> On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:44 AM, "Namhyung Kim" wrote:
>
> Hi Gaurav,
>
>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:23:27 +, Gaurav Jain wrote:
>> On 1/16/14, 9:37 AM, "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo"
>> wrote:
>> Does perf support data mappings from perf map
On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:44 AM, Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Gaurav,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:23:27 +, Gaurav Jain wrote:
On 1/16/14, 9:37 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net
wrote:
Does perf support data mappings from perf map files? Could you please
share
On 1/16/14, 9:37 AM, "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo"
wrote:
>Em Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Gaurav reported that perf cannot profile JIT program if it executes
>> the code on heap. This was because current map__new() only handle JIT
>> on anon mappings - extends
On 1/16/14, 9:37 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@ghostprotocols.net
wrote:
Em Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:49:31AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
Gaurav reported that perf cannot profile JIT program if it executes
the code on heap. This was because current map__new() only handle JIT
on anon
Hi Namhyung,
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:01 PM, "Namhyung Kim" wrote:
>
> Hi Gaurav,
>
>> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 06:44:39 +, Gaurav Jain wrote:
>> Hi Namhyung,
>>
>>
>>> On 1/15/14, 12:46 AM, "Namhyung Kim" wrote:
>>
981c125 introduced a permission check on perf map files such that perf only
loads the map file if it has ownership. Pekka mentioned that this prevents the
perf tool from injecting arbitrary symbols from potentially malicious source.
In our workload, the code generating the map file is running
981c125 introduced a permission check on perf map files such that perf only
loads the map file if it has ownership. Pekka mentioned that this prevents the
perf tool from injecting arbitrary symbols from potentially malicious source.
In our workload, the code generating the map file is running
Hi Namhyung,
On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:01 PM, Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Gaurav,
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 06:44:39 +, Gaurav Jain wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
On 1/15/14, 12:46 AM, Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/map.c b/tools/perf/util/map.c
Hi Namhyung,
On 1/15/14, 12:46 AM, "Namhyung Kim" wrote:
>I'd like to take my ack back - it seems I missed some points.
No worries, looks like the patch wasn’t well thought out.
>On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:48:23 +0000, Gaurav Jain wrote:
>> On 1/13/14, 11:54 AM, "Don Z
On 1/13/14, 11:54 AM, "Don Zickus" wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:32:14PM -0800, Gaurav Jain wrote:
>> Anon records usually do not have the 'execname' entry. However if they
>>are on
>> the heap, the execname shows up as '[heap]'. The fix considers any
>
On 1/13/14, 11:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:32:14PM -0800, Gaurav Jain wrote:
Anon records usually do not have the 'execname' entry. However if they
are on
the heap, the execname shows up as '[heap]'. The fix considers any
executable
entries in the map
Hi Namhyung,
On 1/15/14, 12:46 AM, Namhyung Kim namhy...@kernel.org wrote:
I'd like to take my ack back - it seems I missed some points.
No worries, looks like the patch wasn’t well thought out.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:48:23 +, Gaurav Jain wrote:
On 1/13/14, 11:54 AM, Don Zickus dzic
for records on the heap.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jain
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Paul Mackerras
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Don Zickus
Cc: Arun Sharma
---
tools/perf/util/event.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.c b/tools/perf/util
for records on the heap.
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jain gj...@fb.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org
Cc: Jiri Olsa jo...@redhat.com
Cc: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl
Cc: Don Zickus dzic...@redhat.com
Cc: Arun Sharma asha...@fb.com
---
tools/perf/util/event.c | 5
14 matches
Mail list logo