On 15.12.2016 06:53, David Gibson wrote:
> This adds a new powerpc-specific KVM_CAP_SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT capability to
> advertise whether KVM is capable of handling the PAPR extensions for
> resizing the hashed page table during guest runtime.
>
> At present, HPT resizing is possible with KVM PR
On 15.12.2016 06:54, David Gibson wrote:
> This patch adds a stub (always failing) implementation of the ioctl()s
> for the HPT resizing PAPR extension.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 4
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 16
On 19.12.2016 01:48, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 01:44:57PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 15.12.2016 06:53, David Gibson wrote:
>>> The KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB ioctl() is used to set the size of hashed page
>>> table (HPT) that userspace expects a gu
On 20.01.2017 19:23, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:25:48 +0100
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> Comparison
On 21.04.2016 11:25, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 21:18, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc,
>> I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with kvm-pr,
>> while it is fine with kvm-hv.
kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 3, EV_UNIMPLEMENTED);
> kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) + 4);
> emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
> + } else {
> + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
> + emulated = EMULATE_AGAIN;
> }
> break;
> case 19:
>
Tested-by: Thomas Huth
On 17.05.2016 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote:
On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
On 18.05.2016 12:18, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 17.05.2016 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote:
On 18.05.2016 12:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 18.05.2016 12:18, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 17.05.2016 19:49, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/05/2016 10:37, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>&
OK3S_INTERRUPT_TRACE
>
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 32 +++-
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth
On 22.03.2016 15:53, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Until now, when we connect gdb to the QEMU gdb-server, the
> single-step mode is not managed.
>
> This patch adds this, only for kvm-pr:
>
> If KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP is set, we enable single-step trace bit in the
> MSR (MSR_SE) just before the
On 08.04.2016 08:58, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> On 08/04/2016 08:23, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 22.03.2016 15:53, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> Until now, when we connect gdb to the QEMU gdb-server, the
>>> single-step mode is not managed.
>>>
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
By the way, same is true for device UNplugging: When unplugging devices
in QEMU while the firmware is still running, they are never properly
removed from the guest. I've checked it, and your patch fixes this
problem as well! Great :-)
Tested-by: Thomas Huth
_kvm_s390_real_to_abs(u32 prefix, unsigned long
gra)
Just a matter of taste, but maybe this could be named differently?
kvm_s390_real2abs_prefix() ? kvm_s390_prefix_real_to_abs()?
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth
201 - 214 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
