable CONFIG_FB + CONFIG_FB_RADEON + CONFIG_DRM + CONFIG_DRM_RADEON, my system hangs badly as soon as I start X Window System (namely X.Org 7.2, although it happens in older versions too). I'm not completely sure about the hanging: the system may not be hung, but I

ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-11 Thread DervishD
Hi all :) I was wondering: is there any reason not to use ext2 on an USB pendrive? Really my question is not only about USB pendrives, but any device whose storage is flash based. Let's assume that the device has a good quality flash memory with wear leveling and the like... Thanks a

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-11 Thread DervishD
Hi Eduard :) * Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > >I was wondering: is there any reason not to use ext2 on an USB > >pendrive? Really my question is not only about USB pendrives, but any > >device whose storage is flash based. Let's assume that the device has > >a good

Re: ext2 on flash memory

2007-06-11 Thread DervishD
Hi Alan :) * alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, DervishD wrote: > > I was wondering: is there any reason not to use ext2 on an USB > >pendrive? Really my question is not only about USB pendrives, but any > >device whose storage i

Re: usb-storage nice value

2007-05-18 Thread DervishD
Hi Stefan :) * Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > DervishD wrote: > > I'm having problems when reading/writing to external USB harddisks: > > my *internal* harddisk stalls from time to time, so watching a movie > > while copying data is a PITA

<    1   2   3   >