On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, antirez wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch converts many occurences of '* 4' in the networking code
(often used to convert in bytes the TCP data offset and the IP header len)
to the faster ' 2'. Since this was a quite repetitive work it's better
if someone double-check
s you know anyhow.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.
Yuck. What UDMA mode does your kernel put the drive in at boot WITHOUT
the -X option? -X66 means UDMA 2 (33).
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, paradox3 wrote:
My machine is/has:
Linux 2.2.14
Go update. 2.2.14 and 2.2.15 (and some older 2.2.x possibly as well)
have severe security problems. 2.2.18 is current.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
Disk Block?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Don't take this too seriously, the author had asked for flames without
meaning them, so this is the disclaimer ;-)]
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Mark I Manning IV wrote:
found in teh kernel sources bz2. It is done in parody of teh original
doc and is meant to be laughed at as much as taken
On Mon, 01 Jan 2001, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
If I now patch serial 5.05 on top of that, the kernel itself detects
devices, but does nothing if it's to boot /sbin/init. ctrl-alt-del
and Magic SysRq are both functional and can reboot the machine.
VA's current kernel includes VM-global and
drwxrwxrwt 23 root root 706 Jan 2 11:53 /space/
$ grep /space /etc/exports
/space 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0(ro)
(Linux 2.2.18, nfs-utils 0.2.1)
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
permissions which I find strange,
since the client lists this:
drwxrwxrwt 23 root wheel 706 Jan 2 11:53 /mnt
Evidently, the directory has execution permissions for everyone.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
This looks better and it makes FreeBSD able to ls the directory, and on
touch /mnt/try, I get EROFS on the client, so this is okay; however, the
access reply does not include EXECUTE permissions which I find strange,
since the client lists
,
you're making your own DoS if your machines can't chat to each other. If
you insist on breaking the RFC, make a sysctl for this behaviour that
defaults to "off".
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Working to clean all the modular natures of ATA/IDE now
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Sergey Kubushin wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Modules don't load. I do usually compile heavily modular kernels, with ide
and ext2fs being also
for the interoperability. Is there a problem with this when the
recommendation is not followed?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
can't see at the moment?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Hmm... Reiserfs is incompatible with knfsd? That might explain the
massive data loss I was getting with reiserfs (basically I'd have to
reformat and reinstall every couple of weeks). The machine this was
happening with also exports my apt cache for
reported increased problems after applying the patch?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Tony Hoyle wrote:
Matthias Andree wrote:
You're not getting data loss, but access denied, when hitting
incompatibilities, and it looks like it hits 2.2 hard while 2.4 is less
of a problem. Please search the reiserfs list archives for details.
vs-13048 is a good
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Tony Hoyle wrote:
ls can't access the files either, so I don't see how that could rectify
anything. The entire directory becomes inaccessible. This happened to
/lib once. Nasty.
No-one can access the files once the caches are hosed. Purge the
inode/dentry caches
2.4.4pre6 breaks build on gcc 2.95.2/gnu ld 2.9.5 for x86 with undefined
__builtin_expect reference when linking for bzImage. Details have been
discussed dome days ago for some 2.4.3-ac version.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
pcnet32.o pcnet32.c
pcnet32.c:1385: warning: #warning PCI posting bug
pcnet32.c:327: pcnet32_pci_tbl causes a section type conflict
make[3]: *** [pcnet32.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.3-ac14/drivers/net'
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
)
at fileops.c:652
#3 0x17cbc3 in _IO_new_file_attach (fp=0x8049618, fd=5) at fileops.c:268
#4 0x178f7c in _IO_new_fdopen (fd=5, mode=0x80484dc r) at iofdopen.c:126
#5 0x804845e in main () at test.c:10
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
get it right, then, even without special boot options?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
eth1: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0005 media 18.
It looks like I found a workaround which may help you debugging, if new
questions arise, please ask. Willing to help so this issue can be
resolved for Linux 2.2.20.
1. I'm compiling my eth drivers
On Sat, 19 May 2001, I wrote:
I'm having difficulties with a RTL8139 with Linux 2.2.19 (both drivers),
but not with Linux 2.4.4's 8139too driver. The card is an Allied Telesyn
AT-2500TX, the chip is reported as 8139C/rev. 0x10. The card shares its
IRQ 9 with an nVidia Riva TNT 128 [NV04],
with MIME-enhanced mail.
Plus, people which use any characters beyond ASCII have no real choice
but to use MIME; if they have MTAs in between that don't talk
ESMTP/8BITMIME, then quoted-printable is what happens.
Use emil, metamail or such if you want to keep your mailer.
--
Matthias Andree
0x10ec, Device 0x8139, Subsystem 0x1259.
PCI timer settings -- minimum grant 32, maximum latency 64.
Can someone help?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I see that Alan has reverted back to the 2.4.3 driver for his ac-series for
other reasons, hopefully either the old driver will going in to 2.4.6 or the
new one will get fixed?
I've got one of the two problems fixed here at the test lab, and am
On Fri, 01 Jun 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Matthias Andree wrote:
Will that 8139too be able to share its IRQ with a bttv card (Hauppauge
WinTV in my case)? With 2.2.19, it's currently possible, at least after
unloading and reloading the 8139too module, but it's a no-go with 2.4.5.
Can
appreciate if you did.
--
Matthias Andree
Where do you think you're going today?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Linus rejected a while back.
Does including knfsd v3 break v2? Is not NFS v3 a compile-time option? I
would not object if it was tagged "EXPERIMENTAL".
--
Matthias Andree
Where do you think you're going today?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
one else misbehaving.
*) unspecified as per SUS v2, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Solaris,
HP-UX manual pages.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
a thing such as a non-blocking
listening socket (name the line if there is). Where does inetd set its
listening sockets to O_NONBLOCK? Why should an application that
originates on BSD misbehave if it got BSD semantics?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
Resynchronize the USB stuff and starting bringing the ARM into line
2.2.18pre9
o NFSv3 support and NFS updates (Trond Myklebust and co)
Great. Will test.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
e entirely inserted into their
slots without rotation, bending and so on.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
with the wider range/higher
precision.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
LIST answer)) = 18
write(2, ": ", 2: ) = 2
write(2, "timed out", 9timed out)= 9
write(2, "\n", 1
) = 1
_exit(1)= ?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
of a kernel.org linux 2.2.17.
Do you need any files? I am unclear on which files to send you guys. Who is
the maintainer of the serial code?
Try the updated serial driver from sourceforge.net first. Patching old
drivers into new kernels is usually not a good idea.
--
Matthias Andree
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
Every Linux inetd in the world would instantly stop working.
Why should it? inetd.c does not touch fd flags. No F_SETFL, no
O_NONBLOCK, no fcntl. Why should inetd fail with a changed accept(2)
semantics?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from
is at
http://home.pages.de/~mandree/2904102753.2572.0%40argo.troja.mff.cuni.cz
Dan's mail is at
http://home.pages.de/~mandree/2904193940.20671.qmail%40cr.yp.to
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
gs.
However, this makes Linux incompatible with *BSD and Solaris, so I'm
wondering what this "break existing programs" would be, portable
programs would most likely not break by the API change.
Break portability, that's what it actually does, regardless of who is
correct. *sigh*
--
Matthias Andr
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
Actually, 2.0e3 did include one rather important fix which solved the
Uh. Fix? This sounds like working around very broken devices to me, or
are devices allowed to wreak havoc if sync negotiation is tried in spite
of not being advertised in inquiry
for Linux NFS v3 client support, the
server patches are the interesting part. They get Linux rid of the
long-awaited SysV-NFS-client incompatibilities.
Did you merge Dave Higgens' NFS v3 Server patches completely? Did you
reject parts of the patches?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list
hoto at 1/1000th sec to figure out what
they said.
Do you have a different machine with null-modem or something? You could
copy your syslog/klog output there, or you could send it to a different
host in your LAN.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
)
This is also good.
2.2.18 looks most promising of all 2.2 series kernels so far. No
problems with 2.2.18pre15 at home currently; just reiserfs needs manual
patching in headers since it interferes with additional patches. Not a
2.2.18pre problem, though.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list
directly off the CPU (at least, last time I
looked, in some older 2.2.x, it was like that).
The hint it's actually a K6-2 is the "model: 8" line.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
threads (that cfengine spawns)? Is there anything
related to RLIMIT_NPROC (though I don't see why that would send SIGSEGV
rather than SIGKILL)?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote:
Wasn't dma disabled on all VIA ide chipsets because of sporadic corruption?
That's not the point, the quoted message shows up when you try -X67..
-X69 in hdparm; cable detection seems to not work out properly.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Brown) writes:
I am looking forward to seeing lots of downloads and absolutely no
problem reports but is seems unlikely.
Alan Cox has suggested that these changes may not be appropriate for
2.4, so we
I already asked this on the linux-sound mailing list almost 10 days ago,
but got no response. So here it is again, header cut down to essentials:
-
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:04:32 +0100
From: Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2.2.18: difficulties with Ensoniq
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Has arrived...
What's new with that?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.h
not be reliable.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote:
While 2.0e3 contains a bug that can cause an OOps inside the driver (just
use the echo "INQUIRY 0" /proc/scsi/tmscsim/?), the normal bus rescanning
should not be able to trigger it. The above looks like the bug is occuring
somewhere else.
Having said
Kurt Garloff schrieb am Donnerstag, den 23. November 2000:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 02:06:18AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
I ran that script several times since it did not collect all devices,
Strange.
While 2.0e3 contains a bug that can cause an OOps inside the driver (just
use
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Matthew Dharm wrote:
I was trying to figure out why I periodically get the message
set_rtc_mmss: can't update from 0 to 59
on my console. It appears that the kernel is attempting to update my CMOS
clock for me, based on the more accurate data being provided by my
try the most recent 2.2.19-pre?
The machine is a pentium-MMX with 64 MB RAM with a kernel 2.2.18 that
has these patches/updated drivers (none VM related AFAICS):
IDE 2.2.18.1209
I²C 2.5.4
LM_Sensors 2.5.4
DC390 2.0e7
ReiserFS 3.5.28
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
?
2.2.19pre2 should resolve that problem
I'll give that a try. Thanks to you and Ville Herva for replying.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
or sparc
series.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
or provide more
information as requested.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Andrea Arcangeli schrieb am Freitag, den 22. Dezember 2000:
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
I suspect that these patches are mutually incompatible.
did you checked that there are no rejects after patching :)
Yes, I did, there were none.
I had one patch
fixed, sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
roughly -1 s/min, though my CMOS clock is
fine unless tampered with.
What can I do?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
adjtimex.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
what to test.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000, Matthias Andree wrote:
Relevant dmesg:
apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x03 (Driver version 1.13)
Board: Gigabyte 7ZXR, BIOS rev. F4 (VIA KT133 chip set, AMIBIOS).
That's not a notebook, with a Duron CPU.
For what it's worth, here's a current /proc/apm output:
1.13 1.2
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Erik Mouw wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 02:53:37PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
However, reading from /proc/apm also triggers other weird problems:
- Received characters dropped on serial line. I thought my serial port
was broken, because a 16550 is supposed
, that's OLD NEW (or FROM TO), nothing really difficult since
it's the same way as in mv or cp.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Evan Thompson wrote:
---(CC answer please)---
To: should be fine as well, I assume.
I'm having a strange problem with my IDE controller. I believe (and
that's what Windows and the m/b manufaturer -- PC Chips -- say) that I
have a VIA PCI BusMaster IDE controller, and
ing you can do about that. Talk to non-firewalled, working
machines to prevent that. Possibly try to connect() to several sockets
at once (use fork or threads).
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]. That mail is
also in my lk folder and has kernel.org Received: headers, so you should
have got that mail as well; plus you got it as copy. Is there something
wrong with mail routing?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
the proper system time after these
stalls?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This had been a report for a non-portable computer which should (Duron)
indeed have a TSC, that is, /proc/cpuinfo lists one ;-) Do 486s
generally have APM so it might be worth fixing/working around for them?
If so, would re-reading from CMOS for boxes without TSC be a "valid"
solution?
--
/conf.modules to
/etc/modules.conf. The use of /etc/conf.modules is deprecated,
please remove /etc/conf.modules as soon as possible. Command
rm /etc/conf.modules
depmod: Can't open /lib/modules/2.2.18-ma2/modules.dep for writing
--
Matthias Andree
PGP signature
to be
booted from GRUB 0.5.95 (some CVS version). I then made USB into
modules, the kernel was 887 kB and booted. Is Linux 2.4 supposed to
suffer from the 1 M limit still?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a problem. depmod should not try to do anything besides giving
its version when --version is used, should it?
Historical accident. I want to clean that up but it breaks existing
behaviour; somewhere
for modutils 2.x for x = 3.
(/sbin/depmod -V -n | head -1) 2/dev/null
I was just thinking to write -V "output version in addition to normal
operation" in --help, nothing bigger than like 5 minutes.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
elaborately, I think, CMOS is limited to 1 s, so the
granularity will make the whole thing pretty vain.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
quite some time ago.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Jordan Mendelson wrote:
Everyone who has ever been the press spotlight knows that most of it is
inaccurate, rushed and written to bring in readers rather than to report
well thought out stories.
Money rules the world, not truth.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
- Amiga Y2K fixes (a bit late, wouldn't you say?)
Might relabeling them 3rd Millennium fixes do any good? :-)
Anyhow, thanks.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
Sven, how did you kill the clipping ??
Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ?
Go set the jumpers right. (anyhow, IBM drives are delivered unclipped,
not sure why Maxtors seem to be)
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
or
tomorrow, and look if Andrea's VM-global has anything to do with that
since if buffer.c changes and fss change that as well, we have three
patches to merge. :-/
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
Ah.. This is a i386 machine, UDMA33 capable, and the bloody thing won't
boot with the clipping removed, and with clipping I can use only 32 GB :((
BIOS update or manual configuration in Standard BIOS configuration
required?
--
Matthias Andree
Garloff, says it's ready for inclusion.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
back to the
original open file (that is now outside the chroot) and calls upon
chdir("..").
Note that it's NOT related to the current working directory, but to an
open file outside the chroot.
Please comment.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
is a privileged call. And DO USE setuid,
not seteuid or something (otherwise the saved set-uid will bite you).
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
be called 2.95.2.1 or 2.95.3.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
BUG: you *MUST* chdir() into the chroot jail before it does you any
good at all!
I usually recommend:
#include sysexits.h
/* for EX_NOUSER */
mkdir("foo");
chdir("foo");
chroot(".");
add this:
/* DO REPLACE 500 BY AN EXISTING USER ID
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
2.4.3-ac10
o Fix reboot notifier unregister in aic7xxx (Arjan van de Ven)
2.4.3-ac6
o Merge aic7xxx driver 6.11 (Justin Gibbs)
I tried vanilla 2.4.3 yesterday, on a box which has one DPTA (IDE) drive
and two Seagate
`$@D.57)=F4/+I(`EB@DU_29J5?T?B.!52MOAE5@
MBVB1B2$,V3M^[VM1.P@AF,2;]XGXB(F6)7L\TH)00N68.A`MK2$-\N
=S;JJ8;KIF!O/D!F.']P0#,'^+N2**$@0*1X%@`
`
end
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:
--- /mnt/3/linux-2.2.19/fs/nfs/dir.c Sun Mar 25 08:37:38 2001
+++ linux-2.2.19/fs/nfs/dir.c Thu Apr 5 14:37:59 2001
@@ -454,6 +454,9 @@
*/
static loff_t nfs_dir_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
{
+ /* Glibc 2.0
if someone could mention the canonical aic7xxx LILO append
parameters for a full debug trace in that case.
Bottom line: I'm not buying Adaptec SCSI host adaptors ever again.
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
Kai, can you try this patch out? I think it does the right
thing. What I'm mostly interested in is if your ipchains
setup works for the resulting kernel, I've already checked
that it links properly. :-)
I'm not Kai, but I also reported similar
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Royans Tharakan wrote:
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
aacraid raid driver version, Apr 28 2001
percraid device detected
Device mapped to virtual address 0xf8806000
percraid:0 device initialization successful
percraid:0 AacHba_ClassDriverInit complete
scsi0 :
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, poptix wrote:
Howdy,
I've got an Adaptec AHA-2940UW Pro Ultra SCSI host adapter using
the aic7xxx driver (the new one, not the old one), and have had no
problems, I have a zip drive on ID5, and a 12X Smart Friendly CD-RW on
ID6, haven't had any problems on
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Steve 'Denali' McKnelly wrote:
Let me ask a possibly stupid question... How do you tell
what version of the Gibbs Adaptec driver you're using? Did I
misunderstand you when you said the 2.4.4 kernel is using 6.1.5?
Also, did I understand you to say the 6.1.12
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
Command found on device queue
aic7xxx_abort returns 8194
I have seen blaming for this error to aic7xxx new driver prior to version
6.1.11. It was included in the 2.4.3-ac series, but its has not got into
main 2.4.4 (there is
(that was a problem formerly).
Thanks a lot. (Might it be a good idea to ask Linus and Alan to update the
driver they ship in 2.4.5-pre or 2.4.4-ac, respectively?)
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Todd M. Roy wrote:
I tried 2.4.4 with the old aic7 driver and it worked fine.
That may be true, and it may help the deployment of 2.4.4 on that
particular machine, but the kernel needs the bugfix anyways, and
reporting the bug is the least I can do. If I'm after old
On Fri, 04 May 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Sigh...now, I hope, we can get back to solving problems that I don't
expect to be so rare they're lost in the statistical noise. It's not
good to get so obsessed about finding clever solutions to corner cases
that one loses sight of the larger
On Fri, 01 Jun 2001, Matthias Andree wrote:
Not sure if it's related to IRQ sharing or another initialization issue.
Looks like IRQ sharing is still in the play.
Yesterday, I purchased a pair of used 3C905TXs, replaced the RTL 8139 by
the 3C905, and got complaints by the 3C905 about eth0
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
