Re: [patch] tweak make htmldocs (nochunks and better index).

2007-05-30 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 12:18 am, Randy Dunlap wrote: What is \p supposed to do? Sorry, typo. Should be /p instead. My bad. As to what it does in a larger sense, make the xml people happy. Closing parentheses tags make the various xhtml validators shut up. The main difference between xhtml

Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)

2007-07-14 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 13 July 2007 11:54:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote: If there's interest, I can push some patches to clean up Documentation by moving files into subdirectories, but Documentation's not well-suited to link out to the web. (You need html for that, and it's text.) I think that you should

Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)

2007-07-14 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 13 July 2007 9:46:59 pm Tsugikazu Shibata wrote: How about adding; kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt The problem is, the generated htmdocs are in english. This file is about how to generate (and author) English documentation that won't be translated. What's the point of

Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)

2007-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 15 July 2007 12:28:06 pm Randy Dunlap wrote: On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:56:15 -0400 Rob Landley wrote: On Friday 13 July 2007 11:54:41 pm Randy Dunlap wrote: If there's interest, I can push some patches to clean up Documentation by moving files into subdirectories

Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)

2007-07-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 15 July 2007 12:46:42 pm Tsugikazu Shibata wrote: On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:12:35 -0400, rob wrote: On Friday 13 July 2007 9:46:59 pm Tsugikazu Shibata wrote: How about adding; kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt The problem is, the generated htmdocs are in english. This file is

Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)

2007-07-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 16 July 2007 8:31:52 pm Tim Bird wrote: Rob Landley wrote: If you go to http://kernel.org/doc/ols you should find, nicely split up, all the OLS papers from 2002-2007. Oooh! That's nice! I didn't notice the nicely split up part earlier. Any chance we can get the original docbook

Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)

2007-07-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 16 July 2007 9:17:28 pm H. Peter Anvin wrote: Tim Bird wrote: Oooh! That's nice! I didn't notice the nicely split up part earlier. Any chance we can get the original docbook inputs that OLS uses for paper submissions? Have you asked Andrew or Craig about this? OLS uses LaTeX,

Documentation for sysfs, hotplug, and firmware loading.

2007-07-17 Thread Rob Landley
Here's some sysfs/hotplug/firmware loading documentation I wrote. I finally tracked down the netlink bits to finish it up, so I can send it out to the world. What's wrong with it? :) Note, I still need to actually confirm that /sbin/hotplug can be called from initramfs by a statically linked

Re: [PATCH] Chinese Language Maintainer

2007-07-17 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 12:24:07 pm Li Yang wrote: Here is the helper process I propose to help more people to participate. Suggestions and comments are welcomed. 1) Developer who can't speak English or has a problem going through the submission process sends patches to the Language

Re: Documentation for sysfs, hotplug, and firmware loading.

2007-07-18 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 3:58:57 am Cornelia Huck wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:03:31 -0400, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's some sysfs/hotplug/firmware loading documentation I wrote. I finally tracked down the netlink bits to finish it up, so I can send it out to the world

Re: [RFC][Patch] Allow not mounting a root fs

2007-07-18 Thread Rob Landley
On Saturday 07 July 2007 5:17:31 pm H. Peter Anvin wrote: Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jul 7 2007 13:56, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Jan Engelhardt wrote: On Jul 5 2007 19:08, H. Peter Anvin wrote: BTW: Is it possible to mount a tmpfs on / before extracting the cpio? Not in the stock kernel.

Re: [PATCH 0/3][try 1] init: enable system-on-initramfs

2007-07-18 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 13 July 2007 2:56:00 pm Bodo Eggert wrote: I toyed with setting up a diskless system in initramfs. In the process, I came across some things: 1) There is no way to have the kernel not mount a filesystem, unless you use /init or rdinit=. Er, yes. By design. The kernel has to

Re: Documentation for sysfs, hotplug, and firmware loading.

2007-07-19 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 7:33:19 pm Kay Sievers wrote: On 7/18/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /sys/block/*/dev /sys/block/*/*/dev Note that this will change to /sys/class/block/ in the future. At OLS, Kay Sievers said in a future version they were going to move

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

2007-05-09 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 4:23 pm, Alan Cox wrote: arch/foo almost always supports a single compiler too - gcc. We simply don't support anything else. We use gcc inlines and features extensively. And who cares about such fine detail of C99, did they fix the struct copy bug in ANSI C even ?

Building ppc/powerpc kernel to run under QEMU.

2007-05-09 Thread Rob Landley
Who do I ask about the status of the migration from ARCH=ppc to ARCH=powerpc? I've been putting around with my Firmware Linux project trying to add powerpc as a supported platform. I can build kernels that qemu can boot (such as a prep kernel) using ARCH=ppc, but that one doesn't support make

Re: [patch] removes MAX_ARG_PAGES

2007-05-09 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 4:48 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 6 May 2007 01:51:34 -0700 Ollie Wild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A while back, I sent out a preliminary patch (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.hppa/752) to remove the MAX_ARG_PAGES limit on command line sizes. Since

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-09 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 8:09 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: hm, --time-style sounds rather gnu-specific and perhaps we'd rather not add that requirement. Or perhaps we already require gnu ls, dunno. Running this sort of thing with busybox instead of the gnu tools is why I sent the gawk/awk patches

Re: [patch] removes MAX_ARG_PAGES

2007-05-10 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 10 May 2007 12:06 am, Ollie Wild wrote: On 5/9/07, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just FYI, a really really quick and dirty way of testing this sort of thing on more architectures and you're likely to physically have? Does this properly emulate caching? On parisc, cache

3 years since last 2.2 release, why still on kernel.org main page?

2007-05-10 Thread Rob Landley
Out of curiosity, since 2.2 hasn't had a release in 3 years, and the last prepatch was 2 years ago, why is its' status still on the kernel.org main page? Not exactly something people are checking the status of on a daily basis... Just wondering... Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

2.6.21 broke arm scsi on qemu -M volatilepb

2007-05-10 Thread Rob Landley
Booting a 2.6.20 kernel under qemu works fine and gets me to a shell prompt, but booting a 2.6.21.1 kernel cycles endlessly on scsi, going: Loading iSCSI transport class v2.0-724. PCI: enabling device :00:0c.0 (0140 - 0143) sym0: 895a rev 0x0 at pci :00:0c.0 irq 0 sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7,

Re: 3 years since last 2.2 release, why still on kernel.org main page?

2007-05-14 Thread Rob Landley
On Sunday 13 May 2007 7:57 pm, Bill Davidsen wrote: Rob Landley wrote: Out of curiosity, since 2.2 hasn't had a release in 3 years, and the last prepatch was 2 years ago, why is its' status still on the kernel.org main page? Not exactly something people are checking the status

Re: tracking down disk spinups.

2007-05-14 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 14 May 2007 2:57 pm, Dave Jones wrote: Why did the kernel ignore what I told it to do ? I'm sure it thinks it knows better than me for a reason, but I'd like to know what it is. Remount doesn't switch filesystem drivers, it tells the existing filesystem driver to accept new flags

Re: tracking down disk spinups.

2007-05-14 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 14 May 2007 4:46 pm, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:28:35PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote: On Monday 14 May 2007 2:57 pm, Dave Jones wrote: Why did the kernel ignore what I told it to do ? I'm sure it thinks it knows better than me for a reason, but I'd like

Re: x86 setup rewrite tree ready for flamage^W review

2007-05-15 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 11 May 2007 8:23 pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Kevin Winchester wrote: Not sure if you were looking for testing, but I fuzzed it to apply to 2.6.21-git and gave it a spin. Worked just like a normal boot (which I assume was the point). That would be the point, yes :) Looking for

Re: Weird hard disk noise on shutdown (bug #7674)

2007-05-15 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 5:08 pm, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:32:43PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: Francesco Pretto wrote: 2007/5/4, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yeap, the third iteration of the patch just got submitted. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/18485

Re: Weird hard disk noise on shutdown (bug #7674)

2007-05-16 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 5:15 am, Francesco Pretto wrote: - everyone else: // continue to do nothing :-) reboot(); That would be cool, but the impression I got from http://linux-ata.org/shutdown.html was that shutdown commands were supposed to _add_ quiescing of drives in order to avoid

Re: Weird hard disk noise on shutdown (bug #7674)

2007-05-16 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 7:41 am, Tejun Heo wrote: Hello, Rob Landley wrote: Um, hang on. So libata can't reliably turn the system off without data loss and potential damage to hardware unless userspace goes through a special song and dance? And this is _not_ considered a defect

Re: Weird hard disk noise on shutdown (bug #7674)

2007-05-16 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 9:49 am, Francesco Pretto wrote: 2007/5/16, Stephen Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 15 May 2007 5:08 pm, Dave Jones wrote: I'm confused. Could someone please explain? I agree. This didn't happen when I was just using the ide driver, why can't libata

Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21

2007-05-16 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 6:49 pm, Robert Schwebel wrote: Jeff, Any idea how this could happen? I'm trying to build 2.6.21 for ARCH=um, and the linker stage explodes here: 2.6.21.1 built for me: tar xvjf linux-2.6.21.1.tar.bz2 cd linux-2.6.21.1 cat mini.conf EOF CONFIG_MODE_SKAS=y

Re: Weird hard disk noise on shutdown (bug #7674)

2007-05-16 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 8:58 pm, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2007, Rob Landley wrote: Ok, so the change is to get shutdown to _stop_ doing something stupid (spinning down the disk without first flushing the cache), and the correct thing for shutdown to do is keep

Re: Weird hard disk noise on shutdown (bug #7674)

2007-05-18 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 May 2007 11:04 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 12:39:47AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: Actually, in my limited experience, SAS is marginally less crappy than SATA, and has a higher MTBF, probably because the manufacturers try to cut less

Re: UML doesn't compile in 2.6.21

2007-05-18 Thread Rob Landley
On Thursday 17 May 2007 5:05 pm, Robert Schwebel wrote: Rob, On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 09:11:18PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote: 2.6.21.1 built for me: tar xvjf linux-2.6.21.1.tar.bz2 cd linux-2.6.21.1 cat mini.conf EOF CONFIG_MODE_SKAS=y CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y CONFIG_HOSTFS=y

Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

2007-05-19 Thread Rob Landley
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 4:37 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: +static inline struct logfs_super *LOGFS_SUPER(struct super_block *sb) +{ + return sb-s_fs_info; +} + +static inline struct logfs_inode *LOGFS_INODE(struct inode *inode) +{ + return container_of(inode, struct logfs_inode,

Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three

2007-05-19 Thread Rob Landley
On Saturday 19 May 2007 5:24 am, Jan Engelhardt wrote: On May 19 2007 02:15, Rob Landley wrote: + +static inline struct logfs_inode *LOGFS_INODE(struct inode *inode) +{ +return container_of(inode, struct logfs_inode, vfs_inode); +} Do these need to be uppercase

Status of squashfs?

2007-05-21 Thread Rob Landley
So Fedora uses squashfs, Ubuntu uses, squashfs, Gentoo uses squashfs... It seems like the only place I can get a kernel _without_ squashfs is kernel.org. Is there a reason for this? Rob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH resend] drop_caches: add some documentation and info message

2013-08-02 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/31/2013 10:17:08 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:11:50 -0400 KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote: --- a/fs/drop_caches.c +++ b/fs/drop_caches.c @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ int drop_caches_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write, if (ret)

[PATCH] Tweak Documentation MAINTAINERS entry.

2013-08-02 Thread Rob Landley
languages. (I argued that translations belonged on the web when they were proposed, but Greg KH overruled me.) I habitually ignore these, and cutting down on kernel-doc traffic should make the rest of the list easier to follow. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net --- MAINTAINERS |4

Re: [PATCH trivial] UAPI: Kbuild: add/modify comments for uapi/Kbuild and uapi/linux/Kbuild

2013-08-07 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/06/2013 12:31:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 09:46 +0800, Chen Gang wrote: include/uapi/ is the whole Linux kernel API, it is important enough to get more global explanations by comments. It'd probably be useful to have more descriptions of uapi in the Documentation

Re: [PATCH 5/5] initmpfs v2: Use initramfs if rootfstype= or root= specified.

2013-07-25 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/19/2013 02:57:18 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote: Command line option rootfstype=ramfs to obtain old initramfs behavior, and use ramfs instead of tmpfs for stub when root= defined (for cosmetic reasons). Could

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Squashfs: add LZ4 compression

2013-07-26 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/22/2013 01:04:59 AM, Gu Zheng wrote: On 07/22/2013 01:07 PM, Phillip Lougher wrote: On 22 July 2013 04:05, Gu Zheng guz.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote: Hi Phillip, Have some tests been carried out to confirm that Squashfs really can get benefit from LZ4 compression, comparing

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/trace: Correcting and extending tracepoint documentation

2013-08-25 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/22/2013 04:49:31 PM, Zoltan Kiss wrote: The sample missed the moving of the header files into the events subdirectory. I've also extended it based on the existing headers, and mentioned the tiny but important role of CREATE_TRACE_POINTS. Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss

Re: [PATCH V13 4/4] Documentation/kvm : Add documentation on Hypercalls and features used for PV spinlock

2013-08-28 Thread Rob Landley
Landley r...@landley.net Looks like documentation to me: Acked-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Rob-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please

Re: Kernel summit 2013: Call for Hobbyists

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/18/2013 03:26:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Francois Romieu rom...@fr.zoreil.com wrote: As a hobbyist, I have less time than most pro and must cope with whatever brain juice remains after the paid work. It doesn't make me Indeed. And the dosing of

Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Documentation updates for 3.12

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
. Update RTFP documentation. 3. Fix a control-dependency example in the memory-barriers documentation. Acked-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net (I'm just happy you don't have gratuitous quizzes mixed through it...) Rob-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths?

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/19/2013 04:27:17 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 23:22 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Joe Perches wrote: This is a 7 line patch that corrects logging defects that has had no reply from you for the last month.

Re: [PATCH -mm] docs: Document soft dirty behaviour for freshly created memory regions

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 10:31:32 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov gorcu...@openvz.org Cc: Pavel Emelyanov xe...@parallels.com Cc: Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net Cc: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org Cc: Matt Mackall m...@selenic.com Cc: Xiao Guangrong

Re: [PATCH v3 trivial 0/7] Miscellaneous Trivialities

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 11:02:42 AM, Michael Witten wrote: I've been sitting on some trivial patches for a while, and I'd just like to get them out of the way. Here is the series: [1] Docs: Kconfig: For readability, offset modifiers with commas [2] Docs: Kconfig: Use consistent whitespace

Re: Why are BSD-licensed LZ4 symbols GPL exported?

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 12:38:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 18:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:19:56PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: Why are the LZ4 symbols being GPL-exported when the LZ4 code is BSD-licensed and no substantial changes appear to have been

Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths?

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 03:14:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 15:02 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: On 08/19/2013 04:27:17 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 23:22 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Joe Perches wrote: This is a 7 line patch that corrects

Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths?

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 05:11:18 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 16:49 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: On 08/20/2013 03:14:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 15:02 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: On 08/19/2013 04:27:17 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 23:22 +0200, Jiri

Re: [PATCH v3 trivial 0/7] Miscellaneous Trivialities

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 05:27:53 PM, Michael Witten wrote: On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:20:02 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: On 08/20/2013 11:02:42 AM, Michael Witten wrote: I've been sitting on some trivial patches for a while, and I'd just like to get them out of the way. Here is the series: [1] Docs

Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths?

2013-08-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 07:22:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:10 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: The important question is does he want to handle patches that you're flipping out about not going in before the next merge window because they are SO IMPORTANT that the trivial tree must

Re: [PATCH v3 trivial 0/7] Miscellaneous Trivialities

2013-08-21 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/20/2013 10:32:02 PM, Michael Witten wrote: On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:19:37 -0500, Rob Landley wrote: Hence asking if we really needed three separate commits to accomplish something that didn't actually need to be done in the first place.) ... Actually my objection is that it's not worth

Re: [RFC] Get rid of SUBARCH

2013-08-21 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/21/2013 07:07:33 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Richard Weinberger rich...@nod.at wrote: This series is an attempt to remove the SUBARCH make parameter. It as introduced at the times of Linux 2.5 for UML to tell the UML build system what the real

Re: [RFC] Get rid of SUBARCH

2013-08-22 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/22/2013 07:58:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote: The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32. These architectures magically select a cross compiler if ARCH != SUBARCH. Do really need that behavior?

Re: [RFC] Get rid of SUBARCH

2013-08-22 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/22/2013 03:55:20 PM, David Daney wrote: On 08/22/2013 01:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote: On 08/22/2013 07:58:26 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Sam Ravnborg s...@ravnborg.org wrote: The series touches also m68k, sh, mips and unicore32. These architectures

Re: [Qemu-devel] SCSI bus failures with qemu-arm in kernel 3.8+

2013-08-13 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/12/2013 11:45:49 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 05:24:50PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: On 12 August 2013 01:40, Guenter Roeck li...@roeck-us.net wrote: On 08/11/2013 03:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: It could be that it's qemu's PCI routing is

Re: DoS with unprivileged mounts

2013-08-15 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/14/2013 12:42:19 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: There's a simple and effective way to prevent unlink(2) and rename(2) from operating on any file or directory by simply mounting something on it. In any mount instance in any namespace. Was this considered in the unprivileged mount design? The

Re: Kernel summit 2013: Call for Hobbyists

2013-08-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/14/2013 09:26:21 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: As an experiment this year, the Linux Kernel Summit Program Committee would like to put out a call for hobbyists. This year, we have up to three places to give to people who do Linux Kernel development as a hobby rather than a profession (Our

Re: [PULL] Miscellaneous trivialities

2013-08-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 08/15/2013 04:44:01 AM, Michael Witten wrote: I've been sitting on some trivial patches for a while, and I'd just like to get them out of the way. Here is the series: [1] Docs: Kconfig: For readability, offset modifiers with commas [2] Docs: Kconfig: Use consistent whitespace

Re: [GIT] Networking

2013-07-09 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/09/2013 12:32:56 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote: Um, does that mean I should have cc'd you on the initmpfs patch series back before the merge window opened? So I personally don't tend to care about that kind of patch

[RESEND] The initmpfs patches.

2013-07-09 Thread Rob Landley
checkpatch.pl version. Still applies to a git pull from 3 minutes ago (two patches have offsets, but no fuzz). Thanks, RobFrom: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Subject: [PATCH 0/5] initmpfs: use tmpfs instead of ramfs for rootfs To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexander Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk Cc

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix references to defunct linux-...@vger.kernel.org

2013-07-11 Thread Rob Landley
anymore. Acked-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Adding trivial@ to the cc: Rob --- Documentation/networking/arcnet.txt |7 --- Documentation/networking/vortex.txt |2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/networking/arcnet.txt b

Re: 3.10-rc1: commit ccdfcc398594 broke uClibc build.

2013-07-11 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/09/2013 05:25:53 AM, David Howells wrote: Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote: The #include linux/kernel.h added to include/uapi/linux/netlink.h causes the uClibc build to go: In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:4, from

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Modernize menuconfig a bit

2013-07-14 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/10/2013 10:15:15 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: Hi, After Michal's (somewhat positive) response to the first iteration, here's the second iteration fixing the reserved-letters problem. Someone saying they keep accidentally killing processes in top is a positive response? Rob-- To

Re: When to push bug fixes to mainline

2013-07-15 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/11/2013 10:25:51 PM, Li Zefan wrote: On 2013/7/12 8:50, Theodore Ts'o wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 03:01:17PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: rant I'm sitting on top of over 170 more patches that have been marked for the stable releases right now that are not included in this

Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review

2013-07-15 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/15/2013 10:52:48 AM, Sarah Sharp wrote: On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:17:08 +0200, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote: * Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: Let's discuss this at Kernel Summit where we can at least yell at each other in person. Yeah, just try yelling at me

Re: [RESEND] The initmpfs patches.

2013-07-15 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/15/2013 04:01:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:06:39 -0500 Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote: Attached, so you don't have to fish them out of: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1306.3/04204.html Too hard. Especially when I want to reply to a patch

Re: Need to Test lld3 examples

2013-06-19 Thread Rob Landley
On 06/18/2013 03:39:54 AM, Suki Buryani wrote: hi, i am almost fresh in embedded Linux, i http://kernelnewbies.org is the community's where do I start website. They have mentoring programs that are likely to provide more attention than you'll get here. want to test LDD3 examples, for

Re: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MMU: document fast invalidate all mmio sptes

2013-06-19 Thread Rob Landley
On 06/19/2013 04:09:25 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote: Document it to Documentation/virtual/kvm/mmu.txt Why break a change to a single documentation file into 7 pieces. Are we going to bisect the documentation? Rob-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt: fix stat file documentation

2013-06-19 Thread Rob Landley
On 06/19/2013 07:34:29 AM, Aaro Koskinen wrote: Documentation for inactive_anon / active_anon was mixed up. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@nsn.com Acked-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net --- Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions

Re: [PATCH] nbd: correct disconnect behavior

2013-06-20 Thread Rob Landley
/reconnect behavior.) Acked-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Rob-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH v2] Ceph: Punch hole support

2013-06-20 Thread Rob Landley
On 06/19/2013 11:23:51 AM, Li Wang wrote: This patch implements punch hole (fallocate) support for Ceph. Signed-off-by: Li Wang liw...@ubuntukylin.com Signed-off-by: Yunchuan Wen wenyunch...@ubuntukylin.com +static int ceph_delete_object(struct inode *inode, u64 offset, u64 *length) +{ +

Re: [PATCH] Documentation / cpu hotplug: remove outdated description for MADT entries

2013-06-20 Thread Rob Landley
changed, 3 deletions(-) Acked-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt index 9f40135..2e36e40 100644 --- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt +++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt @@ -370,9 +370,6 @@ A: There is no clear spec defined way

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Minor Alpha updates for 3.11

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/16/2013 12:04:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: Here's a set of minor updates for arch/alpha that should not be controversial. I also note that I had to do this to get busybox to build against uClibc: diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h

Re: [RESEND] The initmpfs patches.

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/16/2013 02:12:19 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: Rob Landley wrote: (Balsa is such an incompetent email client I wrote a python script to do this via raw smtp, and I'm always convinced it's going to screw up the send. But I think I've got it debugged now...) Use the tried

[PATCH 4/5] initmpfs v2: Make rootfs use tmpfs when CONFIG_TMPFS enabled.

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Conditionally call the appropriate fs_init function and fill_super functions. Add a use once guard to shmem_init() to simply succeed on a second call. (Note that IS_ENABLED() is a compile time constant so dead code elimination removes unused function calls when

[PATCH 3/5] initmpfs v2: Move rootfs code from fs/ramfs/ to init/

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net When the rootfs code was a wrapper around ramfs, having them in the same file made sense. Now that it can wrap another filesystem type, move it in with the init code instead. This also allows a subsequent patch to access rootfstype= command line arg. Signed

[PATCH 5/5] initmpfs v2: Use initramfs if rootfstype= or root= specified.

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Command line option rootfstype=ramfs to obtain old initramfs behavior, and use ramfs instead of tmpfs for stub when root= defined (for cosmetic reasons). Signed-off-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net --- init/do_mounts.c | 15 +++ 1 file changed

[PATCH 1/5] initmpfs v2: replace MS_NOUSER in initramfs

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Mounting MS_NOUSER prevents --bind mounts from rootfs. Prevent new rootfs mounts with a different mechanism that doesn't affect bind mounts. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net --- fs/ramfs/inode.c |7 ++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1

[PATCH 0/5] initmpfs v2: use tmpfs instead of ramfs for rootfs

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
Use tmpfs for rootfs when CONFIG_TMPFS=y and there's no root=. Specify rootfstype=ramfs to get the old initramfs behavior. The previous initramfs code provided a fairly crappy root filesystem: didn't let you --bind mount directories out of it, reported zero size/usage so it didn't show up in df

[PATCH 2/5] initmpfs v2: Move bdi setup from init_rootfs to init_ramfs

2013-07-16 Thread Rob Landley
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net Even though ramfs hasn't got a backing device, commit e0bf68ddec4f added one anyway, and put the initialization in init_rootfs() since that's the first user, leaving it out of init_ramfs() to avoid duplication. But initmpfs uses init_tmpfs() instead, so move

Re: [PATCH 0/5] initmpfs v2: use tmpfs instead of ramfs for rootfs

2013-07-18 Thread Rob Landley
Andrew: I'll save you the time of reading this message. tl;dr: I agree with what Hugh said. You're welcome. :) On 07/17/2013 07:15:29 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote: Use

Re: [PATCH] doc: fix some typos in documentation

2013-09-09 Thread Rob Landley
On 09/05/2013 07:26:22 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote: Fix some typos in Documentation/IRQ-domain.txt/email-clients.txt/io-mapping.txt Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu qiuxi...@huawei.com --- Documentation/IRQ-domain.txt|4 ++-- Documentation/email-clients.txt |2 +- Documentation/io-mapping.txt

Re: [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of cpus.

2013-09-10 Thread Rob Landley
On 09/05/2013 03:07:37 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: I am not sure how to call this kernel option but we need something like that. I see drivers and the kernel spawning processes on the nohz cores. The name kthread is not really catching the purpose. Can't you just use the CPU affinity of

Re: [PATCH] README: Alternative configuration commands does not mention make listnewconfig

2013-09-12 Thread Rob Landley
On 09/11/2013 07:39:19 PM, Regid Ichira wrote: Applied to the tip of linux.git, VERSION = 3 PATCHLEVEL = 11 SUBLEVEL = 0 Signed-off-by: Regid Ichira regi...@nt1.in --- README | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/README b/README index a24ec89..f10c16f

Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild/kconfig.txt: Doesn't make listnewconfig replacing yes | make oldconfig ?

2013-09-12 Thread Rob Landley
2006 and I've just maintained it locally ever since... Acked-by: Rob Landley r...@landley.net I'll sit on this for a bit to see if the kbulid guys apply it first, and if not forward it through the trivial tree. Rob-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel

Re: [PATCH] Adding Documentation/module-signing.txt file

2013-11-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/24/2013 07:08:33 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:35 PM, James Solner sol...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote: This patch adds the Documentation/module-signing.txt file that is missing. There is a link to Documentation/module-signing.txt file in init/Kconfig that references

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kerneli typo in description for Serpent cipher algorithm Bug #60848

2013-10-02 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/02/2013 11:10:37 AM, Kevin Mulvey wrote: change kerneli to kernel as well as kerneli.org to kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kevin Mulvey ke...@kevinmulvey.net There's a bug number for this? Acked, queued. (Although I'm not sure the value of pointing to www.kernel.org for this.) Thanks,

Status of kernel crypto services patch? Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kerneli typo in description for Serpent cipher algorithm Bug #60848

2013-10-02 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/02/2013 01:22:22 PM, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: On 02.10.2013 21:12, Rob Landley wrote: On 10/02/2013 11:10:37 AM, Kevin Mulvey wrote: change kerneli to kernel as well as kerneli.org to kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kevin Mulvey ke...@kevinmulvey.net There's a bug number for this? Acked

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kerneli typo in description for Serpent cipher algorithm Bug #60848

2013-10-02 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/02/2013 01:34:30 PM, Kevin Mulvey wrote: sorry, for possible repost but I think my last email got blocked due to html. It read: do you want me to make another patch that does not touch the url? It looks like the crypto directory has been merged since forever, so the old website is

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Detach mounts on unlink.

2013-10-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/04/2013 05:41:25 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: This patchset is an attempt to address two problems: 1) Not all modifications to the filesystems happen through the vfs and since the vfs can not cope with a mount point being unlinked or renamed filesystems whose modifications that do

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Detach mounts on unlink.

2013-10-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/04/2013 07:03:23 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org writes: On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com wrote: After thinking about it removing the restrictions on mount points appears safe, because it is just plain

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Detach mounts on unlink.

2013-10-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/05/2013 06:17:55 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote: A todo item I've had _forever_ is fixing chroot() to not be broken so that you can trivially break out of a chroot via: What drugs are you on? Enough caffeine to count

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Detach mounts on unlink.

2013-10-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/05/2013 06:19:15 PM, Al Viro wrote: On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 06:07:42PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: A todo item I've had _forever_ is fixing chroot() to not be broken so that you can trivially break out of a chroot via: chdir(/); mkdir(sub); chroot(sub); chdir

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Detach mounts on unlink.

2013-10-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/05/2013 06:22:15 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: So learn this pattern: every time you use chroot, add a simple chdir(/); immediately after the chroot call. .. btw, also make sure that you close all

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] vfs: Detach mounts on unlink.

2013-10-05 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/05/2013 06:24:51 PM, Al Viro wrote: On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 04:17:55PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote: A todo item I've had _forever_ is fixing chroot() to not be broken so that you can trivially break out

Re: [RFC] extending splice for copy offloading

2013-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On 09/26/2013 01:06:41 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:34 PM, J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:58:05AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Zach Brown z...@redhat.com wrote: A client-side copy will be

Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Check for the FSF mailing address

2013-10-06 Thread Rob Landley
On 10/06/2013 02:01:52 AM, Joe Perches wrote: On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 23:27 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 11:51:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: On Sat, 2013-10-05 at 11:43 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: Kernel maintainers reject new instances of the GPL boilerplate

Re: [RFC] extending splice for copy offloading

2013-09-16 Thread Rob Landley
On 09/11/2013 04:17:23 PM, Eric Wong wrote: Zach Brown z...@redhat.com wrote: Towards the end of that thread Eric Wong asked why we didn't just extend splice. I immediately replied with some dumb dismissive answer. Once I sat down and looked at it, though, it does make a lot of sense. So

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >