Not a comment on the patch, or even A31, but a question about how the
SMP boot process works on sunxi generally...
On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 10:30 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The A31 is a quad Cortex-A7. Add the logic to use the IPs used to
control the CPU configuration and the CPU power so that we
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 16:01 +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 05/11/13 15:56, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:47:08PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 05/11/13 13:36, David Vrabel wrote:
On 05/11/13 11:24, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
IMHO there's no reason to set a m2p
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 12:53 -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Yes, you are completely right, then I have to figure out why blkback
works fine with this patch applied (or at least it seems to work fine).
blkback also works for me when testing a similar patch. I'm still
confused. One thing
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 19:00 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 01/11/13 10:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
Does this always avoid copying when bridging/openvswitching/forwarding
(e.g. masquerading etc)? For both domU-domU and domU-physical NIC?
I've tested the domU-domU, domU-physical with bridge
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 11:51 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Introduce physical to machine and machine to physical tracking
mechanisms based on rbtrees for arm/xen and arm64/xen.
We need it because any guests on ARM are an autotranslate guests,
therefore a physical address is potentially
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 18:14 -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
3.8.13.13 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
know.
This patch caused a regression in the 3.10 stable tree. Two additional
patches were needed, see:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg256637.html
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 09:40 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
I'm trying to work out if we can make this work with the requirement
which both Xen and KVM have to enter the kernel in NS-HYP mode.
The way this works on e.g. vexpress is (roughly) that u-boot wakes up
the secondary CPUs from the
graft 8 20130528152156.gb3...@phenom.dumpdata.com
prune 8 20130528181149.ga27...@phenom.dumpdata.com
thanks
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 17:52 +, David Vrabel wrote:
Fixes-Bug: http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/8
This bug link has no useful information in it.
Looks like the intention was for
this platform does not use
address-cells=2.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Acked-by: Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com
Cc: Rupjyoti Sarmah rsar...@apm.com
Cc: Tirumala R Marri tma...@apm.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Cc
-cells value for
/plb@0/xps-ll-temac@81c0/ethernet@81c0/phy@7
Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): Relying on default #size-cells value for
/plb@0/xps-ll-temac@81c0/ethernet@81c0/phy@7
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 15:24 +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 02:50 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Hi,
Commit 9bab0b7fbace (genirq: Add IRQF_RESUME_EARLY and resume such IRQs
earlier) split the suspend/resume of the irqs into two parts.
The early-irqs get resumed
-declaration]
tcph-check = ~csum_ipv6_magic(ipv6h-saddr,
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft a...@canonical.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Thanks!
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Found while trying to couple latest kernels
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 17:37 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 07/11/13 10:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 19:00 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 01/11/13 10:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
Does this always avoid copying when bridging/openvswitching/forwarding
(e.g. masquerading etc
is the pfn corresponding to an mfn.
Fix the regression by switching to the old behavior.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
I tripped over this on Friday and my local hack was identical, hence
also:
Tested-by: Ian
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 11:03 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:25:55AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 09:40 +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
I'm trying to work out if we can make this work with the requirement
which both Xen and KVM have
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 17:48 -0800, Anthony Liguori wrote:
See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1590932 for a full
analysis of current users.
Silly nit: Please can you include the message ID in case this goes away,
or use a URL which includes the ID already so it can be translated if
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Using __packed__ on the public interface is not correct, this
structures should be compiled using the native ABI, and __packed__
should only be used in the backend counterpart of those structures
(which needs to handle different ABIs).
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:01 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 03/12/13 10:57, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Using __packed__ on the public interface is not correct, this
structures should be compiled using the native ABI, and __packed__
should only be used in the backend counterpart of those
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:11 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.12.13 at 12:05, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:57 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Using __packed__ on the public interface is not correct, this
structures should be compiled using the native ABI
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:59 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 03/12/13 11:08, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:01 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 03/12/13 10:57, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
Using __packed__ on the public interface is not correct, this
structures should be compiled using
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 15:11 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 03/12/13 13:41, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:59 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 03/12/13 11:08, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:01 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 03/12/13 10:57, Roger Pau Monne wrote
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 15:28 +, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/03/2013 03:15 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.12.13 at 16:09, Julien Grall julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
--- a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
+++ b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ struct
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 15:51 +, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
If Konrad and Boris agree that breaking the kernel's ABI in this way is
acceptable in this specific case, I'll defer to them.
My opinion as Xen on ARM hypervisor maintainer is that this is the right
thing to do in this
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 16:32 +, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
How does the patch ensure new kernels on existing hypervisor versions
don't break ?
As Ian said on the thread xen-block: correctly define structures in
public headers (see thread https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/3/155), the
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 15:11 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
If Konrad and Boris agree that breaking the kernel's ABI in this way is
acceptable in this specific case, I'll defer to them.
My opinion as Xen on ARM hypervisor maintainer is that this is the right
thing to do in this
drivers.
P.S.
Ian Campbell suggested getting rid of 'xen_platform_pci_unplug'
but unfortunatly the xen-blkfront driver is using it, so we
cannot do it.
It might still be nice to expose a suitable semantic interface (i.e.
some relevant predicate) rather than the raw value for blkfront to use
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 10:51 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
+bool xen_has_pv_devices(void)
+{
+ if (!xen_domain())
+ return false;
+
+ if (xen_hvm_domain()) {
+ /* User requested no unplug, so no PV drivers
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:05 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 10:51 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
+bool xen_has_pv_devices(void)
+{
+ if (!xen_domain
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:18 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:05 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 10:51 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 09:28 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
This could probably even be semi automated by producing a script to feed
to gdb which run through all of the options and diffing the result.
If I could have the moon on a stick I would have a tool such as this
running against
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 13:00 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 03/12/13 21:14, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Ian Campbell suggested getting rid of 'xen_platform_pci_unplug'
but unfortunatly the xen-blkfront driver is using it, so we
cannot do it.
I had a look at what blkfront was using
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 18:57 -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@citrix.com
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 14:37:50 +
Maybe you mixed up mine with that? But that's also not eligible to be
applied yet.
I can always revert the series if there are major objections.
Zoltan
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
A long known problem of the upstream netback implementation that on the TX
path (from guest to Dom0) it copies the whole packet from guest memory into
Dom0. That simply became a bottleneck with 10Gb NICs, and generally it's a
huge
Pulling out this one comment for the attention on the core Xen/Linux
maintainers.
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
[...]
@@ -343,8 +347,26 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent,
domid_t domid,
vif-pending_prod = MAX_PENDING_REQS;
for (i = 0; i
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
@@ -135,13 +146,31 @@ struct xenvif {
pending_ring_idx_t pending_cons;
u16 pending_ring[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
struct pending_tx_info pending_tx_info[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
+ grant_handle_t grant_tx_handle[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
@@ -557,12 +577,25 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif)
void xenvif_free(struct xenvif *vif)
{
int i, unmap_timeout = 0;
+ /* Here we want to avoid timeout messages if an skb can be legitimatly
legitimately
+ *
On Wed, 2014-03-12 at 15:40 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 18:57 -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@citrix.com
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 14:37:50 +
Maybe you mixed up mine with that? But that's also not eligible to be
applied yet.
I can
, right?
I think so, and therefore:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 10:56 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 13/03/14 10:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
@@ -135,13 +146,31 @@ struct xenvif {
pending_ring_idx_t pending_cons;
u16 pending_ring[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
struct pending_tx_info
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 13:17 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 13/03/14 10:33, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:48 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
@@ -135,13 +146,31 @@ struct xenvif {
pending_ring_idx_t pending_cons;
u16 pending_ring[MAX_PENDING_REQS];
struct pending_tx_info
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 01:19 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
I don't know if the guest expects that slots for the same packet
comes back at the same time.
I don't think the guest is allowed to assume that. In particular they
aren't allowed to assume the the slots will be freed in the order they
were
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 12:34 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.01.14 at 13:01, Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, Jan Beulich wrote:
You can't do this in one go - the first two and the last one may be
set independently (and are independent in their meaning), and
hence need
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 13:16 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.01.14 at 14:00, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 12:34 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.01.14 at 13:01, Olaf Hering o...@aepfle.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, Jan Beulich wrote:
You can't do
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 14:05 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
I meant the PV protocol extension which allows guests (netfront) to
register to receive multicast frames across the PV ring -- i.e. for
multicast to work from the guests PoV.
Not quite sure I understand, ipv6 works on guests so
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 10:29 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 15/02/14 02:59, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
The purpose of using a static MAC address of FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
was to prevent our backend interfaces from being used by the
bridge and nominating
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
Is this just adding a bunch of (currently) unused functions? That's a
slightly odd way to structure a series. They don't seem to be generic
helpers or anything so it would
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
+ spinlock_t dealloc_lock;
+ spinlock_t response_lock;
Please add comments to both of these describing what bits of the
datastructure they are locking.
You might find it is clearer to group the locks and the things they
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
This patch changes the grant copy on the TX patch to grant mapping
Both this and the previous patch had a single sentence commit message (I
count them together since they are split weirdly and are a single
logical change to my eyes).
Really
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Re the Subject: change how? Perhaps handle foreign mapped pages on the
guest RX path would be clearer.
RX path need to know if the SKB fragments are stored on pages from another
domain.
Does this not need to be done either before the
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 12:16 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Zoltan Kiss zoltan.k...@citrix.com wrote:
Also, the backend is not necessarily Dom0, you can connect two guests with
backend/frontend pairs.
Can you elaborate a bit more on this type of setup?
The
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 11:43 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
New motivation: removing IPv4 and IPv6 from the backend interfaces can
save up a lot of boiler plate run time code, triggers from ever taking
place, and simplifying the backend interaces. If there is no use for
IPv4 and IPv6
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
A long known problem of the upstream netback implementation that on the TX
path (from guest to Dom0) it copies the whole packet from guest memory into
Dom0. That simply became a bottleneck with 10Gb NICs, and generally it's a
huge
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 13:02 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Stephen Hemminger
step...@networkplumber.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:59:37 -0800
Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@do-not-panic.com wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
It doesn't
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 18:46 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 18/02/14 17:40, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
@@ -344,8 +346,26 @@ struct xenvif *xenvif_alloc(struct device *parent,
domid_t domid,
vif-pending_prod = MAX_PENDING_REQS
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
Is this just adding a bunch of (currently) unused functions? That's
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:54 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 19/02/14 10:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:36 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
On 18/02/14 17:06, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 21:24 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
This patch contains the new definitions necessary
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 16:21 +, Julien Grall wrote:
Only Xen is able to know if a device can safely avoid to use xen-swiotlb.
This patch introduce a new property protected-devices for the hypervisor
node which list device which the IOMMU are been correctly programmed by Xen.
During Linux
Adding the -spec list for the generic IOMMU binding question.
On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 16:21 +, Julien Grall wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt
index 0f7b9c2..ee25a57 100644
---
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:53 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Cc'ing kvm folks as they may have a shared interest on the shared
physical case with the bridge (non NAT).
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:29 -0800, Luis R
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 19:32 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Since the early days TX stops if there isn't enough free pending slots to
consume a maximum sized (slot-wise) packet. Probably the reason for that is to
avoid the case when we don't have enough free pending slot in the ring to
finish
the
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 19:32 +, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
Ian made some late comments about the grant mapping series, I incorporated the
outcomes into this patch. Additional comments, refactoring etc.
I don't know how davem feels about merging these kinds of thing into one
patch but from my point
@@ -301,6 +320,10 @@ static int __init xen_init_events(void)
on_each_cpu(xen_percpu_init, NULL, 0);
+ pv_time_ops.steal_clock = xen_stolen_accounting;
+ static_key_slow_inc(paravirt_steal_enabled);
+ static_key_slow_inc(paravirt_steal_rq_enabled);
We don't seem to
to. */
- per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
- }
+ if (err)
+ BUG();
AKA BUG_ON(err);
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
+ per_cpu(xen_vcpu, cpu) = vcpup;
+
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 18:03 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
What if we have Xen support enabled but don't run as a Xen guest?
That's fine as long as the Xen runstate_memory_area interface is
available.
Usually I am a great fun of feature flags, so that every feature can be
dynamically
/ia64/xen/time.c.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
CC: konrad.w...@oracle.com
On the generic and x86 side it looks OK to me. I presume you did a sanity
check on x86 to make sure nothing was off?
Yep
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:37 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Notify a host about a guest memory size limit.
Idea of this patch was discussed with Ian Campbell and Ian Jackson.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com
---
drivers/xen/balloon.c | 25 +
1
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:37 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
This patch enforces on target limit statically defined in Linux Kernel
source and limit defined by hypervisor or host. This way the balloon
driver should not attempt to populate pages above given limits
because they may fail.
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 13:59 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:44:09PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:37 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
This patch enforces on target limit statically defined in Linux Kernel
source and limit defined by hypervisor
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Move do_stolen_accounting, xen_vcpu_stolen and related functions and
static variables to common code (drivers/xen/time.c).
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 21:36 +0100, Christopher Covington wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 05/01/2013 03:27 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Introduce a function, called arch_timer_stolen_ticks, called from the
arch_timer interrupt handler to account for stolen ticks.
[...]
diff --git
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
index d30042e..8f040a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include xen/xen-ops.h
#include asm/xen/hypervisor.h
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:38 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
index d30042e..8f040a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:54 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:38 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 20:27 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
diff --git a/arch
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 19:58 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:44:18PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 13:59 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:44:09PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:37 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 19:04 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:34:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Daniel Kiper wrote:
+/*
+ * Extra internal memory reserved by libxl.
+ * Check tools/libxl/libxl_memory.txt file in Xen
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 19:49 +0100, Christopher Covington wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On 05/01/2013 03:27 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Move do_stolen_accounting, xen_vcpu_stolen and related functions and
static variables to common code (drivers/xen/time.c).
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 14:00 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:15:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 19:04 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:34:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
[...]
The xapi guys, CC'ed, might
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 14:47 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:21:24PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 14:00 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:15:32AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 19:04 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek
On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 16:47 +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Do not forget that guest may change target itself.
Yes it can, and that can fail either due to maxmem or due to ENOMEM, and
the kernel needs prepared to deal with that when it happens.
Sure but why we would like to fail
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 16:33 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Define xen_remap as ioremap_cache (MT_MEMORY and MT_DEVICE_CACHED end up
having the same AttrIndx encoding).
The entries in static struct mem_type mem_types[] look entirely
different to me. What am I missing?
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 16:33 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
---
include/xen/interface/io/protocols.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
different, so introduce a different file
here (use xchg to implement xchg_xen_ulong and pass regs-pstate to
raw_irqs_disabled_flags).
Also introduce asm/hypervisor.h and asm/sync_bitops.h.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb
...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
[]
+#define HYPERCALL_SIMPLE(hypercall) \
+ENTRY(HYPERVISOR_##hypercall)\
+ mov x16, #__HYPERVISOR_##hypercall; \
+ hvc XEN_IMM;\
+ ret
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 13:15 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
---
MAINTAINERS |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b
or not as you wish:
Acked-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 10:27 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:03:39AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 18:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
+ * the second in r1/x1, the third in r2/x2 and the fourth in r3/x3.
+ * Considering that Xen hypercalls
Various temporary files used when building DTB files were not suffixed with
.tmp and therefore were not cleaned up by make clean.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Michal Marek mma...@suse.cz
Cc: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Cc: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Cc
1
make: *** [b4qds.dtb] Error 2
I spotted in build tests of device-tree.git, announcement
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/24/209, which builds *.dts. Probably no one would
do this this in real life on linux.git but it still seems worth fixing.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb
This affects arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml510.dts but I think it is
actually a more general issue:
$ make ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux- virtex440-ml510.dtb
CC scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s
GEN scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.h
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 12:48 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 11:29:30 +0100, Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
wrote:
This affects arch/powerpc/boot/dts/virtex440-ml510.dts but I think it is
actually a more general issue:
$ make ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:01 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Line 374 is the IDSEL 0x16... line here:
interrupt-map =
/* IRQ mapping for pci slots and ALI M1533
...
* management
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 08:01 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Hrm. Is this a that's not in the kernel's copy yet problem?
BTW I'm using dtc.git 4e76ec796c90d44d417f82d9db2d67cfe575f8ed and not
the kernel copy.
dtc-lexer.l in my HEAD is identical to the current master
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 17:31 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 05/31/2013 05:48 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
---
commit d01dccdcb3ea8233b09efb9c24db9f057fbd3b37
Author: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
Date: Fri
this platform does not use
address-cells=2.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Rupjyoti Sarmah rsar...@apm.com
Cc: Tirumala R Marri tma...@apm.com
Cc: Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Cc: linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/powerpc/boot/.gitignore |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
-cells value for
/plb@0/xps-ll-temac@81c0/ethernet@81c0/phy@7
Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): Relying on default #size-cells value for
/plb@0/xps-ll-temac@81c0/ethernet@81c0/phy@7
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 09:36 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:00:24PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Currently I see:
DTC arch/powerpc/boot/kilauea.dtb
Warning (reg_format): reg property in /plb/ppc4xx-msi@C1000 has
invalid length (12 bytes) (#address-cells == 1
-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
to this change too.
Reported-by: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@citrix.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
---
This is a fix for 3.10.
scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.l |2 +-
scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c_shipped | 232
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 17:25 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:33:44PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S
...
+/*
+ * The Xen hypercall calling convention is very similar to the ARM AEBI
+ * procedure calling
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 18:06 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 16:47 +0100, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
No one should be probing registers without making sure it is safe to do
so
301 - 400 of 1198 matches
Mail list logo
