Re: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI hang ?

2008-02-16 Thread FD Cami
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:38:13 +1100 "Omar Kilani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > We're having issues with our Adaptec RAID controller and I was > wondering if anyone would be able to advise on how to go about > resolving them. :) > > The system: > > RHEL 5.1 x86_64 > Kernel

Re: aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI hang ?

2008-02-16 Thread FD Cami
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:38:13 +1100 Omar Kilani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, We're having issues with our Adaptec RAID controller and I was wondering if anyone would be able to advise on how to go about resolving them. :) The system: RHEL 5.1 x86_64 Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5

Re: Disk schedulers

2008-02-15 Thread FD Cami
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:11:26 -0700 Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:57 +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > On the day of Friday 15 February 2008 Jan Engelhardt hast written: > > > On Feb 14 2008 17:21, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: > > > >Hello, > > > > > > > >whom should

Re: Disk schedulers

2008-02-15 Thread FD Cami
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:11:26 -0700 Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 15:57 +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote: On the day of Friday 15 February 2008 Jan Engelhardt hast written: On Feb 14 2008 17:21, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote: Hello, whom should I blame about disk

Re: [PATCH] Re: Forcing modes in libata

2008-01-11 Thread FD Cami
Hi, On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:56:10 -0500 Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FD Cami wrote: > > Revised patch attached. > > > > Best, > > > > François > > > > applied. please include signed-off-by lines in the future... Will do. Thanks

Re: [PATCH] Re: Forcing modes in libata

2008-01-11 Thread FD Cami
Hi, On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:56:10 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FD Cami wrote: Revised patch attached. Best, François applied. please include signed-off-by lines in the future... Will do. Thanks ! François -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH] Re: Forcing modes in libata (was: SATA buffered read VERY slow)

2008-01-06 Thread FD Cami
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:27:38 +0100 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 06 January 2008, FD Cami wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:36:09 + > > Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:

[PATCH] Re: Forcing modes in libata (was: SATA buffered read VERY slow)

2008-01-06 Thread FD Cami
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:36:09 + Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:03:31 +0300 > > > For now you can boot with libata.dma=1 to select DMA on disks but > > > not CD > > > > Great, but why isn't this in the documentation? > > Send patches patch attached. Description :

[PATCH] Re: Forcing modes in libata (was: SATA buffered read VERY slow)

2008-01-06 Thread FD Cami
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:36:09 + Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:03:31 +0300 For now you can boot with libata.dma=1 to select DMA on disks but not CD Great, but why isn't this in the documentation? Send patches patch attached. Description : Add

Re: [PATCH] Re: Forcing modes in libata (was: SATA buffered read VERY slow)

2008-01-06 Thread FD Cami
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:27:38 +0100 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 06 January 2008, FD Cami wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:36:09 + Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:03:31 +0300 For now you can boot with libata.dma=1 to select DMA

scheduler improvements : 2.6.21 vs 2.6.22-ck1 vs 2.6.23-rc6

2007-09-16 Thread FD Cami
Warning: I have not run any benchmarks. One thing I am (more or less) able to measure is my own ability to headshot in some games like UT99. The other thing is to see if flash videos stutter or die under load. Please remember, this is about desktop usage - not numbers. my computer: PIII-S 1400

scheduler improvements : 2.6.21 vs 2.6.22-ck1 vs 2.6.23-rc6

2007-09-16 Thread FD Cami
Warning: I have not run any benchmarks. One thing I am (more or less) able to measure is my own ability to headshot in some games like UT99. The other thing is to see if flash videos stutter or die under load. Please remember, this is about desktop usage - not numbers. my computer: PIII-S 1400

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

2007-09-08 Thread FD Cami
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:15:01 +0530 (IST) Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > > Try this from net-2.6 tree: > > > > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c > > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c > > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static u32 tcp_rto_min(struct sock *sk) > >

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

2007-09-08 Thread FD Cami
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 04:15:01 +0530 (IST) Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: Try this from net-2.6 tree: --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static u32 tcp_rto_min(struct sock *sk) struct

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

2007-09-02 Thread FD Cami
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:38:28 +0200 "Alessandro Suardi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/2/07, charles gagalac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/2/07, daryll q wrote: > > > Upgraded my kernel from 2.6.23-rc2 to 2.6.23-rc5. > > > > > > System hangs (caps lock and scroll lock leds are both

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

2007-09-02 Thread FD Cami
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:38:28 +0200 Alessandro Suardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/07, charles gagalac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/2/07, daryll q wrote: Upgraded my kernel from 2.6.23-rc2 to 2.6.23-rc5. System hangs (caps lock and scroll lock leds are both flashing). It