Hi.
Here's something strange that i've been noticing with 2.4.0. Some websites I am
unable to access now. For example:
snip about sites
This is a FAQ. Check if you compiled with ECN enabled (CONFIG_INET_ECN).
Some sites have broken firewalls that drop packets of that type. Either
don't surf
Hi.
modutils-2.4.3.tar.gz Source tarball, includes RPM spec file
modutils-2.4.3-1.src.rpmAs above, in SRPM format
modutils-2.4.3-1.i386.rpm Compiled with egcs-2.91.66, glibc 2.1.2
modutils-2.4.3-1.sparc64.rpmCombined sparc 32/64.
modutils-2.4.3-1.ia64.rpm
Hi.
iam getting compilation errors for driver code.
struct file_operations my_ops ={NULL,my_read,my_write,NULL,NULL,NULL
NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL
NULL };
Hi!
I am trying to use the --mac-source option in the netfilter code to better refine
access to my linux box. However, I have run up against something. The router
through which my private subnet work box passes sends a 14-group "invalid" mac
address, presumably as an attempt to conceal the
Hi.
I am configuring Bind 9 on Redhat 7 but unable to start the named.
Here is my /var/log message log:
snip named start log
Read the documentation and you shall notice that you must set a ttl for
each zone, which also your logs state that you have not done ...
// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Geert.
I mean: who makes a spelling error in his own first name? ;-)
I don't think so: both `c' and `t' are (different) ASCII-transcripts of the
actual non-ASCII character that should have been there. Yes, UTF-8 to US-ASCII
is lossy and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Bastiaan Naber wrote:
[...]
I have a 15 GB file which I want to place in memory via tmpfs. I want to do
this because I need to have this data accessible with a very low seek time.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The machine we plan to buy is a HP Proliant Xeon machine and I want to run a
32 bit linux kernel on it (the xeon we want doesn't have the 64-bit stuff
yet)
You cant have 16GB of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:00:18PM +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
You cant have 16GB of Memory with 32bit CPUs.
PAE
CONFIG_HIGMEM64G
Supports a 36bit address space, which Xeons do support.
Yes right, I was just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Unfortunately, if you only get printk() working after you ran
userspace app... well it makes debugging things like SATA
interesting. So I quite like this patch.
Most interesting laptop vendors have at least one model in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hubert Chan wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:52:25 -0400, Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This doesn't even invalidate the userland VFSs of the other guys,
they're still needed for systems whose kernels don't have a metadata
facility.
So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok, still haven't heard much discussion of metafs vs file-as-directory,
but it seems like it'd be easier in metafs.
Why not implement it inside the directory containg the file ?
Ie the metadata for /home/stesmi/foo is in /home/stesmi/.meta/foo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Why not implement it inside the directory containg the file ?
Ie the metadata for /home/stesmi/foo is in /home/stesmi/.meta/foo
This should be suit both camps I'd think?
You still need to figure out the parent of foo, which isn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
I have agreed to drop V1.0 support, and yes (as explained in another
emauil), breaking the 4GB limit does involve on-disk format change.
I've only also been reading this thread with half an eye but :
Would it be possible (in some logical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
what do you need e.g. reiserfs 4 for? or jfs? or xfs? does not ext2/3
the journalling job also?
Ext2 does not do journaling. Ext3 does.
Perhaps squashfs is good enough improvement over cramfs... But I'd
like those 4Gb limits to go away.
we all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
initially caused are now sorted out.
Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Davis wrote:
Please don't tell me to care for closed-source drivers.
ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to care.
While ndiswrapper might not be closed source, I would not call the
windows driver it loads open source ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathias Adam wrote:
Currently serial8250_set_termios() refuses to program a baud rate larger
than uartclk/16. However the 16C950 supports baud rates up to uartclk/4.
This worked already with Linux 2.4 so the biggest part of this patch was
simply
Hi.
> Here's something strange that i've been noticing with 2.4.0. Some websites I am
> unable to access now. For example:
This is a FAQ. Check if you compiled with ECN enabled (CONFIG_INET_ECN).
Some sites have broken firewalls that drop packets of that type. Either
don't surf to those sites
Hi.
> modutils-2.4.3.tar.gz Source tarball, includes RPM spec file
> modutils-2.4.3-1.src.rpmAs above, in SRPM format
> modutils-2.4.3-1.i386.rpm Compiled with egcs-2.91.66, glibc 2.1.2
> modutils-2.4.3-1.sparc64.rpmCombined sparc 32/64.
> modutils-2.4.3-1.ia64.rpm
Hi.
> iam getting compilation errors for driver code.
>
> struct file_operations my_ops ={NULL,my_read,my_write,NULL,NULL,NULL
> NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL
>NULL };
Hi!
> I am trying to use the --mac-source option in the netfilter code to better refine
>access to my linux box. However, I > have run up against something. The router
>through which my private subnet work box passes sends a 14-group "invalid" > mac
>address, presumably as an attempt to
Hi.
Thought I'd toss my 0.02sek into the discussion.
> > > objective, arent we?
> >Nope. Are you claiming to be?
> >
> > > For example, if there were six different companies that marketed ethernet
> > > drivers for the eepro100, you'd have a choice of which one to buy..perhaps
> >... Rant
Hi.
> I am configuring Bind 9 on Redhat 7 but unable to start the named.
> Here is my /var/log message log:
Read the documentation and you shall notice that you must set a ttl for
each zone, which also your logs state that you have not done ...
// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Geert.
>>I mean: who makes a spelling error in his own first name? ;-)
>
> I don't think so: both `c' and `t' are (different) ASCII-transcripts of the
> actual non-ASCII character that should have been there. Yes, UTF-8 to US-ASCII
> is lossy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:52:25 -0400, Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
>>>This doesn't even invalidate the userland VFSs of the other guys,
>>>they're still needed for systems whose kernels don't have a metadata
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Ok, still haven't heard much discussion of metafs vs file-as-directory,
> but it seems like it'd be easier in metafs.
Why not implement it inside the directory containg the file ?
Ie the metadata for /home/stesmi/foo is in /home/stesmi/.meta/foo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
>> Why not implement it inside the directory containg the file ?
>>
>> Ie the metadata for /home/stesmi/foo is in /home/stesmi/.meta/foo
>>
>> This should be suit both camps I'd think?
>
> You still need to figure out the parent of "foo", which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
> I have agreed to drop V1.0 support, and yes (as explained in another
> emauil), breaking the 4GB limit does involve on-disk format change.
I've only also been reading this thread with half an eye but :
Would it be possible (in some logical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> what do you need e.g. reiserfs 4 for? or jfs? or xfs? does not ext2/3
> the journalling job also?
Ext2 does not do journaling. Ext3 does.
>> Perhaps squashfs is good enough improvement over cramfs... But I'd
>> like those 4Gb limits to go away.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Bastiaan Naber wrote:
> [...]
>
>>I have a 15 GB file which I want to place in memory via tmpfs. I want to do
>>this because I need to have this data accessible with a very low seek time.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>>The machine we plan to buy is a HP Proliant Xeon machine and I want to run a
>>32 bit linux kernel on it (the xeon we want doesn't have the 64-bit stuff
>>yet)
>
>
> You cant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:00:18PM +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
>
>>>You cant have 16GB of Memory with 32bit CPUs.
>>
>>PAE
>>CONFIG_HIGMEM64G
>>Supports a 36bit address space, wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>>Unfortunately, if you only get printk() working after you ran
>>>userspace app... well it makes debugging things like SATA
>>>"interesting". So I quite like this patch.
>>
>>Most interesting laptop vendors have at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>>4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
>>initially caused are now sorted out.
>>
>>Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Davis wrote:
>>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers".
>
> ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care".
While ndiswrapper might not be closed source, I would not call the
windows driver it loads open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathias Adam wrote:
> Currently serial8250_set_termios() refuses to program a baud rate larger
> than uartclk/16. However the 16C950 supports baud rates up to uartclk/4.
> This worked already with Linux 2.4 so the biggest part of this patch was
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
