On 2 February 2015 at 16:32, Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:50:52PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
When system supporting both DT and
On 6 January 2015 at 11:20, Catalin Marinas catalin.mari...@arm.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:16:30PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 05 January 2015 13:13:02 Catalin Marinas wrote:
since passing no DT tables to OS but
acpi=force is missing is a corner case, we can do a
On 6 January 2015 at 13:50, Hanjun Guo hanjun@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015年01月06日 19:29, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:11:07AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2015年01月05日 19:05, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 09:39:24AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
On
On 4 March 2015 at 22:38, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@rjwysocki.net wrote:
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 04:39:47 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
From: Graeme Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org
ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state()
On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Added the match table and
On 28 July 2015 at 21:12, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015
On 30 July 2015 at 10:37, G Gregory graeme.greg...@linaro.org wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 10:24, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 09:04, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:23:20AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Why do we drop
On 30 July 2015 at 10:24, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 09:04, Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:23:20AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Why do we drop the previous way using QEMU? Something I missed?
So that guests that
On 11 August 2015 at 23:01, Timur Tabi ti...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 07/29/2015 05:08 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
Patches are on top of Marc's branch irq/gsi-irq-domain-v2, and available
at:
git://git.linaro.org/leg/acpi/acpi.git gsi-irqdomain
Is it my imagination, or is Marc's branch based on
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:38:20PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Leif,
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Leif Lindholm
> wrote:
> > Support for configuring bootconsole and console via the ACPI tables
> > DBG2 (Debug Port Table 2) [1] and SPCR (Serial Port Console
On 4 December 2015 at 09:42, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/12/4 17:17, Huang Rui wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:23AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:24:18AM +0800, Wang Hongcheng wrote:
From: Huang Rui
On 4 December 2015 at 10:20, Huang Rui <ray.hu...@amd.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:59:28AM +, G Gregory wrote:
>> On 4 December 2015 at 09:42, Hanjun Guo <guohan...@huawei.com> wrote:
>> > On 2015/12/4 17:17, Huang Rui wrote:
>> >> On F
On 4 January 2016 at 23:13, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Aleksey Makarov
> wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
>> if we are coming from ACPI
On 7 January 2016 at 16:21, Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi Huang,
>
> On 7 January 2016 at 20:00, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Huang,
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on pm/linux-next]
>> [also build test WARNING on v4.4-rc8 next-20160106]
>> [if your patch is applied to
On 21 December 2015 at 18:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Aleksey Makarov
> wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
>> if we are
On 21 December 2015 at 18:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Aleksey Makarov
> wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> On ARM64 some devices use the AMBA device and not the platform bus for
On 20 April 2016 at 02:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now (see commit 47b0eeb3dc8a "clk: Deprecate
> CLK_IS_ROOT", 2016-02-02) so remove it.
>
> Cc: Graeme Gregory
> Cc: Aleksey Makarov
> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:22:29PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>
>
> On 19.04.2016 13:12, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:41:29AM +0100, G Gregory wrote:
> >>On 19 April 2016 at 11:26, Tomasz Nowicki <t...@semihalf.com> wrote:
> >>>
On 19 April 2016 at 11:26, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> On 15.04.2016 19:06, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>
>> Passes 1.x miss PCI enhanced allocation (EA) header for fixed-BARs,
>> thus these passes should use Cavium-specific config access functions
>> that synthesize the missing EA
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:09:26PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo
>
> In ACPI 6.1 spec, section 19.6.62, Interrupt Resource Descriptor Macro,
>
> Interrupt (ResourceUsage, EdgeLevel, ActiveLevel, Shared,
> ResourceSourceIndex, ResourceSource, DescriptorName)
On 6 January 2015 at 11:20, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:16:30PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 05 January 2015 13:13:02 Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> > > since passing no DT tables to OS but
>> > > acpi=force is missing is a corner case, we can do a follow up patch
On 6 January 2015 at 13:50, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年01月06日 19:29, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:11:07AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2015年01月05日 19:05, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 09:39:24AM +, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>
> On
On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>> >> Added the match table and pointers for ACPI
On 28 July 2015 at 21:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 28 July 2015 at 11:27, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:12:33AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 28 July 2015 at 11:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:44:02AM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On 30 July 2015 at 10:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 09:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:23:20AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do we drop the previous way using "QEMU"? Something I missed?
>>
>> So that guests that bind to this interface
On 30 July 2015 at 10:37, G Gregory wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 10:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 30 July 2015 at 09:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:23:20AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why do we drop the previou
On 11 August 2015 at 23:01, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 05:08 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>
>> Patches are on top of Marc's branch irq/gsi-irq-domain-v2, and available
>> at:
>>
>> git://git.linaro.org/leg/acpi/acpi.git gsi-irqdomain
>
>
> Is it my imagination, or is Marc's branch based on
On 2 February 2015 at 16:32, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:50:52PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:40:33PM +, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:45:36PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> > > When system supporting both DT and ACPI but
On 4 March 2015 at 22:38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 04:39:47 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> ACPI 5.1 does not currently support S states for ARM64 hardware but
>> ACPI code will call acpi_target_system_state() for device power
>> management,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:09:26PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo
>
> In ACPI 6.1 spec, section 19.6.62, Interrupt Resource Descriptor Macro,
>
> Interrupt (ResourceUsage, EdgeLevel, ActiveLevel, Shared,
> ResourceSourceIndex, ResourceSource, DescriptorName)
> { InterruptList } =>
On 19 April 2016 at 11:26, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> On 15.04.2016 19:06, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>>
>> Passes 1.x miss PCI enhanced allocation (EA) header for fixed-BARs,
>> thus these passes should use Cavium-specific config access functions
>> that synthesize the missing EA capabilities.
>>
>> We
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:22:29PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
>
>
> On 19.04.2016 13:12, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:41:29AM +0100, G Gregory wrote:
> >>On 19 April 2016 at 11:26, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> >>>On 15.04.2016 19:06, Tomas
On 20 April 2016 at 02:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This flag is a no-op now (see commit 47b0eeb3dc8a "clk: Deprecate
> CLK_IS_ROOT", 2016-02-02) so remove it.
>
> Cc: Graeme Gregory
> Cc: Aleksey Makarov
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_amba.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1
On 7 January 2016 at 16:21, Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi Huang,
>
> On 7 January 2016 at 20:00, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Huang,
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on pm/linux-next]
>> [also build test WARNING on v4.4-rc8 next-20160106]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a
On 21 December 2015 at 18:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Aleksey Makarov
> wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
>> if we are coming from ACPI use this mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
>> Signed-off-by:
On 21 December 2015 at 18:19, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Aleksey Makarov
> wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> On ARM64 some devices use the AMBA device and not the platform bus for
>> probing so add support for this. Uses a dummy clock for apb_pclk as ACPI
>>
On 4 December 2015 at 09:42, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015/12/4 17:17, Huang Rui wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:23AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:24:18AM +0800, Wang Hongcheng wrote:
From: Huang Rui
Inspired by acpi platform bus type, to make
On 4 December 2015 at 10:20, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:59:28AM +0000, G Gregory wrote:
>> On 4 December 2015 at 09:42, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> > On 2015/12/4 17:17, Huang Rui wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:50:23AM +0200, Mika Westerber
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:38:20PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Leif,
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Leif Lindholm
> wrote:
> > Support for configuring bootconsole and console via the ACPI tables
> > DBG2 (Debug Port Table 2) [1] and SPCR (Serial Port Console Redirection
> > Table) [2],
On 4 January 2016 at 23:13, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Aleksey Makarov
> wrote:
>> From: Graeme Gregory
>>
>> In ACPI this device is only defined in SBSA mode so
>> if we are coming from ACPI use this mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksey
40 matches
Mail list logo