My x86-64 system has two network cards, a r8169 and a forcedeth, the r8169
works fine on my network,
but when I attempt to use the forcedeth card, I get the following errors in
dmesg:
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
nv_stop_tx: TransmitterStatus remained busy<7>eth0: tx_timeout: dead
? Or is this really a bug, let me know how
I can help. Thanks!
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
ng around somewhere and needed to find time to dust
> it off and get it up to speed.
>
> Cheers,
> Con
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ck mailing list. Please reply-to-all when posting.
> If replying to an email please reply below the ori
to an email please reply below the original message.
http://bhhdoa.org.au/mailman/listinfo/ck
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
hing odd? Can anyone else with an amd machine confirm this
behavior? Con: should we attempt to get the attention of LKML to see why amd
chips act differently?
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
anyone else with an amd machine confirm this
behavior? Con: should we attempt to get the attention of LKML to see why amd
chips act differently?
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
cool n' quiet with the ondemand
governor running on my athlon64, so that might indicate an issue, again,
I'll look into that tonight.
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
Con Kolivas wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:44, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
Hi Con,
You must hate me by now...
No. A bug report is a bug report. I hate the fact that I coded up 2000 lines
of code and am still suffering from a problem in the same 10 lines that I did
in version .01. PEBKAC.
I
re to make the system settle a little,
perhaps another method needs to be used. Thanks for your time!
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Con Kolivas wrote:
Interbench is a benchmark application is designed to benchmark interactivity
in Linux.
Direct download link:
http://ck.koliva
the system settle a little,
perhaps another method needs to be used. Thanks for your time!
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Con Kolivas wrote:
Interbench is a benchmark application is designed to benchmark interactivity
in Linux.
Direct download link:
http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/interbench
Con Kolivas wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:44, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
Hi Con,
You must hate me by now...
No. A bug report is a bug report. I hate the fact that I coded up 2000 lines
of code and am still suffering from a problem in the same 10 lines that I did
in version .01. PEBKAC.
I
cool n' quiet with the ondemand
governor running on my athlon64, so that might indicate an issue, again,
I'll look into that tonight.
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
89
X 89.7 +/- nan 49452.8
Burn400 +/- nan 100420.1
Write 49.2 +/- nan 34367.2
Read 4.14 +/- nan 56.796.7
Compile 551 +/- nan 136915.4
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL
89
X 89.7 +/- nan 49452.8
Burn400 +/- nan 100420.1
Write 49.2 +/- nan 34367.2
Read 4.14 +/- nan 56.796.7
Compile 551 +/- nan 136915.4
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL
Thats correct, does it need it?
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Con Kolivas wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:11, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
Hello Con,
Attempting to run this on my 2.6.12-ck3s system results in the following
error:
sawtooth interbench-0.24 # ./interbench
loops_per_ms unknown
Thats correct, does it need it?
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Con Kolivas wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:11, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
Hello Con,
Attempting to run this on my 2.6.12-ck3s system results in the following
error:
sawtooth interbench-0.24 # ./interbench
loops_per_ms unknown
d settings for preempt in the ck kernel
configuration?
Thanks for your time.
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On July 20, 2005 00:42, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:46 pm, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
> > I've been using the the -ck patchset for a very long time, and I recently
>
for preempt in the ck kernel
configuration?
Thanks for your time.
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On July 20, 2005 00:42, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:46 pm, Gabriel Devenyi wrote:
I've been using the the -ck patchset for a very long time, and I recently
switched to a amd64 arch. I
ful system,
is there anything I can do to improve this? Thanks for all your help.
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using 1047120 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.12-ck3-r1 at datestamp 200507192216
--- Benchmarking Audio in the presence of loads ---
Latency +/- SD
,
is there anything I can do to improve this? Thanks for all your help.
--
Gabriel Devenyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using 1047120 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.12-ck3-r1 at datestamp 200507192216
--- Benchmarking Audio in the presence of loads ---
Latency +/- SD (ms) Max
20 matches
Mail list logo
