On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The sa1100 definition of the io_p2v macro has changed in v3.6, and this one
> file stopped working because of that.
>
> Without this patch, building hackkit_defconfig results in:
>
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/leds-hackkit.c: In function
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:55:12AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> > Neat macro magic. Are you thinking that we build this in as a self test in
> > the code?
>
> For such things, this is never a bad idea to have some test alongside
> with the main cod
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARMv3 support was removed in 357c9c1f07 "ARM: Remove support for ARMv3
> ARM610 and ARM710 CPUs", which explicitly left parts of the CPU32v3
> support in place for building RiscPC. However, this does not actually
> build in my test se
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 05:12:58PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> CFLAGS_THUMB2 should probably be renamed to something more appropriate
> in this case, e.g. CFLAGS_MODE.
CFLAGS_ISA would be more relevant to it, because it's selecting the
instruction set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> >> Consult the following article on LWN:
> >> http://lwn.net/Articles/470820/
> >>
> >> Then grep your gitlog and you'll see we got rid of it from ARM.
> >
> > Then why is t
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:08:46PM +, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> This patch series provides a generic framework to allow device drivers
> to control voltage and current regulators on SoC based devices (e.g.
> phones, gps, media players).
Note that I'm explicitly avoiding commenting on this as far
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:03:58AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 09 August 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:27:57PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > ARMv3 support was removed in 357c9c1f07 "ARM: Remove support for ARMv3
>
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:56:36AM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> This patch fixes the following when compiling a driver module that uses
> amba-pl08x:
>
> ERROR: "pl08x_filter_id" [drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "pl08x_filter_id" [drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_mlc.ko] undefined!
>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:33:41PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> Oki, here is attempt #2 (btw, new mail or just keep thread?)
Probably better to keep the thread. More comments 8)
> +struct jornada_bllcd_device {
> + struct backlight_device *jorn_backlight_device;
> + struct lcd_devi
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:21:28PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> Oh, and thanks for all the feedback people! (and for doing it nicely)
I'm afraid you missed one - and there's a better fix for one of the other
points I made... 8)
> +static int jornada_bl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:43:40PM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> ATTEMPT #4.
> ---
> Fixed issues as suggested by Russell below.
Great, I'm happy now.
> Doh, right. Do you use a different checkpatch? I mean it doesn't react on
> that for me.
No, all of the comments I've given were
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:38:05PM +0100, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> From: Hans J Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: arch/arm/Kconfig: Make UIO available on ARM architecture
>
> Source drivers/uio/Kconfig
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:58:24AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:38:05PM +0100, Hans-J??rgen Koch wrote:
> > From: Hans J Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: arch/arm/
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:23:29PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> +# if PCMCIA is selected then we need IDE
> +config ARM_PCMCIA
> + depends on PCMCIA
Shouldn't this be:
def_bool PCMCIA
?
> + select HAVE_IDE
Also, should this be something ARM specific - if you have PCMCIA you cou
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Dnia Thursday, 7 of February 2008, Sam Ravnborg napisał:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:58:24AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > > Any chance to make arm finally use drivers/Kconfig? It's a bit silly
> > > that arm still i
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:42:56PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Following patch introduce HAVE_IDE to support flexible per
> arch or even per. sub-arch configuration of IDE support.
> This patch is needed to allow arm to use the generic
> drivers/Kconfig file.
>
> Introducing HAVE_IDE so each arch
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:18:31AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> But still, it's HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS which we want to depend on, not a
> newly-invented HAVE_MTD. And there are other places we really ought to
> be depending on HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS too.
That would be misleading though - !CPU_CP
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:43:42AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:23 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > That would be misleading though - !CPU_CP15_MMU does not mean we
> > support unaligned accesses. It means that we may have no way to
> &
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:04:13AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:23 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Both situations are trivially fixable by introducing
> > HAVE_IDE and HAVE_MTD.
> > See attached patch.
>
> HAVE_MTD is wrong.
If we are serious about allowing ARM to use
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:44:29PM -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> Add a DMA engine driver for the TI EDMA controller. This driver
> is implemented as a wrapper around the existing DaVinci private
> DMA implementation. This approach allows for incremental conversion
> of each peripheral driver to the D
Please read the comments on the function:
* Find the correct struct clk for the device and connection ID.
* We do slightly fuzzy matching here:
* An entry with a NULL ID is assumed to be a wildcard.
* If an entry has a device ID, it must match
* If an entry has a connection ID, it must mat
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:23:06PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
> Ok, so I have to declare it like that :
> CLKDEV_CON_DEV_ID(NULL, "f400.gpio", &pioAB_clk)
Yes, because the wildcarding is in the clkdev tables, not in the driver.
If you think about what's going on, that's the way it has to be.
Okay, so EPROBE_DEFER seems to work when I build everything into the
kernel, but when I build a pile of ASoC drivers as modules, it fails
every time I've tried booting the platform so far.
This is a v3.5 based kernel, with preempt enabled.
Okay, what I have is a bunch of devices already pre-regis
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:22:35PM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> The following "__get_vm_area_node()" can take gfp_mask, it means that
> this function is expected to be called from atomic context, but why
> it's _NOT_ allowed _ONLY_ from interrupt context?
One reason is it takes read/write locks wi
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:37:25PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 09:08:59PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 02:24:15PM -0600,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:31:59AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> +bool dma_is_possible(size_t len)
> +int map_dma_buffers(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> +irqreturn_t dma_transfer(struct driver_data *drv_data)
> +int dma_prepare(struct driver_data *drv_data, u32 dma_burst)
> +void dma_start(struc
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:08:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Convert all uses of devm_request_and_ioremap() to the newly introduced
> devm_ioremap_resource() which provides more consistent error handling.
Does this include the resource part of the handling too?
--
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:04:46PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Every channel has a functional clock that is similarly named.
> It makes sense to use a for loop to manage these clocks as OMAPs
> can come with up to 3 channels.
>
> Dynamically allocate and get channel clocks depending on the
> num
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:05:47PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:58:46PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:08:55AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > Convert all uses of devm_request_and_ioremap() to th
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:20:38AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> See previous mail to Minchan; local_tlb_flush_kernel_range calls
> cpu_tlb.flush_kernel_range on SMP, but a direct function call
> ("glue(_TLB, flush_kernel_range)" which resolves to
> v7wbi_flush_kernel_range etc. etc.) without CONFIG_
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:41:17PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2013, Matt Sealey wrote:
> >
> > ARM seems to be the only "major" platform not using the
> > kernel/Kconfig.hz definitions, instead rolling it's own and setting
> > what could be described as both reasonable and
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:00:15PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> So if you can not get actual timer ticks any faster then 200 HZ on that
> hardware, setting HZ higher could cause some jiffies related timer
> trouble
Err, no John. It's the other way around - especially on some platforms
which ar
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:18:20PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> So we used to have the ACTHZ code to handle error from the HZ rate
> requested and the HZ rate possible given the underlying hardware. That's
> been moved to the register_refined_jiffies(), but do you have a sense if
> there a rea
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:30:07PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2013, Matt Sealey wrote:
> > So is that a bug in that it is not available to ARM right now, a bug
> > in that it would be impossible for anyone on ARM to have ever tested
> > this code, or a bug in that it should
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:20:14PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> I am sorry it sounded if I was being high and mighty about not being
> able to select my own HZ (or being forced by Exynos to be 200 or by
> not being able to test an Exynos board, forced to default to 100). My
> real "grievance" here i
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:36:13PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> Well, Russell brought up a case that doesn't handle this. If a system
> *can't* do HZ=100, but can do HZ=200.
>
> Though there are hacks, of course, that might get around this (skip
> every other interrupt at 200HZ).
Note: in the e
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:54:31PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> Hmm, I think it might be appreciated for people looking at this stuff
> (same as I stumbled into it) for a little comment on WHY the default
> is 200. That way you don't wonder even if you know why EBSA110 has a
> HZ=200 default, why Ex
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:23:33PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:20:14PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> >> I am sorry it sounded if I was being high and mighty about not being
>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 05:30:31PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> But it would effectively stop users drinking kool-aid.. if you set
> your HZ to something stupid, you don't even get a kernel to build, and
> certainly don't get to boot past the first 40 lines of boot messages..
> I think most people w
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 07:06:59PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 6:51 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> > On 01/21/2013 02:54 PM, Matt Sealey wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, John Stultz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 01/21/2013 01:14 PM, Matt Sealey wrote:
> >
> > As fa
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Sorry for not being clear enough. On OMAP, 32KHz is the only clock which
> is always running(even during low power states) and hence the clock
> source and clock event have been clocked using 32KHz clock. As mentioned
> by RMK, wi
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00:56AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> I think I read somewhere at some point that ioread{8,16,32} is preferred
> over write{b,h,l} in new code.
But... there's *no* point using ioread*() if you don't only use the
ioremap() interface.
ioread*() is there to allow PC I
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:49:16AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 01/23/2013 11:27 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00:56AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >> I think I read somewhere at some point that ioread{8,16,32} is preferred
>
Zwane's arm.linux.org.uk email address has not been functional for
a number of years now. It's time that all references to it were
removed. I no longer have a forwarding address for Zwane, as I had
assumed that my repeated requests over a number of years to Zwane to
avoid use of this address had
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:42:01AM +, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 15:52:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 06:06:57PM +0530, Philip Avinash wrote:
> > > +static int elm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
&g
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:36:32PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
>
> > I have hosted the series at [3].
> > [3] https://github.com/sumananna/mailbox/commits/dbx500-prcmu-mailbox
>
> Suman, I suggest you ask Stepgen Rothwell to include this
> bra
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:56:36AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I would put it this way: With the introduction of deferred probing, the
> rules for the use of __init sections have changed slightly for some
> corner cases. While normal device drivers can, as before, not call
> __init functions from
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:40:09PM +0100, Nicolas Schichan wrote:
> On 02/13/2013 10:32 PM, Mircea Gherzan wrote:
> [...]
>> Acked-by: Mircea Gherzan
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks Mircea. Russel, David, do you have any preference as to which path
> this patch should take (net tree or ARM tree) ?
I'm happy
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:47:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Patch c08e20d24 "arm: Add v7_invalidate_l1 to cache-v7.S"
> moves the v7_invalidate_l1 symbol out of imx/headsmp.S,
> which seems to cause a link error because it is now
> too far away from v7_cpu_resume when building an
> allyesconfi
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:05:14AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> $ size obj-tmp/vmlinux -A
> obj-tmp/vmlinux :
> section size addr
> .head.text504 3221258240
> .text32707336 3221258752
> .text.head 8 3253966088
Inter
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:07:39AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 16 February 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 15 February 2013 23:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > +static bool dw_dma_generic_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
> > > {
> >
> > > + dws->cfg_hi = 0xff
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:49:08PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 8<-
> ARM: mm: remove unused variables in pci_reserve_io
>
> Patch "ARM: 7646/1: mm: use static_vm for managing static mapped areas"
> removed code from pci_reserve_io but left variable declarations
> in place that are now unused
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 02:49:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Recent assembler versions complain about extraneous
> whitespace inside [] brackets. This fixes all of
> these instances for the samsung platforms. We should
> backport this to all kernels that might need to
> be built with new binuti
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:43:20PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> It also breaks all of_amba_device users.
>
> of_amba_device_create() --> amba_device_add() --> request_resource()
> and fails.
Presumably that's because we no longer know what the parent resource
is supposed to be?
--
To unsubscribe fro
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 01:09:46PM +0530, vaibhav shinde wrote:
> Hi Russel,
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:18:56PM +0530, trisha yad wrote:
> > > I wish to know how can I support this
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:13:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> s3c2440_clk_add is a subsys_interface method and calls clkdev_add_table,
> which means we might be calling it after the __init section is
> discarded.
>
> Without this patch, building mini2440_defconfig results in:
>
> WARNING: vmli
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> That's odd. I get:
>
> root@ME:/ cat sys/boottime/bootloader
> 0
>
> root@ME:/ cat sys/boottime/kernel
> 4276
>
> root@ME:/ cat /sys/kernel/debug/boottime/summary
> kernel: 4276 msecs
> total: 4276 msecs
>
> root@ME:/ cat /sys/kern
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Sourav writes:
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > index 6ede6fd..3fbc7f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > @@ -14
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 05:29:55PM +, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [li...@arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:12 PM
> To: Kevin Hilman
> Cc: Poddar, Sourav; Paul Walmsley;
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:59:22AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> Sourav writes:
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> >> > b/
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 05:35:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> I rebased my ARM development branch and figured that your patch 9fff2fa
> ("arm: switch to saner kernel_execve() semantics") breaks the boot on my
> board right after init is invoked via NFS:
Ok, I'm not going to assign blame to Al's c
Okay, here's the post-mortem diagnosis.
What's happening is as follows (I'm very certain of this.)
We come through the usual init, and issue (see init/main.c):
kernel_thread(kernel_init, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_SIGHAND);
This creates a new thread, which falls through to the ret_from_fork
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:39:40AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Tested-by: Daniel Mack
>
> Many thanks for the very prompt response!
Thanks Daniel.
I've also tested this on my OMAP4430 board running in ARM mode, so that
still works - we've covered the possibilities between us here between
ARM mo
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:04:34AM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> In addition to those contiguous/discontiguous page allocation, is
> there any way to _import_ anonymous pages allocated by a process to be
> used in dma-mapping API later?
>
> I'm considering the following scenario, an user process al
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:12:49PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean but we had already tried this
> way and for this, you can refer to below link,
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg22555.html
>
> but
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:27:55PM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Russell King - ARM Linux wrote @ Tue, 16 Oct 2012
> 10:59:28 +0200:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:04:34AM +0300, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > > In addition to those contiguous/dis
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 04:04:14PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> I used:
> movne r0, r4
> - movne lr, pc
> - movne pc, r5
> + blxne r5
> get_thread_info tsk
>
> but I assume Russell's patch is better. (Probably because blx doesn't
> exist everywhere?!)
Correct.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:07:49PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> Attempts to retrigger nested threaded IRQs currently fail because they
> have no primary handler. In order to support retrigger of nested
> IRQs, the parent IRQ needs to be retriggered.
>
> To fix, when an
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 07:24:07PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Looks right to me. Just need to remove the select from IMX as well.
Then you don't understand HAVE_CLK_PREPARE.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.k
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:54:24PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > Quoting Viresh Kumar (2012-11-20 02:13:55)
> > > On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov
> > > wrote:
> > > > We'll need to invoke clk_unprepare() via a pointe
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:30:33AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:17:50PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > You've checked non-ARM architectures too?
> >
> > Yes:
> >
> > [dtor@dtor-d630 linux-next]$ grep -r
I assume you're working with an old kernel... this has already been
fixed.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:07:47PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> Introduced by:
> 07bd005ed2457876f653fda12981708d737543df
> ARM: 7547/1: cache-l2x0: add support for Aurora L2 cache ctrl
>
> arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c:37:12: war
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 06:17:50PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > You've checked non-ARM architectures too?
>
> Yes:
>
> [dtor@dtor-d630 linux-next]$ grep -r HAVE_CLK_PREPARE .
> ./arch/arm/Kconfig: select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
> Binary file
> ./.git/objects/pack/pack-7dad5ee164f601f1327dc7864
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:34:40PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> HAVE_CLK_PREPARE is automatically selected by COMMON_CLK and the only
> platform that explicitly selects HAVE_CLK_PREPARE is MXS which has been
> switched to common clk framework, so we can delete this option now.
>
> As part of th
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 05:18:40PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2013/1/10 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:02:15AM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 05:57:39PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
> >> > Emulate NMIs on system
Mark,
Rafael just asked me to look at this patch, though I guess these comments
should be directed to Rob who was the original patch author.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:35:43AM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c
> index 49f335d..dad2d8
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:15:02PM +0100, Michal Bachraty wrote:
> + if (!request_mem_region(priv->conf_res->start,
> + resource_size(priv->conf_res), ndev->name)) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "failed request i/o region\n");
> + ret = -ENXIO;
> +
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:13:31PM +0900, Chanho Min wrote:
> In DMA support, Received data is not triggered until the DMA buffer is filled.
> In order to actually use Rx DMA, We would like to suggest the use of the timer
> for polling DMA buffer. It makes possible character-level trigger.
> In our
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:03:21PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/usb-omap.h
> b/include/linux/platform_data/usb-omap.h
> index d63eb7d..927b8a1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/usb-omap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/usb-omap.h
> @@ -38,6 +3
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> We use "vcc" as the supply name for the PHY's power supply.
> The power supply will be enabled during .init() and disabled
> during .shutdown()
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros
> ---
> drivers/usb/otg/nop-usb-xceiv.c | 18 +++
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:09:59PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 06:33 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> > kbc->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(kbc->clk)) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get keyboard clock\n");
> > err = PTR_ERR(kbc->cl
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:27:07PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 04:24 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:09:59PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 01/11/2013 06:33 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>> kbc->clk = clk_
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 04:04:28PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Going through clock driver, the clk_get() should return error pointer or
> valid pointer, atleast not NULL.
No. clk_get() will return whatever value the 'clk' pointer found in
the clk_lookup structure contains. Or it will retur
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:04:58AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> At some point we reasoned that we may actually be saved
> by the reverse phenomena - if single request is *NOT*
> connected, there will very often be some characters in the
> FIFO, and that's enough to trigger the RTIM IRQ, and we get
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:04:18PM +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> - if (vt8500_port->clk) {
> - vt8500_port->uart.uartclk = clk_get_rate(vt8500_port->clk);
> - } else {
> - /* use the default of 24Mhz if not specified and warn */
> - pr_warn("%s: serial clock
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 07:17 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> We use "vcc" as the supply name for the PHY's power supply.
> >&g
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:51:07PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 01/14/2013 01:25 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Also consider... is dev_err() appropriate for an "error", for which you
> > print a message and continue as if nothing went wrong. To me that sound
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:45:52AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 03:34 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> ...
> > Which is the tree on which Prashant changes are applied. I can debug
> > from that tree.
>
> git://nv-tegra.nvidia.com/user/swarren/linux-2.6 test-ccf-rework-v4
>
> But as I
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:18:53PM +, Cong Ding wrote:
> the pointer cpu_pmu is used without null pointer dereference check, and is
> checked after the using of it, so we move the null pointer check to before the
> first use.
The NULL pointer check is not necessary. cpu_pmu_init() is called
a
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:49:57AM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Without having an AT91 available right now, I guess the hardware
> interface of this GPIO chip is different from the GPIO block API. While
> the hardware has clear and set registers, the val parameter of
> at91_gpiolib_set_block() sho
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > We'll need to invoke clk_disable_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_*
> > conversion so let's uninline the pair.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov
>
> Mike, are you takin
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:50:44PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 December 2012 17:27, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov
> >> wrot
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 06:35:24PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 December 2012 18:10, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > Well, there's my comment against patch 2 which never got a reply:
> >
> > "Again, what about stuff not using drivers/clk/clk.c
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:51:32PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> +static void at91_gpiolib_set_block(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned long
> mask, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = to_at91_gpio_chip(chip);
> + void __iomem *pio = at91_gpio->regbase;
> +
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:21:57PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> When spi client does the spi transfer and does not sets
> the bits_per_word for each transfer then set it as default
> of spi device in spi core before calling low level transfer.
Err, sorry? To me, the above doesn't make too much
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 01:08:33PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:24:43PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
> > index 181ed26..17d7437 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
> > @@ -714,12 +714,12
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 07:18:07PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> + irq_start = NOMADIK_GPIO_TO_IRQ(pdata->first_gpio);
> + irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(irq_start, 0, NMK_GPIO_PER_CHIP,
> +numa_node_id());
> + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(irq_base)) {
commit 07ab67c8d0
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:47:46AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > To be honest, I've not bothered to test the above patch, and now when I
> > look at it, I notice it's broken - in that on error it will
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:47:46AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > To be honest, I've not bothered to test the above pat
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:34:07PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> +static int omap5_usb_phy_power(struct omap_usb *phy, bool on)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> + unsigned long rate;
> + struct clk *sys_clk;
> +
> + sys_clk = clk_get(NULL, "sys_clkin");
> + if (IS_ERR(sys_clk)) {
>
701 - 800 of 4247 matches
Mail list logo
