On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus, please pull the latest x86 git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git
This contains 3 x86/hrtimer/hpet/ACPI fixes from Thomas: the ACPI fix
has been ACK-ed by Venki. Build and boot
Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
is..., rt12 for 2.6.23.9!, argh! :-) and wanted to compare with 2.6.22.x
and the latest I
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 17:02 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... any hope of an updated realtime patch for 2.6.22.14? I'm
having problems with 2.6.23.1 + rt11 (I spent the morning rediffing
agains 2.6.23.9 and just _now_ pressed reload in my browser and there it
is..., rt12
I'll try rt12...
Same problems in rt12, getting lots of delay of xxx usecs exceeds
estimated spare time of ; restart in jackd (on my T61 Lenovo laptop
running fc7). Does not happen with 2.6.22.10 + rt9. This is both with
the internal snd-hda-intel card and a pcmcia rme hdsp multiface.
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 19:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo, I was about to post about timer problems in 2.6.23.9+rt12 when I
saw this. Would this be related / should I test / will this solve
everything? :-)
What I'm seeing is jack
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it doesn't still getting delay and xrun messages galore.
Attached: configuration and dmesg output booting with idle=poll,
reconfirmed that that makes the delay and xrun
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
I confirmed) that the latest rt kernel I released has broken suspend
(tested on fc6 fc7, stock Fedora kernel works fine - the rt
configuration files are virtual clones as far as possible of the
standard Fedora kernel config
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from some of my Planet CCRMA users (which
I confirmed) that the latest
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 12:55 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:42 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:15 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 17:12 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... I'm getting reports from
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:42 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Linus, Christoph,
recent slub commits in -git cause this bootup crash:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 324k freed
Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1294k
Just curious, are the crashes even possible in 2.6.22.1? (I see the
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
does -rt6 work better?
Hmmm, -rt6 seems to be gone... was about to download it and it
dissapeared.
-- Fernando
-
To unsubscribe
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I was too quick, but `make all` on is failing here:
does -rt6 work better?
Hmmm, -rt6 seems to be gone
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:05 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 12:34 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:39 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rui Nuno Capela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 22:34 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apparently you caught that 3 seconds window where the .23-rc1-rt1
release script moved old patches into the older/ directory :-)
Yup, good timing... :-) Hard to do again...
(BTW
Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
-- Fernando
Forwarded Message
From: Matt Barber
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PlanetCCRMA] atl1 driver; sleeping function
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:09:58 -0400
Hello,
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo, I'm forwading this report from a Planet CCRMA user, this is
happening to him with 2.6.21.6-rt21...
thanks!
Thanks for the patch!
Looks like it fixed the problem Matt
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:33, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
--On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 14:32:02 -0500 Dmitry Torokhov [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 7/13/05, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:10 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So we should aim for a HZ value
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
And I'm incredibly frustrated by this insistence on hard data when it's
completely obvious to anyone who knows the first thing about MIDI that
HZ=250 will fail in situations where HZ=1000 succeeds.
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 05:46, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
And I'm incredibly frustrated by this insistence on hard data when it's
completely obvious to anyone who knows the first
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 15:15, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Wednesday 06 Jul 2005 22:02, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Alistair John Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a completely unrelated question, but now we've got everything
under control.. how do I make quiet actually do something
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a build error for 2.6.13-rc7-rt4 with PREEMPT_DESKTOP for
i386:
hm, cannot reproduce this build problem on my current tree - could you
try 2.6.13-rt1? (and please send
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:45, Lee Revell wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:15 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a build error for 2.6.13-rc7-rt4 with PREEMPT_DESKTOP
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 22:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting a build error for 2.6.13-rc7-rt4 with PREEMPT_DESKTOP for
i386
Hi, I'm starting to look at a strange problem. The configuration is:
hardware: AMD X2 4400+ dual core, NForce3 chipset, Midiman 66 soundcard
software: 2.6.13 smp + patch-2.6.13-rt1, PREEMPT_DESKTOP
jack 0.100.4, current cvs
alsa 1.0.10rc1
This is the sequence of events. Start
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:39, Lee Revell wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:03 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi, I'm starting to look at a strange problem. The configuration is:
hardware: AMD X2 4400+ dual core, NForce3 chipset, Midiman 66 soundcard
software: 2.6.13 smp + patch-2.6.13
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 00:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do a tar cvf usr.tar /usr just to read/write a lot to disk (this
within the same SATA disk). Watch memory being used in a system
monitor applet up to 100%. After a while, hard to say how
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 10:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
Raymond Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I remember there's a kernel pcmcia bug preventing the development for
the Audigy2 pcmcia notebook sound card driver.
See
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:11 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i have released the 2.6.19-rt6 tree, which can be downloaded from the
usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
more info about the -rt patchset can be found on the RT wiki:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
this is a
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:07 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 21:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much better performance in terms of xruns with Jackd. Hardly any at
all as it should be. I'm starting to test -rt8
(testing -rt8 but just in case)
I got this overnight, found the machine catatonic this morning, machine
is an Athlon X2 4400 running FC6 x86_64 booting into a rebuilt
2.6.19-rc6-rt7 rpm package based on Ingo's packages (same .config except
for 4KSTACKS=off). I'm including a dmesg after the reboot
Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
using jackd and jack clients. This is a sample from the output of
qjackctl / jackd (jack 0.102.25, qjackctl 0.2.21):
alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 0.034 msecs
11:38:03.681 XRUN callback (154).
delay of 18710.000 usecs
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
using jackd and jack clients. This is a sample from the output of
qjackctl / jackd (jack 0.102.25, qjackctl 0.2.21
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:37 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch and getting alsa xruns when
using jackd and jack clients. This is a sample
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a normal non-root user was left logged in and was running jackd with
realtime privileges, irqs' priority reordered with the rtirq script -
I was getting, and still are under -rt8
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:04 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:37 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm trying out the latest -rt patch
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:35 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:04 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 12:37 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:09 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:43 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(japa-4096 |#0): new 17 us maximum-latency wakeup.
( beagled-3412 |#1): new 19 us maximum-latency wakeup.
( IRQ 18-1081 |#1): new 26 us maximum
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 20:51 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, can you see the xruns/latencies with latencytest too? (That one
might be easier to reproduce for me.)
I can do that. Is this the old latency test script?
(http://www.gardena.net/benno
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 20:51 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, i reproduced something similar on one of my boxes and it turned
out to be a tracer bug. I've uploaded -rt10, could you try it? (The
xruns will likely remain, but at least
Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled, a
jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting some
(hopefully) meaningful data.
I'm running a script that samples /etc/latency_trace every second and
logs the maximums to a file.
First attachment:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled,
a jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting
some (hopefully) meaningful data.
ok. I'm
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could you try the patch below? It changes trace entries to be measured
via get_cycles() again [which should be must faster than pmtimer on your
CPU], but keeps the latency tracing
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 10:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... back to testing.
History:
2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio
On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 10:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 20:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, it doesn't still getting delay and xrun messages galore
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 05:46 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo... back to testing.
History:
2.6.23.x + rt has not been very usable for audio applications.
2.6.24-rt1: same so far.
Why: Jack keeps printing
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c: In function 'nfc_llcp_register_device':
net/nfc/llcp/llcp.c:1185:24: error: expected
On 11/15/2012 10:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 11/12/2012 01:28 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT Folks,
I'm pleased to announce the 3.6.6-rt17 release. 3.6.6-rt16 is just a
not announced update release to 3.6.6.
Got this:
net
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 15:10 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, July 4, 2007 21:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the v2.6.21.5-rt19 kernel on behalf of Ingo.
It can be downloaded from the usual place:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/
More
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes since 2.6.21.5-rt18:
- Fixed a nasty and hard to track down slowness / boot problem on SMP
machines with CONFIG_NOHZ enabled. The problem was caused by the timer
On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 15:36 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes since 2.6.21.5-rt18:
- Fixed a nasty and hard to track down slowness / boot problem on SMP
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:22 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
we are pleased to announce the v2.6.22.1-rt3 kernel
Attention!
Ingo is off for a long weekend and therefor the download location for
this release is:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/preempt-rt/2.6.22.1
more info about the -rt
Hi Ingo, I'm seeing this on 2.6.21.5-rt14 and 2.6.21.5-rt15, this
problem did not happen in 2.6.21.3-rt9 (last I checked on this
hardware). The computer is an athlon x2 and eth0 is alias eth0 skge,
the BUGs trigger on network activity (but not a constant stream of
them)...
BUG: scheduling with
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 17:20 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hi Ingo, I'm seeing this on 2.6.21.5-rt14 and 2.6.21.5-rt15, this
problem did not happen in 2.6.21.3-rt9 (last I checked on this
hardware). The computer is an athlon x2 and eth0 is alias eth0 skge,
the BUGs trigger on network
Hi Ingo, this is happening in a brand new laptop, a Lenovo t61 with a
7700 processor and the Santa Rosa chipset.
Lukewarm IQ detected in hotplug locking
BUG: at kernel/cpu.c:44 lock_cpu_hotplug()
[c0405f88] dump_trace+0x64/0x105
[c0406041] show_trace_log_lvl+0x18/0x2c
[c040664e]
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 21:24 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo, this is happening in a brand new laptop, a Lenovo t61 with a
7700 processor and the Santa Rosa chipset.
Lukewarm IQ detected in hotplug locking
BUG: at kernel/cpu.c:44
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
stock fedora 7 kernel - and both seem
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang as
reported by one of my Planet CCRMA users - flash 9 tested working on
stock fedora 7 kernel - and both seem
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 21:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do get flash 9 (I know, not the best example) and tomboy to hang
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:18 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does lockdep pinpoint anything?
Lots of stuff, and at the end the lock report for the problem.
Hopefully some of this will help... I have attached the whole bootup
sequence
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.9-rt5 patch set.
Thanks!,
Changes since v3.10.9-rt4
- swait fixes from Steven. It fixed the issues with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU
where the system suddenly froze and RCU wasn't doing its
On 08/23/2013 12:08 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/23/2013 07:50 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 08/22/2013 11:21 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
- hwlat improvements by Steven
Known issues:
...
Trying to build I get (in make modules):
ERROR: __udivdi3 [drivers/misc
On 08/23/2013 10:56 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2013-08-23 10:18:08 [-0700]:
Please post a patch when/if you have it so I can retry the build...
Thanks for taking a look at this!
Does this fix your trobule?
Yes, it does, thanks! Builds, installs
On 08/16/2013 12:01 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 08/15/2013 09:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:42:55 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says
On 08/19/2013 05:29 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:23:44 -0700
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote:
The problem is that bcache is using new semaphore functions which it
just introduced which rt does not know about. The comment above their
definition says
On 08/12/2013 09:34 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.10.6-rt3 patch set.
I'm getting this when trying to build:
drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function 'cached_dev_write_complete':
drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1008:2: error: implicit
Hi all,
Just got this on 3.10.20-rt17, ThinkPad T510 running Fedora 19 (I think
it has happened a few times before). The machine is not completely dead,
the mouse pointer moves around but otherwise display updates and
keyboard response are nil.
-- Fernando
Nov 29 23:17:52
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[810dc60a] [810dc60a]
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca/0x330
Can you decode the exact location inside of smp_call_function_many via
addr2line please
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
[771508.546449] RIP: 0010:[810dc60a] [810dc60a]
smp_call_function_many+0x2ca
On 02/14/2014 02:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 03:55 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 02/13/2014 02:25 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Hi all,
I'm seeing these BUGs with 3.12.9-rt13 finally caught the messages.
I was getting frozen machines with no traces left behind, this could
possibly be it (see below - I have to retest with rt15)
-- Fernando
[771508.546420] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#5 stuck for 23s!
On 05/02/2014 04:37 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Fernando Lopez-Lezcano | 2014-04-26 11:29:04 [-0700]:
Saw this a moment ago (3.14.1 + rt1, Fedora 19 laptop - I think I
have seen something similar in 3.12.x-r):
Yes, you did: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/163
You did not test I've
On 04/11/2014 11:57 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v3.14-rt1 patch setty).
Changes since v3.12.15-rt25
- I dropped the sparc64 patches I had in the queue. They did not apply
cleanly, the code in v3.14 changed in the MMU area. Here is where I
On 05/28/2015 06:56 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Oh well. Second time the machine hangs in two days in the same way
(otherwise very stable running 3.18.x-rty)
(this is a bumblebee + bbswitch graphics laptop - argh, if I had known
better...)
May 28 18:49:21 localhost kernel
On 06/09/2015 03:05 PM, Pavel Vasilyev wrote:
09.06.2015 19:45, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano пишет:
This is still happening, about once a day. John Dulaney help me set up a
crash kernel dump (thanks!) so now I have a kernel core dump for this
one,
Asus,Fedora,CGROUPS, iptables,snd_ac97,radeon
On 05/26/2015 12:41 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
On 05/19/2015 02:39 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.0.4-rt1 patch set.
Great!!
Changes since v3.18.13-rt10
- Rebase to v4.0.
- David Hildenbrand's series of decouple of preempt_disable from
pagefault_disable is part of the series.
On 05/26/2015 08:43 AM, Clark Williams wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 11:19:24 -0400
Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 08:48:02 -0500
Clark Williams willi...@redhat.com wrote:
Change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_NORT
Do we have a WARN_ON_NORT? I see a WARN_ON_NONRT, but
On 07/25/2015 03:32 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.1.3-rt3 patch set.
...
I've had a few hangs with nothing left behind to debug... but today I
find this:
(NOTE: I'm attaching a file with the details, I don't know if my mailer
will
On 10/27/2017 03:27 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.13.10-rt3 patch set.
Thanks!! Wonderful!
I'm seeing this (old Lenovo T510 running Fedora 26):
[ 54.942022]
[ 54.942023] WARNING:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 15:15, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 Jul 2005 22:02, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Alistair John Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is a completely unrelated question, but now we've got everything
> > > under control.. how do I make "quiet" actually
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:33, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> --On Wednesday, July 13, 2005 14:32:02 -0500 Dmitry Torokhov <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 7/13/05, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:10 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> > So we should
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > And I'm incredibly frustrated by this insistence on hard data when it's
> > completely obvious to anyone who knows the first thing about MIDI that
> > HZ=250 will fail in situations where HZ=1000
On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 10:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Raymond Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I remember there's a kernel pcmcia bug preventing the development for
> > the Audigy2 pcmcia notebook sound card driver.
> >
> > See
> >
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 05:46, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> >On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:49, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> >>>And I'm incredibly frustrated by this insistence on hard data when it's
> &g
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm getting a build error for 2.6.13-rc7-rt4 with PREEMPT_DESKTOP for
> > i386:
>
> hm, cannot reproduce this build problem on my current tree - could you
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:45, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 18:15 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 22:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 01:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm getting
Hi, I'm starting to look at a strange problem. The configuration is:
hardware: AMD X2 4400+ dual core, NForce3 chipset, Midiman 66 soundcard
software: 2.6.13 smp + patch-2.6.13-rt1, PREEMPT_DESKTOP
jack 0.100.4, current cvs
alsa 1.0.10rc1
This is the sequence of events. Start
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:39, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 19:03 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > Hi, I'm starting to look at a strange problem. The configuration is:
> > hardware: AMD X2 4400+ dual core, NForce3 chipset, Midiman 66 soundcard
> > softwar
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 00:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do a "tar cvf usr.tar /usr" just to read/write a lot to disk (this
> > within the same SATA disk). Watch memory being used in a system
> > monito
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 20:51 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, can you see the xruns/latencies with latencytest too? (That one
> might be easier to reproduce for me.)
I can do that. Is this the old latency test script?
(http://
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 20:51 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > ok, i reproduced something similar on one of my boxes and it turned
> > > out to be a tracer bug. I've uploaded -rt10, could you try it? (The
Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled, a
jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting some
(hopefully) meaningful data.
I'm running a script that samples /etc/latency_trace every second and
logs the maximums to a file.
First attachment:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo, I finally have a rebuilt kernel with latency tracing enabled,
> > a jackd with the proper prctl incantations built in and I'm getting
> > so
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could you try the patch below? It changes trace entries to be measured
> via get_cycles() again [which should be must faster than pmtimer on your
> CPU], but keeps t
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:11 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i have released the 2.6.19-rt6 tree, which can be downloaded from the
> usual place:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
> more info about the -rt patchset can be found on the RT wiki:
>
> http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
>
>
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 21:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Much better performance in terms of xruns with Jackd. Hardly any at
> > all as it should be. I'm starting to test -rt8 right now.
> >
> > No
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:07 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 21:58 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Much better performance in terms of xruns with Jackd. Hardly any at
> >
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
