[PATCH 2/2] power_supply: max77693: Listen for cable events and enable charging

the charger is enabled or disabled. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Wiedmeyer gnu...@cyberdimension.org: small fixes Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- drivers/power/supply/Kconfig| 2 +- drivers/power/supply/max77693_charger.c | 176 2 files changed, 177

[PATCH 1/2] mfd: max77693: Add defines for charger current control

From: Wolfgang Wiedmeyer This prepares for an updated regulator and charger driver. The defines are needed to set the maximum input current and the fast charge current. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Wiedmeyer gnu...@cyberdimension.org: small fix Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli --- include

[PATCH] bcma: add HP Stream Notebook

bcma: bus0: Workarounds unknown or not needed for device 0xA886 bcma: bus0: Bus registered But it not yet supported by brcmsmac so it won't work for now: brcmsmac bcma0:1: brcms_b_attach wl0: vendor 0x14e4 device 0x4365 brcmsmac: unknown device id 4365 Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli

[PATCH] bcma: add HP Stream Notebook

bcma: bus0: Workarounds unknown or not needed for device 0xA886 bcma: bus0: Bus registered But it not yet supported by brcmsmac so it won't work for now: brcmsmac bcma0:1: brcms_b_attach wl0: vendor 0x14e4 device 0x4365 brcmsmac: unknown device id 4365 Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli

Re: [tpmdd-devel] Regression between Linux 3.16 and 4.8/4.9 on Lenovo X60 with coreboot

Hi Paul, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:55:57 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > We added direct ACPI binding to the driver in addition to PNP, so if > you have an ACPI table it goes down that path and does some additional > validation of what is in the TPM. The BIOS must

Re: [tpmdd-devel] Regression between Linux 3.16 and 4.8/4.9 on Lenovo X60 with coreboot

Hi Paul, On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:55:57 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > We added direct ACPI binding to the driver in addition to PNP, so if > you have an ACPI table it goes down that path and does some additional > validation of what is in the TPM. The BIOS must provide a >

Re: Would like to form a pool of Linux copyright holders for faster GPL enforcement against Anthrax Kernels

On Sat, 18 May 2013 03:24:31 -0400 Eric Appleman wrote: > Would anyone be interested in forming such a pool? I am willing to > wait years for this to be resolved through certain organizations, but > I believe we can do better. yes, unfortunately I've only non-crucial code in mainline:

Re: Would like to form a pool of Linux copyright holders for faster GPL enforcement against Anthrax Kernels

> actually, that's a good point. please can it be specifically noted, > from this moment onwards, that all contributions that i have made to > the linux kernel are dual-licensed under both the GPLv2 and also the > GPLv3+ license? Why not simply use "GPLv2 or later" ? For instance in the

Re: Would like to form a pool of Linux copyright holders for faster GPL enforcement against Anthrax Kernels

On Sun, 19 May 2013 11:57:15 +0100 "luke.leighton" wrote: > so. could someone please inform me what the procedure is: is it as > simple as submitting a patch? I think so(however I'm not a kernel maintainer), I found that(however the patch is really old):

Re: Would like to form a pool of Linux copyright holders for faster GPL enforcement against Anthrax Kernels

On Sun, 19 May 2013 11:57:15 +0100 luke.leighton luke.leigh...@gmail.com wrote: so. could someone please inform me what the procedure is: is it as simple as submitting a patch? I think so(however I'm not a kernel maintainer), I found that(however the patch is really old):

Re: Would like to form a pool of Linux copyright holders for faster GPL enforcement against Anthrax Kernels

actually, that's a good point. please can it be specifically noted, from this moment onwards, that all contributions that i have made to the linux kernel are dual-licensed under both the GPLv2 and also the GPLv3+ license? Why not simply use GPLv2 or later ? For instance in the copyright

Re: Would like to form a pool of Linux copyright holders for faster GPL enforcement against Anthrax Kernels

On Sat, 18 May 2013 03:24:31 -0400 Eric Appleman erapple...@gmail.com wrote: Would anyone be interested in forming such a pool? I am willing to wait years for this to be resolved through certain organizations, but I believe we can do better. yes, unfortunately I've only non-crucial code in