On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Hugh Dickins hu...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote:
on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 today's Linux-Next runs into the following
call-trace (machine freezes):
Sep 26 19:22:58 fambox kernel: [ 11.124739] BUG: unable to handle
kernel NULL
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20121107:
[...]
The v4l-dvb tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
next-20121026.
Hi,
I am just wondering why this v4l-dvb issues are still present...
...since
Hi,
looks like [1] is fixing my suspend/resume problem with v3.5-rc6+
(attached call-trace is with a v3.5-rc6 kernel before the commit got
upstream).
Thanks for the fix!
I am wondering if those new-lines are intended (see attachment)?
- Sedat -
P.S.: Commit details
commit
to add:
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Kind Regards,
- Sedat (dileks on IRC) -
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=134216822724119w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
while dealing with [1], I saw this mei-related infos in dmesg when
doing a suspend + resume (see [1] for more logs):
[17046.348467] [a00554d8] mei_pci_suspend+0x78/0xd0 [mei]
[17047.460315] mei :00
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Winkler, Tomas
tomas.wink...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sedat Dilek [mailto:sedat.di...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:48 PM
To: Winkler, Tomas
Cc: Thomas Gleixner; LKML; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Roland Dreier
Subject: [3.5-rc6
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Winkler, Tomas
tomas.wink...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sedat Dilek [mailto:sedat.di...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:48 PM
To: Winkler, Tomas
Cc
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20120713:
The ext4 tree lost its build failure.
The vfs tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20120713.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:17:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20120713:
The ext4 tree lost its build failure.
The vfs
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20120716:
The vfs tree lost its build failure.
The l2-mtd tree gained a conflict against the mtd tree.
The battery tree tree lost its build failure.
The regulator tree gained conflicts
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20120716:
The vfs tree lost its build failure.
The l2-mtd tree gained a conflict against the mtd tree
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20120716:
The vfs tree lost its build
/precise AMD64 host.
[ v2: Polish up subject and commit message ]
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c |1 -
drivers/mfd/ab3100-core.c |2 --
include/linux/random.h |2 --
3 files changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20120716:
Out of curiosity (and normally you are giving a reason why there
is...) no new Tree for July 18?
- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:15 PM, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 13:09 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
26 dwmw2 git
git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/random-2.6.git#master
I'm misusing the word 'random' to mean 'miscellaneous' there; it's not
for things
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
...looks like AB3100 is the *only* driver still using
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:06:17PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20120716:
Not sure what the root cause
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Dirk Brandewie
dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/13/2013 02:55 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, April 12, 2013 11:08:37 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Sedat
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 15 April 2013 21:37, Dirk Brandewie dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
If the intel_pstate driver is being used __cpufreq_governor() should
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 15 April 2013 21:37, Dirk Brandewie dirk.brande...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 15 April 2013 21:37, Dirk Brandewie dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote:
If the intel_pstate driver is being used __cpufreq_governor() should NOT be
called intel_pstate does not implement the target() callback.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130417:
New Trees: rpmsg
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell s
Hi,
I would like to do a diff between a problematic next-mmdd and
next-[mmdd+1].
How can I do this easily?
My old style was to checkout a specific Linux-Next release and then
create a diff against the latest -rcX (of mainline).
So, I have two diffs and try to compare them.
Thanks in
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to do a diff between a problematic next-mmdd and
next-[mmdd+1].
How can I do this easily?
My old style was to checkout a specific Linux-Next release and then
create a diff against the latest
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
See attached dmesg.
This still has the bug Davidlohr pointed at:
This looks like what Emmanuel was/is running into:
https
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com wrote:
On 04/20/2013 08:46 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
I have started a new thread [next-20130419] ipc: sem: BROKEN, please
use this one!
Thanks for all your feedback!
- Sedat -
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-nextm=136646172915261w
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Davidlohr Bueso
davidlohr.bu...@hp.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 02:19 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:47 AM, liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
originally, 'data-flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK',
and we use 'data-flags = ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK'
for csd_unlock, they are not symmetrix operations
so use '|=' instead of '='.
though, now data-flags only hold CSD_FLAG_LOCK,
it's not so
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:22 AM, li guang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
在 2013-04-22一的 08:18 +0200，Sedat Dilek写道：
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:47 AM, liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
originally, 'data-flags = CSD_FLAG_LOCK',
and we use 'data-flags = ~CSD_FLAG_LOCK'
for csd_unlock
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:22 AM, li guang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
在 2013-04-22一的 08:18 +0200，Sedat Dilek写道：
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:47 AM, liguang lig.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
originally, 'data-flags
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I still did not get the original posting...
This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev,
premount and init scripts are run.
... udevd
/scripts/init-premount ... done
/scripts/pre-premount
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I still did not get the original posting...
This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev,
premount and init scripts
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Sedat,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:56:46 +0200 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev,
premount and init scripts are run.
Currently, I have no glue
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 02:47:39 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130408:
The vfs tree still had its build failure so I
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Sedat,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:56:46 +0200 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
This version hangs... I started in rescue-mode and see that udev,
premount and init scripts are run.
Currently, I have no glue
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Jason Wessel jason.wes...@windriver.com wrote:
On 04/09/2013 08:06 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
config DEBUG_RODATA
bool Write protect kernel read-only data structures
- default y
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
+ default n if KGDB
+ default y
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Sedat,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:11:50 +0200 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
[ CC Al Viro ]
You forgot to do that ...
Is there a magic git-command to revert all commits coming from your
latest vfs-merge
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 9 April 2013 19:34, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen it on reboots.
How to online/offline from sysfs?
offline a cpu x with:
echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online
and online with echo 1
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Sedat,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:11:50 +0200 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
[ CC Al Viro ]
You forgot to do
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Sedat,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:11:50 +0200 Sedat Dilek sedat.di
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 9 April 2013 19:34, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen it on reboots.
How to online/offline from sysfs?
offline a cpu x with:
echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online
and online with echo 1
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state.
root# echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online
I could not write my reply and had to do a hard
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130408:
The vfs tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20130405.
With the attached patch including a follow-up I was able to boot
today's Linux-Next.
I have
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
wrote
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state.
root# echo 0 /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/online
I could not write my reply and had to do a hard
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
With x=3 the system gets in an unuseable state.
root# echo 0 /sys/devices
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 9 April 2013 21:38, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
With x
[ CCing some involved maintainers and MLs ]
Hi Joerg,
what is the status of your proposal patch?
Is this [1] the last version you posted?
What's with the integration into linux-kbuild?
Background of my asking is that I need to build cpufreq-info shipped
with the kernel-sources in tools-dir to
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130409:
The vfs tree lost its build failure.
Beyond build-failures in vfs-next [0] and [1], it was not bootable
(see [2] till [4])!
This is now all fixed, thanks to all involved people!
The issue is fixed with Linux-Next (next-20130410).
- Sedat -
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-nextm=136559043516192w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130410:
The tip tree gained conflicts against the net-next and pm trees.
The driver-core tree gained
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10 April 2013 11:44, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
I found this [RFC PATCH] kbuild: Build linux-tools package with 'make
deb-pkg' from February 2012.
Can't say what happened to it...
Sedat,
Sorry
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Herbert Xu herb...@gondor.apana.org.au wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 07:14:31PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130410:
The tip tree gained conflicts
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, April 12, 2013 11:08:37 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Eric W. Biederman
ebied...@xmission.com wrote:
Hehe, I just checked my new kernel... that does not work (nothing in the
logs).
But I think it's good to see if the
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Phillip Lougher
phillip.loug...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:47:14PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
fs/overlayfs/super.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
Hi Al,
Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in
include/asm-generic/unistd.h between commit 837718bfd28b
(CONFIG_SYMBOL_PREFIX: cleanup) from the
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au writes:
Hi Al,
Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got a conflict in
include/asm-generic
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:47:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:42:27 +0100 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
did forget to sent your email [1] to linux-next
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:42:27 +0100 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
did forget to sent your email [1] to linux-next ML?
No, and I even checked my mail server's logs and it was accepted by vger
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
Al and Linus,
Please consider overlayfs for inclusion into 3.10.
It's included in Ubuntu and openSUSE, used by OpenWrt and various other
projects. I regularly get emails asking when it will be included in mainline.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 02:50:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
Al and Linus,
Please consider overlayfs for inclusion into 3.10.
Yes, I think
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
what's the status of union-mount?
Where does the development happen - in [1]?
Regards,
- Sedat -
[1]
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:19 PM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
what's the status of union-mount?
It's being reengineered again to take account of VFS changes that went in in
the last merge window.
Hmmm, sorry for asking, but when do you
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
Al and Linus,
Please consider overlayfs for inclusion into 3.10.
It's included in Ubuntu and openSUSE, used by OpenWrt and various other
projects. I regularly get emails asking when it will be included in mainline.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
Here's another version with the comments addressed plus a small bugfix and
some
checkpatch cleanups.
Changes in v17:
- fix wrong return value
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
Looks like this is missing (or intended?):
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index 482c26f..f23ebfc 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -684,3 +684,6 @@ static void
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
Looks like this is missing (or intended?):
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index 482c26f..f23ebfc 100644
--- a/fs
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
Looks like this is missing (or intended?):
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, with CONFIG_OVERLAYFS_FS=m I do not see any related messages
when the kernel-module is loaded.
So, is this intended?
SquashFS prints
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, with CONFIG_OVERLAYFS_FS=m I do not see any related messages
when the kernel-module is loaded.
So, is this intended?
SquashFS prints
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
fs/overlayfs/super.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index 482c26f..92b9ad5 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -675,11 +675,13 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_FS
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
fs/squashfs/super.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/squashfs/super.c b/fs/squashfs/super.c
index 260e392..9747764 100644
--- a/fs/squashfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/squashfs/super.c
@@ -447,8 +447,7 @@ static
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Felix Fietkau n...@openwrt.org wrote:
On 2013-03-13 7:12 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 05:51:33PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Miklos Szeredi mik...@szeredi.hu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Sedat Dilek
Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
---
fs/overlayfs/super.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index 482c26f..e30141f 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -674,6 +674,8 @@ MODULE_ALIAS_FS
Same happens with ext4 GIT...
OLD: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git
NEW: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/tree/
FIXED: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git
- Sedat -
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@kernel.org wrote:
On 03/03/13 06:34 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately, the Git snapshot tarball feature was dropped when
switching from gitweb-cgit interface.
For example the Freetz router project extracted the Kbuild-system
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@kernel.org
wrote:
On 03/03/13 06:34 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately, the Git snapshot tarball feature was dropped when
switching from gitweb-cgit
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev mri...@kernel.org wrote:
On 04/03/13 07:58 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Hi,
it is still tar.bz2 the default tarball for downloading.
As modern Linux-kernel versions exists also as tar.xz which is smaller
and causes less Internet traffic.
Save
handling path.
Simply remove the -ENOMEM path.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky skinsbur...@parallels.com
Cc: Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com
Cc: James Morris jmor...@namei.org
---
Yeah, I messed up
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130204:
The metag tree gained a conflict
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130207:
The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130207.
The watchdog tree gained a conflict against the mfd tree.
I applied a patch to restore some
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130207:
The sound-asoc tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20130207.
The watchdog tree gained a conflict against the mfd tree.
I applied a patch to restore some
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Hillf Danton dhi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Sedat
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
With today's Linux-Next I see this warning
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, February 08, 2013 01:47:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Hillf Danton dhi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Sedat
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 8 February 2013 18:51, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, February 08, 2013 01:47:44 PM Sedat Dilek wrote:
[0.377473] [8105a5ef] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[0.377479
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
...some...changes... is not very concrete :-).
Which commit(s) caused this trouble?
Is current (meanwhile updated?) linux-pm.git#linux-next good
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new...
commit 8d5666f3456f2fd4a4e5dced228475b829851e53
ACPI: Unbind ACPI drv when probe
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Nah, I pulled in latest pm-next where this commit is new...
commit
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 22:40 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130211:
The acpi tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The arm-soc tree gained conflicts against the usb and metag trees.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:20 PM, James Hogan james.ho...@imgtec.com wrote:
I get the following build error on next-20130213 due to the following
commit:
commit f05de73bf82fbbc00265c06d12efb7273f7dc54a (skbuff: create
skb_panic() function and its wrappers).
It adds an argument called panic
1 - 100 of 2321 matches
Mail list logo
