> > I'm assuming you're running some sort of Fedora/RHEL/
> > derivative; this is what you get when you have a device that starts
> > out named ethX, but which needed to be renamed so that an already
> > configured ethX could be changed to that name.
>
> yes, it's FC6.
>
> > For the new device,
I'm assuming you're running some sort of Fedora/RHEL/
derivative; this is what you get when you have a device that starts
out named ethX, but which needed to be renamed so that an already
configured ethX could be changed to that name.
yes, it's FC6.
For the new device, either add a
On 9/6/07, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > >dear all,
> > >I'm trying to track down a problem on a Sun V40Z server with 4 network
> > >devices grabbing random ethX device names. now, trying to force the
> > >device names to what I want, I
On 9/6/07, Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan Engelhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
dear all,
I'm trying to track down a problem on a Sun V40Z server with 4 network
devices grabbing random ethX device names. now, trying to force the
device names to what I want, I got a __tmpX
dear all,
I'm trying to track down a problem on a Sun V40Z server with 4 network
devices grabbing random ethX device names. now, trying to force the
device names to what I want, I got a __tmpX form of device name,
which I think is a half-configured device... but which piece of
software is to
dear all,
I'm trying to track down a problem on a Sun V40Z server with 4 network
devices grabbing random ethX device names. now, trying to force the
device names to what I want, I got a __tmpX form of device name,
which I think is a half-configured device... but which piece of
software is to
Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm not subscribe to the mailling
list) :
Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay udelay(1000); in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm not subscribe to the mailling
list) :
I'd
maybe RTFM...
a module:
- char device driver for..
- a PCI device
any clue as to how to protect from module unloading while there is still
some process opening it??? have I to sleep in the remove_one() pci
driver function till last process closes its file descriptor???
static void __devexit
maybe RTFM...
a module:
- char device driver for..
- a PCI device
any clue as to how to protect from module unloading while there is still
some process opening it??? have I to sleep in the remove_one() pci
driver function till last process closes its file descriptor???
static void __devexit
I'm authoring a (GPL) driver for a custom 3D network card.
on calling some polling functions from within a workqueue, I'm getting
lockups... sysrq-p got it clear I have a workqueue thread down into
schedule_timeout().
is considered polite to call schedule ? is in_softirq() capable to diff
environment
I'm authoring a (GPL) driver for a custom 3D network card.
/environment
on calling some polling functions from within a workqueue, I'm getting
lockups... sysrq-p got it clear I have a workqueue thread down into
schedule_timeout().
is considered polite to call schedule ? is
12 matches
Mail list logo
