Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:09:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:46, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > I have a model for STD that avoids the need to freeze the entirity of
>> > userspace, but I need to find some more time
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:09:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 5 July 2007 15:46, Matthew Garrett wrote:
I have a model for STD that avoids the need to freeze the entirity of
userspace, but I need to find some more time to flesh it
Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:50:56AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>
>> I'm perfectly willing to think through some alternate approach if you
>> suggest something or prod my thinking in a new direction, but I'm
>> afraid I just can't see right now how
Olivier Galibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:50:56AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
I'm perfectly willing to think through some alternate approach if you
suggest something or prod my thinking in a new direction, but I'm
afraid I just can't see right now how we can
G'day. One of the machines I maintain is having real trouble with the
AIC79XX HBA or the tape drive attached to it. I believe this is a
hardware fault, but I am not certain where the problem lies.
Normally I would blame the cable or, maybe, the tape drive, but the
early stage of the fault and
G'day. One of the machines I maintain is having real trouble with the
AIC79XX HBA or the tape drive attached to it. I believe this is a
hardware fault, but I am not certain where the problem lies.
Normally I would blame the cable or, maybe, the tape drive, but the
early stage of the fault and
Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 17:19 +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> I recently installed a SCSI tape drive and Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI
>> controller into my server to run backups.
>>
>> Since then, the driver issues these warnings
I recently installed a SCSI tape drive and Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI
controller into my server to run backups.
Since then, the driver issues these warnings on a semi-regular basis
while the drive is busy:
Aug 9 17:00:26 anu kernel: scsi0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or
write data
I recently installed a SCSI tape drive and Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI
controller into my server to run backups.
Since then, the driver issues these warnings on a semi-regular basis
while the drive is busy:
Aug 9 17:00:26 anu kernel: scsi0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or
write data
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 17:19 +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
I recently installed a SCSI tape drive and Adaptec AHA-2940U2W SCSI
controller into my server to run backups.
Since then, the driver issues these warnings on a semi-regular basis
while the drive
n of the various registers means we have to spinlock
* nearly all register accesses. We have the main register indirection
@@ -115,6 +114,15 @@
* themselves, but we'll see.
*
* History
+ * v0.15 - Jul 05 2001 - Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * Support multiple open of /dev
have to spinlock
* nearly all register accesses. We have the main register indirection
@@ -115,6 +114,15 @@
* themselves, but we'll see.
*
* History
+ * v0.15 - Jul 05 2001 - Daniel Pittman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * Support multiple open of /dev/dsp, not multiple dsp devices
dmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>> On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
>> > Feb 1 12:58:56 obelix kernel: NAT: 0 dropping untracked packet
>> ce767600 1 129.69.22.21 -> 224.0.0.2
>>
>> It means that your box drops multicast administrative
dmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
Feb 1 12:58:56 obelix kernel: NAT: 0 dropping untracked packet
ce767600 1 129.69.22.21 - 224.0.0.2
It means that your box drops multicast administrative packets on the
in zones, or figuring
+ * out just how to coerce the WP into doing what we want.
*
* The indirection of the various registers means we have to spinlock
* nearly all register accesses. We have the main register indirection
@@ -115,6 +114,16 @@
* themselves, but we'll see.
*
* History
that could work in zones, or figuring
+ * out just how to coerce the WP into doing what we want.
*
* The indirection of the various registers means we have to spinlock
* nearly all register accesses. We have the main register indirection
@@ -115,6 +114,16 @@
* themselves, but we'll see.
16 matches
Mail list logo
