oled/ maybe I could help.
>
> Regards,
> Javier Bolaños Molina.
>
The project moved to sourceforge.net. The new maintainer is:
Adilson Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks,
Chr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
to sourceforge.net. The new maintainer is:
Adilson Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Chr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Just in case, if one of the patches really gets merged!)
Thanks,
Chr.
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:52:52.0 +0200
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:55:45.0 +0200
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ enum {
,
Chr.
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:52:52.0 +0200
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-08-08 00:55:45.0 +0200
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ enum {
ich_pata_33 = 1, /* ICH up to UDMA 33 only */
ich_pata_66 = 2, /* ICH up to 66 Mhz */
ich_pata_100 = 3, /* ICH up to UDMA 100
On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Chr wrote:
>
> > Ok, found it " hid_blacklist is alphabetically sorted blacklist by quirk
> > type. " But is there a Order for the bitfields? e.g
> > shouldn't: hid-quriks.c (line 4
On Tuesday, 31. July 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Chr wrote:
Ok, found it hid_blacklist is alphabetically sorted blacklist by quirk
type. But is there a Order for the bitfields? e.g
shouldn't: hid-quriks.c (line 439, 440)
{ USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE
ype. "
But is there a Order for the bitfields? e.g
shouldn't: hid-quriks.c (line 439, 440)
{ USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, USB_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_FOUNTAIN_ANSI,
HID_QUIRK_POWERBOOK_HAS_FN | HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE }
be:
{..., ..., HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE | HID_QUIRK_POWERBOOK_HAS_FN }
Anyway, tha
-quriks.c (line 439, 440)
{ USB_VENDOR_ID_APPLE, USB_DEVICE_ID_APPLE_FOUNTAIN_ANSI,
HID_QUIRK_POWERBOOK_HAS_FN | HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE }
be:
{..., ..., HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE | HID_QUIRK_POWERBOOK_HAS_FN }
Anyway, thanks for merging!
Chr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Friday, 6. July 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> >> > On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a
> >"off-by-one error" in ata_piix.c,
> >> > do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770:
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >
> >Thanks,
On Friday, 6. July 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a
off-by-one error in ata_piix.c,
do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770:
[...]
Thanks,
Chr.
I quickly tried this patch on an ICH7-R system with an ATA133 Maxtor HD
and it did
troller/hdd/pc,
so make backups and keep a first-aid kit handy!)
> > On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a "off-by-one error" in
> > ata_piix.c,
> > do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770:
> > [...]
>
Thanks,
Chr.
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.
backups and keep a first-aid kit handy!)
On the other hand, we can leave it, because of a off-by-one error in
ata_piix.c,
do_pata_set_dmamode, line ~770:
[...]
Thanks,
Chr.
--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-06-19 12:19:39.0 +0200
+++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c 2007-07
atibility reasons...
>
> Well, just FYI: on my Laptop AHCI is enabled and used for the SATA hard
> disk. But the DVD drive still is a pata one afaics (I'm not in front of
> the machine, so I can't check), connected via the pata controller -- so
> for me there is no emulation involved (at
controller -- so
for me there is no emulation involved (at least afaics).
I know. I wanted to say something else... but it doesn't really matter
(not every operating system supports AHCI-only controllers by default...)
Thanks,
Chr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Gaston, Jason D wrote:
> > I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
> > driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
>
> In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at
> that point.
>
>
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at
that point.
On Monday, 22. January 2007 03:39, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Chr wrote:
> > Ok, you won't believe this... I opened my case and rewired my drives...
> > And guess what, my second (aka the "good") HDD is now failing!
> > I guess, my mainboard has
On Monday, 22. January 2007 03:39, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Chr wrote:
Ok, you won't believe this... I opened my case and rewired my drives...
And guess what, my second (aka the good) HDD is now failing!
I guess, my mainboard has a (but maybe two, or three :( ) bad
sata-port(s
lective self-test log data structure revision number 1
> SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS
> 100 Not_testing
> 200 Not_testing
> 3 00 Not_testing
> 400 Not_testing
> 5
On Sunday, 21. January 2007 19:01, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2007.01.21 18:34:40 +0100, Chr wrote:
>
> I run those two in parallel:
> while /bin/true; do ls -lR / > /dev/null 2>&1; done
> while /bin/true; do echo 255 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sleep 1; done
54 IDENTIFY DEVICE
ec 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05:30:56.191 IDENTIFY DEVICE
ca 00 28 02 ee 9a 0c 00 05:30:56.190 WRITE DMA
ca 00 10 e8 4c 10 0a 00 05:30:56.190 WRITE DMA
Maybe, it's really the HDD!
OT: "http://www.nvidia.com/object/680i_hotfix.html;
Chr.
-
To
e8 4c 10 0a 00 05:30:56.190 WRITE DMA
Maybe, it's really the HDD!
OT: http://www.nvidia.com/object/680i_hotfix.html;
Chr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
On Sunday, 21. January 2007 19:01, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
On 2007.01.21 18:34:40 +0100, Chr wrote:
I run those two in parallel:
while /bin/true; do ls -lR / /dev/null 21; done
while /bin/true; do echo 255 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; sleep 1; done
Not sure if running them in parallel
Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 059 049 006Pre-fail Always
- 215927244
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered 0x001a 059 049 000Old_age Always
- 215927244
Wow! that HDD is really in a bad condition.
Thanks,
Chr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list
On Saturday, 20. January 2007 20:59, you wrote:
> Ian Kumlien wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I went from 2.6.19+sata_nv-adma-ncq-v7.patch, with no problems and adama
> > enabled, to 2.6.20-rc5, which gave me problems almost instantly.
> >
> > I just thought that it might be interesting to know that it DID
On Saturday, 20. January 2007 03:41, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 01:53, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> Robert Hancock wrote:
> >>> I'll try your stress test when I get a chance, but I doubt I'll run
> >>> into the same problem and I haven't seen
On Saturday, 20. January 2007 03:41, Robert Hancock wrote:
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 01:53, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Robert Hancock wrote:
I'll try your stress test when I get a chance, but I doubt I'll run
into the same problem and I haven't seen any similar
On Saturday, 20. January 2007 20:59, you wrote:
Ian Kumlien wrote:
Hi,
I went from 2.6.19+sata_nv-adma-ncq-v7.patch, with no problems and adama
enabled, to 2.6.20-rc5, which gave me problems almost instantly.
I just thought that it might be interesting to know that it DID work
28 matches
Mail list logo
