Freitag, 16. März 2007 wrote Mike Galbraith:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
when trying to access /dev/ttyUSB0, which is a port on a dual port
usb-serial cable (mos7720 based) an kernel OOPS happens
the driver loads ok, first access via minicom - OOPS
(config.gz attached)
Mar 6 11:21:49 emerald Unable to handle kernel paging request at
81093d0e3668 RIP:
Mar 6
Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. März 2007 11:33 schrieb Dirk Schoebel:
when trying to access /dev/ttyUSB0, which is a port on a dual port
usb-serial cable (mos7720 based) an kernel OOPS happens
the driver loads ok, first access via minicom - OOPS
Please apply:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org
new trace
(if i should activate some kernel debugging optioons just mention it)
Mar 6 16:28:02 emerald usbcore: registered new interface driver moschip7720
Mar 6 16:28:12 emerald Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0070 RIP:
Mar 6 16:28:12 emerald
[881895fb]
...btw...
another usb serial adapter (single port ftdi) works well, no OOPSes
so.. maybe the error is less to search within usb-serial itself but more the
interaction or the driver itself...
Dirk.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
I don't really understand the reasons for all those discussions.
As long as you have a maintainer, why don't you just put swap prefetch into
the kernel, marked experimental, default deactivated so anyone who just
make[s] oldconfig (or defaultconfig) won't get it. If anyone finds a good
solution
...sorry for the reply to myself.
As Gentoo user i'm happy about the freedom of choice in almost every aspect of
the system.
But with the kernel this freedom is taken away and i'm left with largely
choices other people did. Sure, i can get the sources and patch and change
the kernel myself in
Up till now i haven't read the interview with Linus.
[2] http://www.oneopensource.it/interview-linus-torvalds/
It is interesting, he mentiones a lesson to learn from Microsoft:
'Well, historically, the most important lesson from Microsoft - and one they
themselves seem to have forgotten - is
Freitag, 16. März 2007 wrote Mike Galbraith:
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 08:13 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:34, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:40 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > Here are full patches for rsdl 0.31 for various base kernels. A full
>
when trying to access /dev/ttyUSB0, which is a port on a dual port
usb-serial cable (mos7720 based) an kernel OOPS happens
the driver loads ok, first access via minicom -> OOPS
(config.gz attached)
Mar 6 11:21:49 emerald Unable to handle kernel paging request at
81093d0e3668 RIP:
Mar 6
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 6. März 2007 11:33 schrieb Dirk Schoebel:
>> when trying to access /dev/ttyUSB0, which is a port on a dual port
>> usb-serial cable (mos7720 based) an kernel OOPS happens
>> the driver loads ok, first access via minicom -> OOPS
new trace
(if i should activate some kernel debugging optioons just mention it)
Mar 6 16:28:02 emerald usbcore: registered new interface driver moschip7720
Mar 6 16:28:12 emerald Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0070 RIP:
Mar 6 16:28:12 emerald
[]
...btw...
another usb serial adapter (single port ftdi) works well, no OOPSes
so.. maybe the error is less to search within usb-serial itself but more the
interaction or the driver itself...
Dirk.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
I don't really understand the reasons for all those discussions.
As long as you have a maintainer, why don't you just put swap prefetch into
the kernel, marked experimental, default deactivated so anyone who just
make[s] oldconfig (or defaultconfig) won't get it. If anyone finds a good
solution
...sorry for the reply to myself.
As Gentoo user i'm happy about the freedom of choice in almost every aspect of
the system.
But with the kernel this freedom is taken away and i'm left with largely
choices other people did. Sure, i can get the sources and patch and change
the kernel myself in
Up till now i haven't read the interview with Linus.
> [2] http://www.oneopensource.it/interview-linus-torvalds/
>
It is interesting, he mentiones a lesson to learn from Microsoft:
"'Well, historically, the most important lesson from Microsoft - and one they
themselves seem to have forgotten -
16 matches
Mail list logo
