On 2015/3/10 10:54 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Ezequiel Garcia
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/09/2015 02:02 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> On 2015/3/10 12:54 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>>> It appears that some of the ways nios
On 2015/3/10 10:54 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:05 AM, Ezequiel Garcia
ezequ...@vanguardiasur.com.ar wrote:
On 03/09/2015 02:02 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2015/3/10 12:54 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
It appears that some of the ways nios2 has organized the
ucontext
On 2015/3/10 12:54 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> It appears that some of the ways nios2 has organized the
> ucontext/pt_regs/etc. are remnants of the pre-generic code, some
> basically because the port was based off m68k.
>
> I've re-organized the headers a bit: nios2/include
On 2015/2/27 07:19 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Right now, my biggest problem is how to remove the pt_regs from being
> exported to userspace, without breaking things. The struct is defined
> and used in a few UAPI headers:
>
> arch/nios2/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
>
On 2015/3/10 12:54 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
It appears that some of the ways nios2 has organized the
ucontext/pt_regs/etc. are remnants of the pre-generic code, some
basically because the port was based off m68k.
I've re-organized the headers a bit: nios2/include/asm/ucontext.h is
deleted
On 2015/2/27 07:19 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
Right now, my biggest problem is how to remove the pt_regs from being
exported to userspace, without breaking things. The struct is defined
and used in a few UAPI headers:
arch/nios2/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h
On 15/2/25 10:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 February 2015 08:33:16 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>
>> /me is more confused now
>>
>> In arch/nios2/include/asm/ucontext.h
>>
>> struct ucontext {
>> unsigned long uc_flags;
>> struct ucontext *uc_link;
>>
On 15/2/25 10:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 08:33:16 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
/me is more confused now
In arch/nios2/include/asm/ucontext.h
struct ucontext {
unsigned long uc_flags;
struct ucontext *uc_link;
stack_t
On 2015/1/22 下午 04:43, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Chung-Lin Tang
> wrote:
>> On 2015/1/22 03:54 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Chung-Lin Tang
>>> wrote:
>>>> The address of __kuser_sig
On 2015/1/22 03:54 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Chung-Lin Tang
> wrote:
>> The address of __kuser_sigtramp is wrong by one word, due to padding
>> __kuser_cmpxchg to fully 64 bytes. The version word at the start of the
>> page displaces __
On 2015/1/22 03:54 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Chung-Lin Tang chunglin.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
The address of __kuser_sigtramp is wrong by one word, due to padding
__kuser_cmpxchg to fully 64 bytes. The version word at the start of the
page displaces
On 2015/1/22 下午 04:43, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 2015/1/22 03:54 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Chung-Lin Tang chunglin.t...@gmail.com
wrote:
The address of __kuser_sigtramp is wrong
,
Chung-Lin
Cc: Ley Foon Tan
Cc: Tobias Klauser
Signed-off-by: Chung-Lin Tang
diff --git a/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S b/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
index 0bdfd13..3224839 100644
--- a/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
@@ -492,14 +492,7 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_kernel_thread
,
Chung-Lin
Cc: Ley Foon Tan lf...@altera.com
Cc: Tobias Klauser tklau...@distanz.ch
Signed-off-by: Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
diff --git a/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S b/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
index 0bdfd13..3224839 100644
--- a/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/nios2/kernel/entry.S
On 14/9/10 5:25 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:22:36 +0800, Ley Foon Tan said:
>> This patch adds support for loadable modules.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan
>
>> +/*
>> + * Modules should NOT be allocated with kmalloc for (obvious) reasons.
>> + * But we do it
On 14/9/10 5:25 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014 17:22:36 +0800, Ley Foon Tan said:
This patch adds support for loadable modules.
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan lf...@altera.com
+/*
+ * Modules should NOT be allocated with kmalloc for (obvious) reasons.
+ * But we do it
Hi Arnd,
Considering two other kernel interface issues that appeared earlier in
the context of nios2 glibc/kernel upstreaming:
(1) The 64-bit time_t/timespec issue.
(2) Dropping renameat by default in favor of renameat2
What's the decision for these? Are they delayed to the next release?
Hi Arnd,
Considering two other kernel interface issues that appeared earlier in
the context of nios2 glibc/kernel upstreaming:
(1) The 64-bit time_t/timespec issue.
(2) Dropping renameat by default in favor of renameat2
What's the decision for these? Are they delayed to the next release?
On 2014/7/15 06:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> +
>> > +#ifndef _UAPI_ASM_NIOS2_STATFS_H
>> > +#define _UAPI_ASM_NIOS2_STATFS_H
>> > +
>> > +#define __statfs_word __s32
> Why this? Every other architecture except parisc uses the default __u32 here.
Because include/uapi/asm/statfs.h has this:
On 2014/7/15 06:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
+
+#ifndef _UAPI_ASM_NIOS2_STATFS_H
+#define _UAPI_ASM_NIOS2_STATFS_H
+
+#define __statfs_word __s32
Why this? Every other architecture except parisc uses the default __u32 here.
Because include/uapi/asm/statfs.h has this:
#ifndef
On 2014/5/15 07:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2014 14:33:18 John Stultz wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 13 May 2014 20:24:59 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Using 64-bit
On 2014/5/15 07:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2014 14:33:18 John Stultz wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 13 May 2014 20:24:59 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Using 64-bit
On 2014/5/15 07:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 14 May 2014 14:33:18 John Stultz wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2014 20:24:59 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On 2014/5/15 07:08 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 14 May 2014 14:33:18 John Stultz wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 13 May 2014 20:24:59 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On 14/4/25 下午4:37, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:06 PM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-L
On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang w
On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2014/4
On 14/4/25 下午4:37, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 2014/4/25 02:42 AM, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
On Apr 24, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote
On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>>> On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 23, 20
On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>>
>>>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foo
On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
>
>> > On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
>> > wrote:
>> >
>>> >> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann
On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan
On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday
On 2014/4/24 11:28 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:55:25AM +0100, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2014/4/24 02:26 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2014/4/24 上午 02:15, Pinski, Andrew wrote:
On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Chung-Lin Tang clt...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On 2014/4/22
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> >> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin,
>>> >>
>>> >> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm
>>> >> that we don't need
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin,
Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm
that we don't need to have 64
On 2014/4/23 上午 12:27, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Apr 23, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> On 2014/4/22 下午 11:35, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> On Apr 22, Tobias Klauser wrote:
>>>> On 2014-04-22 at 16:24:43 +0200, Ezequiel Garcia
>>>> wrote:
>>>>&g
On 2014/4/22 下午 11:35, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Apr 22, Tobias Klauser wrote:
>> On 2014-04-22 at 16:24:43 +0200, Ezequiel Garcia
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Ley Foon,
>>>
>>> On Apr 18, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
+/*
+ * PAGE_SHIFT determines the page size
+ */
+#define PAGE_SHIFT
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin,
>>>
>>> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm
>>> that we don't need to have 64 bit
On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin,
Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you confirm
that we don't need to have 64 bit
On 2014/4/22 下午 11:35, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
On Apr 22, Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2014-04-22 at 16:24:43 +0200, Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Hi Ley Foon,
On Apr 18, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
+/*
+ * PAGE_SHIFT determines the page size
+ */
+#define PAGE_SHIFT
On 2014/4/23 上午 12:27, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
On Apr 23, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2014/4/22 下午 11:35, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
On Apr 22, Tobias Klauser wrote:
On 2014-04-22 at 16:24:43 +0200, Ezequiel Garcia
ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Hi Ley Foon,
On Apr 18, Ley Foon Tan
On 14/4/21 1:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/20/2014 10:23 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' guidance that
any new
On 14/4/21 1:31 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 04/20/2014 10:23 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Friday 18 April 2014, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Did the generic headers ever get updated to match Linus' guidance that
any new architecture
44 matches
Mail list logo
