Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac7

FYI: 2 small issues: o make xconfig fails (works ok in ac6) : cat header.tk ./kconfig.tk ./tkparse ../arch/i386/config.in kconfig.tk drivers/net/wireless/Config.in: 5: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate condition make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk] Error 1

Re: [Demo program]: Poor elevator performance in 2.4.0-test9pre6

On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:00:51PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: On Mon, Sep 25 2000, Robert Cohen wrote: With kernel version 2.4.0-test9pre6 the results are as follows. The test machine has 128 Megs of memory. The tests accesses 240 Megs of files so that it can't fit in cache. If I run it

Re: Linux-MM bugzilla

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:06:32PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: The information page about this bugzilla can be found here: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/bugzilla.shtml OK, I just registered linux-mm.org and changed the httpd

Re: Your message to Meltingpot awaits moderator approval

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:51:58PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: WARNING!! Messages to linux-kernel are now being intercepted (and answered) by this company: On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My message was sent directly to linux-kernel, with no cc address. It should not

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux-NTFS project, first public release

Thank goodness, it's about time. :-) On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 07:08:44PM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: This is to announce the first public release of the Linux-NTFS project hosted on sourceforge. The project page, where you can download the source code tar ball or rpm as well as

Re: [PATCH] Hot swap CPU support for 2.4.1@

Would any special hardware besides a multi-cpu system be necessarey to test this out? Matthew Fredrickson On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 03:00:40PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: Hi all, I did the infrastructure, Anton did the bugfinding and PPC support, aka. the hard stuff. Other architectures

aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

I had tried 6.1.8 + 2.4.3 and had problems which included messages like 'aic7xxx_abort returns 8194' and machine froze up shortly after X started. This on redhat 7.0. Sorry but since I was unable to even boot back the prev kernel (2.4.0) I cant provide any more detailed information.

Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

I used 5000ms. I still freeze up with 2.4.3 + 6.1.10. Unfortunately i could not see any messages and nothing got logged. This time an fsck allowed me to boot back to 2.4.1. The visible symptoms were the same as before (2.4.3 + 6.1.8) but this time I was unable to flip virtual consoles before

Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

Well my aicxxx problems continue: I did it again and indeed verified similar error messages as I had under stock 2.4.3 and 2.4.3+aic 6.1.8. This time it died during boot itself starting with complaints from ssh/xinet et al - then I started seeing the scsi errors. (I believe I had also

Re: aic7xxx and 2.4.3 failures

I confirm similar problems (see my message from yesterday). AIC7XXX_OLD also failed for me. I have tried aic 6.1.8 as well as 6.1.10. Both 2.4.0 under redhat 7.0 and 2.4.1 as shipped by redhat wolverine work. As have all earlier versions going back to 2.3.xx and 2.2.x On Mon, Apr 09, 2001

Re: aic7xxx and newer kernels

Justin: Ya think very buggy? I checked seagate web page and unfortunately was unable to find any firmware updates for the barracuda drives. Curious tho that this has worked flawlessly for well over a year with all prior version of linux and win2000 as well. Also a few other folks seem to

Re: aic7xxx and newer kernels

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:00:19AM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: I'm pretty sure you need to be up to at leaset 0005 of the firmware to stabilize this drive. FYI, I contacted seagate and they say the firmware is the latest. Regards, Gene/ - To unsubscribe from this list:

aicxxx and ac6 - works

After all the earlier difficulties booting off scsi disk I am delighted to report that it worked with ac6. I must confess I did change one thing and that was to turn off SMP and turn on IO-APIC for UP. I dont know if this is related or not as I have not tried going back the other

exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen

I get this on brand new hardware, 2xHitachi Deathstar 320gb SATA2 (sata_via driver) I get this a lot, the disk makes some sound after heavy IO and then the system hangs for a few seconds, then this comes up: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata1.00: cmd

Re: Possible BUG in IPv4 TCP window handling, all recent 2.4.x/2.6.x kernels

Hi David, On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, David S. Miller wrote: From: John Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:51:48 -0400 I have an idea why this is going on. Packets are pre-allocated by the driver to be a max packet size, so when you send small packets, it wastes a lot of memory.

Re: Possible BUG in IPv4 TCP window handling, all recent 2.4.x/2.6.x kernels

On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, John Heffner wrote: Have you tried increasing the size of the receive buffer yet? Actually, I just did. I changed rmem_max and rmem_default to 4MB and tcp_rmem to 64k 4MB 4MB. It did seem to help, but I'm wondering if that's simply because it has a _lot_ of memory now to

[BUG] kernel 4.7 + Xen on UEFI boot crash. patch ID'd & tested, just need to verify & get it into upstream

I'm running kernel 4.7/stable. It's installed from Opensuse packages atm. Using the current kernel causes a crash when booting Xen 4.7 on UEFI. Referenced in this now ridiculously-long thread https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-07/msg02758.html In hunting down

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac7

FYI: 2 small issues: o make xconfig fails (works ok in ac6) : cat header.tk >> ./kconfig.tk ./tkparse < ../arch/i386/config.in >> kconfig.tk drivers/net/wireless/Config.in: 5: can't handle dep_bool/dep_mbool/dep_tristate condition make[1]: *** [kconfig.tk]

Re: [Demo program]: Poor elevator performance in 2.4.0-test9pre6

On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:00:51PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25 2000, Robert Cohen wrote: > > With kernel version 2.4.0-test9pre6 the results are as follows. > > The test machine has 128 Megs of memory. The tests accesses 240 Megs of > > files so that it can't fit in cache. > > > >

Re: Linux-MM bugzilla

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:06:32PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > The information page about this bugzilla can be found here: > > > > http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/bugzilla.shtml > > OK, I just registered linux-mm.org and changed the > httpd

Re: Your message to Meltingpot awaits moderator approval

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:51:58PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > WARNING!! Messages to linux-kernel are now being intercepted > (and answered) by this company: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My message was sent directly to linux-kernel, with no cc address. > It should

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux-NTFS project, first public release

Thank goodness, it's about time. :-) On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 07:08:44PM +, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > This is to announce the first public release of the Linux-NTFS project > hosted on sourceforge. The project page, where you can download the source > code tar ball or rpm as well as

Re: [PATCH] Hot swap CPU support for 2.4.1@

Would any special hardware besides a multi-cpu system be necessarey to test this out? Matthew Fredrickson On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 03:00:40PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi all, > > I did the infrastructure, Anton did the bugfinding and PPC support, > aka. the hard stuff. Other

aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

I had tried 6.1.8 + 2.4.3 and had problems which included messages like 'aic7xxx_abort returns 8194' and machine froze up shortly after X started. This on redhat 7.0. Sorry but since I was unable to even boot back the prev kernel (2.4.0) I cant provide any more detailed information.

Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

I used 5000ms. I still freeze up with 2.4.3 + 6.1.10. Unfortunately i could not see any messages and nothing got logged. This time an fsck allowed me to boot back to 2.4.1. The visible symptoms were the same as before (2.4.3 + 6.1.8) but this time I was unable to flip virtual consoles before

Re: aic7xxx 6.1.10 and 2.4.4-pre1

Well my aicxxx problems continue: I did it again and indeed verified similar error messages as I had under stock 2.4.3 and 2.4.3+aic 6.1.8. This time it died during boot itself starting with complaints from ssh/xinet et al - then I started seeing the scsi errors. (I believe I had also

Re: aic7xxx and 2.4.3 failures

I confirm similar problems (see my message from yesterday). AIC7XXX_OLD also failed for me. I have tried aic 6.1.8 as well as 6.1.10. Both 2.4.0 under redhat 7.0 and 2.4.1 as shipped by redhat wolverine work. As have all earlier versions going back to 2.3.xx and 2.2.x On Mon, Apr 09, 2001

Re: aic7xxx and newer kernels

Justin: Ya think very buggy? I checked seagate web page and unfortunately was unable to find any firmware updates for the barracuda drives. Curious tho that this has worked flawlessly for well over a year with all prior version of linux and win2000 as well. Also a few other folks seem to

Re: aic7xxx and newer kernels

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:00:19AM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure you need to be up to at leaset 0005 of > the firmware to stabilize this drive. FYI, I contacted seagate and they say the firmware is the latest. Regards, Gene/ - To unsubscribe from this

aicxxx and ac6 - works

After all the earlier difficulties booting off scsi disk I am delighted to report that it worked with ac6. I must confess I did change one thing and that was to turn off SMP and turn on IO-APIC for UP. I dont know if this is related or not as I have not tried going back the other

Re: Possible BUG in IPv4 TCP window handling, all recent 2.4.x/2.6.x kernels

Hi David, On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, David S. Miller wrote: From: John Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:51:48 -0400 I have an idea why this is going on. Packets are pre-allocated by the driver to be a max packet size, so when you send small packets, it wastes a lot of memory.

Re: Possible BUG in IPv4 TCP window handling, all recent 2.4.x/2.6.x kernels

On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, John Heffner wrote: Have you tried increasing the size of the receive buffer yet? Actually, I just did. I changed rmem_max and rmem_default to 4MB and tcp_rmem to "64k 4MB 4MB". It did seem to help, but I'm wondering if that's simply because it has a _lot_ of memory now

exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen

I get this on brand new hardware, 2xHitachi Deathstar 320gb SATA2 (sata_via driver) I get this a lot, the disk makes some sound after heavy IO and then the system hangs for a few seconds, then this comes up: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata1.00: cmd

[BUG] kernel 4.7 + Xen on UEFI boot crash. patch ID'd & tested, just need to verify & get it into upstream

I'm running kernel 4.7/stable. It's installed from Opensuse packages atm. Using the current kernel causes a crash when booting Xen 4.7 on UEFI. Referenced in this now ridiculously-long thread https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-07/msg02758.html In hunting down

Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer

On 19/03/15 19:59, Andrew Morton wrote: This is all contingent upon the prevalence of machines which have vast amounts of nv memory and relatively small amounts of regular memory. How confident are we that this really is the future? Somewhat off-topic, but it's also the past. I can't help

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer

On 20/03/15 20:31, Matthew Wilcox wrote: Ah! I've looked at that a couple of times as well. I asked our database performance team what impact freeing up the memmap would have on their performance. They told me that doubling the amount of memory generally resulted in approximately a 40%

How was "120" chosen for CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT?

Hello, I'm trying to understand how this value has been chosen. Was it arbitrary, or did it come up after some rationale? If alter it to a lower value like 30 (or 60), and a piece of third party code hung in D state triggers the kernel hung task complain message, can I still report this as an

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

On 11/04/16 17:39, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Monday 11 April 2016 09:53 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>> L stands for "Mailing list that is relevant to this area", and this is a >>> mailing list. :) >> >> Your proposed patch

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

On 11/04/16 22:08, Joe Perches wrote: > I'm a native English speaker and I think that's a not > a good argument. > > Having the same entry for M: and L: where M: isn't an > actual person is not a great idea. > > The list is not a maintainer. > > Depends on your definition of maintainer ... To

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

On 12/04/16 00:03, Joe Perches wrote: > I think that's not a particularly good definition. > MAINTAINERS describes the M: entry as: > > M: Mail patches to: FullName > > That _person_ is generally responsible for vetting patches > and bug fixing. Ahh ... you are ASS U ME

Re: To add, or not to add, a bio REQ_ROTATIONAL flag

On 29/07/16 01:50, Eric Wheeler wrote: > Hello all, > > With the many SSD caching layers being developed (bcache, dm-cache, > dm-writeboost, etc), how could we flag a bio from userspace to indicate > whether the bio is preferred to hit spinning disks instead of an SSD? > > Unnecessary

Re: [PATCH] Revert "md: raid1: use bio helper in process_checks()"

On 28/03/17 16:02, Ming Lei wrote: >> What I meant is that a future change to the function might cause >> > another bug to go unnoticed later. > What is the future change? And what is another bug? Please don't suppose or > assume anything in future. What was that about some American General

Re: [PATCHv2] mdadm.c: fix compile error "switch condition has boolean value"

You can add my acked-by (never done it before, not sure how :-) Cheers, Wol On 30/03/17 17:58, Gioh Kim wrote: > Remove a boolean expression in switch condition > to prevent compile error of some compilers, > for example, gcc version 5.2.1 20151010 (Ubuntu 5.2.1-22ubuntu2). > > Signed-off-by:

Re: I/O hangs after resuming from suspend-to-ram

On 26/08/17 12:19, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Also… when a hang happened the mouse pointer was frozen, Ctrl-Alt-F1 didn´t > work and so on… so it may easily be a completely different issue. > > I did not see much point in reporting it so far… as I have no idea on how to > reliably pin-point

Re: I/O hangs after resuming from suspend-to-ram

On 26/08/17 12:19, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Also… when a hang happened the mouse pointer was frozen, Ctrl-Alt-F1 didn´t > work and so on… so it may easily be a completely different issue. > > I did not see much point in reporting it so far… as I have no idea on how to > reliably pin-point

Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] firmware: arm_scmi: add SCMIv3.0 Sensors descriptors extensions

On 26.10.20 21:10, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Add support for new SCMIv3.0 Sensors extensions related to new sensors' > features, like multiple axis and update intervals, while keeping > compatibility with SCMIv2.0 features. > While at that, refactor and simplify all the internal helpers macros and

Re: [PATCH 09/14] bdi: remove BDI_CAP_CGROUP_WRITEBACK

On 22/07/20 08:45, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 22/07/2020 08:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> it is know to support cgroup writeback, or the bdi comes from the block > knwon ~^ > Whoops - "known" > Apart from that, > Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn > Cheers, Wol

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] (again) THP for file systems

On 14/02/19 01:59, Song Liu wrote: >> I believe the direction is clear. It needs people to do the work. >> > We're critically short of reviewers. I got precious little review of >> > the original XArray work, which made Andrew nervous and delayed its >> > integration. Now I'm getting little

Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer

On 19/03/15 19:59, Andrew Morton wrote: > This is all contingent upon the prevalence of machines which have vast > amounts of nv memory and relatively small amounts of regular memory. > How confident are we that this really is the future? Somewhat off-topic, but it's also the past. I can't help

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer

On 20/03/15 20:31, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Ah! I've looked at that a couple of times as well. I asked our database > performance team what impact freeing up the memmap would have on their > performance. They told me that doubling the amount of memory generally > resulted in approximately a 40%

Re: [PATCH] Revert "md: raid1: use bio helper in process_checks()"

On 28/03/17 16:02, Ming Lei wrote: >> What I meant is that a future change to the function might cause >> > another bug to go unnoticed later. > What is the future change? And what is another bug? Please don't suppose or > assume anything in future. What was that about some American General

Re: [PATCHv2] mdadm.c: fix compile error "switch condition has boolean value"

You can add my acked-by (never done it before, not sure how :-) Cheers, Wol On 30/03/17 17:58, Gioh Kim wrote: > Remove a boolean expression in switch condition > to prevent compile error of some compilers, > for example, gcc version 5.2.1 20151010 (Ubuntu 5.2.1-22ubuntu2). > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

On 11/04/16 17:39, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Monday 11 April 2016 09:53 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:45:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: >>> L stands for "Mailing list that is relevant to this area", and this is a >>> mailing list. :) >> >> Your proposed patch

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

On 11/04/16 22:08, Joe Perches wrote: > I'm a native English speaker and I think that's a not > a good argument. > > Having the same entry for M: and L: where M: isn't an > actual person is not a great idea. > > The list is not a maintainer. > > Depends on your definition of maintainer ... To

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: correct entry for LVM

On 12/04/16 00:03, Joe Perches wrote: > I think that's not a particularly good definition. > MAINTAINERS describes the M: entry as: > > M: Mail patches to: FullName > > That _person_ is generally responsible for vetting patches > and bug fixing. Ahh ... you are ASS U ME ing that it is a

Re: To add, or not to add, a bio REQ_ROTATIONAL flag

On 29/07/16 01:50, Eric Wheeler wrote: > Hello all, > > With the many SSD caching layers being developed (bcache, dm-cache, > dm-writeboost, etc), how could we flag a bio from userspace to indicate > whether the bio is preferred to hit spinning disks instead of an SSD? > > Unnecessary

How was "120" chosen for CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT?

Hello, I'm trying to understand how this value has been chosen. Was it arbitrary, or did it come up after some rationale? If alter it to a lower value like 30 (or 60), and a piece of third party code hung in D state triggers the kernel hung task complain message, can I still report this as an

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:19:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just wanted to say that Linus´ CodingStyle is the ONLY SANE style of writing code in bigger projects. At university we are forced to use exactly the And the lord

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

n 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Today, Admin Mailing Lists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: And the lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou write thy holy code. Indenting shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shalt be the spaces

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

Please don't listen to this. The only place you really want comments is a) at the top of files, describing the point of the file; b) at the top of functions, if the purpose of the function is not obvious; c) in line, when the code is not obvious. If you are writing code

memory problems?

I'm running 2.4.2ac23 (can't run 2.4.3, messes up my quota system) glibc 2.1.3, intel providence PR440FX mobo, intel etherexpress 100B onboard, RAM is 128MBx3. Started getting the following errors: VM: bad swap entry 2000 Unused swap offset entry in swap_dup 2000 memory.c:84: bad pmd

Re: eepro100 trouble

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote: Hello, On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 02:57:54PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: I'm having endless problem with an eepro100 here. After some trying found out that doing a soft reset (ctrl+alt+del) fixed the problem, and that a power cycle

Re: Linux/MANOS Kernel Debugger

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: Actually, the solution I think would be to use the MSDOS loader to boot linux. I will look at grabbing the ELF code in Linux and loading Linux from MSDOS -- if this can be accomplished you're there -- with an added benfit. When I am debugging

Re: Socket Interface

Note that I deliberately ignored my assumption when replying -- I gave instructions for Debian derivations, even though I don't know of any Debian-derived distribution with a version number 6.2. There are dozens of similarly different (or differently similar - as your prefer) Linux

Re: Where to obtain the latest test kernels

i thought they were versus 2.2.17pre20 ? -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if

[OT] linux article with kernel references

http://www.osopinion.com/Opinions/MontyManley/MontyManley15.html good article, several unfortunate truths within. -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gids in kernel

apache documentation states: # NOTE that some kernels refuse to setgid(Group) or semctl(IPC_SET) # when the value of (unsigned)Group is above 6; # don't use Group nobody on these systems! does this apply to linux in either the 2.2 or 2.4 kernels? i'd like to use a block of uids from

NMI messages - 2.4.1-ac13

I got some NMI messages I have never seen before. In fact i've never seen a NMI message before. This is kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Got them while running X (4.0.2) and KDE (2.1). After 15 mins the system froze hard. PR440FX mobo, dual ppro 200s, 256MB RAM, aic7xxx, no power management at all. I've never

system locks HARD on KDE start

Hi, I'm trying to get kde2 running and i'm not positive if it's a KDE problem, or a kernel thing. Whenever I start kde, the kde startup gets so far and the system freezes. Sometimes it does it at "Loading the panel" sometimes it'll get to "100% KDE is up and running" and do it. When it does it

Re: reiserfs patch for 2.4.0-final

thanx everybody -Tony .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. Anthony J. Biacco Network Administrator/Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Intergrafix Internet Services "Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"

eepro100 timeout errors - 2.2.18pre20

Was running 2.2.15pre18 with no eepro problems. Upgraded to 2.2.18pre20 and started experiencing transmit timed out errors a day into the boot. eth0 was unresponsive in/out. down/uping the interface had no effect. System was not under any big network load. See attached text file for related

quota problems 2.4.2-2.4.3

Hi, WHen i upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4, my first version was 2.4.1, in which i upgraded my quota utils to 3.00 and then converted to the new quota formats for 2.4. my last 2.4 upgrade was 2.4.2ac23, quotas work fine on that. but when i run 2.4.3 they dont. quota -v on a user shows just blank space

Re: [PATCH] User chroot

On 27 Jun 2001, David Wagner wrote: Why is it useless? It sounds useful to me, on first glance. If I want to run a user-level network daemon I don't trust (for instance, fingerd), isolating it in a chroot area sounds pretty nice: If there is a buffer overrun in the daemon, you can get

ufs on linux question/problem

Trying to mount a solaris x86 drive under linux. kernel 2.4.5, ufs support and x86 partition support compiled in (no module) On boot, linux recognizes the drive, but shows no solaris partitions on it. Below, linux drive is hda, solaris is hdb. Jul 2 19:57:56 stevenjude2 kernel: PIIX4: chipset

Re: ufs on linux question/problem

You need support of Solaris disklabels. isn't that what CONFIG_SOLARIS_X86_PARTITION is? And UFS patches that are in -ac. Then you can get more or less safe r/o mounts. r/w is hopeless at that stage. that's ok, i only need to read. -Tony

Re: rlim_t and DNS?

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Bruce Harada wrote: The C file says BSD/OS is the only OS they found not to have rlim_t. Am I missing something? Where can i find this in linux? I looked in all the include files, including resource.h Are you sure you looked in ALL the include files? I seem to

rlim_t and DNS?

Trying to compile bind 9.1.0 here. Kernel is 2.2.18, gcc 2.7.2.1. It failed trying to find the type for rlim_t. The C file says BSD/OS is the only OS they found not to have rlim_t. Am I missing something? Where can i find this in linux? I looked in all the include files, including resource.h For

Re: rlim_t and DNS?

http://www.intergrafix.net .-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-._.-. On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Admin Mailing Lists] i have no bits directory Really? What version of libc, and on what Linux distro? I thought all versions of glibc2 had /usr/in

shared memory problem

I've been using the 2.2.x series successfully, latest i used was 2.2.19pre7. Today i upgraded to 2.4.1-ac9 and noticed that shared memory shows 0. I searched the list archive briefly and someone said the stats have been broken since sometime in 2.3, but my system also shows my swap being used up

Journaled FS on RAID stability..2.4?

Can anyone give testimonials on a journaled FS on software-raid? I'd like to raid-0 2 SCSI 18Gers, adaptec 2940 u2w controller, kernel 2.4.x. Also pros and cons for reiser-fs/ext3 on this solution would be appreciated Thanx, -Tony

2.4 VFS message

got this message spewed on my console this morning: VFS: dqduplicate(): Locked quota to be duplicated! SMP 2.4.1-ac9 quota is used on 1 ext2 FS, converted from the old quota format with the new quota utils quota-3.00 Thanx, -Tony

Re: Linux 2.4.2-ac21

It was causing SMP boxes to crash mysteriously after several hours or days. Quite a lot of them. Nobody was able to explain why, so it was turned off. I know why it was turned off by default. The annoying this is that now the *only* way to activate the watchdog is via a boot command.

aic7xxx TCQ settings?

I'm using 2.4.3 vanilla with aic7xxx (aic7880 onboard) I set the max # of TCQ commands per device setting to 50..what's a really good setting for this, just the default of 253? In /proc/scsi/aic7xxx/0 i see for my drives these numbers: Commands Queued 14 Commands Active 0

SATA errors/messages after upgrade to 2.6.20.7

It is a Samsung HD501LJ SATA drive connected to 631xESB/632xESB controller. Reading and writing every block of the drive does not generate any other errors/failures. This is observed in 2.6.20.7 like a clockwork on any badblocks -v run or rebuild of a MD raid1 array onto the disk. It, however,

Identifying a specific affected file on Ext3 on a top of raid0 of raid1s

Hi, I have a rather nasty situation developing on one of the big 24x7 production database servers. It seems that a batch of drives in one of the servers started to fail. The file servers are ext3fs on a top of raid-0 over a pair of raid-1 mirrors, with each of raid-1 mirrors having two

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Cannot find our GTCO USB Driver in the 2.6.22-rc1 kernel

Hi, which leads to the question: Why is the Enable Tablets entry not inside the tablets menu. This way it's more obvious that it's disabled if it's the only entry in the menu. Plus the parent menu gets cleaned up as well. Till Am Dienstag 15 Mai 2007 schrieb Jeremy Roberson: LOL. Thanks, I

Re: [PATCH 00/11] arm64: Introduce Allwinner A64 and Pine64 support

Just a quick question - will there be any support for enabling booting into virtualisation mode to run xen and the like? Cheers Nick

Re: framebuffer corruption due to overlapping stp instructions on arm64

On 03/08/18 10:29, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 3 August 2018 at 11:15, Ramana Radhakrishnan > wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 08/03/2018 09:11 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: Yes fix Links not to use memcpy on the framebuffer. It is undefined

Re: framebuffer corruption due to overlapping stp instructions on arm64

On 03/08/18 14:31, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Andrew Pinski wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:31 PM Mikulas Patocka wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I tried to use a PCIe graphics card on the MacchiatoBIN board and I hit a >>> strange problem. >>> >>> When I use the links

Re: framebuffer corruption due to overlapping stp instructions on arm64

On 08/08/18 15:12, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:09:02PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: >>> while (1) { >>> start = (unsigned)random() % (LEN + 1); >>> end = (unsigned)random() % (LEN + 1); >>>

memory problems?

I'm running 2.4.2ac23 (can't run 2.4.3, messes up my quota system) glibc 2.1.3, intel providence PR440FX mobo, intel etherexpress 100B onboard, RAM is 128MBx3. Started getting the following errors: VM: bad swap entry 2000 Unused swap offset entry in swap_dup 2000 memory.c:84: bad pmd

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Ragnar Hojland Espinosa wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 05:19:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I just wanted to say that Linus´ CodingStyle is the ONLY SANE style of > > writing code in bigger projects. At university we are forced to use exactly the > > And the

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

n 2001, Mo McKinlay wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Today, Admin Mailing Lists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > And the lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou write thy holy code. Indenting > > > shalt thou count to three, n

Re: [OT?] Coding Style

> > Please don't listen to this. The only place you really want comments is > > a) at the top of files, describing the point of the file; > b) at the top of functions, if the purpose of the function is not obvious; > c) in line, when the code is not obvious. > > If you are writing

quota problems 2.4.2->2.4.3

Hi, WHen i upgrade from 2.2 to 2.4, my first version was 2.4.1, in which i upgraded my quota utils to 3.00 and then converted to the new quota formats for 2.4. my last 2.4 upgrade was 2.4.2ac23, quotas work fine on that. but when i run 2.4.3 they dont. quota -v on a user shows just blank space

gids in kernel

apache documentation states: # NOTE that some kernels refuse to setgid(Group) or semctl(IPC_SET) # when the value of (unsigned)Group is above 6; # don't use Group nobody on these systems! does this apply to linux in either the 2.2 or 2.4 kernels? i'd like to use a block of uids from

NMI messages - 2.4.1-ac13

I got some NMI messages I have never seen before. In fact i've never seen a NMI message before. This is kernel 2.4.1-ac13. Got them while running X (4.0.2) and KDE (2.1). After 15 mins the system froze hard. PR440FX mobo, dual ppro 200s, 256MB RAM, aic7xxx, no power management at all. I've never

Re: eepro100 trouble

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 02:57:54PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote: > > > > I'm having endless problem with an eepro100 here. After some trying found out > > that doing a soft reset (ctrl+alt+del) fixed the problem, and that a power >

Re: Linux/MANOS Kernel Debugger

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > Actually, the solution I think would be to use the MSDOS loader to boot > linux. I will look at grabbing the ELF code in Linux and loading Linux > from MSDOS -- if this can be accomplished you're there -- with an added > benfit. When I am

Re: Socket Interface

> > > Note that I deliberately ignored my assumption when replying -- I gave > > instructions for Debian derivations, even though I don't know of any > > Debian-derived distribution with a version number 6.2. > > There are dozens of similarly different (or differently similar - as your >

  1   2   >