On Friday 08 September 2017 05:17 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 08/09/2017 11:49, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>>> heat
On Friday 08 September 2017 03:19 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>> heat
>> dissipation is not efficient enough where the t
On Friday 08 September 2017 03:19 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Friday 08 September 2017 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> There is a particular situation when the cooling device is cpufreq and the
>> heat
>> dissipation is not efficient enough where the t
temperature = <11>; /* millicelsius */
+ hysteresis = <2000>; /* millicelsius */
+ type = "passive";
+ };
+};
+
+_cooling_maps {
+ map1: map1 {
+ trip = <_high_alert>;
+ cooling-devi
temperature = <11>; /* millicelsius */
+ hysteresis = <2000>; /* millicelsius */
+ type = "passive";
+ };
+};
+
+_cooling_maps {
+ map1: map1 {
+ trip = <_high_alert>;
+ cooling-devi
Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks. This will help
in cases of kexec where in a new kernel can boot abruptly.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
---
Changes in v3:
* Pushed the function outside #ifdef CON
Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks. This will help
in cases of kexec where in a new kernel can boot abruptly.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
---
Changes in v3:
* Pushed the function outside #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
* Added more details to commit log
On Wednesday 06 September 2017 07:26 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> * used a local d
On Wednesday 06 September 2017 07:26 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy
> Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
>
> * used a local dev pointer instead of dereferen
Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>
---
Changes in v2:
* used a local dev pointer instead of dereferencing dev at multiple places.
* dra7xx_pcie_stop_link before di
Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
---
Changes in v2:
* used a local dev pointer instead of dereferencing dev at multiple places.
* dra7xx_pcie_stop_link before disabling clks in the shutdown path.
drivers/pci/dwc/pci
Assign a default parent to mcasp3_ahclkx_mux clock using
the assigned-clock-parents property. This is helpful in
cases like kexec where in the clock parent can be something
other than the value at reset.
Suggested-by: Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer.
Assign a default parent to mcasp3_ahclkx_mux clock using
the assigned-clock-parents property. This is helpful in
cases like kexec where in the clock parent can be something
other than the value at reset.
Suggested-by: Tero Kristo
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
On Wednesday 06 September 2017 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 06/09/17 13:36, Keerthy wrote:
>> Reset the mcasp3_ahclkx_mux to abe_24m_fclk. This is needed
>> in case of kexec where the reset values might be wiped off.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.c
On Wednesday 06 September 2017 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 06/09/17 13:36, Keerthy wrote:
>> Reset the mcasp3_ahclkx_mux to abe_24m_fclk. This is needed
>> in case of kexec where the reset values might be wiped off.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy
>
> Why no
On Wednesday 06 September 2017 04:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 06 September 2017 04:23 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Keerthy,
>>
>> On Wednesday 06 September 2017 04:09 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>> Add shutdown handler to clea
On Wednesday 06 September 2017 04:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 06 September 2017 04:23 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Keerthy,
>>
>> On Wednesday 06 September 2017 04:09 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>> Add shutdown handler to clea
Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
index d4e98f3..66d1cfe 100644
--- a/d
Add shutdown handler to cleanly turn off clocks.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
index d4e98f3..66d1cfe 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci
Reset the mcasp3_ahclkx_mux to abe_24m_fclk. This is needed
in case of kexec where the reset values might be wiped off.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7
Reset the mcasp3_ahclkx_mux to abe_24m_fclk. This is needed
in case of kexec where the reset values might be wiped off.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk
gpio1 soft reset fails in the kexec path as the optional clock
is not enabled hence enable the HWMOD_CONTROL_OPT_CLKS_IN_RESET
flag for gpio1 hwmod.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git
gpio1 soft reset fails in the kexec path as the optional clock
is not enabled hence enable the HWMOD_CONTROL_OPT_CLKS_IN_RESET
flag for gpio1 hwmod.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2
Currently the driver boots only via device tree hence add a
dependency on CONFIG_OF. This leaves with a bunch of unused code
so clean that up. This patch also makes use of probe_new function
in place of the probe function so as to avoid passing i2c_device_id.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-k
Currently the driver boots only via device tree hence add a
dependency on CONFIG_OF. This leaves with a bunch of unused code
so clean that up. This patch also makes use of probe_new function
in place of the probe function so as to avoid passing i2c_device_id.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Reviewed
On Wednesday 30 August 2017 01:35 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Keerthy,
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com> wrote:
>> Currently the driver boots only via device tree hence add a
>> dependency on CONFIG_OF. This leaves with a
On Wednesday 30 August 2017 01:35 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Keerthy,
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Currently the driver boots only via device tree hence add a
>> dependency on CONFIG_OF. This leaves with a bunch of unused cod
Currently the driver boots only via device tree hence add a
dependency on CONFIG_OF. This leaves with a bunch of unused code
so clean that up. This patch also makes use of probe_new function
in place of the probe function so as to avoid passing i2c_device_id.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-k
Currently the driver boots only via device tree hence add a
dependency on CONFIG_OF. This leaves with a bunch of unused code
so clean that up. This patch also makes use of probe_new function
in place of the probe function so as to avoid passing i2c_device_id.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
Changes
On Thursday 08 June 2017 07:41 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Enric Balletbo Serra
> <eballe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Keerthy:
>>
>> 2017-06-08 12:46 GMT+02:00 Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>:
>>> Currently th
On Thursday 08 June 2017 07:41 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Enric Balletbo Serra
> wrote:
>> Hi Keerthy:
>>
>> 2017-06-08 12:46 GMT+02:00 Keerthy :
>>> Currently the driver boots only via device tree hence add a
>>
>>> For pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c,
>>> I do not see "interrupts", so it just straight maps the irq numbers.
>>
>> I think OMAP and DaVinci does someting similar too. This is from a recent
>> DaVinci patch from Keerthy:
>>
>> +Example fo
"interrupts", so it just straight maps the irq numbers.
>>
>> I think OMAP and DaVinci does someting similar too. This is from a recent
>> DaVinci patch from Keerthy:
>>
>> +Example for 66AK2G:
>> +
>> +gpio0: gpio@2603000 {
>> + compat
The patch adds keystone-k2g compatible, specific properties and
an example. The patch also adds the details of supported SoCs
for each compatible.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v4:
* Changed documentation link
66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
reserved.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <l
The patch adds keystone-k2g compatible, specific properties and
an example. The patch also adds the details of supported SoCs
for each compatible.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Acked-by: Rob Herring
---
Changes in v4:
* Changed documentation links.
* Added Rob's Ack.
* Replaced keystone-k2g
66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
reserved.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
---
Changes in v4:
* Couple
On Friday 04 August 2017 11:15 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> 66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
> functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
> instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
> reserved.
On Friday 04 August 2017 11:15 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> 66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
> functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
> instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
> reserved.
66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
reserved.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <l
The patch adds keystone-k2g compatible, specific properties and
an example. The patch also adds the details of supported SoCs
for each compatible.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v4:
* Changed documentation link
66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
reserved.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
---
Changes in v4:
* Couple
The patch adds keystone-k2g compatible, specific properties and
an example. The patch also adds the details of supported SoCs
for each compatible.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Acked-by: Rob Herring
---
Changes in v4:
* Changed documentation links.
* Added Rob's Ack.
* Replaced keystone-k2g
On Friday 04 August 2017 11:15 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> 66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
> functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
> instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
> reserved.
Oops.
On Friday 04 August 2017 11:15 AM, Keerthy wrote:
> 66AK2G has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
> functional. 9 banks with 16 gpios making a total of 144. The second
> instance has only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked
> reserved.
Oops.
gt;>
>> This series depends on Keerthy's gpio node patches on 66AK2G:
> Am waiting for Keerthy to send refresh series. Thanks for
> note about the deps.
Thanks Santosh. I am waiting for a response from Rob H on Suman's
question on whether to include power-domains property.
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
gt;>
>> This series depends on Keerthy's gpio node patches on 66AK2G:
> Am waiting for Keerthy to send refresh series. Thanks for
> note about the deps.
Thanks Santosh. I am waiting for a response from Rob H on Suman's
question on whether to include power-domains property.
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
knav_pool_create is an exported function. In the event of a call
before knav_queue_probe, we encounter a NULL pointer dereference
in the following line. Hence return -EPROBE_DEFER to the caller till
the kdev pointer is non-NULL.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
Changes
knav_pool_create is an exported function. In the event of a call
before knav_queue_probe, we encounter a NULL pointer dereference
in the following line. Hence return -EPROBE_DEFER to the caller till
the kdev pointer is non-NULL.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
Changes in v2:
* Fixed returning
On Sunday 30 July 2017 04:28 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> This fixes missing mfd_remove_devices() call when unload the module.
Reviewed-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel@ingics.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/lp87565.c | 7 +++
> 1 fi
On Sunday 30 July 2017 04:28 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> This fixes missing mfd_remove_devices() call when unload the module.
Reviewed-by: Keerthy
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> ---
> drivers/mfd/lp87565.c | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
&
knav_pool_create is an exported function. In the event of a call
before knav_queue_probe, we encounter a NULL pointer dereference
in the following line. Hence return -EPROBE_DEFER to the caller till
the kdev pointer is non-NULL.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
drivers/
knav_pool_create is an exported function. In the event of a call
before knav_queue_probe, we encounter a NULL pointer dereference
in the following line. Hence return -EPROBE_DEFER to the caller till
the kdev pointer is non-NULL.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c | 3
On Monday 24 July 2017 11:54 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:15PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> Add a separate compatible for keystone-k2g soc
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gp
On Monday 24 July 2017 11:54 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:15PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> Add a separate compatible for keystone-k2g soc
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.
On Friday 21 July 2017 04:14 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2017 05:28 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Grygorii Strashko
>> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:08:09 -0500
>>
>>> In general patch looks good to me, but it's really unexpected to
>>> receive IRQs
On Friday 21 July 2017 04:14 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2017 05:28 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Grygorii Strashko
>> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:08:09 -0500
>>
>>> In general patch looks good to me, but it's really unexpected to
>>> receive IRQs while CPSW is probing ;(
>>
On Friday 21 July 2017 03:04 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2017 05:05 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:32:27PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>> On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:20 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 201
On Friday 21 July 2017 03:04 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 07/20/2017 05:05 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:32:27PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>> On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:20 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 201
to
n->poll being NULL which is called as part of net_rx_action
function.
Suggested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 49 +-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 del
to
n->poll being NULL which is called as part of net_rx_action
function.
Suggested-by: Sekhar Nori
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 49 +-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet
On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:35 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:32:27PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:20 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:40:37PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 20 Jul
On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:35 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 03:32:27PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:20 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:40:37PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 20 Jul
On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:20 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:40:37PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 20 July 2017 12:14 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>&g
On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:20 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:40:37PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thursday 20 July 2017 12:14 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>&g
On Thursday 20 July 2017 12:14 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:14PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
>>> return va
On Thursday 20 July 2017 12:14 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:14PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
>>> return va
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:14PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
>> return value appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 04:40 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:14PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
>> return value appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy
>> ---
>
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 03:07 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:13PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> Use the devm version of gpiochip_add_data and pass on the
>> return value. Reset the static variables to 0 before returning.
>
> You need to describe
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 03:07 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:27:13PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>> Use the devm version of gpiochip_add_data and pass on the
>> return value. Reset the static variables to 0 before returning.
>
> You need to describe
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 12:43 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> keystone-k2g has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
>
> Please use 66AK2G for keystone-k2g.
Okay
>
>> functional( 9 banks wi
On Wednesday 19 July 2017 12:43 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> keystone-k2g has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
>
> Please use 66AK2G for keystone-k2g.
Okay
>
>> functional( 9 banks wi
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 05:01 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On Tuesday 18 July 2017 04:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Add a separate compatible for keystone-k2g soc
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 05:01 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On Tuesday 18 July 2017 04:27 PM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Add a separate compatible for keystone-k2g soc
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gp
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 10:24 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
>> return value appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 10:24 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
>> return value appropriately.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy
>> -
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 10:20 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Use the devm version of gpiochip_add_data and pass on the
>> return value. Reset the static variables to 0 before returning.
>>
>> Signed-
On Tuesday 18 July 2017 10:20 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Keerthy,
>
> On 07/18/2017 05:57 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Use the devm version of gpiochip_add_data and pass on the
>> return value. Reset the static variables to 0 before returning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keer
Add a separate compatible for keystone-k2g soc
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 3 ++-
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documen
Add a separate compatible for keystone-k2g soc
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 3 ++-
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree
The driver patches should have no dependency but the device Tree
will need the above set.
Keerthy (4):
gpio: davinci: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data in place of
gpiochip_add_data
gpio: davinci: Handle the return value of davinci_gpio_irq_setup
function
gpio: davinci: Add a separate compatible
The driver patches should have no dependency but the device Tree
will need the above set.
Keerthy (4):
gpio: davinci: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data in place of
gpiochip_add_data
gpio: davinci: Handle the return value of davinci_gpio_irq_setup
function
gpio: davinci: Add a separate compatible
Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
return value appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/d
Currently davinci_gpio_irq_setup return value is ignored. Handle the
return value appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 18 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio
Use the devm version of gpiochip_add_data and pass on the
return value. Reset the static variables to 0 before returning.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpi
keystone-k2g has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
functional( 9 banks with 16 gpios = 144). The second instance has
only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked reserved.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone-k2g.dts
Use the devm version of gpiochip_add_data and pass on the
return value. Reset the static variables to 0 before returning.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers
keystone-k2g has 2 instances of gpio. The first one has all the 144 GPIOs
functional( 9 banks with 16 gpios = 144). The second instance has
only the GPIO0:GPIO67 functional and rest are marked reserved.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/keystone-k2g.dtsi | 42
On Friday 14 July 2017 02:13 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/05/2017 at 00:38:27 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/05/2017 at 11:39:34 +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 18 April 2017 10:50 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>>>> F
On Friday 14 July 2017 02:13 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/05/2017 at 00:38:27 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/05/2017 at 11:39:34 +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 18 April 2017 10:50 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>>>&
The latest documentation reveals that initial voltage range that is
supported is starting from 0.6V for all the PMICs belonging to lp87565
family. Fix the same.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Fixes: f0168a9bf ("regulator: lp87565: Add support for lp87565 PMIC regulators&quo
The latest documentation reveals that initial voltage range that is
supported is starting from 0.6V for all the PMICs belonging to lp87565
family. Fix the same.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
Fixes: f0168a9bf ("regulator: lp87565: Add support for lp87565 PMIC regulators")
---
drivers/regulat
On Thursday 15 June 2017 12:03 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> Add driver for lp87565 PMIC family GPIOs. Three GPIOs are supported
> and can be configured in Open-drain output or Push-pull output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Latest versi
On Thursday 15 June 2017 12:03 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> Add driver for lp87565 PMIC family GPIOs. Three GPIOs are supported
> and can be configured in Open-drain output or Push-pull output.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy
> ---
>
> Latest version of mfd patch:
>
> https:/
Add driver for lp87565 PMIC family GPIOs. Three GPIOs are supported
and can be configured in Open-drain output or Push-pull output.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
---
Latest version of mfd patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9783079/
Changes in v2:
* included
*
Add driver for lp87565 PMIC family GPIOs. Three GPIOs are supported
and can be configured in Open-drain output or Push-pull output.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy
---
Latest version of mfd patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9783079/
Changes in v2:
* included
* stored the struct regmap
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 07:28 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
Missing commit log?
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław
> ---
> drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 07:28 PM, Michał Mirosław wrote:
Missing commit log?
> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław
> ---
> drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c
>
2-phase outputs configuration,
Buck0 is master for Buck0/1 output and Buck2 is master for Buck2/3
output.
Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org>
---
The other patches are already pulled by Mark. Hence posting
the remaining patch.
Changes in
601 - 700 of 2181 matches
Mail list logo