Re: Tie lose perf, tools ends in Haswell PMU patchkit

2012-10-06 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 10/03/2012 11:22 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: This fixes some left over issues in my Haswell PMU patchkit yesterday: Ideally applied on top, although there should be no direct dependencies. - Now the kernel supplied sysfs aliases can be directly used for cpu. This means I can use tx-aborts

Re: [PATCH] e1000 driver RX race condition fixed

2012-10-17 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 10/14/2012 07:19 PM, Dmitry Fleytman wrote: There is a race condition in e1000 driver. It enables HW receive before RX rings initalization. In case of specific timing this may lead to host memory corruption due to DMA write to arbitrary memory location. Following patch fixes this issue by

Re: [PATCH] net-next: make sock diag per-namespace

2012-07-16 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/16/2012 02:38 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote: You are right. Sorry for this stupid fault. I will send a new patch. Before doing so: Could you put the net-next inside the square brackets (being the tree you are aiming your patch at, which should not end up in the commit log), and mention the

Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry

2012-08-10 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 08/10/2012 04:05 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote: Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry. Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO yam...@redhat.com --- net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c index b4c3582..2b822ac 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry

2012-08-10 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 08/10/2012 08:31 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote: Two points: - I haven't seen patch 01/15; Correction: I have. - these patches should go to netdev rather than lkml But this is still the case; MAINTAINERS would have told you that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux

Re: bootmem code - reboots after 'uncompressing linux' on old computers

2012-08-03 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 08/03/2012 03:37 AM, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: Hello. while bisecting old pcmcia bug i've noticed kernels ~2.6.36 and up do not boot on 586 machines with small amounts of ram (16M) Copying David Miller. Not trimming the rest of the message for David's benefit; no further comments

Re: [PATCH] Fix checkpatch.pl issue.

2012-07-08 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/08/2012 10:16 AM, Toshiaki Yamane wrote: -printk(KERN_ERR, to pr_err(... Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Yamane yamaneto...@gmail.com Hi I submit that your subject line should be more descriptive. Perhaps something like the following: [PATCH] asus_oled: Use pr_err(...) rather than

Re: [PATCH firmware 3/4] rtl_nic: add new firmware for RTL8106E

2012-07-09 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/09/2012 05:11 AM, Hayes Wang wrote: File: rtl_nic/rtl8106e-1.fw Version: 0.0.1 Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang hayesw...@realtek.com Hi I'm afraid that the subject lines of patches 3/4 and 4/4 were mangled. Could you try again? Thanks, Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-09 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/09/2012 03:18 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: Most distros already have or are on the way to switch to systemd. We have to adapt to distros once more:( Well they are the customer... (OK, maybe not _the_ customer, but definitely a major customer). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-07-10 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/10/2012 07:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote: Count me as one of the 1000s that think it's a poor name choice. I think it's a poor name for marketing purposes too. Best of luck with whatever is used. Perhaps it's a typo, and was meant to be AArgh64 :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH 1/6] hrtimer: Provide clock_was_set_delayed()

2012-07-12 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/11/2012 06:47 PM, John Stultz wrote: I'll see if my worry is unfounded, but it might be a bit too clever for rare events. Full ACK. There is an unfortunate history of critical-to-moderately-serious bugs in the leap second handling, so I submit that what is needed is a simple,

Re: 3.4.4: disabling irq

2012-07-12 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/12/2012 03:23 PM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: How to list what modules/programs are using that irq? cat /proc/interrupts -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: Share network traffic between processes with respect to a priority value.

2012-07-23 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/23/2012 05:30 PM, Sameer Rahmani wrote: Hi guys. What do you think about the idea ? What little old me thinks about the idea is that it is not fully formed (i.e. it could do with more detail), and that you have posted in the wrong place (i.e. the networking guys hang out on the netdev

Re: [PATCH] ata: Fix build error in sata_highbank

2012-09-28 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 09/28/2012 07:23 PM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: From: Mark Langsdorf Mark Langsdorf Mark, This From: line is malformed: the bit between the angle brackets should contain an email address. HTH, Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message

Re: [PATCH] Fix checkpatch.pl issue.

2012-07-08 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/08/2012 10:16 AM, Toshiaki Yamane wrote: > -printk(KERN_ERR, to pr_err(... > > Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Yamane Hi I submit that your subject line should be more descriptive. Perhaps something like the following: [PATCH] asus_oled: Use pr_err(...) rather than printk(KERN_ERR ...) The

Re: [PATCH firmware 3/4] rtl_nic: add new firmware for RTL8106E

2012-07-09 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/09/2012 05:11 AM, Hayes Wang wrote: > File: rtl_nic/rtl8106e-1.fw > Version: 0.0.1 > > Signed-off-by: Hayes Wang Hi I'm afraid that the subject lines of patches 3/4 and 4/4 were mangled. Could you try again? Thanks, Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH]RIFS-V3-Test For 3.4.x kernel.

2012-07-09 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/09/2012 03:18 PM, Hillf Danton wrote: >> Most distros already have or are on the way to switch to systemd. > > We have to adapt to distros once more:( Well they are the customer... (OK, maybe not _the_ customer, but definitely a major customer). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port

2012-07-10 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/10/2012 07:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > Count me as one of the 1000s that think it's a poor name choice. > I think it's a poor name for marketing purposes too. > > Best of luck with whatever is used. Perhaps it's a typo, and was meant to be AArgh64 :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Share network traffic between processes with respect to a priority value.

2012-07-23 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/23/2012 05:30 PM, Sameer Rahmani wrote: > Hi guys. > What do you think about the idea ? What little old me thinks about the idea is that it is not fully formed (i.e. it could do with more detail), and that you have posted in the wrong place (i.e. the networking guys hang out on the netdev

Re: [PATCH] e1000 driver RX race condition fixed

2012-10-17 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 10/14/2012 07:19 PM, Dmitry Fleytman wrote: > There is a race condition in e1000 driver. > It enables HW receive before RX rings initalization. > In case of specific timing this may lead to host memory corruption > due to DMA write to arbitrary memory location. > Following patch fixes this

Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry

2012-08-10 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 08/10/2012 04:05 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote: > Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry. > > Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO > --- > net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c > index b4c3582..2b822ac 100644 > ---

Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry

2012-08-10 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 08/10/2012 08:31 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote: > Two points: > > - I haven't seen patch 01/15; Correction: I have. > - these patches should go to netdev rather than lkml But this is still the case; MAINTAINERS would have told you that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Tie lose "perf, tools" ends in Haswell PMU patchkit

2012-10-06 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 10/03/2012 11:22 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > This fixes some left over issues in my Haswell PMU patchkit yesterday: > Ideally applied on top, although there should be no direct dependencies. > > - Now the kernel supplied sysfs aliases can be directly used for cpu. > This means I can use

Re: [PATCH 1/6] hrtimer: Provide clock_was_set_delayed()

2012-07-12 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/11/2012 06:47 PM, John Stultz wrote: > I'll see if my worry is unfounded, but it might be a bit too clever for rare > events. Full ACK. There is an unfortunate history of critical-to-moderately-serious bugs in the leap second handling, so I submit that what is needed is a simple,

Re: 3.4.4: disabling irq

2012-07-12 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/12/2012 03:23 PM, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > How to list what modules/programs are using that irq? cat /proc/interrupts -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] net-next: make sock diag per-namespace

2012-07-16 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 07/16/2012 02:38 PM, Andrew Vagin wrote: > You are right. Sorry for this stupid fault. I will send a new patch. Before doing so: Could you put the "net-next" inside the square brackets (being the tree you are aiming your patch at, which should not end up in the commit log), and mention the

Re: bootmem code - reboots after 'uncompressing linux' on old computers

2012-08-03 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 08/03/2012 03:37 AM, Piotr Gluszenia Slawinski wrote: > Hello. > while bisecting old pcmcia bug i've noticed kernels ~2.6.36 > and up do not boot on 586 machines with small amounts of ram (16M) Copying David Miller. Not trimming the rest of the message for David's benefit; no further comments

Re: [PATCH] ata: Fix build error in sata_highbank

2012-09-28 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 09/28/2012 07:23 PM, Mark Langsdorf wrote: > From: Mark Langsdorf Mark, This From: line is malformed: the bit between the angle brackets should contain an email address. HTH, Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to