RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-29 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Ethan Zhao [mailto:ethan.ker...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:10 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd Cc: Joe Jin; Ben Hutchings; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-26 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Joe Jin wrote: On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote: Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not please do so. Hi Tushar, Seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my operations? ... # lspci -s

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-27 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd Cc: Dave, Tushar N; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang On 11/27/12 00:23, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: If you look

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-27 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
, 2012 10:11 AM To: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath Cc: Joe Jin; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: Forgive me if I'm being

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-28 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
- From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:31 AM To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

RE: [E1000-devel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (e1000e): transmit queue 0 timed out

2013-12-02 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I'm having difficulty following this issue, most likely because of our email system. Can you file a new bug on sourceforge? Thanks. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From:

RE: [E1000-devel] fail to add 64 VLANs or more when SR-IOV is enabled

2014-04-04 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
, April 02, 2014 7:04 PM To: David Miller; Fujinaka, Todd; Skidmore, Donald C; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto; Hiroshi Baba Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] fail to add 64 VLANs or more when SR-IOV is enabled -Original

RE: [E1000-devel] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Hardware Error

2014-04-10 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
We also need to know what part you're using. lspci | grep Ethernet should narrow that down. Thanks. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Borislav Petkov

RE: [E1000-devel] fail to add 64 VLANs or more when SR-IOV is enabled

2014-04-02 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I think you're running into the filter limit for VFs. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Madoka Komatsubara [mailto:m-komatsub...@ab.jp.nec.com] Sent: Wednesday, April

RE: [E1000-devel] PROBLEM: [x86] Running ptpd2 using an Intel 82572EI (e1000e) leads to a kernel oops (3.12.26)

2014-08-06 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Looking at your patches on netdev, it appears that there are flags set in the skb that should never be set for the 82572EI as that part doesn't have hardware timestamping. This points to a bug in the ptpd code. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel

RE: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables

2014-12-01 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
After discussing this locally, I'd like to NAK it because this could cause regressions to parts that are still in use but we don't have access to. Also, the assignment was necessary in the past for some versions of gcc and since this may be used in embedded systems using older compilers, we

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] igb: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead fo sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0])

2015-06-30 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I don't see the reason this is needed so I'm going to say NAK. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] igb: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead fo sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0])

2015-06-30 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Richard Weinberger [mailto:richard.weinber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:01 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd Cc: Maninder Singh; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, Shannon; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] igb: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead fo sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0])

2015-06-30 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I've submitted a version to intel-wired-lan that addresses the original issue as well as Joe Perches's suggestion to just delete the define. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -- To unsubscribe from this

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: don't unmap hw_addr if its NULL

2015-09-10 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Thanks! I tried testing this sort of thing last spring, but there just wasn't a lot of hardware available to me and things weren't breaking with my setup (not sure why). ACK. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503)

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped working

2017-12-18 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Jeff was out sick last week. It might take him a bit to catch up. I'll remind him when I see him next (which I hope is soon). Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Datacenter Engineering Group Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com -Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan

RE: [E1000-devel] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (e1000e): transmit queue 0 timed out

2013-12-02 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I'm having difficulty following this issue, most likely because of our email system. Can you file a new bug on sourceforge? Thanks. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From:

RE: [E1000-devel] fail to add 64 VLANs or more when SR-IOV is enabled

2014-04-02 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I think you're running into the filter limit for VFs. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Madoka Komatsubara [mailto:m-komatsub...@ab.jp.nec.com] Sent: Wednesday, April

RE: [E1000-devel] fail to add 64 VLANs or more when SR-IOV is enabled

2014-04-04 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
, April 02, 2014 7:04 PM To: David Miller; Fujinaka, Todd; Skidmore, Donald C; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net; net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto; Hiroshi Baba Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] fail to add 64 VLANs or more when SR-IOV is enabled > -Origi

RE: [E1000-devel] PROBLEM: [x86] Running ptpd2 using an Intel 82572EI (e1000e) leads to a kernel oops (3.12.26)

2014-08-06 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Looking at your patches on netdev, it appears that there are flags set in the skb that should never be set for the 82572EI as that part doesn't have hardware timestamping. This points to a bug in the ptpd code. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped working

2017-12-18 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Jeff was out sick last week. It might take him a bit to catch up. I'll remind him when I see him next (which I hope is soon). Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Datacenter Engineering Group Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com -Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-29 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Ethan Zhao [mailto:ethan.ker...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:10 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd Cc: Joe Jin; Ben Hutchings; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-26 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Joe Jin wrote: > On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote: >> Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not >> please do so. > > Hi Tushar, > > Seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my > operations? ... > # lspci

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-27 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Original Message- From: Joe Jin Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 8:00 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd Cc: Dave, Tushar N; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang On 11/27/12 00:23, Fujin

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-27 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
, 2012 10:11 AM To: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath Cc: Joe Jin; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci Subject: RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 17:32 +, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > Forgive me if I'm be

RE: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-28 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
- From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:31 AM To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Fujinaka, Todd; Mary Mcgrath; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

RE: [linux-nics] [PATCH] e1000: remove unused variables

2014-12-01 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
After discussing this locally, I'd like to NAK it because this could cause regressions to parts that are still in use but we don't have access to. Also, the assignment was necessary in the past for some versions of gcc and since this may be used in embedded systems using older compilers, we

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: don't unmap hw_addr if its NULL

2015-09-10 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Thanks! I tried testing this sort of thing last spring, but there just wasn't a lot of hardware available to me and things weren't breaking with my setup (not sure why). ACK. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503)

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] igb: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead fo sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0])

2015-06-30 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I don't see the reason this is needed so I'm going to say NAK. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] igb: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead fo sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0])

2015-06-30 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Richard Weinberger [mailto:richard.weinber...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:01 PM To: Fujinaka, Todd Cc: Maninder Singh; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Nelson, Shannon; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/1] igb: Use ARRAY_SIZE instead fo sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0])

2015-06-30 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
I've submitted a version to intel-wired-lan that addresses the original issue as well as Joe Perches's suggestion to just delete the define. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -- To unsubscribe from this

RE: [E1000-devel] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth0: Hardware Error

2014-04-10 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
We also need to know what part you're using. "lspci | grep Ethernet" should narrow that down. Thanks. Todd Fujinaka Software Application Engineer Networking Division (ND) Intel Corporation todd.fujin...@intel.com (503) 712-4565 -Original Message- From: Borislav Petkov