Re: 2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!

Try 2.4.0-test10-pre5 Markus hennig wrote: hi, kernel 2.4.0test10-pre4 pentium mmx with 64MB ram if anybody interested in more details i will send .config last log before freeze: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102! invalid operand: CPU: 0 --

Re: ide/disk perf?

Interesting theory, but no go here. I just remembered one other thing that may have an impact. I have a IBM-DTLA-307045 (~45 GB i think) hanging off the same channel as slave. The thing with that one is that if I try to do a lot of i/o on the disk..my machine locks up. Hard. alt-sysReq doesn't

Re: ide/disk perf?

At the bottom is the IDE/ATA part of my .config. let me knwo if I am missing something. Should I worry about the Multi_Mode configuration? Pierre Etchemaite wrote: As a side note, I usually get better results tweaking disks using kernel compiling options ("default to DMA", "autotune chipset",

Re: 2.4.0test10-pre4: Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102!

Try 2.4.0-test10-pre5 Markus hennig wrote: > > hi, > > kernel 2.4.0test10-pre4 > pentium mmx with 64MB ram > if anybody interested in more details i will send .config > > last log before freeze: > > Kernel BUG at vmscan.c:102! > invalid operand: > CPU: 0 --

Re: ide/disk perf?

Interesting theory, but no go here. I just remembered one other thing that may have an impact. I have a IBM-DTLA-307045 (~45 GB i think) hanging off the same channel as slave. The thing with that one is that if I try to do a lot of i/o on the disk..my machine locks up. Hard. alt-sysReq doesn't

Re: ide/disk perf?

At the bottom is the IDE/ATA part of my .config. let me knwo if I am missing something. Should I worry about the Multi_Mode configuration? Pierre Etchemaite wrote: > As a side note, I usually get better results tweaking disks using kernel > compiling options ("default to DMA", "autotune