Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

2000-11-03 Thread Russ Allbery
committee considers it to be outside their scope, so I doubt you'll ever be completely successful. But I think your goal is one that can reap benefits even when only partially accomplished.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ - To unsubscribe from this list

Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

2000-11-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Meissner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: May I tentatively suggest that one point at which your resources could productively be applied is towards improving the C99 compliance in gcc? Clearly for the near to medium future

Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable

2014-01-30 Thread Russ Allbery
be difficult to retroactively add later. -- Russ Allbery (ea...@eyrie.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo

Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

2000-11-03 Thread Russ Allbery
rd syntax for in-line assembly, as the standardization committee considers it to be outside their scope, so I doubt you'll ever be completely successful. But I think your goal is one that can reap benefits even when only partially accomplished.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.ey

Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

2000-11-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Michael Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 10:19:12PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> May I tentatively suggest that one point at which your resources could >> productively be applied is towards improving the C99 compliance in gcc? >> Cle

Re: non-gcc linux?

2000-11-05 Thread Russ Allbery
successfully defend the license without it. But I can also very readily believe the advice of lawyers on the subject, namely that enforcement of the copyright is significantly easier in real court if one entity owns all of the rights. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://w

Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable

2014-01-30 Thread Russ Allbery
ot a standard fs command to set the current local cell, only to retrieve it. However, I suspect that's primarily due to design limitations in the OpenAFS client. If it's not difficult to support this operation in the in-tree kernel module, I think it would be a good idea to do so early, since it's the kin