On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:17 +0200, Budde, Marco wrote:
Well, it is not the first driver I am writing for Linux.
So yes, I do know, what is part of a Linux driver and
what is not.
It should be fairly obvious. Windows drivers do all kinds of crap that
just obviously doesn't belong in the
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 15:19 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 at 23:38:10 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 18:58 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
I just bought a new notebook.
I'd return it if I were you.
What fun is that? I
On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 23:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Daniel Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] Should we start a known regression list?
please resend the bugs that still trigger for you with 2.6.19-rt0.
I'm working with the developers of the 64Studio distro who are
attempting to
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:17 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
thanks, please do that. Right now i have no open boot-crash regression
left that i can reproduce.
Possibly old news, but with 2.6.18-rt7 this user gets an Oops in
read_hpet() if high res timers are enabled.
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 08:51 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
That makes sense, I/O tasks don't generally hold the cpu for extended
periods, whereas a cpu bound task does.
So what can we do about I/O intensive tasks that also want a lot of CPU,
for example, the bloatier Gnome/KDE apps? Evolution is
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 12:49 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
+int set_mixer_volume(int mixer_vol)
{
- int retVal;
+ /* FIXME: Alsa has mixer_vol in 0-100 range, while SX1 needs
0-9 range */
Untrue. ALSA uses whatever range you define in the info callback for
the mixer element. I
On Feb 5, 2008 5:54 PM, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is every application that uses /proc/sys/dev/rtc/max-user-freq
supposed to be updated to use the new /sys interface?
IMHO the default should be increased to 1024 - the current default of
64 dates back to the 486 era. This would
On Jan 30, 2008 1:54 PM, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IANAL, and I would therefore ask a lawyer whether, and if yes under
which circumstances, shipping a binary driver written for another OS
dynamically linked into the Linux kernel would not be a criminal offense.
Please stop throwing
On Jan 31, 2008 6:13 PM, Reinaldo Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
system is x86_64!
:/# grep model\ name /proc/cpuinfo
model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2
model name : AMD Turion(tm) 64 X2
What does head -20 /usr/src/config-2.6.24 say?
Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Jan 25, 2008 6:02 PM, Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it normal that once I enable cpufreq on
a tickless system, it spews a warning:
Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -288201154 ns)
?
Yes, it's normal. Dual core AMD64 machines really do have unstable TSC.
Lee
--
To
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Stephen Oberholtzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off: I'm not subscribed to the list (I don't think I could
handle the volume), so please make sure you CC me if you reply.
I run an application on one of my machines; it often hangs, with the
process stuck
On 2/3/07, Eric Buddington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EIP:0060:[]Tainted: G M VLI
EFLAGS: 00013246 (2.6.20-rc6-mm3 #1)
The M taint flag indicates that a machine check exception has
occured. Check your logs for the MCE and make sure the hardware is
OK.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe
On 2/9/07, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would disagree that it's a peripheral issue, it's pretty core these
days, at least for any hardware that you can stuff in a laptop (though a
fair number of desktops get suspended and resumed these days too).
Servers are still the most
On 2/9/07, Nigel Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 20:59 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
On 2/9/07, Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would disagree that it's a peripheral issue, it's pretty core these
days, at least for any hardware that you can stuff in a laptop
On 7/12/07, Marcos David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I´m using RedHat Enterprise Server 4 Update 3 (kernel 2.6.9-34.ELsmp)
I was listing the contents of /proc/pid/status file and I came up with
a value of:
...
VmLib: 4294948464 kB,
...
Is this a known bug?
Ask Red Hat.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe
On 6/12/07, R.F. Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to write a kernel module which, when loaded, will blow the PC
speaker?
LOL. May I ask what your use case is?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On 6/13/07, Tetsuo Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Something is wrong with my guest Linux on VMware.
Host: CentOS5 (2.6.18-8.1.4.el5) on x86_64 (ThinkPad X60)
Guest: CentOS5 (2.6.18-8.1.4.el5) on x86_64 on VMware Workstation 5.5.4 using 2
CPUs
BUG messages appear frequently (several
On 6/18/07, Michael Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I have to cardbus sockets, how do I get from what I know (the card
is in socket 0) to I have to talk to ttyUSB2 to talk to the card? I
suspect I have to follow the thread from /sys/bus/pci to
/sys/bus/usb/devices, but how exactly?
You
On 5/30/07, Daniel J Blueman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a SanDisk Extreme IV 4GB CF card, capable of 40MB/s read, but
am seeing 30MB/s read [1], connected directly to the IDE bus on my
ICH8 controller.
How do you know it's capable of 40MB/s read?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 6/1/07, Matthew Fredrickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it acceptable (although
not nice) to simply fix it this way, by disabling irqs while it loads
the firmware?
I would say to just disable IRQs while loading firmware. Almost every
server I maintain has some vendor driver which
On 6/7/07, kernel coder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I am recieveing the packet on eth1 and want to send it through eth2.
I've written code in netif_recieve_skb function .This code changes the
mac header in sk_buff structure so that it can be send through other
interface card.But when i
On 6/27/07, Patrick Draper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
So -- the fact that mixing actually works for you when using libaoss
means software mixing is working correctly for your ALSA setup. The only
thing you should do is _use_ ALSA (natively) and not its OSS emulation
so you
On 6/26/07, Andreas Hartmetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not put the whole sound system in userland? It has been done before. Sound
is just not performance critical at all and it's almost never mission
critical.
There are dozens of companies selling Linux powered professional audio
gear,
On 6/28/07, Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ALSA has been the Linux soundsystem for a number of years now and as such,
an application that runs under Linux and produces sound more and more can be
expected to do so using the Linux API. The only reason it _can_ be seen as a
detail is due to
On 5/8/07, Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I have a reasonable grip on the voluntary and full preempt
models, can anyone give me any wisdom on the preempt of the BKL? I know
what it does, the question is where it might make a difference under
normal loads. Define normal as servers
On 5/17/07, Tomas Carnecky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite it's a Microsoft product, it's actually very nice and useful. A
little pad with a few buttons and connectors for a headset. It's an USB
device, but it doesn't represent itself as an input/HID device:
HID device not claimed by input
On 5/1/07, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
(I've added the E1000 maintainers to the thread as I found the issue
seems to go away after I compile out that driver. For reference, I was
trying to figure out why I lose exactly 24 ticks about every two
seconds, as
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 10:28 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 05:52:20PM +, Mark Fortescue wrote:
> >
> > I am writing a "Proprietry" driver module for a "Proprietry" PCI card and
> > I have found that I can't use SYSFS on Linux-2.6.10.
> >
> > Why ?.
>
> What ever gave you
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 00:54 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> I'd say that the general rule should
> be "don't check for NULL first unless you *know* the pointer will be NULL
> >50% of the time"...
How about running the same tests but using likely()/unlikely() for the
'1 in 50' cases?
Lee
-
To
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 17:15 -0800, Aaron Gyes wrote:
> > So, the fact that someone else is doing something illegal, makes it
> > acceptable for you to do the same thing? Please, talk to a lawyer
> > about
> > this issue if you have _any_ questions.
>
> How is what they are doing illegal? How it
On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 19:20 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Anyway, this is news to me. How about putting it in the FAQ? Too
> > politically charged?
>
> Why does it need to be in the FAQ, when the file COPYING in the main
> kernel directory explicitly spells this out?
That's the problem, it's not
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 12:40 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> > Well, kfree inlined was already mentioned but forgotten again.
> > What if this was used:
> >
> > inline static void kfree_WRAP(void *addr) {
> > if(likely(addr
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 01:08 +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> given that the alsa-user-mailinglist has some strange kind of authentication
> mechanism, and admin-authorization and whatever, I'm writing this mail to the
> LKML (it would have been CCed here anyway).
Still off topic.
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 09:42 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> It seems that Apple's driver has an in-kernel framework for doing volume
> control, mixing, and other horrors right in the kernel, in temporary
> buffers, just before they get DMA'ed (gack !)
>
> I want to avoid something like
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 08:58 +0530, krishna wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can any one tell me how to measure time accurately for a block of C code
> in device drivers.
> For example, If I want to measure the time duration of firmware download.
rdtsc()
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 15:12 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Sul, 2005-03-27 at 14:53, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > > Are you sure? It is perfectly legal to relicense things if you own the
> > > copyright. As long as he never distributes his GPL version
On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 23:40 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 08:58 +0530, Arun Srinivas wrote:
> > I am trying to set the SCHED_FIFO policy for my process.I am using
> > sched_setscheduler() function to do this.
>
> Attached is a little program that I use to set the priority
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:04 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Can the driver advertize in some way what it can do ? depending on the
> machine we are running on, it will or will not be able to do HW volume
> control... You probably don't want to use softvol in the former case...
>
> dmix by
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:31 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Well I don't remember the discussion thread on alsa-devel about this,
> but it's a good idea that alsa-lib checks the capability of hw-mixing
> and apples dmix only if necessary. (In the case of softvol, it can
> check the existence of hw
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 19:57 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Takashi,
>
> > > This one made /proc/asound/card0/id change from "Live" to "Unknown"
> > > on one of my systems, preventing alsatcl from properly restoring my
> > > mixer settings.
> >
> > Hmm, perhaps it's a side effect of chip
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 20:58 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 06:14:22PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 23:59 +0100, Julien Wajsberg wrote:
> > > - audio works too. The only problem is that two applications can't
> > > ope
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 22:46 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> > I think we just have to add this PCI id to the table. I got the same
> > result before James added the SBLive! platinum detection.
> >
> > What is the output of 'lspci -v | grep -1 EMU10k1'?
>
> 00:0d.0 Multimedia audio
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:55 +0200, Wiktor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> recently i had to run some program (xmms) with lowered nice value as
> normal user. to do that i had to su to the root account and then execute
> nice --5 xmms.
Let me guess, the sound skips unless you run at a low nice value.
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:13 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > + {.vendor = 0x1102, .device = 0x0002, .subsystem = 0x80271102,
> > +.driver = "EMU10K1", .name = "SBLive! Value [CT4832]",
> > +.emu10k1_chip = 1,
> > +.ac97_chip = 1} ,
> Unsurprisingly, my card is now named CT4832. I had
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 11:22 +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> No. You didn't get it. I'm taking the view that mixing sound is simply
> a task you would typically love to make a DSP firmware do.
> However providing a DSP for sound processing at 44kHZ on the same
> PCB as an 1GHZ CPU is a ridiculous
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 15:59 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i have released the -V0.7.41-10 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be
> downloaded from the usual place:
>
>http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
Ingo,
-15 has a typo that prevents building with my config.
Lee
---
I am seeing long latencies in the NFS client code. Attached is a ~1.9
ms latency trace.
Lee
nfs-1919us-latency_trace.bz2
Description: application/bzip
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:18 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 29.03.2005 Klokka 18:04 (-0500) skreiv Lee Revell:
> > I am seeing long latencies in the NFS client code. Attached is a ~1.9
> > ms latency trace.
>
> What kind of workload are you using to produce th
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:34 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 29.03.2005 Klokka 18:32 (-0500) skreiv Lee Revell:
> > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:18 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > ty den 29.03.2005 Klokka 18:04 (-0500) skreiv Lee Revell:
> > > > I am seeing lo
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 03:45 +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> On 2005-03-29, at 12:22, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > ALSA provides the "driver" feature in user-space because it's more
> > flexible, more efficient and safer than doing in kernel. It's
> > transparent from apps perspective. It really
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 03:45 +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> > I think your misunderstanding is that you beliieve user-space can't do
> > RT. It's wrong. See JACK (jackit.sf.net), for example.
>
> I know JACK in and out. It doesn't provide what you claim.
>
This was just an example, to prove
On Sun, 2005-03-27 at 10:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Running for several days with PREEMPT_DESKTOP, on the Athlon XP the
> > worst latency I am seeing is ~150 usecs! But on the C3 its about 4ms:
>
> could you r
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 03:48 +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> On 2005-03-30, at 01:39, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Look at the pile of junk that are most winmodem driver implementations,
> > nothing I want to see in the kernel ever. Those things should be in
> > userland.
>
> You are joking?
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 00:42 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 10:27:40PM +, Christensen Tom wrote:
> > I'm running 2.6.11 with Ingo's Preempt patch
> > (realtime-preempt-2.6.11-final-V0.7.40-04). The system is SMP with a
> > broadcom NIC (tg3 driver). I am seeing truly
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:18 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 29.03.2005 Klokka 18:04 (-0500) skreiv Lee Revell:
> > I am seeing long latencies in the NFS client code. Attached is a ~1.9
> > ms latency trace.
>
> What kind of workload are you using to produce th
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 09:50 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> on den 30.03.2005 Klokka 09:26 (-0500) skreiv Lee Revell:
> > On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 18:18 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > ty den 29.03.2005 Klokka 18:04 (-0500) skreiv Lee Revell:
> > > > I am seeing lo
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 09:41 -0500, Mark Hahn wrote:
> >> The test system runs a 2.6.11 kernel (no SMP) on a Pentium3 500 MHz
> > embedded hardware.
>
> which probably has memory bandwidth of at most a couple hundred MB/s,
> which is really horrible by modern standards.
What does that have to do
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 18:07 +0200, Wiktor wrote:
> Bodo Eggert wrote:
> > Wiktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>so i thought that it would be nice to add an attribute to file
> >>(changable only for root) that would modify nice value of process when
> >>it starts. if there is one byte free in
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 21:19 +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:00 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > > quake3 still segfaults when run through "aoss". And can't be fixed, as
> > > > it's closed source still.
> > > >
> > > I guess that's Quake3's problem...
> >
> > It an
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:55 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, kus Kusche Klaus wrote:
>
> > I'm performing realtime latency tests (for details about the hardware
> > and software, see my mail "[BUG] 2.6.11: Random SCSI/USB errors when
> > reading from USB memory stick" erlier
Since 2.6.12-rc1-RT something I get this Oops on boot about 50% of the
time. It's clearly some kind of race because if I just reboot again it
works. Seems to happen shortly after ksoftirqd startup (maybe the first
time we hit the timer softirq?).
This is (lazily) hand copied and incomplete, but
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > I think this is connected to a problem people have been reporting on the
> > Linux audio lists. With some USB chipsets, USB audio interfaces just
> > don't work. There are dropouts even at very high
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:13 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:43 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > > I think this is connected to a prob
[cc list restored]
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:57 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > I think this is connected to a problem people have been reporting on the
> > Linux audio lists. With some USB chipsets, USB audio interfaces just
> > don't work. There are dropouts even at
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:28 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 4:51 pm, Lee Revell wrote:
> > [cc list restored]
>
> Thanks, I never had one to start with ... :)
>
>
Thank you. Sorry for the tone of my reply...
> > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:28 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> This is what Greg just posted (and Linus merged into BK, so it'll be
> in BK snapshots starting tomorrow):
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel=111221966815043=2
Wow, just checked my mail and there were at least 5
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 17:40 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> This all seems off-topic for latency though. :)
>
Disagree, in the bug reports I saw from JACK users the symptoms are
exactly the same as a kernel latency problem. The only clear hint that
it's something else is that the RT kernel and
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 16:14 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> on den 30.03.2005 Klokka 11:56 (-0800) skreiv Andrew Morton:
> > > That's normal and cannot be avoided: when writing, we have to look for
> > > the existence of old nfs_page requests. The reason is that if one does
> > > exist, we must
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 18:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
> > > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today doing. Lee, could you
> >
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 19:12 -0800, Tim Harvey wrote:
> - the number of interrupts per second (1023) seems very high
Why? You have 1000 timer interrupts every second, plus 23 from other
sources.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 12:00 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 19:40 +0200, Jacek Łuczak wrote:
> >
> > I made some tests and almost all Linux distros brings down while freebsd
> > survive!Forkbombing is a big problem but i don't think that something like
> I really liked this
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:39 -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Search the list archives, this has been flamed to death already.
>
Actually, don't search the list archives. Talk to a lawyer about it.
Even if you get legal advice it's probably pointless to pass it on to
the list because you will just
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 16:50 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > So the overhead you are currently seeing should just be that of
> > > iterating through the list, locking said requests and adding them to
> > > our private list.
> >
> > ah - cool! This
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 06:30 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > ah - cool! This was a 100 MB writeout so having 3.7 msecs to process
> > > > 20K+ pages is not unreasonable. To break the latency, can i just do a
>
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 18:34 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> No one has commented about the loss of video in the tvtime/pcHDTV-3000
> card situation, am I on my own, basicly reverting to the
> pcHDTV-2.0.tar.gz stuff to overwrite the kernel stuff?
You didn't really give much of a clue as to where
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 23:05 -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> It can be SMI happening in the platform. Typically BIOS uses some SMI
> polling
> to handle some devices during early boot. Though 500 microseconds sounds
> a
> bit too high.
>
Nope, that sounds just about right. Buggy BIOSes
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 14:37 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> What the test program does, is spawn 5 processes, each with a different
> priority. Starting with 10 and going to 14. All are SCHED_FIFO. Each of
> these processes just do a scan of all directories starting with the root
> directory '/'
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 15:06 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 14:37 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Here's the bug I get:
> >
>
> FYI
>
> For kicks I ran this on 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.36-02 (I still had it as a
> Grub option), and the system just locked up hard. I just was
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 22:35 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > For kicks I ran this on 2.6.11-rc2-RT-V0.7.36-02 (I still had it as a
> > Grub option), and the system just locked up hard. I just was curious
> > if this was from a different change. But at least in the latest it
> > shows output, and
I can trigger latencies up to ~1.1 ms with a CVS checkout. It looks
like inside ext3_try_to_allocate_with_rsv, we spend a long time in this
loop:
ext3_test_allocatable (bitmap_search_next_usable_block)
find_next_zero_bit (bitmap_search_next_usable_block)
find_next_zero_bit
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:10 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 06:13 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I can trigger latencies up to ~1.1 ms with a CVS checkout. It looks
> > > like inside
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 10:27 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Neal Gustafson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, spake thus:
>
> > Blond Amateur Coed Spring Break Bed Sex Hardcore
> > Blonde In Stockings Posing beaumont
>
> Has this list not the simplest spam filter? It's difficult to see how any of
>
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:42 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:49:04PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > >RT-LSM introduces architectural problems in the form of bogus API. And
> >
> > that may be true of LSM, but not RT-LSM in particular. RT-LSM doesn't
> > introduce *any* API
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 22:41 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > It's clever that they do that, but additional control is needed in the
> > future. jackd isn't the most sophisticate media app on this planet (not
> > too much of an insult :)) [...]
>
> i think you are underestimating Jack - it is
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 22:49 +0100, sylvanino b wrote:
> I would like to share this tool if somebody is interested, but I dont
> know how to proceed, I mean how to make a contribution an efficient
> way. Any help/idea/information is welcome.
>
Put the patch on the web somewhere and post the URL
Are there any known incompatibilities with oprofile and the RT preempt patch?
Lee
Oops: [#1]
PREEMPT
Modules linked in: realtime commoncap af_packet via_rhine mii crc32 ehci_hcd
usbhid uhci_hcd usbcore via_
agp agpgart evdev snd_rtctimer snd_emu10k1_synth snd_emu10k1 snd_ac97_codec
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 14:30 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Philippe Elie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > oprofile_ops.cpu_type == NULL, this has been fixed 3 weeks ago, can
> > you retry with -rc4 ?
>
> i've uploaded an -rc4 port of the -RT tree half an hour ago (-39-00).
>
OK, I will test
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:16 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> All distros are trying to reduce boot time.
They certainly aren't all trying very hard. Debian and Fedora (last
time I checked) do not even run the init scripts in parallel.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 09:51 +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote:
> Paolo Ciarrocchi schrieb:
> > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:06:51 -0500, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:16 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >>
> >
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 15:16 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > I don't see why so much effort goes into improving boot time on the
> > kernel side when the most obvious user space problem is ignored.
>
> What user space problem is that?
That init scripts with no interdependencies are run sequentially
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 15:21 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Lee> I don't see why so much effort goes into improving boot time
> Lee> on the kernel side when the most obvious user space problem
> Lee> is ignored.
>
> How much of a win is it to run init scripts in parallel? I seem to
>
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:16 -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > But, I was referring more to things like GDM not being started until all
> > the other init scripts are done. Why not start it first, and let the
> > network initialize while the user is logging in?
&g
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 01:15 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote:
> Another issue would be dual-booting, which a lot of people still do for some
> strange reason.
Um, to reverse engineer Windows drivers?
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 00:43 +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> There's stuff that it could be done in the kernel to help improving those
> numbers,
> IMHO.
>
> xp logs all the io done the first two minutes after booting. The next time it
> boots
> it tries to read all those files at once so the
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 13:29 -0700, Joseph Cosby wrote:
> Hi,
> Using VMWare 4 with a 2.6.9 kernel I get "IO-APIC + timer doesn't work!"
> As suggested, the noapic option fixes the problem. This resulted after
> adding APIC support to my kernel. My problem is, I need APIC support to boot
> on
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 01:49 -0500, Sean wrote:
> The affects of many top level folks using a non free system is felt all
> the way down the food-chain. If the top tier would agree to use a free
> SCM system then we could build bridges and offer the data in the preferred
> format to _everyone_
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:27 -0500, Fao, Sean wrote:
> Where are those nonsense (base64) messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming
> from after I post?
>
Looks like a new spammer tactic. They have progressed from spoofing
emails from real LKML posters to sending spam replies to actual threads.
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 14:30 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Philippe Elie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > oprofile_ops.cpu_type == NULL, this has been fixed 3 weeks ago, can
> > you retry with -rc4 ?
>
> i've uploaded an -rc4 port of the -RT tree half an hour ago (-39-00).
>
Thanks, -rc4 did
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 14:03 -0800, Chuck Harding wrote:
> Why can't the list owners apply spamassassin to the list's *incoming*
> mail stream so we don't ever see this stuff? Nearly every one of the
> lists hosted on vger.kernel.org get spammed on a regular basis because
> there is no spam
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 18:32 -0500, Sean wrote:
> On Thu, February 17, 2005 6:25 pm, Ed Tomlinson said:
> > Linus has tried other SCMs. They did not suffice. I remember the preBK
> > days, when you had to post a patch half a dozen time to get it merged.
> > Patches were being missed left right
601 - 700 of 1258 matches
Mail list logo
