On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:36:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
That's all a bit crappy if the wrong races happen and some other task
is somehow exceeding the dirty limits each time this task polls them.
Seems unlikely that such a condition would persist forever.
How exactly do you define
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 06:52:20PM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote:
On Saturday 25 August 2007, Fabio Comolli wrote:
On 8/25/07, David Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using 2.6.22.5 with cfs v20.3 and suspend2 2.2.10.2. With
that combination, suspend is not working anymore
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Matthias Hensler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:34:07AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
I am also willing to try the patch posted by Richard.
I want to give some update here:
1. We finally hit the problem on a third system, with a total different
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:55:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:59:43 +0200 Matthias Hensler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Matthias Hensler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:34:07AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
I am also
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:34:07AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
(attempting to cc Matthias. If I have the wrong one, please fix it up)
You got the correct one.
Looks like the same problem with spinlock unfairness we've seen
elsewhere: it seems to be looping here? Or is everyone stuck
just
Hi!
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 06:52:20PM +0200, Christian Hesse wrote:
> On Saturday 25 August 2007, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> > On 8/25/07, David Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm using 2.6.22.5 with cfs v20.3 and suspend2 2.2.10.2. With
> > > that combination, suspend is not working
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Matthias Hensler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:34:07AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> [...]
> I am also willing to try the patch posted by Richard.
I want to give some update here:
1. We finally hit the problem on a third system, wit
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:55:34AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:59:43 +0200 Matthias Hensler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Matthias Hensler wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:34:07AM -0
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:34:07AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (attempting to cc Matthias. If I have the wrong one, please fix it up)
You got the correct one.
> > Looks like the same problem with spinlock unfairness we've seen
> > elsewhere: it seems to be looping here? Or is everyone stuck
>
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:36:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> That's all a bit crappy if the wrong races happen and some other task
> is somehow exceeding the dirty limits each time this task polls them.
> Seems unlikely that such a condition would persist forever.
How exactly do you define
10 matches
Mail list logo
