IBM Model 350 does not like 2.4

Hi All, I have 10 systems running 2.4 that are rock solid, but I have 1 system that has problems with 2.4. The box had run perfectly for 46 days with 2.2.19pre2, and today I installed 2.4.1-ac3 to see how it would go. It seemed to run fine for a few minutes, then the old problem reasserted

IBM Model 350 does not like 2.4

Hi All, I have 10 systems running 2.4 that are rock solid, but I have 1 system that has problems with 2.4. The box had run perfectly for 46 days with 2.2.19pre2, and today I installed 2.4.1-ac3 to see how it would go. It seemed to run fine for a few minutes, then the old problem reasserted

drm woes continue in test13-pre4

Greetings, Up to and including -test12, tdfx.o has built and run nicely. Starting with -test13-pre1, and continuing to -test13-pre4, tdfx.o (and other modules e,g the olympic.o token ring driver) have not been successfully created. In general, modules work fine, it's just a few that have been

drm woes continue in test13-pre4

Greetings, Up to and including -test12, tdfx.o has built and run nicely. Starting with -test13-pre1, and continuing to -test13-pre4, tdfx.o (and other modules e,g the olympic.o token ring driver) have not been successfully created. In general, modules work fine, it's just a few that have been

[Fixed] - Repeatable oops mounting snapshots w/ test 10

Thanks Andrea, it all works like a charm with your lvm utils. But why is the "official" release of the lvm utils so buggy? Regards, jjs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

[Fixed] - Repeatable oops mounting snapshots w/ test 10

Thanks Andrea, it all works like a charm with your lvm utils. But why is the "official" release of the lvm utils so buggy? Regards, jjs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at