On Sunday 16 September 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> > If the OpenBSD developers want to attack the Linux Kernel community
> > over patches that were *NEVER* *ACCEPTED* by said community, it
> > should be just as fair for the Linux Kernel community to complain
> > about those
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
If the OpenBSD developers want to attack the Linux Kernel community
over patches that were *NEVER* *ACCEPTED* by said community, it
should be just as fair for the Linux Kernel community to complain
about those
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Eben Moglen wrote:
> Also, and again for the last time, let me state that SFLC's
> instructions from its clients are to establish all the facts
> concerning the development of the current relevant code (which means
> the painstaking reconstruction of several
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> Secondly, what the HELL is with you guys and the personal
> attacks?!?!? You said I am "hopelessly misinformed, or a habitual
> liar"???
You are right and I apologize. I've received plenty of personal attacks
from your group, and failed
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless=118857712529898=2
>
> Link with outdated info.
>
> > http://madwifi.org/browser/branches/ath5k
>
> Link with outdated info.
>
> > I suggest actually
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2007, at 06:33:18, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> > Would Linus put up a fight if someone took his source tree and
> > relicensed the whole thing as GPLv3 without his permission? Yep,
> > you betcha he'd fight and he h
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Sep 15, 2007, at 06:33:18, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Would Linus put up a fight if someone took his source tree and
relicensed the whole thing as GPLv3 without his permission? Yep,
you betcha he'd fight and he has already had to put up
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
J.C. Roberts wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-wirelessm=118857712529898w=2
Link with outdated info.
http://madwifi.org/browser/branches/ath5k
Link with outdated info.
I suggest actually taking the time to get the facts before making
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Kyle Moffett wrote:
Secondly, what the HELL is with you guys and the personal
attacks?!?!? You said I am hopelessly misinformed, or a habitual
liar???
You are right and I apologize. I've received plenty of personal attacks
from your group, and failed to
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Eben Moglen wrote:
Also, and again for the last time, let me state that SFLC's
instructions from its clients are to establish all the facts
concerning the development of the current relevant code (which means
the painstaking reconstruction of several independent
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
> It boggles my mind that we can lie around complacently, arguing about
> installer menus and taking the bait from trolls, while our freedoms
> are quickly eroding away. The rights and recognition of one of our
> own developers (reyk@) have been
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
It boggles my mind that we can lie around complacently, arguing about
installer menus and taking the bait from trolls, while our freedoms
are quickly eroding away. The rights and recognition of one of our
own developers (reyk@) have been
12 matches
Mail list logo
