On Saturday, 27 October 2007 14:05, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Recently I noticed that my system resumes just after suspend to disk.
I traced this to commit 9cd9a0058dd35268b24fa16795a92c800f4086d4.
Note:
This happens only if I enable WOL using /proc/acpi/wakeup
(echo ILAN
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 02:00, Oliver Martin wrote:
Hello,
it seems that there is some dependency missing for CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND.
When I compile a kernel without CONFIG_SUSPEND, USB suspend doesn't work
(or at least doesn't expose its interface to userspace).
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 17:50, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 02:00, Oliver Martin wrote:
Hello,
it seems that there is some dependency missing for CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND.
When I compile a kernel without CONFIG_SUSPEND
On Saturday, 27 October 2007 09:45, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I don't understand why, on resume, the function socket_resume() (in
drivers/pcmcia/cs.c) do:
if (!(skt-state SOCKET_PRESENT)) {
skt-state = ~SOCKET_SUSPEND;
return socket_insert(skt);
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 19:07, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
- Are large enough to qualify as a student project, luckily there is
flexibility here since we get inquiries for anything from 6 week
projects to 6 month projects.
If you have ideas on what projects would be useful, please
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 16:33, C Sights wrote:
Well, a test program that triggers the SIGABRT under gdb would be useful.
The attached program causes a SIGABRT for me,
Thanks,
C.
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce the problem here and fix it.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 21:00, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Saturday 27 October 2007 23:46:45 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 27 October 2007 14:05, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
Hi,
Recently I noticed that my system resumes just after suspend to disk.
I traced this to commit
-By : Hideaki YOSHIFUJI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : linux-2.6.23-git3: Many sysfs-related warnings in dmesg
Submitter : Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/13/204
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/26/317
http
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 23:48, Frans Pop wrote:
The regression in process CPU usage display in top is still there:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9135
It's a regression from .22, not from .23, but I guess it should still be
listed.
Well, my intention is to list the most
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 23:53, Alan Cox wrote:
Subject : 2.6.24-rc1: pata_acpi fails to activate DMA for
DVD-ROM on ALi M5229 secondary channel
Submitter : Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=119342005216716w=2
On Monday, 29 October 2007 02:17, David Miller wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100
Subject : Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not
propagated. via sysctl too
Submitter : Serge van den Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Monday, 29 October 2007 21:19, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote:
Hello Thomas, Pavel, Rafael!
I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running 2.6.23 with the following problem:
Suspend2Ram work fine, but when I do a Suspend2Disk (echo disk
/sys/power/state), the notebook hangs showing the following
On Monday, 29 October 2007 07:45, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007 22:23:15 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 21:00, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Saturday 27 October 2007 23:46:45 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 27 October 2007 14:05, Maxim Levitsky
On Monday, 29 October 2007 23:36, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Monday 29 October 2007 22:37:37 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 29 October 2007 07:45, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007 22:23:15 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 28 October 2007 21:00, Maxim Levitsky wrote
On Tuesday, 30 October 2007 09:35, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote:
Hello Rafael, Pavel!
Thank you both for the fast help.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:05:10PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 29 October 2007 21:19, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote:
I have an IBM X41 tablet pc running
On Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:24, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I suspect new ACPI AC adapter code but have to add some printk's to be sure.
To reproduce - plug in AC cord, suspend, unplug, resume - kpowersave and
sysfs
still show AC adapter online. Or other way round.
Is this a resume from
On Tuesday, 30 October 2007 20:33, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
Is it valid to send events from within -resume device method?
It is or at least it should be. The GPEs are supposed to be fully functional
at this point.
If not, what is the proper way to notify user space about hardware changes
On Wednesday, 31 October 2007 01:52, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
...does not seem to work too well :-(. It connects with the AP
(good!), and survives some normal use, but it died at first big
tcpspray (bd!).
Is this a regression from 2.6.23?
Oct 31 01:03:57 amd log1n[1411]: ROOT LOGIN
On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 05:44, Qi Yong wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:46:12AM +0800, Qi Yong wrote:
On 12/05/2007, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[--snip--]
please apply.
Signed-off-by: Qi Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 12:17, Kay Sievers wrote:
On 10/17/07, Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 23:36, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 October 2007 22:50, Jens Axboe wrote
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do not allow processes to clear their TIF_SIGPENDING if TIF_FREEZE is set,
to prevent them from racing with the freezer (like mysqld does, for example).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/signal.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On Friday, 19 October 2007 09:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2007-10-19 00:22:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do not allow processes to clear their TIF_SIGPENDING if TIF_FREEZE is set,
to prevent them from racing with the freezer (like mysqld does
dropped for
another reason.
The mysqld problem seems to have been caused by another patch, though, and the
fix is appended.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do not allow processes to clear their TIF_SIGPENDING if TIF_FREEZE is set,
so that they will not race
On Monday, 22 October 2007 18:15, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi all ,
I'm running current git + aic7xxx suspend patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3062
on a Dell Precision WorkStation 530 MT SMP box ( HT enabled ).
Suspend works fine but on resume I have some problems.
All
On Monday, 22 October 2007 16:11, Mark Lord wrote:
Rafael,
What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK?
Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend,
or just leave it be with whatever?
The answer has to be restore the value it had at suspend time,
but I
On Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:00, Gabriel C wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 22 October 2007 18:15, Gabriel C wrote:
Hi all ,
I'm running current git + aic7xxx suspend patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3062
on a Dell Precision WorkStation 530 MT SMP
On Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:57, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 10/23/07, Marcel Holtmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
first of all, please check if this still happens with 2.6.23, because we
had some patches in the area of the RFCOMM TTY code that might have
fixed this.
These messages are of
[Please consider as 2.6.24 material.]
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do not allow processes to clear their TIF_SIGPENDING if TIF_FREEZE is set,
so that they will not race with the freezer (like mysqld does, for example).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked
On Tuesday, 23 October 2007 03:01, Gabriel C wrote:
Also box just froze on level 3 but I got a ACPI error at least which I
didn't got in any other dmesg till now :
( also patch was tested with HT disabled and Suspend and Hibernation
enabled in kernel and BIOS )
...
Oct 23
On Thursday, 11 October 2007 22:54, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
That's certainly possible. We already pass a very small amount of data
between
the boot and resuming kernels at the moment, and it's done quite simply -
by
putting the variables we want to 'transfer' in a nosave
On Wednesday, 24 October 2007 17:18, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:35:14 am Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
We seem to see a lot of bug reports along the lines of, my machine
resumes but I can't see X or, I can see X but only with a bright
flashlight, etc. These sorts
On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Rafael, this is for you.
Thanks.
My cleanups, relative to your cleanup patch. You may need manual patching
around rep/stosd.
OK, I'll try to merge it.
Rafael
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/Makefile
On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2008-02-08 13:27:30, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:
See arch/x86/kernel/acpi/realmode/wakeup.S (the version that was sent
to the list). No problem there, but table stored at nonzero
offset. Short jump at the beggining
On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2008-02-08 23:01:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Rafael, this is for you.
Thanks.
My cleanups, relative to your cleanup patch. You may need manual patching
On Saturday, 9 of February 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Consolidated patch is appended. I'll test it tomorrow on x86-64.
I'd like to add the cleaned up beeping code to it and perhaps try to push it
for -mm testing without any further changes. We can still do
On Thursday, 7 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/sched-rt-group/
on top of sched-devel.
Indeed, with these patches applied the issue is not reproducible any
more.
great! I've
c95d47a868f35cd47643d116a3c680cdaa954df8
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jan 8 00:05:21 2008 +0100
ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAK
Reverting it resolves the problem for me, but I can't say if this makes
any sense.
Well, _GTS and _BFS are nops on all
bisected it down to this commit:
commit c95d47a868f35cd47643d116a3c680cdaa954df8
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Jan 8 00:05:21 2008 +0100
ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS from _PTS and _WAK
Reverting it resolves the problem for me, but I can't
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
On Sunday, 10 of February 2008, Rafaek J. Wysocki wrote:
Can you apply the appended patch on top of the current mainline and tetest?
Thanks,
Rafael
Sorry, that doesn't fix it.
But I'm pretty sure it is related to that
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
On Feb 9, 2008 6:10 PM, Alessandro Suardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I finally had a bit of time to try out different kernel versions to find
out where this began... and it's in 2.6.24-git2.
What happens: Oracle 11g starts up and
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, they were not lost, they just didnt pass QA here (they crashed on
a particularly hard to debug 8-way box i have) and Peter worked on
that queue of fixes up until today to get it really
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Can you send me the output of acpidump from your system, please?
I atach the output.
BTW, does the kernel compile for you after reverting this patch?
Rafael
Yes, the kernel still compiles and runs on 2.6.25-rc1 with the commit
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Can you send me the output of acpidump from your system, please?
I atach the output.
BTW, does the kernel compile for you after reverting this patch?
Rafael
Yes, the kernel still compiles and runs on 2.6.25-rc1 with the commit
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
On Di, 2008-02-12 at 00:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, this is strange, because one function introduced by this commit
is
referred to by the subsequent commits. Can you send me the patch
reverting
this commit that you apply
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 11 of February 2008, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
2.6.24-git1 is okay
2.6.24-git2 is bad
Ok, that's git ID's
b47711bfbcd4eb77ca61ef0162487b20e023ae55 2.6.24
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Fabio Coatti wrote:
Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:03:41 +0100 Fabio Coatti wrote:
Hi all,
I'm stuck in a weird situation: I'm unable to go beyond 2.6.23.14, so to
fix the splice bug I've had to apply by
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:47:19 +0100 Fabio Coatti wrote:
Alle martedì 12 febbraio 2008, Randy Dunlap ha scritto:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:03:41 +0100 Fabio Coatti wrote:
Hi all,
I'm stuck in a weird situation: I'm unable to go beyond
On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
On Mi, 2008-02-13 at 00:23 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Ah, ok. Thanks for testing. :-)
Can you please check if the current mainline with the following patch
applied
works on your box?
Thanks,
Rafael
On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2008-02-13 00:32:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The _WAK global ACPI control method has to be called with the
argument representing the sleep state being exited. Make it happen
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The _WAK global ACPI control method has to be called with the
argument representing the sleep state being exited. Make it happen.
Special thanks to Mirco Tischler [EMAIL PROTECTED] for reporting the
problem and debugging.
Reported-by: Mirco Tischler
On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 23:18 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
Ouch. I think I know what the problem is.
On top of this patch, please apply the appended one and retest.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/hardware
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944
Distribution: Debian Sid
Hardware Environment: Thinkpad T61
Software Environment:
Problem Description:
Suspend to ram doesn't work anymore on my thinkpad t61 with 2.6.25-rc1.
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Mirco Tischler wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
Since _GTS and _BFS don't seem to be defined in your box's BIOS, please
try to apply the appended patch on top of the revert and see if that breaks
things again
On Tuesday, 5 of February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi,
The kernel bootup panics with the 2.6.24-mm1 and 2.6.24-git13 kernel
while defconfig compiled in for x86_64 (Intel(R) Xeon) box
Is that still happening or has it been fixed?
Rafael
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
On Wednesday, 13 of February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:39:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:39:14PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 11 February 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
In general 2.6.25 if
On Friday, 8 of February 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit dd2cc4dff3b08ab54c4c177a080046bcc84ac41d broke uml:
-- snip --
...
CC fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.o
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c: In
function ‘hostfs_show_options’:
Hi Thomas,
On Thursday, 7 of February 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
current mainline triggers:
Has the issue been fixed in the meantime?
WARNING: at /home/tglx/work/kernel/x86/linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52
kmap_atomic_prot+0xe5/0x19b()
Modules linked in: ahci(+) sata_sil libata
On Tuesday, 12 of February 2008, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:39:17PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Mon 11-02-08 20:13:20, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
Hi,
On Sun 10-02-08 11:48:17, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
On Monday, 4 of February 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Commit c40a22e0ce5eb400f27449e59e43d021bee58b8d aka
PCI: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b resources
renders one tg3-equipped box networkless here.
Has it been fixed already or is it still happening with the current mainline?
On Thursday, 14 of February 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:52:46PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 4 of February 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Commit c40a22e0ce5eb400f27449e59e43d021bee58b8d aka
PCI: Fix bus resource assignment on 32 bits with 64b
On Thursday, 14 of February 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
I have created the first cut of the linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git.
Things to know about this tree:
It has two branches - master and stable. Stable is currently just
On Friday, 15 of February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
scripts/checkpatch.pl
ERROR: do not initialise externals to 0 or NULL
#113: FILE: arch/x86/boot/video-mode.c:29:
+int do_restore = 0;/* Screen contents changed during mode flip */
We were doing file move with minimal
Herrmann herrmann.der.u...@googlemail.com
*
* Based on the powernow-k7.c module written by Dave Jones.
* (C) 2003 Dave Jones on behalf of SuSE Labs
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
it, please help
(openSUSE/Tumbleweed users anyone?).
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the
struct acpi_device object corresponding
and the like to happen.
Well, I personally think it should be centralized somehow. I'm not quite
sure how to achieve that, though.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
of Second event: dump-type0-1-2-12345678
type:0
id:1
sequence counter: 1(first event), 2(second event)
ctime:12345678
Signed-off-by: Seiji Aguchi seiji.agu...@hds.com
Please feel free to add
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
for the erst.c change.
Thanks
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 12:31:00 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:33:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, October 29, 2012 06:52:21 PM Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann herrmann.der.u...@googlemail.com
Am I supposed to take
/devfreq.h /dev/null
Cc: Rajagopal Venkat rajagopal.ven...@linaro.org
Cc: MyungJoo Ham myungjoo@samsung.com
Cc: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Cc: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 09:35:48 PM Maciej Rutecki wrote:
On niedziela, 28 października 2012 o 22:45:26 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:12:49 PM Maciej Rutecki wrote:
On niedziela, 21 października 2012 o 17:12:28 Maciej Rutecki wrote:
Error: kernel BUG
, it was not possible to use the cpufreq-cpu0 driver.
I've got patches [3-6/6] only for some reason. Care to resend the other three
with direct CCs to me?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
-cpu, target_freq, relation, old_target_freq);
if (target_freq == policy-cur)
return 0;
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
On Friday, October 26, 2012 01:17:12 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2012 03:06:26 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Avoid calling cpufreq driver's target() routine if new frequency is same as
policies current frequency.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
: MyungJoo Ham myungjoo@samsung.com
Cc: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Cc: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham
J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
, do you want me to keep sending pull requests to you as you've told
last time?
Yes, please.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
: scaling_available_frequencies.
Cc: Rajagopal Venkat rajagopal.ven...@linaro.org
Cc: MyungJoo Ham myungjoo@samsung.com
Cc: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Cc: Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com
Cc: linux...@vger.kernel.org
Cc
...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |6 ++
drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c |5 -
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel
Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 40 +++-
include/linux/acpi.h | 28
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux
mathias.ny...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
---
drivers/acpi/Makefile|1
drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 285 +++
drivers/acpi/internal.h
Westerberg's work.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/device.h |3 ---
arch/x86/include/asm/device.h |3 ---
drivers/acpi/glue.c| 14 ++
include/acpi
From: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
These functions might be called from modules as well so make sure
they are exported.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
---
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
patch series applied (although that series is not strictly necessary for them
to work). They have been tested by Mika.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 09:24:07 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:38:29AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
With ACPI 5 we are starting to see devices that don't natively support
discovery but can
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:44:45 AM H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/31/2012 11:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Great, thanks!
I wonder if the x86 and/or ia64 maintainers have any reservations?
None here.
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com
Thanks!
--
I speak only
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 08:03:34 PM Luck, Tony wrote:
On 10/31/2012 11:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I wonder if the x86 and/or ia64 maintainers have any reservations?
Can you elaborate on the tested by mika that you put into the 0/5
message. Especially w.r.t. ia64. Compile tested
to acpi_platform_device_ids[]), so for ia64 it should be sufficient to
test that code as is (ie. without any new devices in the system).
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
;
default:
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:34:24 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
From: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
With ACPI 5 it is now possible to enumerate traditional SoC
peripherals, like serial bus controllers
speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 09:19:59 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
@@ -1544,8 +1553,13 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
*/
device = NULL;
acpi_bus_get_device(handle, device
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 01:16:22 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 01:17:58 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 11:28 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Toshi Kani
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:15:31 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
oh, no, that commit should not be reverted. instead we should add some
comment for it...
that mean : three path, will have three separated static lock dep key
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 03:38:19 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
So you are going to replace acpi_device/acpi_driver with
platform_device/platform_driver ?
Not exactly. Let me start from the big picture, though
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 04:39:50 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Subject: ACPI: Make seemingly useless check in osl.c more understandable
There is a seemingly useless check
On Friday, November 02, 2012 01:17:10 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On 10/30/2012 11:20 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2012 03:28:45 PM Aaron Lu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:11:20AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
(struct acpi_device *);
void acpi_remove_dir(struct acpi_device *);
I wonder which code path(s) is(are) going to use the new routine?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
| 1 +
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
701 - 800 of 29240 matches
Mail list logo
