> > Or are you saying that the bottleneck is somewhere
> > else completely,
>
> Indeed. The bottleneck is with processing the incoming network
> packets, at the interrupt level.
Where is the counter for these dropped packets? If we run a few mbit of
traffic through the box, we see noticeble
Or are you saying that the bottleneck is somewhere
else completely,
Indeed. The bottleneck is with processing the incoming network
packets, at the interrupt level.
Where is the counter for these dropped packets? If we run a few mbit of
traffic through the box, we see noticeble
> Malcolm Beattie writes:
> > Alexey has mailed me suggesting the problem may be that netfilter
> > is turned on.
>
> Oh yes, netfilter being enabled will cause some performance
> degradation, that is for sure.
Do you think that netfilter being enabled would also cause a decrease in
routing
Malcolm Beattie writes:
Alexey has mailed me suggesting the problem may be that netfilter
is turned on.
Oh yes, netfilter being enabled will cause some performance
degradation, that is for sure.
Do you think that netfilter being enabled would also cause a decrease in
routing
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote:
> > AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically
> > enable it at run time.
>
> I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in...
> Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it
>
Hi,
/sbin/insmod cls__u32
insmod: cls__u32: no module by that name found
I think you meant cls_u32, not cls__u32. Your script output seems to
indicate that you've already got the modules loaded somewhere.
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 10:1 classid 10:300 cbq bandwidth
> Throughput: 100Mbps is really nothing. Linux never had a problem with
> 4-500Mbps file serving. So throughput is an important number. so is
> end to end latency, but in file serving case, latency might
> not be a big deal so ignore it.
If I try to route more than 40mbps (40% line utilization)
Hi,
/sbin/insmod cls__u32
insmod: cls__u32: no module by that name found
I think you meant cls_u32, not cls__u32. Your script output seems to
indicate that you've already got the modules loaded somewhere.
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 10:1 classid 10:300 cbq bandwidth
Throughput: 100Mbps is really nothing. Linux never had a problem with
4-500Mbps file serving. So throughput is an important number. so is
end to end latency, but in file serving case, latency might
not be a big deal so ignore it.
If I try to route more than 40mbps (40% line utilization)
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:35:50 +, David Ford wrote:
AFAIK, this hasn't ever been true. I have never had to specifically
enable it at run time.
I was suspicious of that in the old doc but thought I'd leave it in...
Should have asked for feedback on it, but you caught it
anyway,
> > What are "zerocopy patch set"s?
>
> Basically, if you want to send something to the network, the
> kernel has to
> copy your data to its memory space. It is an overhead and with these
> patches, the kernel doesn't has to do it. So it is faster.
> Moreover, few
> ethernet cards are able to
> I'm back from OZ, and to help deal with my sudden lack of Victoria
> Bitter, I've made a new zerocopy patch set.
What are "zerocopy patch set"s?
Cheers!
Jon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the
What are "zerocopy patch set"s?
Basically, if you want to send something to the network, the
kernel has to
copy your data to its memory space. It is an overhead and with these
patches, the kernel doesn't has to do it. So it is faster.
Moreover, few
ethernet cards are able to compute
I'm back from OZ, and to help deal with my sudden lack of Victoria
Bitter, I've made a new zerocopy patch set.
What are "zerocopy patch set"s?
Cheers!
Jon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the
That's just nasty! Funny, but nasty. :)
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Satchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> It took a while to prepare the source for this jerk. Here is
> what I did to
> the source I gave the guy:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Title: RE: [OT?] Coding Style
I prefer descriptive variable and function names - like comments, they help to make code so much easier to read.
One thing I wonder though... why do people prefer 'some_function_name()' over 'SomeFunctionName()'? I personally don't like the underscore
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Do the tulip driver updates address the increasingly common
> NETDEV timeout
> > repots?
>
> I don't see increasingly common timeout reports.. with which
> hardware?
> They are likely on the newer LinkSys 4.1
> -Original Message-
> From: adrian
>
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Mark I Manning IV wrote:
>
> > It is alot neater tho :P~
> >
> > // even for multi line comments
> > // no visual clutter over there -->
>
> /*
> * I tend to find standard C comments easier to read. They stand out,
> *
-Original Message-
From: adrian
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Mark I Manning IV wrote:
It is alot neater tho :P~
// even for multi line comments
// no visual clutter over there --
/*
* I tend to find standard C comments easier to read. They stand out,
* especially for
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Do the tulip driver updates address the increasingly common
NETDEV timeout
repots?
I don't see increasingly common timeout reports.. with which
hardware?
They are likely on the newer LinkSys 4.1 cards, and
Title: RE: [OT?] Coding Style
I prefer descriptive variable and function names - like comments, they help to make code so much easier to read.
One thing I wonder though... why do people prefer 'some_function_name()' over 'SomeFunctionName()'? I personally don't like the underscore character
That's just nasty! Funny, but nasty. :)
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Satchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It took a while to prepare the source for this jerk. Here is
what I did to
the source I gave the guy:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry McVoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:04:50AM -0500, Jonathan Earle wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > > S
> -Original Message-
> From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> So, every good programmer
> should know where to put comments. And it is unnecessary to
> put comments to
> explain what code does. One should see this as stated in the
> CodingStyle doc.
> Ok, there are points
-Original Message-
From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So, every good programmer
should know where to put comments. And it is unnecessary to
put comments to
explain what code does. One should see this as stated in the
CodingStyle doc.
Ok, there are points where a
-Original Message-
From: Larry McVoy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:04:50AM -0500, Jonathan Earle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: profmakx.fmp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So, every good programmer
should know where to put comments
Hi all,
I've a system comprosed of two PIII machines, equipped with Znyx 346Q 4port
ethernet cards (tulip driver) which I'd like to connect together in a bonded
configuration. For various reasons, we require 2.4.0 kernels on our
machines - currently we are using 2.4.0-test9.
The setup is
Hi all,
I've a system comprosed of two PIII machines, equipped with Znyx 346Q 4port
ethernet cards (tulip driver) which I'd like to connect together in a bonded
configuration. For various reasons, we require 2.4.0 kernels on our
machines - currently we are using 2.4.0-test9.
The setup is
Hey all,
Still working with kernel 2.4.0-test9 (other things we use require it for
now), and I was looking at a driver for a Znyx zx346q network card that I
grabbed from the znyx.com website. The driver is for a 2.2.x kernel, but
figuring I'd try it anyway, downloaded and tried to build it. It
Hey all,
Still working with kernel 2.4.0-test9 (other things we use require it for
now), and I was looking at a driver for a Znyx zx346q network card that I
grabbed from the znyx.com website. The driver is for a 2.2.x kernel, but
figuring I'd try it anyway, downloaded and tried to build it. It
el List (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Kernel oops in mm/slab.c [ kmem_cache_grow() ]
> with test4-8
>
>
> > Jonathan Earle wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been having kernel oopses with the 2.4.0-test series and am
> > including ksymoops processed outpu
)
Subject: Re: Kernel oops in mm/slab.c [ kmem_cache_grow() ]
with test4-8
Jonathan Earle wrote:
Hi,
I've been having kernel oopses with the 2.4.0-test series and am
including ksymoops processed output from both test4 and test5
kernels. The same oops happens in later kernels too
Title: Kernel oops in mm/slab.c [ kmem_cache_grow() ] with test4-8
Hi,
I've been having kernel oopses with the 2.4.0-test series and am including ksymoops processed output from both test4 and test5 kernels. The same oops happens in later kernels too (Tested with test6, test7 and test8).
Title: Kernel oops in mm/slab.c [ kmem_cache_grow() ] with test4-8
Hi,
I've been having kernel oopses with the 2.4.0-test series and am including ksymoops processed output from both test4 and test5 kernels. The same oops happens in later kernels too (Tested with test6, test7 and test8).
d $0x7,%ebp
Code; c01270ff
12: 68 03 00 00 00 push $0x3
Aiee, killing interrupt handler
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill the idle task!
1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable.
---
Jonathan Earle
Linux Admin, ONC Software Development
Nortel Networks
* Email: [EMA
!
1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable.
---
Jonathan Earle
Linux Admin, ONC Software Development
Nortel Networks
* Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Phone: 613-768-1371
* Cell: 613-612-0946
36 matches
Mail list logo
