On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:03:25 +0100, Alessandro Zummo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600
> Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely
> > handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc?
> >
> > I
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:03:25 +0100, Alessandro Zummo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:11:23 -0600
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the functionality provided by drivers/char/gen_rtc.c completely
handled by the rtc subsystem in drivers/rtc?
I ask for two
Hi all...
since some time ago I have noticed that mplayer can't use the RTC for
time accounting. Perhaps it is deprecated and should be migrated to
hrtimers, that is what every reference I found said, but the fact is
that nowadays it uses it.
I thought I was because a misbuild of my kernel, but
Hi all...
since some time ago I have noticed that mplayer can't use the RTC for
time accounting. Perhaps it is deprecated and should be migrated to
hrtimers, that is what every reference I found said, but the fact is
that nowadays it uses it.
I thought I was because a misbuild of my kernel, but
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:24:29 +0100, Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:53:44AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > I'd say this implies the exact opposite. It almost sounds like the
> > compiler is free to change:
> >
> > void foo(const int *x);
> > foo(x);
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:24:29 +0100, Olivier Galibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 08:53:44AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
I'd say this implies the exact opposite. It almost sounds like the
compiler is free to change:
void foo(const int *x);
foo(x);
printf(%d,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:57:35 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J.A. Magallón wrote:
> > I'm still pending to pysically remove the disks (or at least unplug the
> > cable...), but I have realized a cusious thing: after some errors, the
> > kernel is loweri
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:57:35 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.A. Magallón wrote:
I'm still pending to pysically remove the disks (or at least unplug the
cable...), but I have realized a cusious thing: after some errors, the
kernel is lowering the disk speed (UDMA/133, then 100
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:10:08 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> J.A. Magallón wrote:
> > It reproduces also with 2.6.23.13.
> > Finally I think the problematic disk is sdc:
>
> Okay, then, it's less likely a regression and more likely a n
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:10:08 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
J.A. Magallón wrote:
It reproduces also with 2.6.23.13.
Finally I think the problematic disk is sdc:
Okay, then, it's less likely a regression and more likely a newly
developed hardware problem.
ICH5 PATA
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:56:02 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J.A. Magallón wrote:
> > HI all...
> >
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It's been two weeks
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:56:02 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.A. Magallón wrote:
HI all...
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
(and birthdays
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:52:35 +0100, Guillaume Laurès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1f02 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
> > ata5.00: cmd 60/40:08:8f:eb:67/00:00:03:00:00/40 tag 1 cdb 0x0 data
> > 32768 in
> > res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:52:35 +0100, Guillaume Laurès [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1f02 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata5.00: cmd 60/40:08:8f:eb:67/00:00:03:00:00/40 tag 1 cdb 0x0 data
32768 in
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4
HI all...
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
> (and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working
> days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is
HI all...
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:16 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been two weeks since rc6, but let's face it, with xmas and new years
(and birthdays) in between, there hasn't actually been a lot of working
days, and the incremental patch from -rc6 is about
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:05:48 -0500, "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:27:37PM -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>
>
> It never
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:08:53 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe though that printk messages are not sentences but are
> > logging statements. Statements do not require full-stops.
> >
> > Opinions, of course, vary.
>
> I do not believe "opinions" are relevant here.
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:08:53 +, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe though that printk messages are not sentences but are
logging statements. Statements do not require full-stops.
Opinions, of course, vary.
I do not believe opinions are relevant here. Relevant would be
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:05:48 -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:27:37PM -0500, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
It never gets to the printk(). You were
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:57:27 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You could write an equally effcient kernel in languages like C++,
> > using C++ abstractions as a high level organization, where
>
> It's very very hard to generate good C code because of the numerous ways
> objects get
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:19:50AM +0100, J.A. Magall??n wrote:
> > I think BeOS was C++ and OSX is C+ObjectiveC (and runs on an iPhone).
> > Original MacOS (fron 6 to 9) was Pascal (and a mac SE was very near
> > to
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:54:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:19:50AM +0100, J.A. Magall??n wrote:
I think BeOS was C++ and OSX is C+ObjectiveC (and runs on an iPhone).
Original MacOS (fron 6 to 9) was Pascal (and a mac SE was very near
to
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:57:27 +, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could write an equally effcient kernel in languages like C++,
using C++ abstractions as a high level organization, where
It's very very hard to generate good C code because of the numerous ways
objects get
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:13:53 +0100, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>
> It just depends how many times a second it happens. For instance, consider
> this trivial loop (fct is a two-function array which just return 1 or 2) :
>
> i = 0;
> for (j = 0; j < (1 << 28);
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:13:53 +0100, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
It just depends how many times a second it happens. For instance, consider
this trivial loop (fct is a two-function array which just return 1 or 2) :
i = 0;
for (j = 0; j (1 28); j++) {
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 00:31:19 +, Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:19:50AM +0100, J.A. Magall??n wrote:
> > An vtable in C++ takes exactly the same space that the function
> > table pointer present in every driver nowadays... and probably
> > the virtual method
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:29:55 +0100, "Loïc Grenié" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
> >
> > regards,
> > BPC
>
Well, I really would like to learn some things here, could we
keep this
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:09:45 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
> >
> > Why not C# instead ?
>
> Why not Haskell nor Erlang instead ? :-D
>
Flash
http://www.lagmonster.info/humor/windowsrg.html
--
J.A.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:29:55 +0100, Loïc Grenié [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
regards,
BPC
Well, I really would like to learn some things here, could we
keep this off-topic thread
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 00:31:19 +, Al Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:19:50AM +0100, J.A. Magall??n wrote:
An vtable in C++ takes exactly the same space that the function
table pointer present in every driver nowadays... and probably
the virtual method call that
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:09:45 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
Why not C# instead ?
Why not Haskell nor Erlang instead ? :-D
Flash
http://www.lagmonster.info/humor/windowsrg.html
--
J.A. Magallon
Hi all...
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
include/asm/compat.h:210: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
There are several of this warnings. The code in question for this example
is:
static __inline__ void __user
Hi all...
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
include/asm/compat.h:210: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
There are several of this warnings. The code in question for this example
is:
static __inline__ void __user
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:50:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:45:21PM +0100, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
> > Well, problem solved...
> >
> > I'm going to kill all pc assemblers in the world... Someone should teach
> > them
> > to learn mauals before
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:10:46 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:18:47AM +0100, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
> > Well, I was able to get about 3 Gb with MTRR=discrete in the BIOS,
> > but I'm still in the process to find the 'software hole' option to get
> > the
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:10:46 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:18:47AM +0100, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
Well, I was able to get about 3 Gb with MTRR=discrete in the BIOS,
but I'm still in the process to find the 'software hole' option to get
the rest
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 13:50:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 07:45:21PM +0100, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
Well, problem solved...
I'm going to kill all pc assemblers in the world... Someone should teach
them
to learn mauals before assembling
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:58:10 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > Hi...
> >
> > I have some Quad-Opteron boxes with 4Gb memory and two of them are
> > running two different Linux distros.
> >
> > Box one sees 4Gb of memory, but box two just sees 3.
> >
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:58:10 -0700, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.A. Magallon wrote:
Hi...
I have some Quad-Opteron boxes with 4Gb memory and two of them are
running two different Linux distros.
Box one sees 4Gb of memory, but box two just sees 3.
Their mtrr setups
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:58:10 -0700, "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J.A. Magallon wrote:
> > Hi...
> >
> > I have some Quad-Opteron boxes with 4Gb memory and two of them are
> > running two different Linux distros.
> >
> > Box one sees 4Gb of memory, but box two just sees 3.
> >
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:58:10 -0700, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.A. Magallon wrote:
Hi...
I have some Quad-Opteron boxes with 4Gb memory and two of them are
running two different Linux distros.
Box one sees 4Gb of memory, but box two just sees 3.
Their mtrr setups
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:58:26 +0100, Denys Vlasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following patches debloat drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/*.
> I also had to add prototypes for ahc_lookup_scb
> and ahd_lookup_scb to .h files.
>
Sorry for the late replay, but.. working fine on
annwn:~# lspci |
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:58:26 +0100, Denys Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Following patches debloat drivers/scsi/aic7xxx/*.
I also had to add prototypes for ahc_lookup_scb
and ahd_lookup_scb to .h files.
Sorry for the late replay, but.. working fine on
annwn:~# lspci | grep Adap
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:43:21 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc6/2.6.22-rc6-mm1/
>
I have noticed a funny problem.
Lets say 666 is not an uid used on you system. This oopses:
rm -f dummy
touch dummy
chown
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:43:21 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc6/2.6.22-rc6-mm1/
I have noticed a funny problem.
Lets say 666 is not an uid used on you system. This oopses:
rm -f dummy
touch dummy
chown 666
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:56:11 +0100, Rui Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a strange slow performance behavior on a recently installed
> Server. Here are the details:
>
...
>
> I can get a write throughput of 60 MB/sec on each HD by issuing the
> command 'time `dd
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:56:11 +0100, Rui Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting a strange slow performance behavior on a recently installed
Server. Here are the details:
...
I can get a write throughput of 60 MB/sec on each HD by issuing the
command 'time `dd if=/dev/zero
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:32:55 +0200, Ingo Freund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> one of the systems I'm working with was changed (copied) from single (scsi -
> sda1)
> to multiple disk (raid1) (sdb1,sdc1 --> md0).
> When I try to boot from the new created md-device it stops with:
>
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:32:55 +0200, Ingo Freund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
one of the systems I'm working with was changed (copied) from single (scsi -
sda1)
to multiple disk (raid1) (sdb1,sdc1 -- md0).
When I try to boot from the new created md-device it stops with:
...
loading
On Mon, 16 May 2005 02:13:02 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc4/2.6.12-rc4-mm2/
>
>
Hi...
I have a (stupid, I suppose) problem with framebuffer console.
I have builtin VESAFB in this kernel, so:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 02:13:02 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc4/2.6.12-rc4-mm2/
Hi...
I have a (stupid, I suppose) problem with framebuffer console.
I have builtin VESAFB in this kernel, so:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:23:07 +0200, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J.A. Magallón napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:53:57 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, And
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:23:07 +0200, Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.A. Magallón napsal(a):
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:53:57 +0200, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:53:57 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-mm2/
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-mm2/
>
> - Basically a bugfixed version of 2.6.22-rc4-mm1. None of the subsystem
> trees were repulled, several bad patches were
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-mm2/
- Basically a bugfixed version of 2.6.22-rc4-mm1. None of the subsystem
trees were repulled, several bad patches were
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:53:57 +0200, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:03:13 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc4/2.6.22-rc4-mm2/
- Basically a bugfixed version of 2.6.22-rc4
On Wed, 23 May 2007 00:42:33 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc2/2.6.22-rc2-mm1/
>
Don't know if it's specific to this kernel, but as I have realized it now...
I booted with idle=poll to check some issues
On Wed, 23 May 2007 00:42:33 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.22-rc2/2.6.22-rc2-mm1/
Don't know if it's specific to this kernel, but as I have realized it now...
I booted with idle=poll to check some issues
On Sat, 5 May 2007 01:49:55 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
>
...
> - The staircase CPU scheduler was dropped
>
Sorry, perhaps I missed the thread in LKML, but... why ?
--
J.A. Magallon
On Sat, 5 May 2007 01:49:55 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-mm1/
...
- The staircase CPU scheduler was dropped
Sorry, perhaps I missed the thread in LKML, but... why ?
--
J.A. Magallon
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:39:54 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:50:39 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>
> But I think I found the problem.
> In short, in /dev/pts is mounted before /dev
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:50:39 +0200, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:22:50 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:43:21 +0200 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:22:50 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:43:21 +0200 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:58:01 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:22:50 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:43:21 +0200 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:58:01 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:10:41 +0200 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:50:39 +0200, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:22:50 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:43:21 +0200 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:58:01 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:39:54 +0200, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 22:50:39 +0200, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
But I think I found the problem.
In short, in /dev/pts is mounted before /dev. I remounted it and ssh worked
fine again.
I'll dig
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:58:01 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:10:41 +0200 "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:35:59 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:35:59 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc6/2.6.21-rc6-mm1/
>
>
> - Lots of x86 updates
>
Has somthing related with PTY's changed in this kernel ?
I have to enable legacy PTY handling
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:35:59 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc6/2.6.21-rc6-mm1/
- Lots of x86 updates
Has somthing related with PTY's changed in this kernel ?
I have to enable legacy PTY handling in a
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 04:58:01 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:10:41 +0200 J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:35:59 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches
Hi all...
After a big update in my systems, two of them just does not let me ssh into it.
It says that stdin is not a terminal. The same hapens if I try to open any
terminal emulator, like aterm.
It finally let me do somathing like ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] /bin/bash -i, to get
a terminal,
and I
Hi all...
After a big update in my systems, two of them just does not let me ssh into it.
It says that stdin is not a terminal. The same hapens if I try to open any
terminal emulator, like aterm.
It finally let me do somathing like ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] /bin/bash -i, to get
a terminal,
and I
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:22:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:58:26 +0200, "J.A. =?UTF-8?B?TWFnYWxsw7Nu?=" said:
>
> > Anyways, I have just remembered I use the (in)famous nVidia driver.
> > Will try to reproduce without it. This was more like a probe to see if
> >
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:13:07 +0200, Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> On Tuesday 03 April 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > So, anybody else has a proposal? This is a pressing issue and cannot
> > wait until someday in the distant future NUMA topology information is
> > easily
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:51:35 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:40:05 +0200
> "J.A. Magall__n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:47:45 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:47:45 -0700, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm4/
>
> - The oops in git-net.patch has been fixed, so that tree has been restored.
> It is huge.
>
> - Added the
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:47:45 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm4/
- The oops in git-net.patch has been fixed, so that tree has been restored.
It is huge.
- Added the device-mapper
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 15:51:35 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 00:40:05 +0200
J.A. Magall__n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 22:47:45 -0700, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:13:07 +0200, Ingo Oeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ulrich,
On Tuesday 03 April 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
So, anybody else has a proposal? This is a pressing issue and cannot
wait until someday in the distant future NUMA topology information is
easily and
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:22:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:58:26 +0200, J.A. =?UTF-8?B?TWFnYWxsw7Nu?= said:
Anyways, I have just remembered I use the (in)famous nVidia driver.
Will try to reproduce without it. This was more like a probe to see if
somebody else is
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> > Hi all...
> >
> > I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
> > (as I recall ma
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
(as I recall many discussions about inlining yes
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
(as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...).
Testing other problems, I finally got this this issue: the same short
and stupid loop lasted from 3 to 5 times more if it was in main() than
if it was in
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
(as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...).
Testing other problems, I finally got this this issue: the same short
and stupid loop lasted from 3 to 5 times more if it was in main() than
if it was in
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:27:09 +0100, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:01:52 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J.A. Magallón wrote:
> > Libata seems to misdetect my cable.
> > I have double-checked and the cable is 80 pin...
>
> Does the following patch fix your problem?
>
> http://articl
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:27:09 +0100, J.A. Magallón [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:01:52 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J.A. Magallón wrote:
Libata seems to misdetect my cable.
I have double-checked and the cable is 80 pin...
Does the following patch fix your problem?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/17444
(You can get
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
>
Libata seems to misdetect my cable.
I have double-checked and the cable is 80 pin...
ata1 is PATA ICH5 bus 1 with DVD-RW + ZIP and 40 pin
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
Libata seems to misdetect my cable.
I have double-checked and the cable is 80 pin...
ata1 is PATA ICH5 bus 1 with DVD-RW + ZIP and 40 pin cable
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
>
> Will appear later at
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc4/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
>
Is anybody
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc4/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
Is anybody having problems
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:29:38 +0100, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Today I heard fans running a bit too much. I checked with top, and got
> no obvious power hog. And now acpi battery says:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/l/zaurus/oz.spitz.3541# cat
> /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:29:38 +0100, Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Today I heard fans running a bit too much. I checked with top, and got
no obvious power hog. And now acpi battery says:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/data/l/zaurus/oz.spitz.3541# cat
/proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:36:57 +0100, "J.A. Magallón" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Temporarily at
> >
> > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
>
After applying hot-fixes, I get this:
MODPOST vmlinux
WARNING: init/built-in.o - Section mismatch: reference to .init.text: from
.text
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Temporarily at
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
>
> Will appear later at
>
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc4/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
>
(oops, I forgot
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:56:23 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Temporarily at
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
Will appear later at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc4/2.6.21-rc4-mm1/
(oops, I forgot LKML)
I
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
