Re: Git archive now available

2005-04-15 Thread Darren Williams
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Darren Williams wrote: > Hi All > > Thanks to the team at [EMAIL PROTECTED] we now have a > no so complete Git archive at > http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/ > > If somebody could send me a complete Git mbox I will > update the arch

Re: Git archive now available

2005-04-15 Thread Darren Williams
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Darren Williams wrote: Hi All Thanks to the team at [EMAIL PROTECTED] we now have a no so complete Git archive at http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/ If somebody could send me a complete Git mbox I will update the archive with it. Apparently gmane.org have

Re: Git archive now available

2005-04-14 Thread Darren Williams
Hi David On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:01:47 +1000 > Darren Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks to the team at [EMAIL PROTECTED] we now have a > > no so complete Git archive at > > http://ww

Git archive now available

2005-04-14 Thread Darren Williams
Hi All Thanks to the team at [EMAIL PROTECTED] we now have a no so complete Git archive at http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/ If somebody could send me a complete Git mbox I will update the archive with it. - dsw -- Darren Williams

Git archive now available

2005-04-14 Thread Darren Williams
Hi All Thanks to the team at [EMAIL PROTECTED] we now have a no so complete Git archive at http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/ If somebody could send me a complete Git mbox I will update the archive with it. - dsw -- Darren Williams dsw

Re: ext3 journalling BUG on full filesystem

2005-03-23 Thread Darren Williams
in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Darren Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: ext3 journalling BUG on full filesystem

2005-03-23 Thread Darren Williams
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Darren Williams dsw AT gelato.unsw.edu.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gelato.unsw.edu.au

[PATCH] 2.6.11-bk Stallion driver module clean up

2005-03-10 Thread Darren Williams
, boot and running on our console server as module and built-in. Signed-off-by Darren Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. # # ChangeSet # 2005/02/25 15:17:25+11:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] # stallion serial driver module clean up # # drivers/char/stal

[PATCH] 2.6.11-bk Stallion driver module clean up

2005-03-10 Thread Darren Williams
, boot and running on our console server as module and built-in. Signed-off-by Darren Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch. # # ChangeSet # 2005/02/25 15:17:25+11:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] # stallion serial driver module clean up # # drivers/char/stallion.c

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-06 Thread Darren Williams
Hi Christoph On Sun, 06 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: > > > Hi Christoph > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > > > Make sure that scrubd_stop on startup is set to 2 and no zero

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-06 Thread Darren Williams
e to zero */ This is the assignment when page zero fails. Darren > On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: > > > Hi Darren > > > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: > > > > > Hi Christoph > > > > > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wr

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-06 Thread Darren Williams
*/ This is the assignment when page zero fails. Darren On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: Hi Darren On Fri, 04 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: Hi Christoph On Tue, 01 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: Is there any chance that this patchset could go into mm now? This has been

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-06 Thread Darren Williams
Hi Christoph On Sun, 06 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: Hi Christoph On Fri, 04 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: Make sure that scrubd_stop on startup is set to 2 and no zero in mm/scrubd.c. The current patch on oss.sgi.com may

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-03 Thread Darren Williams
Hi Darren On Fri, 04 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: > Hi Christoph > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Is there any chance that this patchset could go into mm now? This has been > > discussed since last August > > > > Changel

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-03 Thread Darren Williams
k 3 for a long time. > > The patchset is composed of 4 patches (and was tested against 2.6.11-rc5-bk4): > [SNIP] > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http:/

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-03 Thread Darren Williams
-rc5-bk4): [SNIP] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ia64 in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Darren Williams dsw AT gelato.unsw.edu.au

Re: Page fault scalability patch V18: Overview

2005-03-03 Thread Darren Williams
Hi Darren On Fri, 04 Mar 2005, Darren Williams wrote: Hi Christoph On Tue, 01 Mar 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: Is there any chance that this patchset could go into mm now? This has been discussed since last August Changelog: V17-V18 Rediff against 2.6.11-rc5-bk4 Just

Re: BUG: stallion module cannot register it's ISR in a 2.6.10 kernel on a FC3 system

2005-02-23 Thread Darren Williams
ne "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ --------

Re: BUG: stallion module cannot register it's ISR in a 2.6.10 kernel on a FC3 system

2005-02-23 Thread Darren Williams
in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Darren Williams dsw AT gelato.unsw.edu.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gelato.unsw.edu.au

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-bk5: XFS: fcron: could not write() buf to disk: Resource temporarily unavailable

2005-02-13 Thread Darren Williams
xfs_trans_set_sync(tp); > error = xfs_trans_commit(tp, 0, NULL); > xfs_iunlock(xip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); > - if (error) > - g

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-bk5: XFS: fcron: could not write() buf to disk: Resource temporarily unavailable

2005-02-13 Thread Darren Williams
/ -- Darren Williams dsw AT gelato.unsw.edu.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gelato.unsw.edu.au -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch

2005-01-17 Thread Darren Williams
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Darren Williams wrote: > Hi Ingo > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > +BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, spinlock_t, spin_is_locked); > >

Re: Horrible regression with -CURRENT from "Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks" patch

2005-01-17 Thread Darren Williams
->lock) <= 0) > + > +/** > + * write_is_locked - would write_trylock() fail? > + * @lock: the rwlock in question. > + */ > +#define write_is_locked(x) ((x)->lock != RW_LOCK_BIAS) > > /* > * On x86, we implement read-write locks as a 32-bit counter > ---

Re: Horrible regression with -CURRENT from Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks patch

2005-01-17 Thread Darren Williams
majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Darren Williams dsw AT gelato.unsw.edu.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.gelato.unsw.edu.au

Re: Horrible regression with -CURRENT from Don't busy-lock-loop in preemptable spinlocks patch

2005-01-17 Thread Darren Williams
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Darren Williams wrote: Hi Ingo On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +BUILD_LOCK_OPS(spin, spinlock_t, spin_is_locked); +BUILD_LOCK_OPS(read, rwlock_t, rwlock_is_locked); +BUILD_LOCK_OPS(write, rwlock_t