El Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:42:25 +0100
Santiago Garcia Mantinan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi!
>
> There was a problem that affected all tulip based drivers and which has been
> fixed in most of them, for uli526x the problem remains on 2.6.25-rc2 as the
> fix has not yet been applied.
>
> A
El Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:42:25 +0100
Santiago Garcia Mantinan [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hi!
There was a problem that affected all tulip based drivers and which has been
fixed in most of them, for uli526x the problem remains on 2.6.25-rc2 as the
fix has not yet been applied.
A discusion
El Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:56:16 -0500 (EST)
Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
> >x86_64+SMP+PREEMPT+GnuC-4.1.2+Glibc-2.5 = Reproducible.
> >
> That should of course be
> x86_64+SMP+PREEMPT+GnuC-4.1.3+Glibc-2.6.1 =
El Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:57:38 -0500 (EST)
Parag Warudkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Frank Mayhar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 16:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > It's probably better to handle this one via email, so please send that
> > > testcase vie
El Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:56:16 -0500 (EST)
Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
x86_64+SMP+PREEMPT+GnuC-4.1.2+Glibc-2.5 = Reproducible.
That should of course be
x86_64+SMP+PREEMPT+GnuC-4.1.3+Glibc-2.6.1 = Reproducible.
From
El Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:57:38 -0500 (EST)
Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 16:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
It's probably better to handle this one via email, so please send that
testcase vie reply-to-all to
El Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:18:05 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> struct smb_fattr root;
> int ver;
> void *mem;
> + static int warn_count;
> +
> + if (warn_count < 5) {
> + warn_count++;
> + printk(KERN_EMERG "smbfs is deprecated
El Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:18:05 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
struct smb_fattr root;
int ver;
void *mem;
+ static int warn_count;
+
+ if (warn_count 5) {
+ warn_count++;
+ printk(KERN_EMERG smbfs is deprecated and will be
Maybe for the trivial tree...
sata_via.c has PATA support since:
d73f30e1c9a9af14757fa5bf4014343926047156
sata_via: PATA support
AFAICS so the TODO list is no longer true.
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_via.c b/drivers/ata/sata_via.c
index 3ef072f..30caa03 100644
---
Maybe for the trivial tree...
sata_via.c has PATA support since:
d73f30e1c9a9af14757fa5bf4014343926047156
sata_via: PATA support
AFAICS so the TODO list is no longer true.
---
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_via.c b/drivers/ata/sata_via.c
index 3ef072f..30caa03 100644
---
El Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:59:03 +0100 (CET)
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> # uname -m
> I won't tell you.
> # linux32 uname -m
> i686
Ubuntu 7.10 64 bit userland 2.6.24
$ uname -m
x86_64
$ linux32 uname -m
i686
>
> Now what? :-)
>
> Well, the answer is simple, a 64-bit
El Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:59:03 +0100 (CET)
Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
# uname -m
I won't tell you.
# linux32 uname -m
i686
Ubuntu 7.10 64 bit userland 2.6.24
$ uname -m
x86_64
$ linux32 uname -m
i686
Now what? :-)
Well, the answer is simple, a 64-bit kernel will
Just one more try
Ubuntu x86_64 gcc-4.2
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xe4): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data.2:trampoline_level4_pgt (between 'ident_complete' and
'secondary_startup_64')
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xeb): Section mismatch: reference to
Just one more try
Ubuntu x86_64 gcc-4.2
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xe4): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data.2:trampoline_level4_pgt (between 'ident_complete' and
'secondary_startup_64')
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xeb): Section mismatch: reference to
for the quick answer.
>
> Mattias
Regards;
Alejandro
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:57 +0100, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> > Running
> >
> > Linux Varda 2.6.24-rc8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 16 15:09:43 CET 2008 x86_64
> > GNU/Linux
> >
Regards;
Alejandro
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 22:57 +0100, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
Running
Linux Varda 2.6.24-rc8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 16 15:09:43 CET 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
my logs are spmmed with:
[20126.343240] phy0 - rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived
Running
Linux Varda 2.6.24-rc8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 16 15:09:43 CET 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
my logs are spmmed with:
[20126.343240] phy0 -> rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free
entry in the non-full queue 1.
[20126.343242] Please file bug report to
Running
Linux Varda 2.6.24-rc8 #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 16 15:09:43 CET 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
my logs are spmmed with:
[20126.343240] phy0 - rt2x00pci_write_tx_data: Error - Arrived at non-free
entry in the non-full queue 1.
[20126.343242] Please file bug report to
El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:31:39 +0100
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> >
> >MODPOST vmlinux.o
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xe4): Section mismatch: reference to
> > .
El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:31:39 +0100
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
MODPOST vmlinux.o
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xe4): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.data.2:trampoline_level4_pgt (between
El Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:18:28 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) escribió:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:46:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> > Nothing will make it work reliably if the system clock isn't stable.
>
> I remember my nforce2 board having totally insane clock behaviour
El Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:18:28 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) escribió:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:46:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Nothing will make it work reliably if the system clock isn't stable.
I remember my nforce2 board having totally insane clock behaviour back
El Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:30:30 +0100
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 21:23:44 Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
>
> >
> > How can I check? The source code I build does indeed have the line
> > you quoted on net/mac80
El Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:27:35 +
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > David - will you look into this?
>
> Do you have a config?
>
> David
My config follows:
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version:
El Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:27:35 +
David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David - will you look into this?
Do you have a config?
David
My config follows:
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.24-rc6
El Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:30:30 +0100
Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Monday 07 January 2008 21:23:44 Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
How can I check? The source code I build does indeed have the line
you quoted on net/mac80211/rx.c:1486 Is that what you are asking
El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:30:51 +0100
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 17:52:48 Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> > El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:24:03 +0100
> > Michael Buesch <[EM
El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:24:03 +0100
Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> Can you post the lines above this?
> This might be a WARN_ON_ONCE() triggering, for which fixes are on their way
> into
> the
El Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
> (and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working
> days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is about half
El Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
> (and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working
> days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is about half
El Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
(and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working
days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is about half the
El Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
(and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working
days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is about half the
El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:24:03 +0100
Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Can you post the lines above this?
This might be a WARN_ON_ONCE() triggering, for which fixes are on their way
into
the
El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:30:51 +0100
Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Monday 07 January 2008 17:52:48 Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
El Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:24:03 +0100
Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió
I'm getting this on latest git (v2.6.24-rc6-174-gdc51281)
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x104f8): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:fork_idle (between 'do_fork_idle' and 'lapic_timer_broadcast')
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xe4): Section mismatch: reference to
I'm getting this on latest git (v2.6.24-rc6-174-gdc51281)
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x104f8): Section mismatch: reference to
.init.text:fork_idle (between 'do_fork_idle' and 'lapic_timer_broadcast')
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.head+0xe4): Section mismatch: reference to
El Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:04:42 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Saturday, 22 of December 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
>
>
> I have created a bugzilla entry for this problem at:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
I have a rt2500pci card on an 64 bit system (Ubuntu) AMD X2 processor and i'm
trying latest vanilla kernels i've used a 2.6.24-rc5 kernel without mayor issues
(except that i have to issue a sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M because it allways
connect at 1Mbit and it is dog slow) but now with
I have a rt2500pci card on an 64 bit system (Ubuntu) AMD X2 processor and i'm
trying latest vanilla kernels i've used a 2.6.24-rc5 kernel without mayor issues
(except that i have to issue a sudo iwconfig wlan0 rate 54M because it allways
connect at 1Mbit and it is dog slow) but now with
El Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:04:42 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Saturday, 22 of December 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
I have created a bugzilla entry for this problem at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9622
and added it to the list of reported
El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:16:06 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On 12-12-07 01:09, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
[...]
>
> Great, thanks much for reporting. Sort of interesting in itself that without
> -O2 you do still get correct results on 64-bit but f
El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:16:06 +0100
Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On 12-12-07 01:09, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
[...]
Great, thanks much for reporting. Sort of interesting in itself that without
-O2 you do still get correct results on 64-bit but for some other time
El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:51:25 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On 12-12-07 00:43, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
>
> > On my AMD 3800 X2 (2000MHz) ULi M1697 2.6.24-rc5 i get:
> >
> > cycles: out 1844674407370808, in 184467440736908
El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:31:18 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Good day.
>
> Would some people on x86 (both 32 and 64) be kind enough to compile and run
> the attached program? This is about testing how long I/O port access to port
> 0x80 takes. It measures in CPU cycles so CPU
El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:31:18 +0100
Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Good day.
Would some people on x86 (both 32 and 64) be kind enough to compile and run
the attached program? This is about testing how long I/O port access to port
0x80 takes. It measures in CPU cycles so CPU speed
El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:51:25 +0100
Rene Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On 12-12-07 00:43, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
On my AMD 3800 X2 (2000MHz) ULi M1697 2.6.24-rc5 i get:
cycles: out 1844674407370808, in 1844674407369087
It is not constant but variations
El Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:26:22 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>
> hm. There are no similar reports so far. Could you try to run the wine
> program from a VGA text console (first do 'xhost +' in an xterm under X
> and then 'export DISPLAY=:0' in the text console) and see
El Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:26:22 +0200
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
hm. There are no similar reports so far. Could you try to run the wine
program from a VGA text console (first do 'xhost +' in an xterm under X
and then 'export DISPLAY=:0' in the text console) and see whether
El Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:20:13 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> > I feel it better than 20.5 but the later is more stable. Let me explain.
> >
> > I patched a 2.6.22.9 kernel wit
El Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:20:13 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
I feel it better than 20.5 but the later is more stable. Let me explain.
I patched a 2.6.22.9 kernel with both versions 22 and 20.5[1
El Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:13:57 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
> full backport of the latest & greatest sched-devel.git code to
> v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
>
El Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:13:57 +0200
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
By popular demand, here is release -v22 of the CFS scheduler. It is a
full backport of the latest greatest sched-devel.git code to
v2.6.23-rc8, v2.6.22.8, v2.6.21.7 and v2.6.20.20. The patches can be
downloaded
I get this in today's head 8f41958bdd577731f7411c9605cfaa9db6766809
$ make O=../2.6.23
Using /home/alex/kernel/linux-2.6 as source for kernel
GEN /home/alex/kernel/2.6.23/Makefile
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALL
I get this in today's head 8f41958bdd577731f7411c9605cfaa9db6766809
$ make O=../2.6.23
Using /home/alex/kernel/linux-2.6 as source for kernel
GEN /home/alex/kernel/2.6.23/Makefile
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALL
El Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:21:32 +0200
Christoph Pleger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hello,
>
> In the newest Ubuntu Release, my PATA-disk is called sda instead of hda.
> Is that a general feature in newer kernel versions or is it a special
> feature in Ubuntu?
You can get information here
El Fri, 6 Jul 2007 10:21:32 +0200
Christoph Pleger [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hello,
In the newest Ubuntu Release, my PATA-disk is called sda instead of hda.
Is that a general feature in newer kernel versions or is it a special
feature in Ubuntu?
You can get information here
El Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:18:28 +0100
Matt Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > The CONFIG_VMSPLIT config options were merged for such cases.
> >
> > It should be able to split on any 4MB-aligned boundary in
> > CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G. CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT appears to
El Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:18:28 +0100
Matt Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
The CONFIG_VMSPLIT config options were merged for such cases.
It should be able to split on any 4MB-aligned boundary in
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G. CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G_OPT appears to do something
El Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:10:03 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:19:08PM +0100, Norbert Kiesel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 12:58 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 12:42 +0100, Norbert Kiesel wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > >
El Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:10:03 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:19:08PM +0100, Norbert Kiesel wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 12:58 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 12:42 +0100, Norbert Kiesel wrote:
Hi,
I remember reading
60 matches
Mail list logo
