Alexey Dobriyan 于2018年12月14日周五 下午11:44写道：
>
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 03:26:04PM +0800, 程洋 wrote:
> > Anyone who can review my patch?
> >
> > 程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道：
> > >
> > > Here is an article illustrates the details.
> > > https://medi
@Nick. Would mind giving this patch an "Acked-by"?
This issue causes any Android who uses latest kernel cannot mount proc
with "hidepid=2" option. Which causes problems
程洋 于2018年12月5日周三 下午3:26写道：
>
> Anyone who can review my patch?
>
> 程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:
@Nick. Would mind giving this patch an "Acked-by"?
This issue causes any Android who uses latest kernel cannot mount proc
with "hidepid=2" option. Which causes problems
程洋 于2018年12月5日周三 下午3:26写道：
>
> Anyone who can review my patch?
>
> 程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:
Anyone who can review my patch?
程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道：
>
> Here is an article illustrates the details.
> https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-system-security-vulnerability-9b955a182f20
>
> And There is a similar fix on kernel-4.4:
> https://git.kernel
Anyone who can review my patch?
程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道：
>
> Here is an article illustrates the details.
> https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-system-security-vulnerability-9b955a182f20
>
> And There is a similar fix on kernel-4.4:
> https://git.kernel
d some logs). And even it is
called, it doesn't clean sb->s_root. Until now, i didn't see any
deeper issue. Maybe it's true that we should handle proc filesystem
specially.
If anyone who is sure about the functionality of sb->s_root and think
it should be handled in another way, feel free to cor
d some logs). And even it is
called, it doesn't clean sb->s_root. Until now, i didn't see any
deeper issue. Maybe it's true that we should handle proc filesystem
specially.
If anyone who is sure about the functionality of sb->s_root and think
it should be handled in another way, feel free to cor
Why is this considered to be security sensitive? I can guess, but
I'd like to know your reasoning.
A: See the article above. It's part of Android sanbox.
程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道：
>
> Here is an article illustrates the details.
> https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-sys
Why is this considered to be security sensitive? I can guess, but
I'd like to know your reasoning.
A: See the article above. It's part of Android sanbox.
程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道：
>
> Here is an article illustrates the details.
> https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-sys
Here is an article illustrates the details.
https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-system-security-vulnerability-9b955a182f20
And There is a similar fix on kernel-4.4:
Here is an article illustrates the details.
https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-system-security-vulnerability-9b955a182f20
And There is a similar fix on kernel-4.4:
11 matches
Mail list logo
