not noticed any performance issues on the Debian box while
in X. The Fedora machine currently runs X only occasionally as most of
the time I use it for building and testing various non-graphical
things.
Art Haas
--
Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities
the most
not noticed any performance issues on the Debian box while
in X. The Fedora machine currently runs X only occasionally as most of
the time I use it for building and testing various non-graphical
things.
Art Haas
--
Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities
the most
should be used on kernel data.
Signed-off-by: Art Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
b/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
index 59efe84..4da9345 100644
--- a/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
+++ b/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@
should be used on kernel data.
Signed-off-by: Art Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
b/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
index 59efe84..4da9345 100644
--- a/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
+++ b/include/asm-i386/spinlock_types.h
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@
#endif
=115217423929806=2
I've been build and running SMP kernels on a dual PIII machine with
the i386 version of the patch since then and the kernels have worked
well. Perhaps the patch(es) can make it into the 2.6.20 kernel?
The i386 version of the patch is below, the x86-64 patch is identical.
Art Haas
diff
=115217423929806w=2
I've been build and running SMP kernels on a dual PIII machine with
the i386 version of the patch since then and the kernels have worked
well. Perhaps the patch(es) can make it into the 2.6.20 kernel?
The i386 version of the patch is below, the x86-64 patch is identical.
Art Haas
by following the link below:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02/msg00053.html
The patch moves the array declaration after the definition of the
fb_modelist structure, and with this small change GCC is happy once
again. Maybe this can sneak in for 2.6.11?
Art Haas
= include/linux/fb.h 1.94 vs edited
by following the link below:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02/msg00053.html
The patch moves the array declaration after the definition of the
fb_modelist structure, and with this small change GCC is happy once
again. Maybe this can sneak in for 2.6.11?
Art Haas
= include/linux/fb.h 1.94 vs edited
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:33:10AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Here is the fix for everyone. Please report back if it doesn't
> solve the problem. Thanks.
>
> [ ... snip ... ]
Success!!!
Art Haas
--
Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdit
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:33:10AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Here is the fix for everyone. Please report back if it doesn't
solve the problem. Thanks.
[ ... snip ... ]
Success!!!
Art Haas
--
Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities
the most monstrous
Here's a trivial patch that changes ...
#endif BLAH
to
#endif /* BLAH */
gcc-3.0 will flag this. Patch is relative to 2.4.5-ac13.
Thanks to everyone working on the kernel!
Art Haas
==
--- linux-2.4.5-ac13/include/asm-mips/watch.h.orig Sat
Here's a trivial patch that changes ...
#endif BLAH
to
#endif /* BLAH */
gcc-3.0 will flag this. Patch is relative to 2.4.5-ac13.
Thanks to everyone working on the kernel!
Art Haas
==
--- linux-2.4.5-ac13/include/asm-mips/watch.h.orig Sat
12 matches
Mail list logo