Re: [PATCH] fat/vfat: optionally ignore system timezone offset when reading/writing timestamps

HI OGAWA-san and Paul-san, Sorry late response, I'm not famillar with recent fat code, but code itself looks good for just turn on/off time adjusting. On the other hand, I feel we need more consideration on use cases/requirements. I feel that turning off time adjustment is a just ad-hoc

[PATCH] Preserve hibenate-system-image on startup

a permanent system image for startup. During shutdown, does a conventional shutdown without saving a system image. We'll explain concept and initial work at OLS. So if you have interest, we can talk with you at Ottawa. Thanks, Hiroyuki Machida --- This patch enables preserving swsuspend system

[RFD] FAT robustness

that update data first, meta data later with transaction control - With O_SYNC, close() make flush all related data and meta-data, then wait completion of I/O Q3 : I'm not sure JBD can be used for FAT improvements. Do you have any comments ? Thanks, Hiroyuki Machida

Re: [PATCH] Preserve hibenate-system-image on startup

Jose at the beginning of this year. Regards, Hiroyuki Machida Nigel Cunningham wrote: Hi. We've had this feature in Suspend2 for a couple of years and I can confirm that the approach works, provided that the on-disk filesystem remains unchanged throughout this. (Useful mainly for kiosks etc

Re: [RFD] FAT robustness

devices we may prepare another elevator functions, depending on property of devices or lower layer. E.g. NAND/AND flash have different operation units for read/write and erase, and have some translation layer. Paulo Marques wrote: Hiroyuki Machida wrote: [...] Q3 : I'm not sure JBD can

Re: [RFD] FAT robustness

Hi, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: Hiroyuki Machida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We currently plan to add following features to address FAT corruption. - Utilize standard 2.6 features as much as possible - Implement as options of fat, vfat and uvfat What is the uvfat? typo (xvfat)? Why

Re: [PATCH] Posix file attribute support on VFAT (take #2)

helpful. It's not required to support full attributes. What do you think ? Thanks, Hiroyuki Machida - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read

[PATCH] Posix file attribute support on VFAT

embedded device has resource limitation. So it's very handy that VFAT has capability to built root fs, even that has restrictions. Details are described within a patch. I think this feature still needs improvemnts, however it is very helpful for most embedded developpers. Thanks, Hiroyuki Machida

[PATCH] Posix file attribute support on VFAT

embedded device has resource limitation. So it's very handy that VFAT has capability to built root fs, even that has restrictions. Details are described within a patch. I think this feature still needs improvemnts, however it is very helpful for most embedded developpers. Thanks, Hiroyuki Machida

Re: [PATCH] Posix file attribute support on VFAT (take #2)

helpful. It's not required to support full attributes. What do you think ? Thanks, Hiroyuki Machida - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.h

[PATCH] Preserve hibenate-system-image on startup

rnate from a permanent system image for startup. During shutdown, does a conventional shutdown without saving a system image. We'll explain concept and initial work at OLS. So if you have interest, we can talk with you at Ottawa. Thanks, Hiroyuki Machida --- This patch enables preserving swsusp

[RFD] FAT robustness

oordinate order of operations so that update data first, meta data later with transaction control - With O_SYNC, close() make flush all related data and meta-data, then wait completion of I/O Q3 : I'm not sure JBD can be used for FAT improvements. Do you have any commen

Re: [PATCH] Preserve hibenate-system-image on startup

Jose at the beginning of this year. Regards, Hiroyuki Machida Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > We've had this feature in Suspend2 for a couple of years and I can > confirm that the approach works, provided that the on-disk filesystem > remains unchanged throughout this. (Useful ma

Re: [RFD] FAT robustness

devices we may prepare another elevator functions, depending on property of devices or lower layer. E.g. NAND/AND flash have different operation units for read/write and erase, and have some translation layer. Paulo Marques wrote: Hiroyuki Machida wrote: [...] Q3 : I'm not sure JBD can

Re: [RFD] FAT robustness

Hi, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: Hiroyuki Machida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: We currently plan to add following features to address FAT corruption. - Utilize standard 2.6 features as much as possible - Implement as options of fat, vfat and uvfat What is the uvfat? typo (xvfat)

Re: [PATCH] fat/vfat: optionally ignore system timezone offset when reading/writing timestamps

HI OGAWA-san and Paul-san, Sorry late response, I'm not famillar with recent fat code, but code itself looks good for just turn on/off time adjusting. On the other hand, I feel we need more consideration on use cases/requirements. I feel that turning off time adjustment is a just ad-hoc