3d9e25159aa57e235ca4d1] perf symbols: We need
> > util.h in symbol-elf.c for zfree()
> > git bisect bad cf8b6970f4fc31898f3d9e25159aa57e235ca4d1
> > # bad: [9f94c7f947e919c343b30f080285af53d0fa9902] perf tools: Increase
> > MAX_NR_CPUS and MAX_CACHES
> > git bisect bad 9f94c7f947e919c343b30f080285af53d0fa9902
> > # good: [122f1c51b11a9e572263c4965d772381fcef06c5] perf/x86/rapl: Get
> > MSR values from new probe framework
> > git bisect good 122f1c51b11a9e572263c4965d772381fcef06c5
> > # bad: [2d7102a0453769fd37e9f4ce68652e104fbf5c84] perf tools: Fix
> > cache.h include directive
> > git bisect bad 2d7102a0453769fd37e9f4ce68652e104fbf5c84
> > # good: [637d97b53cdded02da55d0a25cda6fd6af3bd042] perf/x86/rapl: Get
> > quirk state from new probe framework
> > git bisect good 637d97b53cdded02da55d0a25cda6fd6af3bd042
> > # bad: [fd7d55172d1e2e501e6da0a5c1de25f06612dc2e] perf/cgroups: Don't
> > rotate events for cgroups unnecessarily
> > git bisect bad fd7d55172d1e2e501e6da0a5c1de25f06612dc2e
> > # first bad commit: [fd7d55172d1e2e501e6da0a5c1de25f06612dc2e]
> > perf/cgroups: Don't rotate events for cgroups unnecessarily
> >
> > Is there any more information that I can gather to make this issue
> > easier to fix?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tibor Billes
>
cgroup: add documentation for pids.events file
Document the event counters file for pid cgroups.
Signed-off-by: Tibor Billes
---
Documentation/cgroup-v1/pids.txt | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroup-v1/pids.txt b/Documentation/cgroup-v1/pids.txt
index
om:
> commit 208bf9fdcd3575aa4a5d48b3e0295f7cdaf6fc44
> Author: Ville Syrjälä
> Date: Mon Aug 11 13:15:35 2014 +0300
>
> drm/i915: Fix locking for intel_enable_pipe_a()
>
> v2: Make the code more readable (Chris)
>
> Cc: Tibor Billes
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
I tested the posted patch, applyi
Author: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:15:35 2014 +0300
drm/i915: Fix locking for intel_enable_pipe_a()
v2: Make the code more readable (Chris)
Cc: Tibor Billes tbil...@gmx.com
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
I tested the posted
e_getcrttc
drm_ioctl
...
This may have something to do with the hang or it may not, I don't know but is
related to drm locking so I thought it was a good idea to mention it.
My laptop is an old Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo M1450g, running Linux Mint 16.
Let me know if I can help further debug this issu
M1450g, running Linux Mint 16.
Let me know if I can help further debug this issue.
Tibor Billes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 10/01/13 10:27 PM
> To: Tibor Billes
> Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:59:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/13/13 02:19 AM
> > > On W
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 10/01/13 10:27 PM
To: Tibor Billes
Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 03:59:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/13/13 02:19 AM
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Tibor
Hi Paul,
I was just wondering if you received my last mail, because I haven't heard from
you for a while now.
Tibor
> - Original Message -
> From: Tibor Billes
> Sent: 09/14/13 03:59 PM
> To: paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with
Hi Paul,
I was just wondering if you received my last mail, because I haven't heard from
you for a while now.
Tibor
- Original Message -
From: Tibor Billes
Sent: 09/14/13 03:59 PM
To: paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/07/13 02:23 AM
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:16:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:11:01PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/30/13 03:24 AM
> > > > On Tue, Aug
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 09/07/13 02:23 AM
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:16:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:11:01PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/30/13 03:24 AM
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/30/13 03:24 AM
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/26/13 06:28 AM
> > > Here is a patch that is more likely to help. I am testing it in parallel,
> > > but figured I s
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/30/13 03:24 AM
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/26/13 06:28 AM
Here is a patch that is more likely to help. I am testing it in parallel,
but figured I should send you a sneak preview.
I
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/30/13 03:24 AM
> To: Tibor Billes
> Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/26/13 06:28 AM
> > > O
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/30/13 03:24 AM
To: Tibor Billes
Subject: Re: Unusually high system CPU usage with recent kernels
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:05:42PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/26/13 06:28 AM
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0200, Tibor
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/26/13 06:28 AM
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/24/13 11:03 PM
> > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > From: Paul E.
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/26/13 06:28 AM
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/24/13 11:03 PM
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
On Wed, Aug 21
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/24/13 11:03 PM
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > > From: Paul E.
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/24/13 11:03 PM
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
On Wed, Aug 21
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/24/13 02:18 AM
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:20:25PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > > From: P
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > > From: Paul
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 11:43 PM
On Tue, Aug 20
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/24/13 02:18 AM
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:20:25PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
On Wed, Aug 21
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
> > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > > From: P
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/22/13 12:09 AM
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:05:51PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 11:43 PM
On Tue, Aug 20
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 11:43 PM
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:52:26PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > > From: P
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 11:43 PM
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:52:26PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 04:53 PM
> > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:01:28AM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> >
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 11:43 PM
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:52:26PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 04:53 PM
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:01:28AM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
Hi,
I was using the 3.9.7 stable release and tried
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/21/13 09:12 PM
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 11:43 PM
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:52:26PM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 04:53 PM
On Tue, Aug 20
> From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 04:53 PM
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:01:28AM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was using the 3.9.7 stable release and tried to upgrade to the 3.10.x
> > series.
> > The 3.10.x series was showing unusually
From: Paul E. McKenney Sent: 08/20/13 04:53 PM
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:01:28AM +0200, Tibor Billes wrote:
Hi,
I was using the 3.9.7 stable release and tried to upgrade to the 3.10.x
series.
The 3.10.x series was showing unusually high (75%) system CPU usage in some
situations
32 matches
Mail list logo