random reboots

2001-04-24 Thread Nathan Walp
Help! My machine seems to be rebooting at random. Actually, it's more like the screen blanks, and suddenly the BIOS is going through POST. There may be a reset-button gnome in my case putting a jumper over the reset pins, but I seriously doubt it. ;-) I recently tried to switch from APM to ACPI

2.4.1-ac13 tulip problems

2001-02-14 Thread Nathan Walp
I just booted to 2.4.1-ac13, and was fine for a couple minutes. Then all network connectivity went away, and I had this sitting in syslog: Feb 14 16:45:48 patience kernel: LDT allocated for cloned task! Feb 14 16:47:19 patience kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Feb 14 16:47:51 p

Re: 2.4.1-ac13 tulip problems

2001-02-14 Thread Nathan Walp
Alan Cox wrote: > > > I just booted to 2.4.1-ac13, and was fine for a couple minutes. Then > > all network connectivity went away, and I had this sitting in syslog: > > Hence, I'm back to 2.4.1-ac12, and sending this in. No other noticible > > problems in my short-lived uptime ;-) > > I guess

2.4.1-ac14 tulip woes

2001-02-15 Thread Nathan Walp
The fix in ac14 for the ac13 patch that killed the tulip driver doesn't quite work either: Feb 15 13:04:16 patience kernel: LDT allocated for cloned task! Feb 15 13:04:55 patience kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Feb 15 13:05:27 patience last message repeated 4 times Feb 15 13:06

Oops in 2.4.0-ac5

2001-01-10 Thread Nathan Walp
First post to the list, hope I get this right... 2.4.0-ac5 oopses very early on in the boot process. I can't get the actual oops off of the machine, but this is what i managed to type into my laptop: ... Getting VERSION: 40010 Getting VERSION: 40010 Getting ID: 0 Getting ID: f00 Getting LVT

Re: Oops in 2.4.0-ac5

2001-01-10 Thread Nathan Walp
Hans Grobler wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Nathan Walp wrote: > > First post to the list, hope I get this right... > > Could you please run this through ksymoops on your machine. > Depending on which distribution you're using, this can be as > simple as

Re: Oops in 2.4.0-ac5

2001-01-10 Thread Nathan Walp
Hans Grobler wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Nathan Walp wrote: > > Here it is... I opted to cut out the 1200-odd warnings, which from the > > look of them were all because i'm running it under 2.4.0-ac4 (which > > boots fine). > > Thanks! My local mirror doe

Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20

2001-03-12 Thread Nathan Walp
Alan Cox wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/3.4/ > > Intermediate diffs are available from > > http://www.bzimage.org > > (Note that the cmsfs port to 2.4 is a work in progress) > > Its now 2767631 bytes .gz but a fair

Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20

2001-03-13 Thread Nathan Walp
David Balazic wrote: > > Nathan Walp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > Also, sometime between ac7 and ac18 (spring break kept me from testing > > stuff inbetween), i assume during the new aic7xxx driver merge, the > > order of detection got changed, and now t

Re: Linux 2.4.2ac20

2001-03-14 Thread Nathan Walp
David Balazic wrote: > > Nathan Walp wrote: > > > > David Balazic wrote: > > > > > > Nathan Walp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > > > > > > > Also, sometime between ac7 and ac18 (spring break kept me from testing > > > >

Re: devfs vs. devpts

2001-03-16 Thread Nathan Walp
John Jasen wrote: > > On 16 Mar 2001, Ian Soboroff wrote: > > > i don't have devpts mounted under 2.4.2 (debian checks whether you > > have devfs before mounting devpts), so i tried building my kernel with > > Unix 98 pty support but without the devpts filesystem. i get the > > following error

Re: [sligthly OT] serial console on palm

2001-03-18 Thread Nathan Walp
Andreas Dilger wrote: > > John Lenton writes: > > I remember seing a project to get a palm pilot working as a > > serial console, but now google seems unable to find it. Does > > anyone know of such a project? > > I got one recently called "serialrecord" for the Palm, but it is one-way > only (u

OOPS in 2.4.0-ac10

2001-01-23 Thread Nathan Walp
A whole bunch of oopses. Was able to alt-sysrq with all of them. The second one of the 4 i'm posting here happened about a dozen times in a row in about a 45 min period while I was away from my machine. I opted not to post a dozen duplicate oopses, so I sipped those out. For the most part, I t

Re: fat32 corruption with 2.4.0

2001-01-25 Thread Nathan Walp
Heikki Lindholm wrote: > > Hello, > I haven't seen much vfat/fat32 complaints lately, so: > 2.4.0 destroyed my windows partition. There seemed to be some trouble in > 2.4.0-test9, too. I don't know if this was a known problem or not, but > 2.4.0-test9 wrote filenames in a wrong way. It could be o

Re: Promise PDC20265, VIA KT133 and corruption

2001-02-03 Thread Nathan Walp
Petr Vandrovec wrote: > > Hi Andre, > if you remember, last week I complained that Promise corrupts data > when I copy them from hdh to hde. Today I did some more experiments > (running 2.4.1-ac1) and found: > > 1) Debian sid's 'cmp' prints incorrect offsets when files differ >in more than

OOPSes and BUGs everywhere (2.4.0)

2001-02-05 Thread Nathan Walp
I'm gonna type fast and send this as soon as possible, cuz I'm not sure how long i'll be able to stay up. I'm OOPSing and BUGging (is that a word?) like crazy, and I can't figure it out. I thought it was the BIOS upgrade I did, but downgrading didn't do anything. System is 1.1GHz Tbird on Asus

Re: OOPSes and BUGs everywhere (2.4.0)

2001-02-06 Thread Nathan Walp
Nathan Walp wrote: > I'm gonna type fast and send this as soon as possible, cuz I'm not sure > how long i'll be able to stay up. I'm OOPSing and BUGging (is that a > word?) like crazy, and I can't figure it out. I thought it was the BIOS > upgrade I di

New USB HID driver in -ac series

2001-06-01 Thread Nathan Walp
1 Rev= 9.10 S: Manufacturer=Logitech S: Product=USB Receiver C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=a0 MxPwr= 50mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 1 Cls=03(HID ) Sub=01 Prot=02 Driver=hid E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 8 Ivl= 10ms Hope this is of some help Nathan -- Nathan Walp || [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG F

Re: random reboots

2001-04-25 Thread Nathan Walp
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:18:42PM -0400, Nathan Walp wrote: > > I upgraded the BIOS on this Asus A7V sometime in the past week, but I > > honestly don't remember when. From 1005C to 1007. This was released in > > march, so I assumed it was pretty stable, but it coul